Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Review of attribution theory
Review of attribution theory
Review of attribution theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Review of attribution theory
The Attribution Theory: Explanations of Different Behavior
Frimy Frankel
Social Psychology
In social psychology, attribution explains why people behave or act a certain way. There are two theories that are believed to analyze and justify human behavior. The Attribution Theory and Covariation Model both determine how a person will act in a certain situation. At times, people will underestimate the root of certain behaviors because of their ignorance to the actual circumstances. Fritz Heider, known to be the father of the Attribution Theory, came up with the concept of internal and external attribution. Both of these attributions demonstrate as to why people behave a certain way. Internal attribution concludes that a person’s behavior
…show more content…
Moreover, Riggio and Garcia analyzed the effect of priming on a second group of students. “The students in the second group watched a video demonstrating the power of social influences and environmental factors on the behavior of individuals. After watching the video, students were asked to read the same excerpt that was given to the first group. The students who watched the video attributed more situational factors to the cause of the character’s bad day than students who did not watch the video” (Berry: the Fundamental Attribution Error the Journal of Integrated Social Sciences, Volume 5). These results show an example of how the Fundamental Attribution Error has assumptions for how we judge behavior through internal or external attributions. In this experiment, we see how the first group judged the behavior through internal attributions. The second group however, watched a video that influenced their decision in attributing the circumstances and the situation rather than the individual traits of the character in the excerpt. This experiment is an example of how the Attribution Theory and Covariation Model affect the behavioral judgment of people. A “belief in a just world” makes the presumption that people get what they deserve. This is a type of defensive attribution. Although this allows people to deal with vulnerability, people will end up blaming the victim in the situation and cause injustice. People will often misjudge other people claiming that they deserve what they get. For example, they will find ways of excusing and justifying unfair behavior by insisting that people succumb to situations that they are meant to fall victim
Furthermore, the authors aim to unfold the scientific logic of their analysis of the effects of hidden biases so people will be “better able to achieve the alignment,” between their behavior and intentions (Banaji and Greenwald, 2013) preface
The self-serving bias is the tendency for an athlete to accommodate to factors that paint the athlete in a favorable light. In the athletic realm, individuals portray the self-serving bias to foster future, effective performance in a sport. Whereas an athlete will attribute positive events to the doing of themselves, an athlete will attribute negative events to the doing of others. Although an individual may be inaccurate when imputing a factor, the self-serving bias is a method by which an individual safeguards esteem. It is this protection of esteem that is paralleled in the attribution theory. For instance, an athlete uses the self-serving bias to attribute success as a byproduct of the team. On the other hand, the athlete uses the self-serving
Thought processes can greatly influence people's social interactions, and the way that they live their lives. Cognitions develop how people perceive themselves and others on a daily basis. It is important to investigate how people attribute actions and behaviors exhibited, not only by themselves, but also those around them. These attributions shape the way an observer feels and reacts to others, and how people feel about themselves due to their own actions. The correspondence bias (fundamental attribution error) and the self-serving bias are two errors made in attribution by virtually every human being (Baron & Byrne, 2000). Both of these biases can be shown not only in adults, but also children (Guern, 1999). Even sport spectators display these biases when watching their favorite teams (Wann & Schrader, 2000). When the self-serving bias is absent in people's cognitions, they will show the self-defeating attributions. It is important to study people that demonstrate self-defeating attributions, because these individuals also show symptoms of depression (Wall & Hayes, 2000). Clearly, attributions are an imperative aspect of social cognition. Attributional bias is discussed by Marie Beesley. It is also important to investigate the factors that affect people's judgment biases in decision making and reasoning skills, which is explored by Amanda Wheeler. Because these two processes are so vital to the way in which people perceive themselves and others, and to the way a person chooses to behave, it is important to understand the factors that can cause inaccurate judgments. Judgment biases affect the way people form conclusions and make attributions about others, as well as abou...
I can say this is a topic that could bring about many different opinions on what could be the most interesting theory. All the theories that I have read can come into play, depending on what the circumstance is. To me, I feel as though the most interesting theories would be: Classical Theory, Differential Association Theory, and Labeling theory. There is no way that I could just have left it as haveing one theory as my favorite or most interesting because once I saw one of these theories; I was able to pick out two more. The reason why this happened was the simple fact of knowing someone who reacts in a certain situation and I can compare their actions to one of these theories. Once this occurs, I would be able to know the reason of why people
There are some human phenomena, which seem to be the result of individual actions and personal decisions. Yet, these phenomena are often - on closer inspection – as much a result of social factors as of psychological ones.
...onson, E., Wilson, T.D., & Akert, R.M. (2013). Social Psychology (8th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
Sullivan. This proposed that individuals learn values, techniques, attitudes and motives for criminal behaviour through their interactions with others . Believing that group-think can possess a large influence on the behaviour of those around people engaging in criminal behaviour . This theory can easily be associated with Albert Banduras observational learning theory that is based on the importance of social factors in learning . It was believed that the reason people start engaging in criminal behaviour is from the group they are associated with. Both theories highlight the importance of observational learning in the younger age bracket. In the case of the crime previously mentioned the youngest member of the gang of thieves was 11 years old. It can rationally be assumed that an 11 year old child does not possess the knowledge to steal a motor vehicle without the explicit teachings of someone older that does possess this “skill”. This exposure to criminal behaviour normalises wrong doings. The more someone is exposed to anti-social stimuli the more acceptable it becomes in their own social world. While Sullivan’s theory has its strong points it also has its criticisms. This critique stems from the idea of rational thought and individualism. Claiming people are independent thinkers with rational actions and individual motives . However, in Banduras Bobo doll experiment the impressionability of children is highlighted and showed that children exposed to certain behaviour are highly likely to repeat the behaviour themselves. Which would ensure a child being directly taught the adverse behaviour would, in turn, be highly likely to repeatedly engage with the same behaviour
Attribution theory explains people motives by giving an option of disposition or situation, of which we decipher the motive to a behavior. The fundamental attribution error is the tendency to link behaviors with personal characteristics, therefore if someone is murdered a suspect could be someone who really hates them because it gives them a motive. We can characterize a dispositional situation from a situational and come to a conclusion on why someone had a such behavior, and it helps to find a motive based on that. We can infer a motive from a behavior from things like external and internal attributions, so internal traits and responses to things.
Forty ordinary male citizens of New Haven and the surrounding New England areas representing several occupations, ranging in the ages of twenty to fifty years old, were solicited and recruited under the premise of participating in a study of “memory and learning”. Each subject was compensated $4.50 for participating, and told that the payment was for their attendance to the Yale University laboratory, and no matter what the outcome the payment was theirs to keep. The controlled assignments were an experimenter/authority figure, portrayed by an impassive, somewhat stern thirty-one year old male, and the victim portrayed by a mild-mannered, likeable forty-seven year old male. Through rigged drawings, the uncontrolled assignments or subjects were always selected as teachers (Milgram, 1963). To justify administration of electrical punishment, the subjects were given a cover story that led them to believe their role was to help in a study to “find out just what effect different people have on each other as teachers and learners, and also what effect punishment will have on learning in their situation” (Milgram, 1963)....
As the textbook defines the Just World Hypothesis or Believe in Just world (BJW) is a belief that people get what they deserve in the life and deserve what they get. For example, people who believe in Just World, would argue that poor people are poor because of the choices and decisions they made in life. The BJW has both negative and positive side. The negative side of strong BJW is that it forces people to ignore the facts of injustice and change themselves(or their outlook on the facts), rather than changing the facts. The positive side, on the contrary is that people who themselves are victims of injustice and believe in Just World, experience less anger and much more acceptance to their current situation, decreasing chances of depressions. The article "Causal Attributions of Workplace Gender Equality Just World Belief, and the Self/Other Distinction" by Marina Bastounis and Jale Minibas-Poussard was about the Just World Belief in regards of gender equality/inequality.
Everyday many people witness and are exposed to many different situations and emergencies. Bystander effect is a social psychological phenomenon that refers to people who don’t offer any help in a situation to a victim when others are around. The research study by Abbate, Ruggieri, & Boca (2013) has shown that helping behavior can be easily primed. Many researchers and social psychologists over the years, have been studying how knowledge is activated in individual’s memory and how that information shapes and guides emotions, impressions, and judgments. For example studies by Bargh, Chen, and Burrows' (1996) mentioned in Abbate, Ruggieri, & Bocas’ (2013) work, explains the perspective on behavior and trait concepts that activate relative behavior. There studies concluded that unconscious behavioral priming is real that includes different mechanisms from the typically assumed cause of effect.
...ation, and Attribution Style Among College Students." Individual Differences Research 11.2 (2013): 59-69. Academic Search Complete. Web. 31 Oct. 2013.
The Fundamental Attribution Error (FAE) is a concept within social psychology that assumes when someone is aggressive, it is due to a flaw in their personality as opposed to a reaction to their personal circumstances (Aronson, Wilson & Akert, 2015). However, there is typically a situational reason for the other person’s behavior that is not taken into account through the FAE (Aronson, Wilson & Akert, 2015). I have been guilty of making the FAE myself; for example, I can think of two situations where my frustration led me to believe that there were flaws in my antagonists’ characters. Recently, my mother wanted me to assist my brother in scheduling classes for the semester. Since I was annoyed that my mother was insisting that I assist him when
How the Attribution Theory in an attempt to assign meaning/understanding to events on the basis of eith...
Attribution theory suggests that when we observe an individual's behavior, we attempt to determine whether it was internally or externally caused. That determination depends largely on three factors: distinctiveness, consensus, and consistency. Our perceptions of people differ from our perceptions of inanimate objects.