The Art Of Charlie Chan Hock Chye Analysis

987 Words2 Pages

In The Art of Charlie Chan Hock Chye, local artist Sonny Liew explores the history of Singapore through the eyes of protagonist Charlie Chan Hock Chye, a comic artist who lives from the Colonial era to post-independence Singapore. Using his under-rated artistic genius, Chan depicts Singapore’s transforming landscape through various comic strips that allegorizes cornerstones of the Republic’s history. With Singapore’s colonial history and evolution into an independent nation-state, Singapore’s nationalism parallels Thai scholar Thongchai Winichakul’s belief that Asian nationalism is distinct from European nationalism, writing in his book Southeast Asian Historians and Postnational Histories that “[T]he experiences of Western Europe” (17) should …show more content…

From Chan’s satirical comic panel of “Singapore Story” (annex A), Liew depicts interviewer Wang Sha Sha and curator Ye Man Fong engaged in dialogue over Singapore’s history. While Wang is skeptical of “British imperialistic colonialism(‘s) “influence on Singapore, the pro-government Ye reassures him of the vital role which the British played in creating Singapore’s free port, enabling the inflow of immigrants from multiple backgrounds, building the foundation which ultimately led to Singapore’s unique multiculturalism. Through examining “Singapore Story” through the lens of Thongchai, I find that the Republic’s former colonial masters have played Thongchai’s envisioned “genealogical ancestors of nationalism” in Singapore’s context, essentially creating the groundwork for post-independent Singapore government to incorporate multiculturalism into the core identity of Singapore’s nation. By weaving the transformative narrative of Singapore in the comic strip, Liew demonstrates his art work’s nationalistic …show more content…

Nonetheless, the book has managed to top local and international bestseller lists, receive positive reviews from Publishers Weekly and the Economist, and win the 2016 Singapore Literature award. I interpret this reception of The Art of Charlie Chan Hock Chye as being favorable to the local and international community at large. By winning the prestigious local award organized with the support of the NAC, Liew’s art piece has been effectively acknowledge by Singaporeans and even the government alike to contain not only storytelling appeal, but also an accurate portrayal of nationalistic sentiment. Additionally, the rave reviews Liew’s book receives from international publications and periodicals brings critical commentary on the artwork itself on the Singaporean artwork, and by extension Singapore’s national narrative. Having Liew’s art work scrutinized under both international and local scrutiny, I feel that Thongchai’s fear of topics studied by local academics such as nationalism having less “critical inquiry and rigorous challenges” (21) due to “homegrown knowledge” (21) is minimal through exposure, disqualifying Liew’s artwork as a misrepresentation of Singapore while lending greater credibility to Liew’s artistic rendition on Singapore’s national

Open Document