Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Tradition similarity between the USA and japan
Cultural differences between us and japan
Difference between japan and other countries
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Tradition similarity between the USA and japan
After completing the interviews and collecting my own memories, I had the chance to analyze and compare the differences and similarities to the Anne Allison article and the Japanese style of lunch. One of the first things from the Allison article that I found to be the most striking, was the face that mothers spent hours planning and preparing the lunches for their children. In the American culture, many mothers work and if they do not, they spend very little time packing the lunch for their children. Allison states “food must be organized, reorganized, arranged, rearranged, stylized and restylized to appear in a design that is visually attractive” (Allison, 1991: 223). Mothers spend around 45 minutes each day preparing a “small box packaged …show more content…
The lunch box and its style is a very important thing in the American lunch culture. If you have a nerdy looking lunch box, you are not as popular or cool as the others. When I was in middle school, the Vera Bradley lunch box was the thing to have. It was what classified you as cool and what made you the loser of the group. Of course, since it was middle school, you had to comply with the norm and have exactly the same thing as everyone else so you did not run the risk of being the social outcast. For the Japanese, the container was more of a way to transport the food in a manner that would not disrupt the design and the work that the mother had put into …show more content…
This fact, shares a similar quality with the American lunch. After completing all three of my interviews and the analysis of myself, I found that for Jennifer, Mary and myself, only our moms ever packed our lunches. If our dads ever did, it was very rare and the lunches that came out of that encounter were very interesting. In Leo Coleman’s “Food: Ethnographic Encounters” Claire Nicholas spoke about one of her host families and how the family dynamic was made up in the Moroccan culture. She said that Houda, the wife and mother of the household, “balanced child-rearing responsibilities of her infant daughter and three-year-old son while accomplishing the bulk of meal preparation, dishwashing, and laundry for the entire household” (Nicholas, 2011: 86). In Berman’s article “It all started with the Bhajias” she takes a paragraph to discuss the role of women in the family. They used up a large part of their day and designated that to shopping and preparing meals along with “dishwashing, cleaning, sewing, ironing and washing clothes by hand” (Berman, 2011: 34). I think what was the most astonishing thing about this for me, is that women were given these tasks so they would be persuaded away from the work force. Jennifer and I both had working mothers and they still managed to hold a job and prepare meals, do laundry, clean the house and keep all the children very well
-at home, it is the culture for women to serve the men first, and then eat with their children after the men have finished
The Oscar Mayer team decided to come up with a product that is known today as Lunchables. Lunchables became a popular product due to the fact it was convenient. The convenience of Lunchables was due to the fact that it was a chilled prepared food. The original Lunchables contained red meat, cheese, crackers, a napkin and a juice. Since the Lunchables gained a lot of attention the producers of Lunchables decided to add various different kinds of Lunchables. Lunchables varied from pizza, hamburgers, hot dogs and more. The new kinds of Lunchables also included sugary drinks and desert such as cookies and or candy. Researchers studied the Lunchables and deemed them a disaster. They stated that Lunchables co...
... Nestle’s quote, Bittman makes his editorial plea to ethos, by proposing proof that a woman of reliable mental power of this issue come to an agreement with Bittman's thesis statement. Bittman also develops pathos in this article because he grabs a widely held matter that to many individuals is elaborate with: "...giving them the gift of appreciating the pleasures of nourishing one another and enjoying that nourishment together.” (Mark Bittman) Bittman gives the reader the actions to think about the last time they had a family dinner and further imposes how these family dinners are altogether important for family time. Therefore, Bittman did a magnificent job in pointing into the morals of his targeted audience and developing a critical point of view about fast food to his intended audience leaving them with a thought on less fast food and more home prepared meals.
During that time period, food was a woman’s primary concern, it was up to her to ensure that there was food prepared and ready for others in the household, it was her responsibility. Bynum focuses on emphasizing the fact that food
Four people sit kneeling around a small table in a small room laden with food. A room where a serious man in a black box holds out a can of something altered and edible, and a young girl perched near her mother clutches a bag of potato chips to her chest as if claiming it as solely her own. This is the scene depicted in a photograph of the Ukita family in Kodaira City, Japan as part of a series taken by Peter Menzel for the book “What the World Eats”. This series of photographs illustrates not only what people eat in different parts of the world, but also how their families, and lives as fellow humans can so closely resemble our own.
During the video clip Changes in the American Family Since 1970 we were learning about the changes that had occurred in American families since 1970, which have, even since then, changed in other ways. At the time of the video clip we were learning different things from experts Arlie Hochschild and Timothy Biblarz. One of the changes that have been made, this change being the most drastic, is the amount of women who were working in the labor force at the time. According to Arlie Hochschild, mothers of children 18 and under, less than half of them (43%) were in the labor force in the 1970s. Today over 2/3 of women are now working in the labor force, and taking care of children when they arrive home from work. Once women joined the labor force it seemed that the roll of men seemed to change drastically also. Once women were gone at work during the day, along with the men, the men were beginning to help more around the house. Hochschild had made the comment during the video clip that men are doing more work at home and women are doing a lot less, which all together means that less work is being done at home. In the home in the 1970s the rolls that each spouse had were different in many ways. Before women joined the labor force women took care of the children. By taking care of them, women did the important things such as bathing them, brushing their teeth, combing their hair, as the video stated, the maintenance things. As a father in the 70s th...
I can distinctly recall spending many early mornings with my mother as a very young child. Endlessly engraved in my memory is aroma of coffee and sprinting down the stairs to my basement to collect my mothers’ uniform from the dryer. And then with a kiss laid upon my forehead, she would drop my siblings and I off at my grandparents’ home to begin her ten, sometimes twelve hour shifts as an ultrasound technologist. Then just as I can vividly recount my mother’s morning routine, I still can picture the evenings I spent with my mother to the same caliber. Simply put, my mother is a wonderful cook. And thus, each evening she would prepare a different meal. And while the meals always varied, her superior cooking skills never faltered. Despite her hectic work schedule, never once did I witness my mother skip cooking dinner for myself, my four elder brothers, or my father.
The article “Young Mums Sidelined over Nutrition” discusses about how women are disempowered because they have little say in household and child rearing decisions and that “when mothers are disempowered they are less likely to attend health...services for themselves and their children” (Garbarino). This illustrates how closely tied together gender roles and nutrition are. Women are usually left with household managing and child rearing roles, yet in some parts of the world they can not even go to the doctor for medicine without their husband’s approval. Limiting a female’s decision-making power renders her incapable of taking control of herself and can be harmful to her children. The idea of gender roles being inimical to the health of women and their children is further validated by the The Memory Keeper’s Daughter as seen in the case of a woman name Norah. When Norah’s husband, David, tells her that their daughter Phoebe was stillborn she falls into postpartum depression. Instead of going to get the help Norah needs, she falls into the societal gender role that “she has her house, her baby, [and] her doctor husband. She [is] suppose to be content” (Edwards 76). The quote emphasizes that society dictates that a woman with a family and a house should be satisfied with what she has. Norah realizes that she’s not feeling well, but
The lunch box and its style is a very important thing in the American lunch culture. If you have a nerdy looking lunch box, you are not as popular or cool as the others. When I was in middle school, the Vera Bradley lunch box was the thing to have. It was what classified you as cool and what made you the loser of the group. Of course, since it was middle school, you had to comply with the norm and have exactly the same thing as everyone else, so you did not run the risk of being the social outcast. For the Japanese, the container was more of a way to transport the food in a manner that would not disrupt the design and the work that the mother had put into
Throughout history, the roles of men and women in the home suggested that the husband would provide for his family, usually in a professional field, and be the head of his household, while the submissive wife remained at home. This wife’s only jobs included childcare, housekeeping, and placing dinner on the table in front of her family. The roles women and men played in earlier generations exemplify the way society limited men and women by placing them into gender specific molds; biology has never claimed that men were the sole survivors of American families, and that women were the only ones capable of making a pot roast. This depiction of the typical family has evolved. For example, in her observation of American families, author Judy Root Aulette noted that more families practice Egalitarian ideologies and are in favor of gender equality. “Women are more likely to participate in the workforce, while men are more likely to share in housework and childcare (apa…).” Today’s American families have broken the Ward and June Cleaver mold, and continue to become stronger and more sufficient. Single parent families currently become increasingly popular in America, with single men and women taking on the roles of both mother and father. This bend in the gender rules would have, previously, been unheard of, but in the evolution of gender in the family, it’s now socially acceptable, and very common.
Gender is defined as the scopes of genetic, physical, mental and behaviour characteristics pertaining to, and differentiating between, masculinity and feminity, meanwhile inequality is defined as in a situation where there is an unfair situation or treatment in which certain people have more privileges or better opportunities or chances than other people. Thus, from the definition stated gender inequality refers to unequal or unfair management, treatment, or perceptions of persons or individuals are based on their gender. In a parallel sense, gender inequality can be said as the world in which there was discrimination against anyone based on gender. In this introductory, the general understanding of gender inequalities will be discussed further into three significant factors that influence the allocation of housework between men and women. Household chores can be classified as cleaning, cooking and paying bills. Division of housework serves as an important element in the continuation of the function of a family and it requires contribution from both spouses (Tang, 2012). However, current society’s perception on housework is based on gender, so the three major factors that influence the division of household chores within the couples are education level, economic resources, and time availability (refer to Figure1 in Appendix 1).
American culture is changing dramatically. In some areas it’s a good thing, but in other areas, like our food culture, it can have negative affects. It is almost as if our eating habits are devolving, from a moral and traditional point of view. The great America, the land of the free and brave. The land of great things and being successful, “living the good life.” These attributes highlight some irony, especially in our food culture. Is the American food culture successful? Does it coincide with “good living”? What about fast and processed foods? These industries are flourishing today, making record sales all over the globe. People keep going back for more, time after time. Why? The answer is interestingly simple. Time, or in other words, efficiency. As people are so caught up in their jobs, schooling, sports, or whatever it may be, the fast/processed food industries are rapidly taking over the American food culture, giving people the choice of hot
More and more women work outside and inside the home. The double demands shouldered by these women pose a threat to their physical health. Whether you are an overworked housewife or an exhausted working mother the chances are that you are always one step behind your schedule. No matter how hard women worked, they never ended up with clean homes. Housewives in these miserable circumstances often became hysterical cleaners. They wore their lives away in an endless round of scouring, scrubbing, and polishing. The increased strain in working women comes from the reality that they carry most of the child-rearing and household responsibilities. According to social trends (1996), women always or usually do the washing in 79 percent of cases and decide the menu 59 percent of the time. Picking up the children at school or doing grocery shopping are just a few of the many typical household-tasks a woman takes on every day.
Cookbooks during this time period in the 1950’s had a significant role in society in which it impacted and influenced the domestic ideology of postwar America. Many cookbooks were created to advise women and mainly newly-weds in the culinary arts to reassure that their skills in the kitchen would ensure happy marriages. These cookbooks helped to limit women’s role to those of wives, mothers, and homemakers. They are a reflection of the 1950’s popular culture which emphasized conformity, a gender-based society, and gender norms, in which gender roles were very distinct and rigid. They are similar to television in that they can be seen as teachers because they have instructional texts “given detailed account of the correct gender specific way to undertake the activity of cooking” in which their students are mainly women pressuring them to identify themselves as solely housewives and mothers (“The Way to a Man’s Heart”, pg. 531). Because of cookbooks and its reflection on popular culture, there was a heightened emphasis during this time period on the woman’s role in feeding the family. The 1940s cookbooks emphasized more on rationing food and helping the war effort by not wasting any food and being creative of limited sources of food. However, although the concept of food is different, the domestic ideology was still the same in that these
“The Satisfactions of Housewifery and Motherhood” was an interesting and informative article of what life was like when living in the shoes of a housewife in 1977. That was a time when women were going off to work in order to help support their families due to The Women’s Rights Movement. Society frowned upon those women who remained a housewife. They were viewed as blood sucking leaches living off their husbands. Terry Hekker believed that she would be one of the last housewives before their extinction. Some of the main beliefs that Ms. Hekker wanted to explain is there are misunderstandings about the role of a housewife, benefits can be gained and that the occupation of a housewife is an acceptable job for women. Terry Hekker proves that society back then left some women affected negatively by the “do-your-own-thing” philosophy. The author brought up a few arguments...