Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reflection on systems thinking
Reflection on systems thinking
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reflection on systems thinking
The traditional approach to thinking within an organisation is the focus on linear thinking. This being the focus on the components of the system analyzed separately and quick fixes within the organisation to the most the parts that are the most visibly broken (Alman, 2011). Systems thinking moves away from looking at the constituent parts of the organisation and rather focuses on the whole system and how the parts are interrelated. Systems thinking was developed from the field of system dynamics and was founded in 1956 by an MIT professor named Jay Forrester. (Aronson, 1998)
Systems thinking is used to provide an insight into underlying system dynamics of an organisation. It is a way of understanding the reality within an organisation well emphasizing the relationships and connections between the systems components rather than the components separately (Green Plus, 2013). A system is a set of elements that interact to produce behaviour and all parts of a system are interdependent. Organisations are viewed as interrelated, interconnected and interdependent systems thus systems thinking is suitable to organisations. Systems thinking results in a better understanding of the deeper issues within an organisation and provides efficient solutions. Systems thinking focuses on the organisation as a whole, the interactions between parts, thus not the parts themselves, the way systems affect other systems, reoccurring patterns rather than individual events, changes over time and how feedback affects the parts of the system (CPS HR consulting, 2012). Systems thinking is different from the traditional forms of analysis. Systems thinking makes use of synthesis. Synthesis is a thinking tool that makes sense of interactions of component...
... middle of paper ...
...e highest in the industry (Figure 3). The design team plus representatives of each of the other redesign teams were brought together to develop a systemic analysis of the bigger picture of the company. Figure 4 illustrates the systems map which revealed that the root cause of the company’s high supply chain costs was ongoing effort by the sales and marketing organizations to increase product mix to improve profitability. The increasing of the product mix led to many unplanned consequences that both increased supply chain costs and eventually reduced revenues as well. From this new acquired knowledge the management streamlined its product line and achieved both higher revenues and lower costs. (Stroth, 2012)
Figure 3: Graph illustrating the trends of different variables against time (Stroth, 2012)
Figure 4: The System Map (Stroth, 2012)
Understanding the changes in the market and the growth of e-commerce prompted the organization to invest heavily in its supply chain management forecasting and management system. The development of a network of distribution centers and Direct Fulfillment Centers to position the company to capitalize on the growing e-commerce market indicate a strong understanding of the need to adapt to changing market forces. The company spent over $300 million on new distribution center facilities in 2014 alone, and continues to expand to maintain efficiency in product movement (Cassidy,
“When technology is seen as a combination of devices, skills, and organizational structures, it becomes natural to think of it as a system.”
S represents Systemic - complexity and interconnectedness of situations means it is essential to be inclusive and acknowledge relationships in a system approach, to deal with the situation as a whole system rather than as parts.
... that system 4 management has the greatest long-range potential for contributing to organizational effectiveness. System 4 characterized by high degree of trust and interaction between superiors and subordinates. It involves extensive participation by subordinates in goal settings and control process.
...h the full expenses included. Challenge overseeing and incorporating over a huge supply change and developing patterns.
Systems thinking: helps build the framework for the individuals to gain knowledge and the tools to visualize the “big picture”
Specifically what my main goal in this paper is to help you understand what a Computer Systems Analyst is, what they do, things like those that explain everything about a Computer Systems Analyst. You could probably guess from the name of this job title that the main function of a Computer Systems Analyst is to determine how a computer system can best help something. Well this is exactly the key role of what they do is determine how a computer system can best serve a business or organization's needs. David P. Bieg says “You need to understand how systems interact, but you don’t really need to understand the core of every technology---it’s really about how information and process flows through the system.” Someone who is working as a Computer Systems Analyst is going to to have to be big-picture oriented and be able to understa...
To get started, we first need to understand what Crocs' value chain is and how that process plays a role in the strategic direction of the company. The authors of our text, views the value chain as "the entire series of organizational work activities that add value at each step, from raw materials to finished product. In its entirety, the value chain can encompass supplier's suppliers to the customer's customers"(Robbins & Coulter, 2009, p.430). At Crocs, the entire series of organization work activities may be broken down even further using Porter's value chain model of viewing a manufacturing (or service) primary and secondary activities as a "system made up of subsystems, each with inputs, transformation processes and outputs"(Ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk, 2011). A diagram, compliments of Porter(1985) can be seen below:
...adequate use when trying to explain complex ones (Salmon 1978: 179-180). Trigger notes that the fundamental flaw of the Systems theory was that it ‘was less useful in explaining change as it was in describing it (1989: 308).
The business environment is increasingly becoming competitive and challenging. In the recent past, manufacturers have found themselves facing the threat of dwindling profit margins due to unfortunate global events such as the 2007 global financial crisis and the on going Europe economic crisis. The need to improve operation efficiency so as to ensure current and future investment yield the highest rate of return has therefore become extremely important. Manufacturers are now actively engaged in, managing their costs, Research and Development, adopting best procurement strategies, among other Actions. While such actions might eventually lead to positive results, additional business value can be achieved through proper management of the supply chain (Waymer, Ivanaj & Mussa 2009; Krivda 2004).
Systems approach is based on the fundamental principle that all aspects of a human problem should be treated together in a rational manner (Healy, 2005). I have divided this essay into relevant sections that cover an overview of systems ideas, general systems theory and ecological systems theory. This assignment will also include Germain and Gittermans life model, and it will be related back to the case study that has been provided. Limitations of systems theory will also be discussed.
“ Organizations are collectivities oriented to the pursuit of relatively specific goals and exhibiting relatively highly formalized social structures” (page 29). The rational system is a group of individuals, bound together as an organization, designed to reach predetermined goals. The rational system models sees organizations as a mechanical model. A machine that has multiple parts that also works individually but also work together for the better good of the whole. All the individuals of the group can be replaced with a new one if it doesn’t meet the standards of
The second way is to achieve low direct and indirect operating costs is gained by offering high volumes of standard products and offering basic no-frills products. Production costs are kept low by using less parts and using standard components. Limiting the number of models produced to ensure larger producti...
Design thinking is a process for practical, creative resolution of problems or issues that looks for an improved future result. It is the essential ability to combine empathy, creativity and rationality to meet user needs and drive business success. Unlike analytical thinking, design thinking is a creative process based around the building up of ideas. There are no judgments early on the design thinking (Simon, 1969, p. 55). Design thinking includes imagination and reason, a combination of convergent and divergent thought, and creativity. Design thinking might be thought of as dialectic, or conversation. It involves design wisdom, judgment, and knowledge. Lastly, design thinking is skill (Hegeman, 2008).
It is for the business to create work system, because it is ‘set of ideas for organizing a thought process about a particular type of thing or situation’ (Alter 2002 p. 45). A good framework is useful to understand a sense of other complexity and to identify topics and show how these topics are related.