Systems theory is defined by Kirst-Ashman as a useful means for understanding human behavior in many contexts, including the interactions of individuals, groups, families, organizations and communities in the macro social environment (Kirst-Ashman, 2011, p. 78) but it does not end in face-to-face interaction. System theory can be worldwide where people can also interact through social network, whether it is through Facetime, Tango, Imo, Skype, Facebook, Twitter and other means to communicate. Through this interaction, they can share ideas or resources and swap things. With the new dynamic happening, especially with new technology emerging there are new ways of doing things. Like the website Swaptree and many other sites like it, it makes things a lot easier, social networking is raising and people are able to interact in a global extent rather than being limited to face-to-face interaction. All these three levels do come into play even in …show more content…
No matter which way it is, being used micro, mezzo, and macro systems will always play a part because they are all intertwined. Listening to the TedTalk, Rachel gave some examples of the three levels of systems. According to Kirst-Ashman,” micro system refers to an individual” (Kirst-Ashman, 2011, p. 30) and the example that Rachel uses using the micro system as she asked the audience to raise …show more content…
Mezzo system deals with small groups (Kirst-Ashman, 2011, p. 30) and Rachel’s example of mezzo system uses the site Swaptree, she states that there are approximately 59,300 items of things on the site that she could swap with using her copy of “24” DVD. Within that many items on the site, there was a person that had the item that she wanted to swap. Rondoron happened to own a DVD by the name of “sex in the city” and with using the website it allowed her the opportunity to swap things
From walkmans to CD players to iPods, technology has evolved over the succession of the years; humans have taken extensive steps towards a technological transformation that has revolutionized the manner in which several individuals communicate with one another. Likewise, various humans have opted for more modern methods to connect and contact their loved ones such as speaking on a cell phone, video chatting, e-mailing, instant messaging, and conversing through social media. With these contemporary methods of communication, global interaction has now been facilitated and easily accessible; conversing with individuals from across the world is as transparent and prompt as speaking with individuals within the same city. Nonetheless, these technological
Microsystem. There are several immediate factors acting on the individual. This nearest level of the system is known as the microsystem that directly interacts with the individual. This system might include forces such as family, peers, school, or religion. (Video 1)
The family structure is made up of individuals living together in intimate groups with the purpose of caring and supporting each other. Rules and boundaries, spoken and unspoken, are developed by the family members. Family rules and boundaries change and shift over time in order to evolve and grow as a family unit. Some changes are subtle, but some events force major change within the family system. This paper applies the concepts of systems theory to the family system in the movie Sweet Home Alabama. Reese Witherspoon (Melanie Smooter) and Josh Lucas (Jake Perry) star in this heart-warming film telling a story of a young woman who flees from Alabama to reinvent herself in New York City as a high fashion designer. She leaves behind her redneck husband and white-trash upbringing. Melanie finds herself engaged to the cities most eligible bachelor and has to return to Alabama to request a divorce from her first love and confront her past ("Alabama," 2002).
According to Richard Charles (2001) “the effectiveness of family systems theory rests not much on empirical research but on clinical reports of positive treatment outcomes, the personal benefits experienced by the families that underwent this kind of treatment, and the elegance of Bowen’s theory” (p. 279). Bowen’s family systems theory views the family as an emotional unit and is a theory of human behavior. Systems thinking are used to describe the complex interactions in the unit. However, the client’s ability to differentiate himself/herself from the family of origin is the basis for Bowen’s family systems theory. In addition, the primary focus for growth within the emotional system is differentiation of self. Differentiation of self will be explored as well as how it relates to a church congregation.
Theory has been defined as, “an organized set of assumptions, beliefs, or ideas about particular phenomena in the world (Teater, 2015).” Theory is used to understand and explain possible and perceived instances, behaviors and outcomes (Teater, 2015). Social workers use theory in order to understand, as well as, introduce interventions and solutions to their client’s individual situation. It is important for students entering into the social work profession to have a base knowledge of theories, with basic understanding of their similarities and differences to appropriately apply theory in practice. The theories which will be focused on in this paper include Systems Theory and Cognitive Behavioral Theory.
• Mesosystem, which includes the microsystem and all the other systems that affect the teens. ”(Bigner & Gerhardt,
The five systems are the Chronosystem, Macrosystem, Exosystem, Mesosystems, and the Microsystems. The Microsystem is the system closest to the person and the one in which they have direct contact. The Mesosystem is the interactions between the different parts of a person’s microsystem. The Exosystem is a setting that does not involve the person as an active participant, but still affects them. The Macrosystem is the cultural environment in which the person lives and all other systems that affect them. The Chronosystem is the dimension of time in relation to a person’s development and is my favorite system out of all of them because time is what’s affecting
Social work has long recognized the relationship between the behavior of an individual and the environment in which the individual interacts (Hutchison, 2008). Human behavior theories offer a framework to organize, interpret and understand this relationship (Hutchison, 2008). For this case study, the following three theories will be examined for relevancy: Life cycle theory, role theory and resiliency theory.
Microsystems- “The microsystems layer, the smallest of the contexts in which the child is embedded, is made up of the environment where the child lives and moves. The people and institutions the child interacts with in that environment make
Systems thinking: helps build the framework for the individuals to gain knowledge and the tools to visualize the “big picture”
There are many differences between macro and micro-level theories. Micro-level focuses on individuals and their interactions. For example the relationship between adult children and their parents, or the effect of negative attitudes on older people. Some criticize on micro-level theories becuase they focus on what older people do rather than on social conditionsand policies that cuase them to act the way they do. Macro-level focuses more upon social structure, social processes and problems, and their interrelationships. For example the effects of industrialization on older people's status, or how gender and income affect older people's well being. This approach tends to minimize people's ability to act and overcome the limits of social structures. Both micro and macro-leve theories can take one of three perspectives which include: interpretive perspective, normative, and conflict.
The second system in Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory is the mesosystem. This is where there is an interaction between the different parts of a person’s microsystem because an individual’s microsystem does not operate independently. I am fortunate enough that for most of my life, the different elements in my mesosystem has never conflicted with each other. For example, my mother has a great relationship with my friends.
To further more for a better understanding, I will explain the Bronfenbrenner 's Ecological systems model and how each level help in forming our human development. The ecological system model is a five different level model that contains people, places, and things that is believed to help a person 's develop in life. The first level is known as microsystem. The microsystem is the system that contains the closest and direct contact to a person, such as family, friends, school/work, and church. For example, my microsystem would consist of my home and work. At home, I tend to interact more with my parents and siblings. At work, I 'm more interactive with my boss, co-workers and the customers. Secondly, the next level of the ecological system is the mesosystem. The mesosystem consists of interaction between the different parts in the microsystem. For example, back in 8th grade I attended a catholic school. I had a nun as teacher and her name was Sister Anna. She was a very caring and loving teacher. I wasn 't a bad student, I just had bad habits. I tended to not do my homework while I was home, instead I rushed to do it in the morning before class. Sometimes I would finish in time and other times I would not. She would always ask why didn 't I do my homework at home and I would simply not know. So her and my parents sat down together to agree for me to stay with her after school to
Systems approach is based on the fundamental principle that all aspects of a human problem should be treated together in a rational manner (Healy, 2005). I have divided this essay into relevant sections that cover an overview of systems ideas, general systems theory and ecological systems theory. This assignment will also include Germain and Gittermans life model, and it will be related back to the case study that has been provided. Limitations of systems theory will also be discussed.
My microsystems are consistency of relationships that have brought meaningful influences over a long or short amount of time. To describe each system more accurately, I two different types of lines. I drew broken lines for weakened relationships over the time. In contrast, I drew thicker lines over critical relationships even to the present day. My parents have been fully present throughout my life. They are my key caregivers and support me financially, emotionally, socially, and spiritually. My younger brother is my only sibling who I consider to be my oldest friend and whom I have given care as well when we were younger. Our relationship has weakened due to physical distance, but we still emotionally depend on each other. My family friends are mostly in the same neighborhood, Iowa City, attending the same church and they supported my family to settle into a new home physically, socially and emotionally. My relationships with college friends are the most influential relationships outside of