Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative Impacts of Animal Agriculture
Animal agriculture effects on the environment
Animal agriculture effects on the environment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative Impacts of Animal Agriculture
In the What the Health documentary by Kip Andersen and Keegan Kuhn, their sole purpose was to inform the viewers about the advantages of eating a plant-based diet. Since Kuhn and Andersen are vegans, so they are biased towards this topic, so it makes sense that they presented information that only backed up their views. They address numerous of issues that could have strengthened their stance if they went into more detail, such as, issues with the meat industry. That being said, a few of the facts mentioned in the film are incorrect, which is an issue of credibility and more importantly, it may mislead others. Therefore, the main issue is the evidence used in the film, which deceives the viewers in order to prove the director's point: eating …show more content…
a plant-based diet is more beneficial for your health. Andersen, the main speaker, lacks credibility by arguing with health professionals. And he interviewed mostly vegan doctors and nutritionists that gave the viewers false information about the vegan diet and a few medical studies. Another issue is that they included dishonest pieces of evidence from personal interviews that show a significant amount of healing from only eating plant-based meals. As a result, the evidence in What the Health misinform the viewers that may want to convert to veganism, but their evidence supporting their claims are flawed. Andersen questions why there are beef and egg recipes on these health organization websites, yet studies has shown that they may cause heart disease.
Which is true, but he ultimately loses his strength in his argument since the first person that answered his call from the American Heart Association (A.H.A) wasn’t able to give him an answer. Although, this man was only an assistant, not a health care professional, and wasn’t qualified to give him an answer. After the call he seems disappointed and says that there was “Another organization rep that wasn’t able to answer [Kip Andersen’s] questions.” This representative told Andersen that someone would get back to him to answer his questions because that’s not his job. He never talks about this instance again and the viewers don’t know if Andersen received a call back from the A.H.A. Instead, he further complains about these health organizations (Susan G. Komen) that didn’t want to engage in an interview with …show more content…
him. Until finally Andersen had an interview with an important health professional: Dr.
Robert Ratner, who is a Chief Scientific and Medical Officer of the American Diabetes Association. The interview didn’t go over well, since Andersen was being unprofessional and tried to argue with Dr. Ratner. He didn’t have the time to sit with Andersen and have a debate over what foods can cause diabetes. While Andersen continued to try to persuade him that you can reverse diabetes with a vegan diet. This circumstance resulted in losing the appointment for asking him questions. I agree with Dr. Ratner’s decision by ending the interview because I felt that Andersen should have been more respectful.
Throughout the entire film I questioned on whether or not the information that was factual. He attempts to inform the viewers about the grotesque issues with the meat, dairy, and pharmaceutical industries. But in the process even myself (a vegetarian) felt personally attacked because I consume dairy products.
Another way Andersen loses credibility is by including personal experiences of people with diabetes, asthma, and hip complications in the film. These interviews were not truthful. If people adopt a vegan lifestyle with these specific health conditions, it will take longer than two weeks to see major
improvements. For instance, Andersen interviewed Amy Resnic who had to take asthma, heart, antidepressants, and pain medication. But only after two weeks, she was off all medications and felt great. Even though, she seemed she was still having difficulties breathing when she was talking with Andersen. She should have known that with antidepressants you have to gradually reduce to dose to limit the amount of withdrawal side effects. Hopefully, she spoke with her doctor about stopping that medication because it could cause a great amount of mental and physical issues. I know from experience from my family and friends, that it’s detrimental to your health if just stop taking medicines like antidepressants. After watching What the Health, it completely makes sense why vegetarians and vegans didn’t care for this documentary: it provides inaccurate interviews, medical studies, and facts. I felt that this film was biased considering Mr. Andersen was a vegan -- he truly wanted to prove his diet was the only way to be healthy. And it seemed that it didn’t matter whether the evidence to support his claims were factual. He has been overly aggressive about proving that veganism is the solution of all health problems, his attitude and chosen interviews hinders his credibility throughout the documentary.
People can be classified into two categories, meat eaters and non meat eaters. Meat eaters or carnivores are common in society so there has to be a tremendous amount of meat production to meet these needs. But has anyone ever thought about the amount of fuel and energy it takes to make it and how it would ultimately destroy the Earth? Many have and it revealed to them that the cost of being a vegan or vegetarian is far less than continuing their carnivorous ways. Two authors have their opinions to offer, even if they are on the same side of the argument and want to convert people to being a vegan. In “Eating Green” Margaret Lundberg states why becoming a vegan is healthy, not only for the person, but also the environment. John Vidal’s “10 Ways Vegetarianism Can Help Save the Planet”
Moss uses more real-life examples and understands how to appeal to readers to prove his point and figures out the perfect combination of ethos, pathos, and logos in the stories to build his case, a great example of this being Jeffrey Dunn’s story. Dunn worked as an executive for Coca-Cola in 2001 whose main goal was to drive Coca-Cola into poor areas and convince “heavy drinkers” of the soda to drink more. On a business trip to Brazil, Dunn realized that “these people need a lot of things, but they don’t need a Coke” and decided to push the company in a healthier direction. This choice led to Dunn’s eventual firing, and the tale ends with Dunn marketing baby carrots as a snack food (Moss, 491-494). This story not only appeals to pathos by getting to readers’ emotions, but also to ethos and logos because Dunn is a credible source and gives an authentic experience that adds to the credible feel of the article. Pollan’s article has a very different connotation than Moss’s article, and reads as an appeal to authority right from the start. Pollan’s primary occupation is described as an author of food and eating books, not food scientist, however, Pollan’s entire article is based off of his opinion of how Americans should eat (Pollan, 420). Pollan’s rules, “Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants.” might be a fine setup for a fad diet, but these rules don’t necessarily provide a reasonable solution for America’s obesity problem. Escape from the Western Diet is littered with logical fallacies that stunt its credibility, such as the False Dichotomy, Begging the Question, and the Hasty Generalization. In Pollan’s quote, “people eating a Western diet are prone to a complex of chronic diseases that seldom strike people eating more traditional diets” (Pollan, 421), the Hasty Generalization fallacy is apparent, as not every person who eats a Western diet is prone to chronic diseases. The quote, “the health care industry...stands to
I will first show the lack of validity and soundness to Howard’s claim that A) a vegan lifestyle is a healthier choice and B) his claim that one must switch to that lifestyle to enjoy these said benefits. To the claim made in A, Howard uses his own health problems he endured on his meat diet, and uses it as a constant variable comparing it to his now relative healthy lifestyle as a vegan. On first glance anyone who eats a calorie-laden, unbalanced diet and ends up weighing 300 pounds, as Lyman himself admitted, will have health problems regardless of his orientation to meat or vegetables. With this said his comparing analogy is inertly flawed and must be disregarded from the argument he presents. On march 8 before the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, Mary K Young, MS.,R.D,NCBA Director of Nutrition Research and Information, presented the benefits of eating meat. Using Data from the 1995 USDA Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals (CSI) she confirms that red meat enhances one overall diet quality. Young goes on to point out that red meat is the number one source for protein, B12, and zinc, number 2 source for B6 and third greatest source for iron, niacin and potassium. She also pointed out that red meat alone has the greatest concentrates of iron and zinc together. Also included cited in Young’s report was the research recently published in the Journal of the American...
The taste of the processed chicken from my elementary school cafeteria remains imbedded in my memory. I can still taste the chunks of chicken that could not be broken up by my teeth, and the tired, lazy feeling I had walking back to my next class. This is the exact situation organic farmer and producers are trying to avoid by making healthy products. The documentary, In Organic We Trust, attempts to persuade the viewers that organic products create a healthy lifestyle, and improve living conditions for people all over the world. Kip Pastor’s use of ethos and logos in his documentary are strong and provide supporting evidence, however, Pastor is lacking an abundant amount of pathos. Pastor incorporates logos into his documentary by allowing the audience to experience a multitude of facts and supporting evidence. Ethos is used in the film through Pastor’s interviews with professionals, and pathos is shown by the touching stories of individuals.
Lundberg’s mother and her healthy ways had influenced Lundberg to start eating green. Her mother believed in having two vegetables with every meal and exercising daily. This healthy ritual led Lundberg to do the same for her family by preparing meals from scratch, because she knew that having good health did not just happen on its own (570). As an adult she took this ritual of health further by becoming vegetarian and later a vegan, saying “I look and feel better at fifty two then I did five years ago. For my health and well-being, becoming a vegetarian was the best thing I could have done.” (571) She ties her personal experience with what she expects everyone else to experience by making the same decision of not eating
The western diet consists of foods high in sugar and fat, as well as a large consumption of red meats and refined grains. As a result, people who consume a western diet face problems with their weight and often have many diseases related to poor dieting. Pollan believes that the food industry and medical community take advantage of this. Pollan claims that the food industry will change their processed food and sell it back to the consumer rather than removing the process food all together. The medical community will treat people’s diseases instead of helping to prevent theses disease by educating people on how to make healthier life style choices. Mary Maxfield believes that these points made by Michael Pollan are hypocritical. She states that Michael Pollan is taking advantage of the consumer the same way he claims that the food industry and medical community are. Pollan would criticize the food industry and medical community but at the same time publish and sell his theories on how to eat
The food industry is in a state of necessary revolution, for obesity rates seem to be rising exponentially, counties striving to develop have hit lack-of-food road blocks, and massive animal farms produce threats such as unethical treatment of animals and food-borne pathogen spikes. With these dilemmas revolving around the food world, it is natural for one to ponder, “Are human’s inherently omnivorous, eating both animal and plant based products, or were we suppose to be receiving nutrients solely from a vegetarian diet?” Kathy Freston, author of The Lean: A Revolutionary (and Simple!) 30-Day Plan for Healthy, Lasting Weight Loss, discusses her viewpoint surrounding the dilemma by writing “Shattering the Meat Myth: Humans are Natural Vegetarians.” Freston’s answer to the questions presented above
The film enlightened me about many topics concerning the production of food. Although I would prefer not to view many of the graphic animal scenes I believe that they are necessary to present the arguments. I was also surprised to see the connections between so many political figures and the major corporations. I do not think that my eating habits will change, but I do think that I will give more thought to something before I eat it.
We care so much about what the food is and how it is made that we overlook about where the food had come from. According to the reading selection, “Killing Them with Kindness?” by James McWilliams, an American history professor at Texas State University, states “animals raised in factory farms have qualities that make them worthy of our moral consideration…[and yet, we] continue to ignore the ethical considerations involved in eating meat” (311). This exhibits that when Americans are so engrossed in healthy eating, our morals about animal rights are neglected. Most of what we eat are animals, and animals like we do have emotions, interests, and possibly goals in life. We pay no heed of the animal’s interests and it should not be that way since our interests are no more important just because we are more superior, intelligent beings should not give us the right to perceive animals in such a manner. In addition to paying notice of the origin of where the animals come from, we need to be aware of what killing animals will do to the earth. In the TedTalk, “What’s Wrong with the Way We Eat,” Mark Bittman states “10 billion animals are killed each year for food and they represent 18% of the harmful greenhouse gasses” (Bittman). This reveals that our careless consumption would not only lead to the suffering of animal deaths but the suffering of our world and our imminent death. As we increase our progression with our unhealthy obsession over healthy eating, there will not be any positive effects for the body, the animals around us, or the world. If we were to be conscious about the source of our food and the consequence of eating then we will be able to eat healthily and
Health as a Social Construction In my essay, I aim to find out why social construction affects the health of our society. Ill health may be defined as 'a bodily or mental state that is deemed undesirable'. This means that health is the condition of the body both physically and mentally. Social construction of health refers to the way health varies from one society to another.
The emotional feel or atmosphere created by the documentary was just trying to help. You could tell that they want to help people and make sure they are all healthy and can live the right lifestyle. While watching this film I encountered many things I found questionable. I found three claims to be bias/ controversial in this documentary: it uses correlation as causation, they claim someone having health issues can be solved by cutting meat out of their diet, and lastly they only use one study to prove their method, and it is the one that one of the main people in the movie made.
One example of how the food industry is ruthless is when one of the CEOs of a fast-food chain states they are part of the problem is hired immediately. Though I don’t not find this wrong because if I was a stock-holder with my life savings invested within his company I would without a doubt have him fired for placing my money at risk. That is the harsh reality of economics, you cannot place you company in shock by either a damaging statement or bad executive move. I found most disturbing about the movie was how a case was being made against McDonalds that two obese teens did not know fast-food was unhealthy (Spurlock). Regardless of how they lived word of mouth had to have taught them fast food is not healthy, and if that didn’t health education has been in place for years now teaching us
Albert Einstein once said, "Nothing will benefit human health and increase chances of survival for life on earth as much as the evolution to a vegetarian diet." As people move into a more health conscious society, vegetarianism is becoming a popular choice. While some people cannot imagine a day without meat, others are convinced that a vegetarian lifestyle is the better option. There are numerous benefits of being a vegetarian. Some of the reasons are as follows: vegetarianism has multiple health paybacks, is far better for the environment, and is morally sound. Most people believe that vegetarianism is unhealthy, goes against our natural diet, and unnecessary, however, a vegetarian diet offers many health benefits and is more ethical than an omnivorous existence.
Vegetarians tend to be healthier than those who consume meat. This is due to the prevalent unnatural chemicals used in the processing of meats, and eating these are unsuitable for the body. Meats already contain harmful amounts of cholesterol, and over-consumption of red meat can lead to early heart disease. Animals that are raised on farms for their meat are not treated well, and this mistreatment can lead to harm in the meat they are producing. Although one life choice cannot change one’s environmental
I could trust the material he was presenting because he used a popular and reliable news channel. He also used visual aids to help us visualize the amount of sugar the average child’s intakes in a one month span in just milk alone. He stated that he was a chef and that he uses information and education instead of expensive equipment. Being that I am in the Culinary Arts program here at Stark, I know what classes are needed to become a chef, and a nutrition class is required. I know that there is a lot of information to learn and read about to know all of the things that he has stated.