More handpicked essays just for you.
The lone ranger and tonto fistfight analysis
The lone ranger and tonto fistfight analysis
“The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in Heaven" analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The lone ranger and tonto fistfight analysis
“Survival = Anger X Imagination.” Is this equation really true? Well, at least one person thinks it is. In Sherman Alexie’s book The Lone Ranger and Tonto’s Fistfight in Heaven, he gives the equation in order to aid in the understanding of character backgrounds and characteristics. By taking Alexie’s equation on blind faith, it in fact would be quite simple to in some way, shape or form halfheartedly apply to any character and see some sense in doing so. However, when a deeper and more thorough examination takes place it is more inherently apparent that this equation is not fully applicable to all characters in the movie. In the movie “Smoke Signals,” equation it’s true for some characters while not being true for others. Additionally, there are some certain circumstances where are the …show more content…
In this case, it is Victor’s father who tells the story of how he and Victor won a basketball game between the two of them and clergy members from a church. Victor’s father says that Victor made the game winning shot at the last second. As it is seen in the movie, Victor states that his father’s recollection of the events was not accurate, thus the audience might speculate that Victor’s father was using his imagination. The reason that Victor’s father was using his imagination was due to the anger that he had that his son did not make the game winning shot. This is a perfect example of how anger and imagination can be used in accordance with each other to lead to survival. In the case of Victor’s father come on the equation “ Survival = Anger X Imagination” is very true and apparent. This proves that Alexie’s equation is fully applicable to at least one character. This occurrence may have been the event when Alexie was given the inspiration to write the equation itself. For Victor’s father, survival was only possible because of his anger and imagination. He is a perfect example of how clearly the equation can
In the short stories “A Drug Called Tradition,” “The Approximate Size of My Favorite Tumor,” and “The Only Traffic Signal on the Reservation Doesn’t Flash Red Anymore” collected in The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in Heaven, author Sherman Alexie uses humor to reflect the life on the Spokane Reservation. In “A Drug Called Tradition,” the story starts with a joke by having Thomas sit down inside a refrigerator in response to Junior’s comment as to why the refrigerator is empty. The Indians are having a party hosted by Thomas, who gets a lot of money from a corporation for leasing some of his land. Alexie’s three second selves, Victor, Junior, and Thomas, later go to the Benjamin Lake and use the drug that Victor brings with him. In “The Approximate Size of My Favorite Tumor,” Jimmy Many Horses, who suffers from terminal cancer, humorously describes his tumors to his wife, Norma, who cannot bear Jimmy’s humor and leaves him. At the end, Norma comes back to Jimmy because the person she lives with is too serious. In “The Only Traffic Signal on the Reservation Doesn’t Flash Red Anymore,” Victor and Adrian talk about the basketball stars on the reservation, hoping that someone on the reservation can resist alcohol and develop his or her basketball skills to be a successful ballplayer. The function of Alexie’s humor shifts throughout his stories. In “A Drug Called Tradition,” Alexie’s humor effectively accomplishes one of his goals by obliging readers to reconsider their concepts, while his humor helps his characters improve their situations in “The Approximate Size of My Favorite Tumor.” In “The Only Traffic Signal on the Reservation Doesn’t Flash Red Anymore,” humor mitigates the characters’ pain and despair. One common function hum...
... 74). Unlike Thomas, Victor was planning to do the same at first, but his credence changed. Thomas’ spirituality is pure and this scene brings them closer together because of their connection through Victor’s father.
In the movie there is Victor, the main character, which tries to be the typical Indian, or maybe just a typical man. He shows just hate towards his father, who left Victor and his mother alone and fled to Phoenix. The picture Victor has about his father is that he was an alcoholic and always tried to talk with his fists.
Your insightful argument statement must “get outside” of the book (it CANNOT mention character names; must apply to life in general, not just the novel). Avoid the obvious -- move beyond the simplicity of Victor being happy the first time and unhappy the second time.
Victor grows up in school both on the American Indian Reservation, then later in the farm town junior high. He faces serious discrimination at both of these schools, due to his Native American background. This is made clear in both of the schools by the way the other students treat him as well as how his teachers treat him. His classmates would steal his glasses, trip him, call him names, fight him, and many other forms of bullying. His teachers also bullied him verbally. One of his teachers gave him a spelling test and because he aced it, she made him swallow the test. When Victor was at a high school dance and he passed out on the ground. His teacher approached him and the first thing he asked was, “What’s that boy been drinking? ...
This paper will examine Robert C. Solomon's Emotions and Choices article, to best identify what anger is, and to what extent a rational human being is responsible for their anger. Firstly, Solomon's argument must be described. A quick summation of Solomon's argument can be found in the following four points: Emotions are judgements, emotions are chosen, emotions serve a purpose, and emotions are rational.1 To quote Solomon, he explains that “Emotions are not occurrences, and do not happen to us. They ... may be chosen like an action.”2
With the different trips that Victor endures individually, it hints a sense of individuality as he seeks isolation from the world. He is also a very emotional man, who loves his family. As death of his family members occurs, he becomes emotionally unstable and seeks revenge against his creation. Ultimately trying to end the life he so vigorously wanted to create. This reflects both the passion and individualism theme from the Romantic
This time is the pre-text to the story as the mind was open to new thinking and thus Mary Shelly was using these influences when she wrote on how Victor took his thoughts and ideas to the extreme. The freewill of Victors mind led to his irresponsibility in his actions. In his “consequences be damned “ thinking he never calculated the negative impact that his imagination mixed with his scientific pursuit would have on him, humanity or his creation. Victor defied the natural, and challenged the moral right. Victor knew he was stepping over the boundaries as he never shares any detail of his creation even with his most intimate of
Victor says this comment about the wedding “Those were the last moments of my life during which I enjoyed the feeling of happiness” (162). This comment is made in a way that foreshadows the events to come which show that victor is going to become fearful for his wife's safety. Victor’s happiness turns to fear as he approached his honeymoon, this can be seen by his comment saying “I had been calm during the day; but so soon as night obscured the shapes of objects, a thousand fears arose in my mind” (165). He soon discovered that his attempts to protect his wife as he returns to his room, from patrolling to try and find the monster, to find his wife dead. After a day has elapsed and an unsuccessful attempt to find the monster Victor decides while taking to the police that he will after the monster. He this in a fit of rage “As I spoke, rage sparkled in my eyes; the magistrate was intimidated:--"You are mistaken," said he, "I will exert myself; and if it is in my power to seize the monster, be assured that he shall suffer punishment proportionate to his crimes” (169). This shows that he is extremely enraged. The loss of his wife has changed Victor’s mood from happiness to uncontrollable rage all in the span of a single day. He spends the rest of his life chasing the monster just to quench his
He considers that “...this was the hour and moment of trial, which would decide my hopes or realize my fears (Shelley 134).” Unfortunately for him, “Who can describe their horror and consternation on beholding me?...in a transport of fury, he dashed me to the ground and struck violently with a stick (Shelley 136).” The DeLaceys reject and abandon him despite his best efforts at effecting their opinions and acquiring their acceptance, they also reject him. Perhaps this would have been different if the monster found compassion in another part of the world as presented by Allan Horwitz, of Rutgers who argued “What would the genetic studies show if conducted in modern Russia, ancient Rome, or 15th-century Mongolia? ‘The sweep of environmental variation is huge’ he says, yet the new studies capture just a tiny, Western corner of it (“The Nature-Nurture” 5).” This shows how different the monster’s and Victor’s life would have been if a different place, era or family factored into their lives. However, aggression has been linked to genetics. In fact, a researcher found that 52 characteristics, including aggressiveness, have been found to be partially heritable (“Nature-Nurture” 2) and “a gene associates with levels of the neurotransmitter serotonin
Victor recalls the fight by remembering the struggles he went through with his family. By remembering the past, the author gives the reader a sense of sympathy of Victor’s life experiences. Coming from a household that went through violence is very affecting in many ways where the individual’s physical acts or thinking mindset can change who they first where. Violence is a memory to Victor when he recalls Adolph and Arnold, his uncles, fight. He describes the memory by going outside the window “He could see his uncles slugging each other with such force that had to be in love. Strangers would never want to hurt each other that badly (Alexie 2)”. I personally believe the narrator is expressing Victor’s deepest thoughts how family should not be getting into physical fights but instead showing care for each other because no stranger will get into such pain if hate is not involved or common sense towards
He was contemplating trying out for the basketball team but is not sure he can cut it. His coach made him do some drills and he saw potential in him. The coach said that he was the best shooter he has ever seen and ends up making varsity. Victor plays basketball to escape the real world and to relax himself. He usually played it with his father and that was their special bonding moment between them. The difference in the book and the movie is that basketball is a huge impact on Arnold life not so much of Victor. The reason being is that Victor doesn't really play that much because his father left him and he only at the community center with his
In a case like the role of Walter Finch, living alone in a remote cabin, he was desperate to have a friend when he began a relationship with the victim. A psychological view of his behavior is indicative of someone with low self-esteem as a result of his environment, having no one around to give him the support that he needs. As such, Finch developed a temperament that was geared toward control and aggression, reflected in the way that he killed 17 year old Kay, then, methodically washed her hair and clipped her nails prior to dumping her body. Subsequently, experts agree that temperament is not all related to heredity, a biological and/or evolutionary approach to personality, but, this character’s urges could have developed in a childhood
While the three biological processes help a person understand love, it is not the only emotion they are exclusive to. This way of thinking can help someone understand anger as well as many other emotions. When a person experiences anger, it is difficult for them to truly understand why they are angry and how their body and mind are processing that anger. If one were to apply Fredrickson’s theory then everything would be clearer, allowing the person to gain a clearer scope on their situation and therefore understanding and dealing with their anger. She details that, “Mere photographs fail to capture these non stop and mostly unseen churning dynamics. Instead, you need movies” (Fredrickson, 109). She means that by only looking at a situation face value, one can not truly understand it. Therefore, by viewing it as dynamic and changing, like the emotions one faces in their day, one can truly understand the situation they are in. Using this new view on emotions as not something that is mystical but as biological and part of a system can genuinely help people understand emotions such as anger.
Therefore, the inherent emotions of the human species made a way to ethics ‘the capacity for morality is ultimately based upon a species’ emotional wiring as much as on its cognitive abilities’ (Turner 1997 220). The difference between humans and animals is that humans can achieve control over their emotions. However, Jack has a difficult time keeping his temper. This happens once when he catches a student shredding the tire of his car, he fought with the student and ‘the French teacher, holding Jack’s arms, crying, screaming: “Stop it, Jack! You’re going to kill him!”’ (TS 165). There lies a similarity between Jack and the boiler. However, Jack seems incapable of control. For example, ‘The boiler had a pressure gauge: old, cracked, clotted with grease, but still workable, Jack had none’ (TS 282). Buss and Shackelford state that according to biological explanations, ‘aggressive energy is said to be an instinctual drive that builds up until it explodes. Conversely, ‘an evolved psychology takes in specific forms of input, operates on that input with decision rules, and then produces an output (Buss and Shackelford 2015 607). Jack’s tendency to alcoholism combined with a haunting past, his father ‘had beaten their mother for no good reason at all’ (TS 329), and the fact that he is obsessed with having a higher status ‘his wife […] had opted for the poisonously active task of trying to destroy his last and best chance to become a member of the Overlook’s staff, and possibly to rise’ (TS 563), lead him to behave violently. A prominent factor regarding the functions of aggression is that it can ‘increase one’s status or power within existing social hierarchies’ (Buss and Shackelford 1997 610). As though this was not enough, he contemplates the murder of his wife ‘in bed the night before, lying there and suddenly he had been contemplating the murder of his wife’ (TS