Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Lost in translation poem analysis
Interpretation in literature
Interpreting poetry essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Lost in translation poem analysis
One man’s trash is another man’s treasure. This proverb means that people can view the exact same object very differently. Doesn’t that imply people can also view the exact same events in a different light? This is what Theodore Roethke’s poem “My Papa’s Waltz” proves. The poem can be easily interpreted to be a scene of a troubled father and son in a dysfunctional home, while at the same time it can also be interpreted to be a warm scene of the relationship between the father and the son. Both interpretations are correct. There is enough evidence in the poem to argue for both sides. And because there is, that’s why there’s so much disagreement between the readers: The disagreement proves that people can interpret the same event, or in this …show more content…
The word romped, which is used in the second stanza, means to play roughly, which to some readers may warrant them to believe that it means the father and the son are fighting each other. And their fighting caused the pans to fall off the kitchen shelf, which causes their mother to frown because she’s sad that her household is so dysfunctional. This is continued proof of the interpretation of the troubled father and son relationship is valid.
Another reader may interpret the second stanza in a completely different light. They might believe that it’s a scene where the father and son are waltzing roughly with each other because they’re having so much fun with each other. But their waltzing causes the pans to fall off the kitchen shelf, which makes their mother sad because her pans fell to the ground and she has to probably clean it up. This is further evidence that the interpretation of the warm memory between father and son is valid.
Roethke purposely created this poem to have multiple interpretations. If he didn’t, then why would his poem be full of words and images with double meaning? And how much luck is required for the diction choice and imagery choice throughout every stanza would be consistent enough that they are able to create two different readings of the same poem? This poem is a polysemous poem: This poem has more than one valid interpretation and Roethke purposely created it this
In the poem "My Papa's Waltz" by Theodore Roethke, the speaker is reflecting on a childhood experience involving his father. Through diction and details, the speaker conveys his complex attitudes toward his father. When first read it, it appears the young boy is afraid of his father. The first line of the poem writes: "The whiskey on your breath; could make a small boy dizzy." Apparently, the father likes whisky and the smell of it is remaining on his person, which causes the young boy's aversion. The diction of "dizzy" depicts the young boy is getting overwhelmed by the smell of the drink. Imagine how a little child feels when he notices the strange smell of his parent, He feels weak or even scared. That is exactly what the young boy feels when he saw his drunken father with the distasteful smell. The poem then goes on saying: "but I hung on like death, such waltzing was not easy." This simile compares the fear of the boy to the death. To have a feeling of death is not a pleasant feeling, therefore when they started "waltzing"; the young boy thinks it is "not easy." This shows that ...
When the poem is read aloud, the explicit rhyme and rhythm of the lines becomes extremely obvious. In fact, the bouncy rhythm is so uplifting, it occasionally makes the audiences feel like it is too predictable and straight-forward. An example would be “bright with chrysolite”, the word “chrysolite” feels like it is forcefully implemented for the sake of the rhyme. This is somewhat similar to a children’s tale. Most children’s tale as we know it, conveys messages straightforwardly and are easily understood by children, it also has an amiable tone and a merry mood that engages the children 's attention. Similarly, the rhyme and rhythm of this poem is very obvious and explicit, creating a delightful, casual mood that appeals to a young audience. Even though the legend dealt with deep insights about parenting that are intricate and puzzling, the father delivered it in such a gratifying, simple manner that made even the most dark and dreadful matters: like the description of precarious beasts and vicious monsters to sound like a blissful adventure of friendly animals. The sole purpose of this contradiction between the tone and message is to make this seemingly strong and serious topic more tolerable and captivating to the son of the father. Unsensible, impulsive youth is very similar to restless children, a long insipid lecture about deep insights is very difficult for them to buy into. In the same time, a harsh, threatening warning will only make them obey unwillingly, and creating a doubtful relationship will make them uncomfortable to communicate or appeal to their parents. Clearly, the percipient father recognized the ineffectiveness of these unsuitable parenting methods. Instead, he conveyed the message in a uncomplicated, friendly way that made his son to accept his teachings more comfortably. A
But as the poem goes on, you come to realize that there is a hidden secondary situation taking place. The more obvious parts of the poem is the two parents having sexual intercourse, and the child feeling all alone in their big house. Once the child comes into the parent’s room, we actually get to see them transform into the loving parents that they are. The author illustrates the exact moment in when the child barges in on his parents love making session. “But let there be that heavy breathing / … and make for it on the run- as now, we lie together, / after making love, quiet, touching along the length of our bodies” (Kinnell (917). For some readers, it may be easy to see and comprehend this surface situation. The child is the product of their being, and this poem is about the love the whole family shares. The author uses euphemisms to display an image of affection and compassion versus a nasty and indecent love. Kinnell’s main focus is on the love and devotion between the parents. He conveys his focus through such words like “after making love, quiet, touching along the length of our bodies / familiar touch of the long-married” (Kinnell 917). The act of their gentle and quiet love is what wakes their
Notably, the denotation “romping” can mean, “to play roughly and energetically” (Google), but it can also have a connotation that the boy is hurt or in pain. Furthermore, stanza two also mentions the “mother’s countenance/ could not unfrown itself” (7- 8) which is unusual in the description of playing. While the father and son are playing, the mother is standing aside frowning. Her unhappiness contrasts the playful description of the waltz, which gives the poem its sense of seriousness. In other words, it tells the reader that there is much more happening here than the father and son playing. The drunkenness of the father has caused him to become careless and rough with the boy. The mother is clearly unhappy about the situation, but only watches as the two continue their
... overall themes, and the use of flashbacks. Both of the boys in these two poems reminisce on a past experience that they remember with their fathers. With both poems possessing strong sentimental tones, readers are shown how much of an impact a father can have on a child’s life. Clearly the two main characters experience very different past relationships with their fathers, but in the end they both come to realize the importance of having a father figure in their lives and how their experiences have impacted their futures.
Still even more evidence of these mixed feelings is illustrated in the third stanza. "This love dance, a kind of blood rite between father and son, shows suppressed terror combined with awe-inspired dependency" (Balakian 62). "The hand that held my wrist/was battered on one knuckle;/ At every step you missed/ My right ear scraped a buckle"(Roethke 668). The speaker's father's hand being "battered on one knuckle" is indicative of a man who...
This poem has a kept form. Even at a glance, it has a set form. It consists of four quatrains, each line being an iambic tritameter. The poem is about a young boy waltzing with his father. One can assume that the speaker is a young boy, or perhaps the poet reminiscing his youth. The father dances around in a haphazard manner, knocking over pans in the kitchen. Upon first glance, the tone is humorous. The picture one immediately forms is rather comical with the boy clinging on for dear life as his chuckling father spins him round and round, making a mess in the kitchen while the mother looks on discontentedly. However, the line, "whiskey on your breath could make a small boy dizzy" suggests the father's drunkedness and "at every step you missed my right ear scraped buckle" suggests the dance was not an altogether joyful one. Lines such as "hung on like death", and "beat time on my head" are might even lead the reader to think the father is abusive of the boy.
Even though mom likes organization, she does not say anything so that they can enjoy their time together as a family before the little retires for the night. Dad is also presenting to us after a hard day of work, a display of his hands having his palm caked with that of hard dirt. The atmosphere goes on to present us how they danced in the kitchen to where the mom was getting upset because her pans were falling off the shelves but did not want to change the mood in which all were having fun. How do these poetic devices contribute to the development of the poem’s message? I believe the poetic devices help to make the poem come to life more. To hook you into the poem, bring you into the kitchen with the family, and enjoy the fun they were having, to maintain a family bonding. It shows you that family is always first and tight no matter what time of day, no matter what the situation entails. The dance is the center of the family bond, which is the
Most people have different interpretations of the above poem based on individual reading perspectives. Some people have the idea that this poem shows a cordial relationship between a father and his son. On the other hand, some people think the poem portrays parental abuse of a father on this son. However, from my own perspective, the language, imagery, symbolism and the tone of the poem create the impression that author isn't angry about the experience, so he's not in an abusive relationship. The poem is very brief since it consists of 4 stanzas only each made up of 4 lines. The author makes the experience interesting by referring to it as a waltz. The poem has a plain 'abab' rhyme scheme in the first stanza, ‘cdcd' in the second stanza, ‘efef' in the third stanza and ‘ghgh' in the fourth stanza. The author also uses iambic trimeter; it makes the poem sound good and flow easily. The fact that the poem has three
From the every begin of the first lines of the poem, the imagery shows that the parents and son are at odds with each other. In the poem, the son is argues that there are 102 gallons of water in his body even though the parents tell him that he has mistaken the words “divide” and “multiply” to come out with a false answer. But, the son insists that he is right about this improbable figure because his teacher said that he was right. The parents argue back by saying do you remember that jug of milk and no way you’re carrying one hundred of those. Even after this the son still doesn’t listen to them. Because of the divide between son and his parents, the son won’t even consider that his parents might be right. The son thinks they are “idiots” without ev...
The first time I read it, I was unsure about the meaning and how the images interacted. However, I did not feel deterred by this. Rather, I was eager to go back and try to string things together. I think this was due to the fact that all of the images were very concrete and accessible, allowing for me as a reader to navigate them quite familiarly. You also have a mix of details the speaker knows or seems to be lacking (i.e. there was a wedding there once I do not know whose). Near the end, you provide a realization, writing “it was my parents there was a chocolate cake.” This realization is followed by a stanza that seems to describe the death and burial of the speaker’s dog. In turn, with a lot of the negative, even morbid, imagery you provide, the poem seems to represent a loss of innocence for the speaker. However, it did take a lot of thought for me to come to this conclusion, and I am still not truly confident in if this is meaning you intended. If I was very far off from perceiving the meaning, you may want to think about how your lines interact to provide
The stanza says, “The hand that held my wrist was battered on one knuckle at every step you missed my right ear scraped a buckle” (9-12). This shows that the child was so young that his ear only reached to his father buckle. This is also a fierce connotation for the father missing every step or making a mistake in the child’s life and this caused pain for the child. Every time the father misses a step and the buckle hits the boy’s ear, he is hurting his son. The use of the word batter in these lines is very important. According to Merriam Webster dictionary battered means “to beat with successive blows so as to bruise, shatter, or demolish” (Merriam Webster). The strong diction used sets up an image of a bruised and bloody hand. The father’s battered hand is the result of the amount that the father would abuse his son. This stanza also shows a shift in the poem. The reader is taken from an image of the father and son romping and causing chaos in the kitchen, to the son being held by his wrist while being physically and emotionally hurt by his
It goes from admiring the father in the photo, to being hurt by her mother’s emotions in the family. In the beginning, it quotes, “He looks like Errol Flynn” (Stanza 1), which was a very famous man at that time. A lot of men wanted to be him and women wanting to be with him. Therefore, he was a player. This shows that she thought very highly of her father. Also foreshadowing, he is a player like Errol Flynn. But as the poem goes on, it starts to shift to talking about her mother. The first thing she said about her mother is that “She is not crying,” (Stanza 2), which shows that she significantly remembers her mother crying in her childhood, but has to explain that she is not at this moment. Since normally, people remember the good times when looking at an old photo, she remembered her mother was hurt, shows she is also hurting. It is not easy seeing mothers cry, therefore, it must have pained her knowing her mother always cries knowing her father is out cheating, then confronting him, but end up only forgetting about it and has to live with all that pain for the child. As the shift as the poem went from admiring to hurt, it leads up to the
Theodore Roethke 's "The Waking," is a villanelle, and is made up of five tercets and a quatrain. This villanelle is made up of only two rhyme schemes, two lines of the first stanza alternate repeating with the last line of each tercet and are joined together in the ending quatrain. The two most important lines of the poem are "I wake to sleep, and take my waking slow” (Roethke 1) and "I learn by going where I have to go”(3) These two lines create the meaning of the poem. They are both mentioned throughout the poem connecting each stanza of the poem. Where these lines do not repeat, the sound pattern becomes a vital part of the poem. Three half rhymes; ”wake”(1) and “go”(3) and “fear”(2) flow from each verse through the vowel sound. End-stopped
I find it possible to read this poem as a statement of some self-pity on the poet's part, a feeling, perhaps, that he has been beguiled and misunderstood because he, like me, favored an isolated path.