More handpicked essays just for you.
Melting pot theory in united states
The Syrian conflict and refugees
The melting pot from re reading america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Melting pot theory in united states
I am writing to submit my essay “(s) Melting Pot?” It is a look at the current Syrian Immigration crisis that is erupting. Specifically, it looks at the positions for and against the acceptance of Syrian immigrants in Europe, The United States, and elsewhere; online. I found several webpages and documented the information and how they presented their position to the public, rhetorically. The main strength surrounds the rather blunt piece written by George Whale. This resource was a gold mine for information and support of my topic. I was able to really disseminate the data and it was also rather refreshing to have a piece that puts the whole situation so bluntly, as an integral part of my paper.
If I could change anything about this essay,
Schwarzenegger being an: actor, body builder and former governor, he is also an immigrant. Since he is an immigrant, some people might suggest that his essay is somewhat bias or opinionated. People may say that he’s more for immigrants because he is one even if that isn’t the case. He uses “should” and “must” throughout his essay showing that this is what he thinks needs to happen. He says that immigrants are good people but, are all of them good? He doesn’t know that for sure. The statistic he used in his essay wasn’t credited to anyone. Even though that information could be found on any government website, crediting your source makes it more reliable. He could have added some more facts or statistics on immigrants. He also could have received a statement from a congressmen to explain what congress is doing to control the boarders or about the immigration policy. These suggestions could have helped but, the essay is still effective without
Thomas Morton wrote about the Native Americans and their way of life while the colonist slowly populated the Americas. Native American’s living styles, religious views, and the relations the Indians had with the colonist are a few of the things that came across when you heard about the Indians during the time the colonist inhabited the Americas.
Appealing to the readers emotions, beginning with a rational tone, and using reasoning to prove the thesis are all features that Van Gelder fails to use effectively. Van Gelder often strays far away from achieving any type of agreeance with regards to her thesis because of her condescending and disrespectful tone used throughout the essay. Her use of sarcasm distracts readers of the thesis which overall takes allows all means of persuasiveness to be overlooked. Also, many people don't take issue with the English language as it is today. Other tragedies that have occurred throughout recent years such as the Las Vegas shooting, Paris bombing, and mosque Shootings are more important to address these issue before any strides to change our language can be made. Secondly, using a calm and rational tone is vital to an essays persuasiveness. Van Gelder strays as far away from calm and rational as possible and uses strong, offensive diction to communicate her message. An example of the authors disrespectful diction is when she states “you’re jeopardizing the worthy cause of woman’s rights by focusing on ‘trivial’ side issues” (Van Gelder). These mocking tactics are only discouraging to people that hold different beliefs than the author. This lack of calmness and rationality is a major downfall in terms of the essays persuasiveness. Lastly, Van Gelder uses weak reasoning to persuade the readers of her
Jake Richey, author, makes extremely valid points of the issues of Immigration. I fully agree with what he has to say about all the contradictive issues of immigration
Miller has written for Newsweek, where this article comes from. He has also written writing handbooks, such as Motives for Writing (McGraw-Hill) and Hodges’ HarBrace Handbook (Harcourt College Publishers). He is an educator in argument techniques, writing Informed Argument: A Multidisciplinary Reader and Guide.
Before taking this course, I did not know that writing in different media impacts the rhetorical context and choices a writer makes. I understood the basics of rhetoric itself, but I never thought to pay attention to how often it is used. Week one’s page was really useful in understanding how rhetoric is used in different media. From television to political cartoons, rhetoric plays an important role. But the context and choices the authors makes are impacted by the type of media. For example, in my week one rhetoric example, I cited a tweet made by President-elect Donald Trump.
My paper is about my opinion and what I’m interested in my history . It’s about tragic stories that caught my eye and of course “Give me liberty or give me death” that we were all interested in as a class. What I did to complete my research was i read over and over of the articles that i picked i also analyzed my stories and highlighted interesting facts and added a piece of my mind of how i feel about the story which was pretty intense. Being an american defines a lot of things being an american gives a lot of opportunities , being american gives you choices ,and being american gives you the right to speak and others agree.For example one article i picked was “The right to Fail” was amazing and it's a great example
The Syrian refugee crisis has become major part of international news in these past few months. Many countries are strapped of resources and will soon not be able to handle any more refugees. The Syrian people are looking to flee conflict in their country, looking for better opportunities, and better lives for their families. Recently, a letter sent by fourteen senate democrats was sent to President Obama calling for the need of the United States to allow more Syrian refugees into our borders to alleviate pressure from European nations. The numbers are staggering, the letter states that half of Syria’s 23 million people have been forced from their home along with 4 million have been registered as refugees. The main purpose of the letter is
I used plenty of second-hand sources, as the prompt requires, yet I seemed to rely too heavily on the evidence and not enough on how that contributed to my personal argument. I noticed while looking over this essay that I had a small obsession with short sentence structure, as nearly half of all my sentences were short in length, with only one “long” sentence present. My vocabulary was decent, but undeveloped in this essay. My argument about a scholarly issue could be strengthened with stronger diction. My transitions were sound in this essay, and the essay read smoothly. In this essay, my conclusive skills are displayed as I correctly wrap up my argument, and reiterate the main points of the prior
The book resonates with my life experience as a young immigrant in the United States. To be more specific, the
I had not only never written a paper like this before, I hadn’t even been familiar with the format. In high school we only briefly touched upon rhetorical analysis, so when we were introduced to it in this class I felt wholly unprepared for such an undertaking. I truly made the effort but knew that my paper had fallen short. The thing which I struggled the most in this paper with stiffness in my writing. I could just never break from lifeless analysis and make it any more interesting. This frustrated me and forced me to carefully at the way in which I write. I did, however, leave with a much better understanding of rhetoric and how to form a logical and strong
attempted to shape our perception of asylum seekers and refugees through the use of rhetoric. In the
This semester has taught me a great deal about how to develop my rhetorical, persuasive, and reflective writing skills. In the rhetorical essay, I believe my skills revolving around analyzing evidence to support my claims were improved drastically. My rhetorical analysis introduced me to that a direct correlation between tone and what a writer is trying to prove must be present if an argument is going to be strong and effective. My persuasive essay forced me to focus on my tone and diction, as I chose to discuss a very controversial topic that is currently a major social issue within the United States as of today. Prior to writing this essay, I have never thoroughly considered how my audience might respond to my opinions and the evidence used
An estimated one million immigrants come to the United States from all over the world each year. With immigration rates drastically increasing, as are the concerns among some Americans, specifically, the influx of immigrants and refugees from the Middle East. This has been a growing concern since the tragic attacks on 9/11, and the topic of immigration control resurfaces after any terrorist attack committed by a Muslim. Aside from that, there has also been a humanitarian crisis in Syria that produced refugees. There have been millions of Syrian refugees in need of humanitarian assistance, and the question of whether or not the US should accept them has been debated back and forth. These issues were all addressed by then-candidate Donald Trump during his presidential campaign, when he promised a “total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States”.
With the introduction to the paper I discussed the issues that exist with political correctness and I gave a brief overview of the article I was refuting “Apple Removes All American Civil War Games From the App Store Because of the Confederate Flag.” After introducing the article I elaborated on the meaning of politically correct; additionally, I included an important court decision that pertained to my topic. Lastly I concluded the introduction paragraph by stating my thesis: “Exercising the first amendment can be controversial; however, the censorship of people is unnecessary and it conflicts with the principle of free speech, which is a key aspect of American culture”. In the second paragraph I discusses the use of “happy holidays” in lieu of “merry Christmas.” I claimed that in the past it has been a real issue; however, more recently people have been fighting back against political correctness and are use merry Christmas despite it being not politically correct. In defense of this argument I used a quotation from an article in the USA Today titled “‘Merry Christmas’ Is Favored Greeting.” This article defended my original beliefs that in regards to “merry Christmas” political correctness was on the decline. In the second body paragraph I argued that political correctness affects the way that people use the English language. I include the story of a political aide in Washington, DC who was forced to resign over the use of the word “niggardly.” He was referring a budget that was set in place; however, some people disliked that. Furthermore, a few months later there was a professor in Madison, Wisconsin who used the term in discussion of a work of literature. A student, who did not know what the term meant, was offended and brought it up with the deans demanding disciplinary action for the professor. Additionally, in the third paragraph I bring up the Supreme