Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strategies and interventions in teaching essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strategies and interventions in teaching essay
Paul Roberts, in "How to Say Nothing in 500 Words", talks about the mistakes that students often make while writing papers. One of the biggest issues with students when they are writing papers is the fact that they are too timid. Rather than thinking outside of the box, they focus on common issues and the simple, obvious answers to questions. To create a quality paper the writer must be willing to bring forth ideas that are not commonly used or else you will bore the reader. Another common mistake is beating around the bush, get to the point. Students are often under the false impression that loading up basic sentences with extra words can make a paper better, but they are falling victim to making a paper that is "a wolf in sheep's skin." Meaning, they are filling up a paper that is not necessarily good with big words and phrases in order to make it seem good. This is known as word-padding. One of the most effective ways to improve a paper is by incorporating examples of what is being written about. Mr. Roberts makes it a point to prove the importance of such examples. If the reader does not understand a part of the paper then having it broken down with an example can easily help to dismiss any confusion. There are three types of writing; the concepts of "colored writing", "colorful writing", and "colorless writing." Paul Roberts breaks down and explains the differences of these concepts. Professor Roberts provides a very persuasive argument on examples and how the usage of them can make an average paper great. He defends his belief by using examples that explain the points of statements that he makes in his writing. Without his use of examples to help the reader to understand what he was trying to convey, he would have a very ro... ... middle of paper ... ...es the example that "driving fast is dangerous" to relate to "word-padding". He relates the two by saying that, even though they both can spice things up, they more than likely will backfire. In "How to Say Nothing in 500 Words", Roberts stresses two main things. These two things are the importance of originality and the importance of providing examples in your paper. Every time that he covered a topic, he would provide an example to really break down what he was trying to say. I believe that the main thesis was Roberts telling the reader to write a paper as interesting and fresh as possible, and to use examples in order to be as easy to understand and straight-forward as possible. All of the supporting topics were used to talk about the importance of creating a simple, yet captivating paper, and the importance of examples was shown by the constant use of examples.
In English 1102, I was exposed to a variety of different genres, including, argumentative research paper, an annotated bibliography, an analytical paper, and a workplace specific piece. Entering this class the majority of papers I had written were all analytical, and in this class we went above and beyond the basic 5 paragraph essay. Though each paper had a different genre and style, I learned that each project was similar in composition.
In the article, How to Say Nothing in 500 Words, Paul McHenry Roberts starts by explaining that writer tends to focus more on the total of words that has to be used than on the actual content. McHenry gives many advice on ways to become a better writer. He mentions that writers should get rid of “padding,” which are words that simply add up the total number of words but does not add any detail nor does it support your main idea. He also talks about calling a person or item for what it is. McHenry use the example of a student calling a principal a fool but in different words.
How did the Author use language techniques and stylistic features to meet the expectation of the intended audience?
Upon reading Chapter 3 of Mimi Markus (2015) text, it is clear that paragraphs are extremely significant in writing. Paragraphs help the writer’s paper illustrate the clarify of words, sentences, and supporting points. Paragraphs that are written appropriately allow any document, manuscript, and or research to group a collection of sentences that identifies and displays a complete thought (Markus, 2015). Nevertheless, paragraphs should be well written and constructed, so that the writer can give the readers a clear and concise understanding of the topic, ideas, main points, and supporting points being discussed. Moreover, the main points and supporting points must be detailed complete sentences as well. Unsurprisingly, paragraphs are found
“Most living organisms fossilize after death, so fossils in exemplary condition are easily found all over the world.” This statement does not make much sense because; it says that these fossils are found all over the world which is not the case. If the fossils were found all over the world then we would have the answer to evolution and the beliefs behind it would not exist. Shubin would not have traveled to the artic if this statement was true because fossils are not found in perfect condition all the time. An example is when Shubin was talking about Artic temperature changes “crumbles the surface rocks and fossils” (20). The volcano activity would have ruined the fossils and made them incapable of getting to. Either way the statement
Originally appearing on the blog “Good Writer, Bad Writer,” the post called “The Five-paragraph Fix” was written by Shaun Patrick Doyle, a Writing Consultant at Cornell University. It is a unique approach in presenting the argument of lengthy crtical thinking papers being easier than, what many claim to be more of a comfortable writing, a short 1-2 page paper. The author of this blog makes a personal realization of why he used to believe long essays are harder and how that belief has changed as he grew out of the five-paragraph structure of writing a paper. Writing long papers require hard work in coming up with the argument and brainstorming deeper questions that allow you to know the topic you are discussing in depth, but once you have developed strong research it is easy to meet the required word count for those lengthy critical papers.
‘The Final Project’ is a horror film about a group of college students and their film project. The students film a documentary on an old, Civil War era plantation—which is said to be haunted—but they don't believe in spirits.
Graff, Gerald, and Cathy Birkenstein. "Watching TV Makes You Smarter." They Say / I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing. New York: W.W. Norton &, 2010. 277-94. Print.
The Big Short is a film adaptation of the non-fictional book of the same name by Michael Lewis. This film explores the years preceding the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the events leading up to the financial crisis of year 2008. There are three storylines running concurrently throughout the film:
For this final reflection paper I am asked to consider how I have changed as a result of my learning experience in the Adult Education Program. My answer to this question is to state that the changes are numerous and changes have occurred in ways that I did not expect. Through this education I have developed my critical thinking skills. As a result I am considerably more competent at deciphering information and seeking out appropriate sources of information before making any decisions on whether or not I will place it in my personal knowledge library. And, I certainly take greater care in ensuring that I have obtained sound and well researched information before I share this knowledge with others in a learning environment.
The writing process is no simple task. From brainstorming, creating an outline, to implementing ideas into a coherent paper requires a strong understanding of the task at hand. Looking back at the classes leading up to first year writing this semester, I can seee were my prior knowledge has proven to be helpful. In Ap language and composition in high school, the writing process began to be something of enjoyment. The most important information was how to identify aspects of a paper that would answer the general question of analysis, “What is the author trying to convey to the reader?” Responding to this question is it important to look at the aspects of writing which including: tone, diction, style, syntax, and word choice. These five aspects
Based on your readings, how would you characterize the effectiveness of technology use in education today? How would you improve that effectiveness? (30 pts)
On February 16th, I went to the first Film Series Event held in the Humanities building in room 218. The event started at 7 pm as Dr. Smith who is a professor of Accounting and Dr. Madhogarhia who is a professor of Finance held a full analysis of clips from the movie, The Big Short. Each professor used clips of the movie to describe the financial situations that occurred during the 2008 financial crisis as the housing market was beginning to crash and how financial experts predicted and benefited from the collapse by gaining a substantial amount of money through the build-up of credit bubbles that were created by the impending market collapse. During the event Dr. Smith and Dr. Madhogarhia used visuals of clips of different scenes of the movie
Coming into this class I was not sure what to expect. I knew this class was going to be a challenge for me seeing as writing was never one of my strengths, but I came to this class with a desire and determined mind to learn what a college professor expects from a well-written paper. I believe I have learned some very effective ways to express my thoughts on paper while drawing from other sources to enhance my argument.
The writing process is a key factor into having a perfect paper. But it is also an abundant