Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In Feedback as a gift, Friedrich discusses his points on how feedback should be viewed. The author describes feedback as a gift and if we view it that way it would change our mindsets when receiving it. On another note the article by Stone and Heen, Difficult conversations 2.0: Thanks for the feedback, the main focus is on the benefits we receive from accepting feedback and becoming a skillful receiver. The author also discusses why we as humans reject feedback calling these reactions triggers. In Max Performance Feedback, Sadri and Seto discuss the three different types of feedback. Each articles content is crucial to one’s professional development.
In Feedback as a gift, Friedrich makes some good points about how to give and receive feedback.
…show more content…
First type is positive feedback. This type of feedback we all love but too much positive feedback can cause us to become complacent with our work. Receiving this type of feedback is definitely encouraging to a worker and it stands out the most due to the fact of how well it made us feel. The next type is negative feedback, which to us means failure. We do not like how receiving negative feedback feels so we usually do not accept unfavorable information. There is also a tendency for the recipient to try to place blame on another individual, constant explanations as well as only fixing the behavior to avoid it in the future. Doing so may change the individual’s actions but if they have no guidance with it he or she may still not perform at a desired behavior. The last type of feedback is no feedback at all. The article states, that no response feedback at all is detrimental to the employee’s performance in the workplace (Sadri and Seto, 2011). There has to be some type of encouragement or motivation for them. The authors have a good rule to follow with feedback, “Since the purpose of feedback is to motivate and inform, we suggest that the ratio of positive to negative information that an individual receives is very important. Three positives followed by one negative is a good ratio” (Sadri and Seto, 2011, p.
Feedback is an excellent tool to provide employees with information and guidance. Feedback consists of two-way communication. Employee feedback provides managers with clues regarding how they are hindering or aiding their subordinates ' work performance. Supervisory feedback should inform, enlighten, and suggest improvements to employees regarding their performance. Feedback increases self-awareness. Proverbs 19:20 states “Hear counsel, receive instruction, and accept correction, that you may be wise in the time to come.” If presented correctly, feedback is not positive or negative. It is just data to make someone aware of the impact of his/her skills and behaviors on
A supportive management where communication is placed on high priority and constructive feedback is appreciated ("Forces of Magnetism"): Managers can implement this force by meeting with staff monthly, sending out meeting minutes emails and placing a folder on the unit where staff can read important announcements and acknowledge it. Also, acknowledging staff 's exceptional work in form of thank you notes mailed, emailing feedback and conducting staff 's semi-annual evaluation to provide feedback and improvement opportunities is very important. It helps staff feel appreciated which makes them more receptive to constructive criticism and to
In the workplace feedback is given among employees or from leaders to employees. A performance review is an example of how employers can provide constructive feedback to their employees to help them identify their strengths and weaknesses to assist them to improve and develop the necessary skills to be successful within the organization. For information on how to provide better feedback, please visit: http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/giving-constructive-feedback.html
Feedback requires attention and should never be unexpected and surprising. Feedback is an opportunity to tell the employee exactly what needs to be improve. Criticism of the employee’s work will sometimes be taken out of content, that’s why it’s always good to talk one on one without interruptions. When administering feedback always start on the positive. Tell the employee where they are excelling and then go into the negative.
Also, continually seek feedback from my preceptor has been crucial. Learning from my previous experiences, I have realized that a balance of ongoing constructive, and appreciative feedback has a very positive impact on both my learning, and confidence level. Therefore, during my first meeting with my preceptor, I discussed how important her feedback is to me, which has ensured that throughout my preceptorship I have received detailed, and timely
Schachter (1991) cited in El Tatawy (2001) stated that the feedback can be explicit, that is grammatical explanation or overt error correction, or implicit. Implicit correction can be done using the following techniques “confirmation checks, repetitions, recasts, clarification requests, silence, and even facial expressions that express confusion.” (Schachter (1991) cited in El Tatawy (2001))
The 360-degree feedback system can be very delicate in nature. A person not well ready for it could be thrown out of balance. It can also generate some new problem in an organisation. It not designed and conducted well, it posses the potential danger of a candidate developing wrong perceptions or notions about one or more of his auditor and creating new perspective towards them. It is therefore, unavoidable and significant to handle the process well and make it foolproof. The first important step is to examine whether the organisation is ready for it or not. The second important step is to examine if the candidate is ready for it. For the purpose of systematic analysis and examination of the problem at hand, the studies by the several researchers have been reviewed. Baron, (2009) examines that managers who received upward feedback about their supervisory behaviour significantly improved their behaviour and improves the subordinate ratings of managerial performance. Similarly, Baron, (2009) found that employees were favourably disposed toward associate rating. The feedback is positively related with fulfilment with prior peer ratings and negatively associated with perceived friendship bias and years of company experience. Subordinates’ ratings of leadership were significantly higher following feedback from subordinates under which a highly structured session is there where leaders discussed the feedback results with subordinates (Baron, 2009).
The 360-degree feedback or multi sources feedback is assessment, which comes from other employees. This feedback contains direct and indirect information from managers, colleagues, subordinates as well as self-evaluation data. Also, it includes other external sources such as customers and suppliers reports. The 360-degree feedback plays a significant role to help workers develop their performance. Human resources professionals are increasingly using this assessment. The main propose of the 360 feedback is to encourage employees to seek out information about their performance, skills and working relations. The origin of 360-feedback came from the German military during World War II. They started using multiple sources in order to evaluate officer’s performance (Thornton, 2014). In this paper, I am going to explore some key principles and actions that can help a manager increase their 360-degree feedback ratings. The paper will identify manager perspective of job performance, environmental factors influencing employee review of managers, and perspective of customers and suppliers satisfaction. Also, actions will be suggested for affective applications of the principles.
In terms of feedback, I feel like I can improve greatly, as this is the second term I’ve taken at UoPeople, so I am quite new to this whole peer based assessment and feedback type of learning. When providing feedback I feel like my strengths shine through in the following two aspects; First, being that
Code of conduct includes the values and standards set up by the organization. Feedback Feedback is the direct communication between employer and employee regarding performance which could be positive feedback or constructive feedback. Goals Goals are objectives set up by higher authorities that must be followed/achieved by all employees.
Employees who receive frequent positive attention are more receptive to their leader’s advice and attain a greater boost from praise both promote increased
According to University of Reading (2012), “Feedback can improve a student's confidence, self-awareness and enthusiasm for learning.” Feedback is important because it helps student understand their progress whilst achieving goals. Goal can be anything for instance to pass with good grades, to learn and understand the topic etc. Feedback helps to identify your strengths and weaknesses. For example, imagine yourself learning to play basketball, you have a coach who is guiding you and providing constant feedback on your progress versus you teaching yourself; big difference in terms of monitoring and feedback isn't it?
Performance appraisal are very important to employees because some type of feedback is needed in order for employees to be aware of how well they are performing their job or on the contrarily, to be informed of the areas which they need improvement in. Feedback is one of the most important factors supporting high level of performance. Without performance appraisals or feedback, employees have no way of knowing whether they are doing a good job or whether there are some areas in which they need to improve (F...
This is not to say that we should always have to accept feedback or the manner in which it is sometimes given. We all have the right to refuse feedback, and we can expect feedback to be given in a respectful and supportive manner. But for every positive and open way of accepting feedback, there's an opposite; a negative and closed manner which pushes feedback away and keeps it at bay.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.