Situational Learning Theory Analysis

Learning Theories There are many learning theories used by educators to help develop lesson plans. These theories furnish educators with the understanding of how learners learn. This paper will provide the reader with the identity, strength, and weakness, of seven different theories. The essay will also compare and contrast the learning theories and discuss how each theory supports cross-curriculum instruction.

Behaviorism

Behaviorism learning theorist believe that learning takes place when the student responds appropriately to environmental stimulus (Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J., 2013). To achieve the correct response the learner receives positive or negative reinforcements. The strength of Behaviorism learning theory is its ability facilitate

The Strength of Situational learning theory is the learning revolves around real-world problems in a rich, meaningful setting. A weakness in the theory is the group environment, if a learner is not engaged or has insufficient social skills the learning will be hindered. This learning theory lends itself to interdisciplinary learning through its need for higher-level, project-based learning. Like the Social and Cognitivism learning theories Situational learning requires the student to be an active participant in their learning, unlike Behaviorism which uses a passive learning

N., 2015). The strength of this learning theory is that motivation leads to deep learning and through learners feeling of autonomy gives value to the learning. Unfortunately, students may not feel confident in their learning which could impede the full comprehension of knowledge. Because students have the desire to learn, employing a variety of activities Motivational learning theories can be adapted to cross-curricular instruction. The assimilation of knowledge is done actively analogous to Social, Situational, Cognitivism, and Constructivism what makes Motivational learning theory different is that it demonstrates relevance and satisfaction in the