Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cyberbullying and effects on health essay
Cyberbullying and effects on health essay
Cyberbullying and effects on health essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cyberbullying and effects on health essay
Should School Officials Respond To Cyberbullying Cyberbullying has been going around since social media started to evolve and has made a great impact in the lives of teenagers as well as children. Cyberbullying is a way where teenagers harass others by sending them vulgar language as well as calling them names. It has gone to an extreme where the teenagers do not feel comfortable going back school, so they take what they think is the “easy way out” and end their life or get revenge on their harassers that leads to a school shooting. People are between two positions: whether school officials’ should take an act towards cyberbullying or not. Cyberbullying happens at any time and any place in a child’s or teenager’s life and majority of the time it is a classmate that harasses the victim. Therefore, school officials’ should respond to cyberbullying whether it happens in campus or off campus. Cyberbullying …show more content…
For instance, Willard mentioned the Tinker v. Des case and how the Court stated that “students should not ‘shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate’”. However, the court also admitted, “‘the special characteristics of the school environment’ by permitting school officials to prohibit student speech if that speech ‘would substantially interfere with the work of the school or impinge upon the rights of other students’” (Willard). For this reason, school officials’ should react to cyberbullying because the victim feels insecure at school and this can lead to the students to do poorly in their schoolwork as well as not attending to class. School officials’ can prevent a tragedy from a school shooting or a student’s death. If school officials notice the student being distracted from their schoolwork because of cyberbullying, then they should try to stop the cyberbullying even if it had happened off
Document C, states that K.K., a 12th grade student from Musselman High School made a discussion group on Myspace that accused a peer, S.N., of being sexually promiscuous and that she invited 100 people from her school to join and 24 actually accepted. This is an example of how cyberbullying disrupts learning, the 12th grader not only harassed her peer, but she also invited various students from school to join her and many did. K.K. disrupted the school by inviting others to join her in humiliating S.N., this not only has an effect on the victim, but it also has an effect on how the victim actually feels at school. After being cyberbullied by a classmate school can become an environment of fear and disrespect, preventing the victims from learning. Students also feel insecure, embarrassed, and unsafe. Students’ shouldn’t have to deal with extra stress at school because school is already stressful as it
School for students should be a safe place to learn, grow, and develop into impeccable human beings. Bullying has been a major problem for years. As times have changed, and technology has taken over. Bullying has become harsher, and dangerous. Students have more ways to when it comes to bullying, with endless options. Cyberbullying in Michigan has become more of an issue over the years, leading to serious crime offenses. Since technology isn’t going anywhere, this offense will only advance. After careful review of Lamphere School District policy’s, student handbooks and Michigan state laws and policies have a great affect with the First Amendment on cyberbullying.
The Supreme Court’s decision in Tinker v. Des Moines held that students do not necessarily shed their constitutional rights when they enter onto school grounds. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969). However, the court recognizes the school’s special relationship with the students including abilities to limit freedoms on campus like speech that are not necessarily the same as adults outside school grounds. Id. The court established a two-prong test to determine the constitutionality of those limitations, of which either can be met. Id. The first prong is the forecast of a substantial disruption of the work of the school. Id. The second is the infringement of the rights of other students to be let alone. Id.
Approximately 83% (5 out of 6) of all males have never been a victim of cyberbullying. This evidence helps explain why schools should not limit students’ online speech because the majority of the students are not affected by cyberbullying, making no reason for new reinforcements on the students. In document D, the court sided with the students, but the students must serve ten days, but the ten day suspension will not be shown on their records. It must pose a threat, there was no threat so they sided with the students.
Over 40 years ago the United States Supreme Court issued a landmark decision that defined student free speech rights within the framework of the public schools, but the Tinker decision, or any of United States Supreme Court’s other student free speech rulings, could not anticipate the impact of student off-campus use of the Internet would have on the school environment. “In this cyberspeech setting, the two-pronged Tinker framework yields only meager guidance for analyzing off-campus student speech.” (Crawford, 2013)
The District Court recognized that the US Constitution protects free speech and expression, but at schools, free speech needs to be held to a different standard. School officials must ensure that school environments are safe and welcoming to all students (Batterton, 2011). Thus, public school administrators have a compelling interest to regulate speech that is considered student harassment and bullying. This is well established in the Student Code of Conduct that students receive each year at the beginning of the school year (Batterton, 2011). Still, Kara Kowalski argued that she was protected under the First Amendment because this did not happen at school, but it was sufficiently connected to the school environment.
Jackson’s continued employment at Middleton High School could cause disruption by compromising students’ learning environment. Although the school may argue Mr. Jackson’s dismissal was due to negative feedbacks school received, none of those complaints concerning Mr. Jackson’s speech proved that students’ interest were compromised. CT 12. In fact, the hectors that could cause potential disruption by threatening to picket school unless Mr. Jackson was fired, were outsider social groups that had no interest in the operation of school. Therefore, their opinions should not contribute to school’s decision to dismiss Mr. Jackson. In Melzer, the court held that only when the hectors are students and parents who hold interest in public education, can the court permit “hectors veto”. Melzer v. Board of Education, 336 F.3d 185, 199 (2003). In a scenario where students would likely be unable to concentrate in class or be uncomfortable asking teacher for help in any one-on-one situation because their teacher is a pedophile, the students’ interest of learning would be compromised. Id. at 198. Consequently, the disruption to school’s normal operation will
Each year, schools are having to update the Code of Conduct in order to keep up with the bullying that is occurring on social media. Schools have failed to effectively monitor and take action upon what these students have been doing to others and what others are doing in return. This has resulted in many lost lawsuits, in which schools were held liable for not taking appropriate action on what occurs outside of campus. School districts therefore must take more responsibility over what happens to the students, on and off campus. Districts argue that such instances are outside of the school’s control, however, these victims are still their students.
In some cases, criminalization is preferred, while other bullies are slapped on the wrist and grounded for a month. What can be agreed upon is the need for a definitive policy. Cyberbullying, as a burgeoning field of abuse directed specifically at teens, requires direct, speedy, and, perhaps even harsh, measures to curtail the stream of mistreatment flowing freely online. In order to develop such measures, cyberbullying must be recognizable. The government website dedicated to the prevention of bullying in general offers this definition: cyberbullying is “bullying that takes place using electronic technology” (“What is Cyberbullying.”)....
over an extended period of time. Since the Ryan Halligan case in 2003, there has been a string of cyberbullying suicides which have made states and school districts react by imposing policies to deter and essentially criminalize cyberbullying which happens on and off campus. The issue at hand is whether state legislature and school districts enacting laws and policies regarding students’ speech in terms of off campus cyber speech, is interfering with the students’ free speech rights. Three Supreme Court cases have been cited in recent cyberbullying cases, in the context of the speech of students and the authority of the school district; Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969), Bethel v. Fraser (1986), Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988).
The initial reason why anyone who cyberbullies should be criminally accused is due to their harmful behavior that can result in people getting seriously hurt both mentally and physically. If the bully is convicted, cyberbullying can be stopped! As directly stated in the Radio Interview of source one “Cyberbullying can also lead to kids getting physically injured.” This statement further emphasizes why the outcome of this act should be punishable by law. Due to the fact that individuals face violent behavior, it could mean suicide for the victim. In no shape or form should this be tolerated since lives are taken due to the
Cyberbullying should be a criminal offense because whether it’s bullying or cyberbullying, it still damages a person emotionally and physically. Admittedly, many will argue that it is crossing the line to force perpetrators behind bars when it is not even bullying, but some foul words thrown in social sites. However, there is no difference between cyberbullying and offline bullying when it is still an issue that constantly eats away at its victims, abusing them with hurtful words and messages. “The United States Department of Health and Human Services calculated the percentages of bullied victims, where 37% of teens have been physically bullied, while 52% of teens have been cyberbullied” (Cyber/Bullying Statistics). Studies shown indicate that there have been more cases of cyberbullying than offline bullying, whereas people believe that “cyberbullying is not real bullying” and “it is to speak out in what...
For a student to have a successful education and time in highschool he student must feel comfortable in the learning environment. Schools have done a relatively adequate job in dealing with bullying that occurs at school, but it should not end there.What happens at home affects a student 's performance in school and that students attitude. Many times schools are left helpless when it comes to cases of cyberbullying and harassment on social media due to that school 's limits on its power. If a student 's attitude at school is stunted or the student is so distressed the thought of going to school is a nightmare, then the school must step in. From here, the next step is to involve the law enforcement to find a way to prosecute people who do harass or bully students on social
...r understanding of appropriate behavior, parents can create contracts for proper internet and cell phone use and schools already has a safety program. To enhance online security, parents can install filtering and blocking software. Teachers could create a formal contact regarding cyber bullying and contact the school’s attorney to find out what actions can be taken if cyber bullying issues arise. They can also encourage peer mentoring. Always document incidents. Keeping evidence of the incident is crucial, so recording dates, times and descriptions of the harassment would be most helpful. In addition, e-mails, text or posts in question should be saved or printed. If cyber bullying ever happen in school, it should be reported because it is often accompanied be traditional face-to-face bullying which may lead to an overall disruptive atmosphere at the victims school.
With technology progressing, students are moving past face to face hectoring, and are verbally bullying other through social media. Cyberbullying can sometimes become more harmful than verbal, physical, and emotional bullying due to victims, not feeling like they have an escape route because they are threatened repeatedly through text messages, e-mails, social media, etc. The worst part about cyberbullying is that the things posted can be anonymous; therefore, there is no blame for who posts what. A victim can suspect that someone is to blame for the actions done, but there is no proof to solve a possible ongoing issue. Cyberbullying and bullying are actually considered a crime when someone: physically assaults another person, gender or racism is talked about, violent or deadly threats are made, sexually texting, inappropriate photos, stalking,