Cyberbullying Persuasive Essay

--------------Hook-------------The problem is that cyberbullying is an act that must be stopped, but putting limits on students ' online speech is unnecessary. If you are not familiar with the word Cyberbullying, it is a is when an individual is tormented, threatened, harassed, humiliated, embarrassed or otherwise targeted by another individual using the Internet, interactive and digital technologies.But yet again I bring the point that schools should not limit the amount of students online speech. Schools must protect students’ First Amendment rights but also maintain the learning environment and safety at school. Three main reasons why school should not limit students online speech are there is not a large percent affected, it does not cause

Approximately 75% (3 out of 4) of all girls have never been a victim of cyberbullying. Approximately 83% (5 out of 6) of all males have never been a victim of cyberbullying. If only 25.1% of girls reported being a victim of cyberbullying and only 16.6 % of all males reported being a victim of cyberbullying what 's the point of limiting students speech. The percentages hardly makes up one-fourth of the overall percentage.Approximately 75% (3 out of 4) of all girls have never been a victim of cyberbullying. Approximately 83% (5 out of 6) of all males have never been a victim of cyberbullying. This evidence helps explain why schools should not limit students’ online speech because the majority of the students are not affected by cyberbullying making no reason for new reinforcements on the

In document D the court sided with the students, but the students must serve ten days, but the ten day suspension will not be shown on their records. It must pose a threat, there was no threat so they sided with the students.In document C, the school suspended the student, but that was because the student caused a threat against the targeted student, S.N. If the student did not target S.N. and say the students name and harm her directly then there would probably be no suspension.J.S created a MySpace profile (“the profile”) making fun of her middle school principal, James McGonigle. The profile did not name the principal or his school, but did include a photo of him and contained some vulgar and offensive language.J.S. did not name the principal or the school, she did not directly target the principal even though a photo of the principal was on the page.This evidence helps explain why schools should not limit students’ online speech because it didn 't cause a substantial disruption. A reason why schools should not limit students online speech is because of the violation of constitutional rights.We question reports of increasing threats to students online.The number of young people using digital technologies is increasing rapidly, problems online would also be expected to rise, simply as a result of increased use. Bullying also has a long history. Bullying has occurred for