More handpicked essays just for you.
Critiques of student engagement
Importance of student engagement
The negative effects participation trophies have on young kids
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
One point in someone’s life, you would get a trophy. Once in my life, I got a medal for winning a painting contest, which made me feel like a winner! But when I looked at the back of the medal, it said “Participation Medal.” I was really sad, and soon wondered why do people give participation awards to everyone? Participation Trophies can tell kids not to work hard, and soon kids will just show up in an event unprepared. So trophies should only be for winners because giving trophies to everyone will make people unprepared for an event, would cost a lot to buy millions of trophies for everyone, and giving everyone a trophy would make trophies have no value.
A trophy can prompt people to try and work hard, but giving everyone one would only make them think that you can get a trophy by just showing up in an event. An article called “Should Everyone Get a Trophy” by Lauren Tarshis talks about a boy who got trophies even though he didn’t exactly win. One quote from the article says,”Lucas admits that he didn’t exactly earn
…show more content…
these trophies for his athletic prowess.’I’m actually not so good at sports,’ he says.” This explains that kids just like Lucas can just show up to an event and get a trophy, which won’t encourage to work even harder next time. Another evidence from the same article states,”Like many kids in sports programs, Lucas got his trophies for simply showing up to practices and games.”This also tells that people give everyone trophies to keep motivating them to come, which is bad. As a result, trophies shouldn’t be given to kids who didn’t work hard to earn them. Competitions have money to buy a trophy, but a trophy for everyone can be really expensive. One article called “Losing is Good for You” written by Ashley Merryman say’s,”every day — and the “day” is one-hour long. In Southern California, a regional branch of the American Youth Soccer Organization hands out roughly 3,500 awards each season — each player gets one, while around a third get two. Nationally, A.Y.S.O. local branches typically spend as much as 12 percent of their yearly budgets on trophies.” This tells that people who held these competitions buy a lot of trophies by using their budget they have. Another support comes from the same article which tells,”It adds up: trophy and award sales are now an estimated $3 billion-a-year industry in the United States and Canada!” This support means that people are buying too many awards and trophies both in Canada and in the US. People can have a hard time buying trophies with not much funds for everyone, therefore it would easier to give trophies to the winners who earned it. A long time ago, trophies can make kids so motivated that they sign up and practice for the competition they joined, but these days trophies aren’t like what they used to be. In the same article from the last paragraph, it states,”Trophies were once rare things — sterling silver loving cups bought from jewelry stores for truly special occasions. But in the 1960s, they began to be mass-produced, marketed in catalogs to teachers and coaches, and sold in sporting-goods stores.” This quote tells us that trophies were popular items that made kids want them, but now they are bought by everyone, so they aren’t rare items. Another example is from a piece called “Should Everyone Get a Prize” by Brenda Lasevoli says,”’The trophy has to stand for something,’ Dweck told TFK. ‘If we give a trophy to everyone, then the award has no value.’ Dweck argues that giving kids trophies for particular reasons, such as improving in a sport, teaches kids that adults value hard work and trying our best.”Dweck, a Psychology Professor, also argues how trophies will be less respected in the future if given to everyone. Hence, trophies can’t make people be more competitive in events like they used to before. Even though giving trophies to everyone can have some disadvantages, giving trophies can motivate kids to play more.
But by doing this, it can also send a wrong message to kids who get them for not winning. They could think that these trophies are given for everyone. One quote from the article called “Should Everyone Get a Trophy” by Lauren Tarshis say’s,”But some experts suggest that giving trophies to everyone sends the wrong message. In life, most people are not awarded for simply doing what’s required.” So this tells that giving trophies for every child can tell them something other than what others want them to know. Another quote from the same article states,”An employee doesn’t get a raise just to arriving to work on time. Shouldn’t only the hardest working or the highest performing athletes get the accolades.”This message is what trophies try to tell kids but they can’t because people keep giving these awards to everyone just for
competing. Trophies are huge motivators for children and should be given to people who worked hard just to earn them. Trophies should motivate kids to practice rather than showing up in an event unaware about what to do. Also, there cannot be enough funds to buy a trophy for everyone which can cause problems, and if millions of these trophies are produced, then no one will care about it. So I say we should stop giving awards to everyone and start giving them to the real winners who deserve them.
Some people may argue that if everyone gets a trophy, everyone will be happy. That might be an understandable concern, however, according to people on blog.sportssignup.com, “By acknowledging everyone with the same award we’re actually celebrating no one and even undermining the efforts of those who really deserve to be recognized.” Similarly, it makes the kids who work really hard feel like there efforts were equal or worse than the efforts of those who do not try hard and do not work hard. On the other hand, if everyone gets a trophy than winners are no longer special. Kids should play sports because they enjoy playing them, not because they want a trophy. It is like one of those arcade games at the movie theater, you keep playing until you win. Another way to say this is, sports were made because they wanted to let people have fun and try to compete, but now sports is turning into the concept of everyone is a winner. Kids and adults feel like we are ruining what sports are supposed to be. In summary, many citizens think that kids should not get trophies for participation because only kids who work hard deserve
Children shouldn't be given participation trophies, this can cause false sense of confidence and it can make them expect to always be a winner in life. This can affect them every day not everyone will nail that job interview or win the game and it will be hard on them not being able to except that they lost or couldn't do it. You don't get paid to just show up at a job, you have to work. You don't win by showing up to the hockey
L. Hefferman’s article “ In Defense of Participation Trophies: Why they really do teach the right values?” it states “ An award is not really an award if everyone gets it.” (Today.com) In another article by Ashley Merryman called “Losing is Good For You” it says “Awards can be a powerful motivators but nonstop recognition does not inspire children to succeed. Instead, it can cause them to underachieve.” (New York Times Sept. 2013) It is clear, by not giving participation awards it make the children who do get awarded feel more special than if everyone gets one. Obviously, not giving participation awards to everyone gives more of a boost of self-esteem to the people who do get
Our society has shifted its beliefs in how we should treat competition in young people. The question is asked, should all kids get a participation trophy? As it may seem to be an unanswerable question, it honestly isn’t. Thought that the participation trophies may send the message that “coaches” value the kids’ efforts despite their abilities, trophies do not need to be given out. Your words mean just as much when you remind an athlete that you value them in more ways than one. Some may think trophies are a great idea because it shows that everyone’s a “winner.” However, I disagree with that idea. I believe that kids should know that they need to work their hardest in order to be rewarded and understand that not
Every kid on the football field has a trophy. Even the kids who are on the losing team. Kids’ and parents’ faces are bright with smiles, and laughter echoes throughout the field. Kids are showing off their miny trophies, each with a bronze football on them. No one is paying attention to the two feet tall, gold, first place trophy that is in the winning team’s coach’s hand. Everybody is focused on the miniature trophies. Why are these trophies so special? These are participation trophies. Every kid gets one just for participatcuing in a game. Kids started getting participation trophies in the 20th Century. They got the trophies to feel more confident about themselves. Trophies should not be given to every kid because of narcissism increase,
Handing out participation trophies does not teach kids about the real world. O’Sullivan says, “We reward them for having a parent capable of registering them for a sport.” Participation trophies are for registering and showing up the day they hand out trophies, they are not for hard
A solution could be improved by only handing out trophies to those who have earned them. There have been many studies to show the harms of participation trophies and how they can affect a child’s future. One study has shown that “if coaches use trophy presentations as a way to acknowledge each player’s unique effort or contribution, that message can be powerful” (Ross), but the fact is that many coaches will not do this and for that reason participation trophies must be banned from youth athletics. When coaches hand out these trophies they are sending the message that they don’t care and just want the children to always be acknowledged as “winners.” Participation trophies have also diminished the value of true awards, and can make the children who have put in the effort and hard work not feel the reward they should. “In the kid’s movie The Incredibles, the evil villain tries to give everybody superpowers. His theory is that if everyone is special, then no one is special” (Krumrie). This is very true in our society and needs to be implemented by regulations and rules to make sure this does not happen. These rules and regulations would be set by athletic associations across the country to ensure the use of participation trophies are not used in sports. The directors will come
A participation trophy can help a child's drive to improve. When a child plays a game and loses, but then watches the other team get a trophy they feel that they suck and won't try to improve. Once they get a participation trophy they make the child feel like they did good and that next time if they get better they will get a bigger trophy for winning and not losing. For instance, “Further, studies also tell us that children who participate in sports get better…”(Huffington 1). This exemplifies that children who participate feel the drive to get better at the sport. When inferring that since they participated they are getting an award if makes them feel like they did good, and then they want to get even better to get a better reward. Thus making the kids get better at the sport showing that participation trophies are beneficial to children, but there are more opportunities to show how they are
Todays generation of kids have been crafted to expect praise for everyday tasks and have become entitled all because of something many people thought was harmless, participation trophies. If you ask anyone, they have probably recieved a participation trophy at least once in their life and some will think it was a good thing, but others may beg to differ. In my opinion participation trophies are a bad tool in life because it goes along and is a big part of the we are all winners concept. Trophies should be a symbol of accomplishing something not a symbol of participation in an activity and a few people have written about their opinion about this situation varying from critical writers, to college athletes from around the country here are
John Darns worked hard his entire soccer season for his trophy; he attended every practice, went beyond the required off season training, and always left the field knowing he left everything he possessed on there. With grass stains in his shorts and bloody scrapes on his knees, he was finally rewarded with the championship trophy, that beautiful two feet tall golden trophy with a man on top in the middle of kicking what would be a perfect goal. Yes, he wore that orange tiger on his jersey well; he truly deserved that trophy. Yet a few feet away, are The Black Hawks, the team who lost every game the entire season, getting an almost identical trophy for participating in the league. They did not work as hard: they practiced less than half as much as John’s team, and they are rewarded almost equally to make sure everyone feels like a winner. The concept that every child deserves a blue ribbon or a trophy for trying their best plagues generation Y every day of their young lives.
For example Carol Dweck, a psychology professor at Stanford University in California, said in the article “Should Everyone Get a Prize?” written by Brenda Iasevoli that, “‘The trophy has to mean something,’ Dweck told TFK. ‘If we give a trophy to everyone, then the award has no value.’” This shows how if everyone gets a prize, there is no point in getting one at all. It means nothing to have it when everybody has one as well. Additionally, Dr Michelle Anthony an author and psychologist and Karen Coffin a coach who writes about youth sports agreed in the article “Should Everyone Get a Trophy?” written by Lauren Tarshis that “... trophies can lose their meaning when everyone gets one.” This explains how it is senseless to get the trophy because it no longer means anything to the child who receives it. As a result, giving everyone a reward takes away the
In the op-ed “Losing is Good for You”, the author talks about how participation trophies can lead to narcissism and entitlement later in life. Children begin looking forward to getting a trophy at the end of a season, no matter what. This belief has kept with the children into adulthood. Now, many people feel as if they should automatically get a promotion, even if they have done nothing to earn it.
Naturally, some children are better at sports than others. On a team which does not give out participation trophies, but gives out trophies for hitting the farthest or running the fastest, the child who does not fall into any of those categories can be left feeling useless and inadequate. A child who gives 100% and dosent get rewarded for it is more likely to give up the sport completely than if he were to be given a trophy for engaging and participating. Also, when every child receives a trophy, it can be used to teach the importance of teamwork and the necessity of every individual on a team, not just the talented ones. Every child receiving a participation trophy weaves a common thread throughout the team to hold it together.
Should kids get trophies just for participation? That's the big question. People have different ideas on this subject. Today's society has changed its ideas in how we should treat competition in young people. It used to be that only kids who have done good in the sport receive trophies, but now, everyone who participates gets one. Many people like think that only kids that have achieved excellence in their sport should receive trophies, while others believe all participating kids should get one. I, for one, believe that kids should only get trophies if they have achieved excellence in their sport.
Before World War II with high tensions and lurking dangers gay men in New York had to be careful about exposing about their sexuality, so they adopted a way to sign to others like them: wearing red neckties. This was referred to as flagging, and was not the only way those within the gay community used clothing and items to safely express their sexuality. Lesbian women would often gift those they were courting with violets, and men in England during the Victorian era would pin green carnations to their lapels. While their were those who were more bold in their expression through clothing it’s easy to see why so many men and women preferred subtlety.