Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gay civil rights movement
Gay civil rights movement
Gay rights movement research paper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gay civil rights movement
Before World War II with high tensions and lurking dangers gay men in New York had to be careful about exposing about their sexuality, so they adopted a way to sign to others like them: wearing red neckties. This was referred to as flagging, and was not the only way those within the gay community used clothing and items to safely express their sexuality. Lesbian women would often gift those they were courting with violets, and men in England during the Victorian era would pin green carnations to their lapels. While their were those who were more bold in their expression through clothing it’s easy to see why so many men and women preferred subtlety. Screening during enrollment required soldiers to answer questions about their sexual orientation, …show more content…
Originally called Society of Fools, the organization’s goals were to unify the gay community, have leaders rise within the community, and assist those who were victimized due to oppression. Hay structured the Mattachine Society so that it resembles that of the Communist Party with multiple levels of membership, cells, and oaths of secrecy. In 1952 one of the founding members Dale Jennings was arrested and charged for lewd behavior when he invited an undercover cop, looking to apprehend gay men, to stay the night at his apartment, Hay and the rest of the Mattachine Society decided it was time to fight back. Contesting the charges against Jennings the Mattachine Society raised funds to hire Jennings a criminal defense attorney, George Shibley, and distributed news of the trial across the nation. With Shibley arguing “that the only true perverts in the courtroom were the cruising policemen intent upon entrapment” (Victory: the Triumphant Gay Revolution, by Linda R. Hirshman) Jennings and the Mattachine Society successfully won the case. News of the victory spread and the Mattachine Society’s numbers …show more content…
Upon moving to San Francisco from New York Milk quickly became a community leader and in 1973 Milk declared that he would be running for the San Francisco Board of supervisors. Milk was known for strongly advocating for gay rights in his campaigns, and often had it as a central point in his speeches. Losing the election but determined Milk would run again in 1975, only to yet again lose, but just barely this time. Since his first election Milk had become well known and had gained many powerful political allies including: San Francisco’s mayor George Moscone. In fact Milk had gained so many followers within Castro that he was “known affectionately as the ‘Mayor of Castro Street’”. (Harvey Milk, Biography.com). Milk was finally victorious when he ran yet again in 1977, but it wasn’t without opposition. Dan White a man with a more conservative viewpoint also on the board, who frequently clashed with Milk, eventually leading him to enter city hall with a gun and shoot both Milk and his long-time ally George Moscone. In wake of the trial where White was convicted of manslaughter rather than murder protests that were once peaceful quickly became violent, with police for eventually taking action and leaving numerous people with
The Times of Harvey Milk suggests that the experiences of lesbians, gay men, bisexuals, and transgender people in the 1980s and 1990s reflect on the dangers of visibility. While the election of the first openly gay politician, Harvey Milk, was a first, representing change in it’s own, the murder of Harvey Milk spoke even louder, specifically the short amount of time his murderer, Dan White, was sentenced. The film suggests that while being openly gay at the time, while accepted by some, remained and still remains a danger. Public leaders within the movement experienced violence, discrimination, and in Harvey Milk’s case murder. Even so, it is shown that with every injustice the community grows bigger and stronger, never losing the support of its community and allies. This is shown in the film by the silent, candlelight parade of 45,000 people on the night of the murder, followed by an angry, violent, riot following the sentencing of his murderer. Though Milk was murdered, a decade before he would have never been elected, he wouldn’t have had support, this was a pivotal point in the growth of the movement.
The Mayor of Castro Street is an inspiring yet emotional and tragic story that takes a look at Harvey Milk’s life and the way it influenced the Gay Liberation Movement. The book goes into detail about Harvey as a person and how that affected his political campaign. In this review I’ll be going over what the book was about, the fear gay people felt and how unfair things were for people in the LGBT community in the 1970’s.
In 1978 after mayor George Moscone and a member of the board Harvey Milk were assassinated, Feinstein decided to run for mayor. Feinstein won in 1979 due to her promises of non-tolerate legal and social reforms, and was reelected in 1983 for a second four-year term. City and State magazine named her “America’s Most Effective Mayor” in 1987 (Leiman). While she was the mayor of San Francisco, Feinstein’s main concern was public safety. She cut the emergency police response down to be four times faster than before she was in office.
Thomas B. Stoddard’s “Gay Marriages: Make Them Legal” is a successfully written argument with some minor flaws in technique. Stoddard uses this article to present his major claim, or central thesis, on the reasons gay marriage should be legalized. He presents his argument using minor claims. In a lecture on February 2, 2005, James McFadden stated a minor claim is the secondary claim in an argument. Stoddard uses minor claims in his discussion of homosexual people being denied their rights by the government and by others who discriminate against them. He also discusses how love and the desire for commitment play a big part in the argument for and against gay marriage.
In his work about gay life in New York City, George Chauncey seeks to dispel the various myths about the gay lifestyle before the Civil Rights era of the 60’s. He distills the misconceptions into three major myths: “…isolation, invisibility, and internalization” (Chauncey 1994, 2). He believes a certain image has taken in the public mind where gays did not openly exist until the 60’s, and that professional historians have largely ignored this era of sexual history. He posits such ideas are simply counterfactual. Using the city of New York, a metropolitan landscape where many types of people confluence together, he details a thriving gay community. Certainly it is a community by Chauncey’s reckoning; he shows gay men had a large network of bar, clubs, and various other cultural venues where not only gay men intermingled the larger public did as well. This dispels the first two principle myths that gay men were isolated internally from other gay men or invisible to the populace. As to the internalization of gay men, they were not by any degree self-loathing. In fact, Chauncey shows examples of gay pride such a drag queen arrested and detained in police car in a photo with a big smile (Chauncey 1994, 330). Using a series of personal interviews, primary archival material from city repositories, articles, police reports, and private watchdog groups, Chauncey details with a preponderance of evidence the existence of a gay culture in New York City, while at the same time using secondary scholarship to give context to larger events like the Depression and thereby tie changes to the gay community to larger changes in the society.
The “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy means that service men and women are not questioned about their sexual orientation, and they are not to talk about their sexual orientation. In 1993 U. S. Congress passed a federal law forbidding the military service of openly gay men and women serving in the military. Even though Congrees created the law, it was up to the military leadership to carry it out. Opposing viewpoints states:
Mattachine, an activist group in New York, called for a meeting July 16 to organize around gay liberation. Dick Leitsch, an old time leader, tried to lead the meeting. “ Acceptance of gays and lesbians would take time,” he explained, but one young man shouted, “we don't want acceptance, we have got to radi...
Harvey Milk, one of the first openly gay elected officials, was assassinated in San Francisco by a former supervisor, Dan White, on the 27th of November, 1978. He was killed after a disagreement over White’s position in the government and White’s intolerance for homosexuals. White entered city hall and killed George Moscone, the mayor, and Harvey Milk. He later turned himself into the police station he used to work at. The assassination of Harvey Milk was unjustified because he was killed over an argument and his inspiration provided to the LGBT community was taken abruptly. His murder was unjustified because he was killed over a spot in government, his homosexuality, and his voice was taken from the very people he used it to help. Despite some people finding his views too ahead of their time, Harvey Milk was a good man who did not deserve to have his life ended in such a violent way.
“Do you know what the Gays did to me now? They took away my right to vote!”
Prior to the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy the United States and its citizens were not very tolerant to openly gay, lesbian and bisexual individuals. Prior to World War II gays were not specifically targeted for exclusion from the military, although sodomy was considered a criminal offense as early as the Revolutionary War. However by the beginning of World War II, the military had shifted focus from excluding acts that were considered homosexual to focusing on members that were considered homosexual. In 1942, the military issued its first regulation that contained a paragraph defining the difference between a homosexual and a normal person. In fact, this regulation also described procedures for rejecting gay draftees. (Martinez, Hebl, & Law, 2012). The military based these procedures on medical rationale and psychiatric screening to...
The persecution of homosexuals during this age of McCarthy proved exactly how vulnerable they were to attack and discrimination. Out of those persecutions came some of the first organized “gay rights” groups, known as Homophile organizations, the first two being the Mattachine Society and the Daughters of Bilibis (who focused their efforts on Lesbian rights). Founded in 1950 by Harry Hay, the...
Harvey Milk said, “If a bullet should enter my brain, let that bullet destroy every closet door.”(Aretha 83). Harvey Milk was the first gay politician that moved people’s hearts. He changed the way people thought about gay people back in the 1970’s. Defending homosexuals from criticism, he civilized them with the people. Since the background of homosexuality was harsh which affected Harvey Milk’s early life, he took the action to process of becoming civilized as an officer, and he left many legacies.
In the 1940s, homophobia was extremely prevalent in the United States. People who were openly gay were often stigmatized. “Homosexuality was discussed as ‘an aspect of three personality disorders: psychopaths who were sexual perverts, paranoid personalities who suffered from homosexual panic, and schizoid personalities’ who displayed gay symptoms” (Kaiser 29). Many regulations and practices discriminated against gays. The military found homosexuality to be a direct threat to strength and safety of the U.S. government and the American people, in general. In 1941 the Army and the Selective Service banned homosexuals from participation in the war (Kaiser 29). All major religions considered it sinful and throughout the country, more and more people found it to be immoral. Life was hard for homosexuals in the early and mid-twentieth century. They were forced to hide their sexuality in order to escape derision or imprisonment.
Harvey Milk Bernard campaigned as a gay populist against the politically conventional gay democratic establishment. Milk began the personal transformation from financial analyst to gay political activist before the 1960s. He encouraged a gay community where many were afraid to live openly. Milk was open and came forward with his decisions and being gay. He wanted other people to feel like it's okay to live freely and be themselves.
“The unprecedented growth of the gay community in recent history has transformed our culture and consciousness, creating radically new possibilities for people to ‘come out’ and live more openly as homosexuals”(Herdt 2). Before the 1969 Stonewall riot in New York, homosexuality was a taboo subject. Research concerning homosexuality emphasized the etiology, treatment, and psychological adjustment of homosexuals. Times have changed since 1969. Homosexuals have gained great attention in arts, entertainment, media, and politics. Yesterday’s research on homosexuality has expanded to include trying to understand the different experiences and situations of homosexuals (Ben-Ari 89-90).