Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Views on school dress code
Importance of dress code in school
Views on school dress code
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Public School Dress Codes School dress codes have been a very controversial topic lately. With social media helping to spread the stories of students that feel like their schools have taken these rules too far people all around the country are outraged over public school dress codes and how they oversexualize pre-teen and teenage girls and limit the clothes students can wear. To help fully understand this hot button issue and establish a point of view I will speak of some of the history of dress codes, why I believe they are unnecessarily restrictive, inconsistent, and unfair, and some arguments that are promoting these codes. The first dress code laws were established in 1969 by the US Supreme Court. The case that brought this law was the …show more content…
Typical male attire might include a t-shirt and jeans, both acceptable at almost any school. Lower necklines, sleeveless shirts, and hems above the knee are elements of most female clothes. But these aspects are banned from school making it harder for girls to find clothes that are acceptable. This not only limits their shopping options but requires the conscious awareness of what is and isn’t allowed at school while buying clothes. According to a study by the Education Partnership Inc. into the effect of dress codes on test scores, the result were inconclusive and mixed. There are several more studies just like this one proving that strict dress codes don’t really do much except anger students. Now that we have the looked back to the past, learned about the present, and have evaluated how unnecessarily restrictive, inconsistent, and unfair dress codes are let’s look at some of the arguments promoting these rigid dress …show more content…
However what they fail to acknowledge is college is about learning, so there is no dress code. Yes there are certain days, like when you are giving a speech, which you will want to look professional but overall people don’t focus on things like that because frankly nobody cares. Even in professional office settings more often than not shoulders and collarbones and knees are acceptable. Another argument for these strict dress codes is that without them people would dress in a way that would distract their peers. When, in reality, it is the responsibility of each student to control his or her mind and focus in class. Doubting students’ ability to control their own minds is an insult to them. It suggests that these students are not able to control their thoughts and other people must change to fit their needs. This isn’t how the world works and if these students think the world around them will change to fit their needs they are sorely mistaken, and definitely not college or career ready. These young adults should be held responsible for their own
Life is full of distractions and, for high school students, inappropriate clothing has the potential to grab much attention. However, does the matter of clothing warrant strict rules? I agree that, like alcohol, the students’ attire should have rules regarding whether or not the choices in clothing are suitable for a public school setting. I also agree that violators of school rules should receive punishment for their lack of compliance to the school policies. However, there is a fine line. Some schools, like Carroll High School, are taking dress codes too far. One rule in particular hinders the students’ ability to wear pants with holes in them. It makes sense that holes located in certain places might cause a...
Issues involving the apparel enforcements, including sexism, repressed self- identity, and punishment issues will be discussed within this paper. Literature Review The First Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the creation of laws offensive to religious groups and ensures their ability to freely practice, grants the freedom of speech, comply the freedom of the press, and allows the right to assemble peacefully. Adopted on December 15, 1791, it has served the United States of America for over one hundred years. Freedom of expression is a controversial topic when applied to the school dress code.
"Why Dress Codes and Why Now?" Clearinghouse on Educational Policy and Management. Web. 13 Dec. 2011.
The belief that public schools should enforce strict dress codes has been the topic of many controversial and heated debates throughout history. Although it is uncommon for public schools to require uniforms, every school has some type of dress code. Elizabeth Forward High School in Elizabeth, Pennsylvania, is no different than the rest of the nation. When caught violating the dress code, some teachers will choose to ignore it, whereas others will send the student to the high school office. If sent to the office, students are penalized with a day of in-school suspension instead of being allowed to call for a change of clothes. At first glance, the prohibition of tank tops, jeans with holes above the knee, and shorts and skirts shorter than fingertip length, among many other guidelines, seems reasonable, but after further reconsideration, it is clear that the dress code at Elizabeth Forward High School is ridiculous and hypocritical. I think that Elizabeth Forward High School should lift the harsh policies because of the temperature fluctuation in the building throughout the school year, recent trends among teens, and the hypocrisy associated with the dress code.
Kiracofe explains that codes back in 1901 were much stricter than today’s dress codes. Males could only wear suspenders and a suit coat, and women were required to wear two petticoats and dresses two inches above the ankle. Then the author addresses dress codes in regards to religion explaining how some world religions require clothing to cover every inch of their body. Kiracofe tells the readers how the First Amendment contains two religion clauses, the first The Establishment Clause and the second being The Free Exercise Clause. The author goes on to explain that employers can deny religious dress to employees if the attire would threaten the health of employees or the employer.
In the 2015 article on The Atlantic on The Sexism of School Dress Codes, stating that "Many of these protests have criticized the dress codes as sexist in that they unfairly target girls by body-shaming and blaming them for promoting sexual harassment. Documented cases show female students being chastised by school officials, sent home, or barred from attending events like prom." (Zhou, l.) There are more dress code policies for the females compared to the males. For example, girls should not use backless shirts, no spaghetti tops, no crop-tops that exposes the stomach, no short shorts, no miniskirts, etc. Boys on the other hand have no specific dress code policies. Dress codes may come off as sexist for women and they get insulted by it. An article on the problem with dress code from The Daily Princetonian stating "- women are policed so that they are no longer distracting to men, while men, if policed at all, are never told to change for the benefit of the opposite sex. The most prominent example that comes to mind when thinking of male-specific supplements to dress codes relates to sagging pants, an urban trend where pants are worn low to expose many inches worth of boxers. Efforts to ban these practices have never once mentioned how visible boxers would tortuously distract nearby females. Rather, they focus on visible underwear being inappropriate for a learning or work environment.", based on that article, dress codes seem to be a little too specific on what girls should or should not be allowed to wear, while boys only have a few dress code policies to worry
The Dress Code is also to help from distractions like weird, strange clothes, it often distracts the students from learning. Not only that, but in High School there is large groups of gangs, and they can’t wear clothing that represents them and wear anything offensive, because then less violence will occur.
According to greatschools.org, “Enforcing a strict dress code can place the focus of school on clothing and rules, rather than on education.” Most schools have specific uniforms that a child must wear in order to attend. Many children that go to school, have single parents and / or more than one ...
Dress code is put into place to keep students from being bullied for how they dress and how some people may treat them different depending on what they wear. There is a lot of evidence that show students losing time in the class room because they are too worried about there personal apparel. David Brunsma, a sociologist who wrote Uniforms in Public Schools: A Decade of Research and Debate in 2005, says,
At Penn State women usually had to wear a dress or skirt and men, a tie and jacket to evening meals in the dining hall. Students had to dress as if they were going out to eat at a five star restaurant just to eat the grossly unremarkable food in the dining hall, every single night (“Authority”). This was an unfair to students because the campus was their home and simply wished to be comfortable at the dining area in their “home”. The dress code was quickly abolished and is now not even in the vocabulary at most major universities. Without the Free Speech Movement there is a small chance that any student, at any university would have had the audacity to challenge dress codes. In fact, at Berkeley in the 1990’s, Luis Andrew “The Naked Guy” Martinez, fought to justify wear nothing at all
America’s school systems seem to have many issues concerning students receiving a quality education without distraction. A current debate argues weather a dress code policy is efficient or takes away from student’s expression. Administrators at schools should regulate a dress code policy because the system improves discipline and student’s attention, reduces social conflict and peer pressure related to appearance, and dress code provides a more serious learning environment.
Every morning students are faced with the decision of what to wear. However, many students automatically have to rule things out because of the dress code policy at their school. Dress codes constantly restrict students from being themselves and having control of their body and what they put on it. It says in the constitution, we have the right to express ourselves without being oppressed and punished. Some might say they have plenty of room to express themselves, but in reality they don't.
The first dress code was sent to be decided by the Supreme Court. The problem was that students were protesting against the Vietnam War by wearing black wristbands which educators thought to be disrupting to the classroom. However, these codes help prepare kids for the real world where they must dress to the appropriate attire. Research shows, that students learn better when there is a dress code in place and the staff says many students are less worried about what they are wearing and focusing more on completing their school work. Dress codes also introduce a healthy learning environment for kids and help reduce violence. Other statistics have changes as well. Attendance has gone up and gang violence has gone down. Some students are feeling uncomfortable and are saying students are going to have to start dressing the same due to the dress code. On the same note, students also feel that their individualism has gone down because there are so many restrictions on what they can and cannot
Dress codes and uniforms have been deemed legal by the United States Supreme Court. As long as the dress code or uniform regulations pass a four-pronged test. Opposition for school uniforms holds fast to preserving the sanctity of freedom of speech. The supreme court ultimately has decided that dress codes and uniforms do not violate the freedom of speech. In Harold W. Mitchell and John C. Knechtle’s study of the first amendment rights and dress code, they note that in 1968 in Ginsberg v. New York the supreme court ruled that “[t]he state has power to control the conduct of children that reaches beyond its scope of authority over adults (491).” Mitchell and Knechtle go further into explaining the 4 pronged rule the supreme court uses to judge if a rule is against the freedom of
While dress codes are a necessity in schools to regulate what is and is not appropriate for the learning environment, the fact that they place blame on females for how they are treated because of their clothing is completely sexist and unfair. Hardly ever is a boy busted for wearing athletic shorts or bro-tanks when he should not be, but as soon as a girl wears leggings or shows her shoulders, she is persecuted and given punishment. This is about as unfair as school systems can be, and it also sends the message to girls that what they perceive as being cute and fashionable is perceived by others as “offensive” and that it is their fault for anything bad that happens to them. These ideas should be changed so girls do not have to feel guilty and boys can stop thinking that their behavior in these situations is acceptable.