Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How is rhetoric used today
Using rhetoric in everyday life
Personal attributes leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How is rhetoric used today
Deception in Politics In recent discussions of politics, a controversial issue has been whether or not politicians rely on deception in order to persuade and manipulate voters. One one hand, some may argue that politicians do not use deceptive tactics to gain support from voters. These people argue that politicians are simply exaggerating some facts in order to support their own campaign. However, others argue that this is immoral and can lead voters to believe false information. My own view is that being a politician is an art of deception which is learned, not a talent that a person is born with. Years of learning how to persuade and deceive an audience go into the creation of a successful politician. Because this deceptive practice can …show more content…
This is simply a part of human nature and that is okay. It is a part of our biological autopilot system where, “statements that align with our existing beliefs cause us to feel good and we want to believe them” (Tsipursky). Lying or exaggerating to hide the truth has become an overwhelmingly popular political tactic. In fact, this tactic was used frequently in the last presidential election in the United States. Politicians embellish their ideas in order to win over the general public. People respond well to it, and that is why it continues to work. For example, if a politician wanted us to believe that all immigrants are awful people, they will use every example of immigrants who are criminals. However, they will never mention that the majority of immigrants are good people who are simply searching for better lives for themselves and their families. A few examples of the other persuasive tactics Trump and Clinton in particular used include their rampant use of positive association words and exaggeration of their capabilities of accomplishing large tasks that people want done (Smith). These tactics may seem trivial but they do have a major impact on who ends up getting elected. Politicians know that using positive language and exaggerating who they are and what they are capable of will win over the …show more content…
"Lie or Lose? Deception Has Become a Political Survival Technique." The Independent, 17 Dec. 2015, www.independent.co.uk/voices/lie-or-lose-deception-has-become-a-political-survival-technique-a6777481.html.
Smith, Kyle. "The Persuasion Tactics Trump and Clinton Are Using to Manipulate Voters." New York Post, 10 Sept. 2016, nypost.com/2016/09/10/the-persuasion-tactics-trump-and-clinton-are-using-to-manipulate-voters/.
Tsipursky, Gleb. "The Brain Science of Political Deception in the Election." Psychology Today, 29 Mar. 2017,
In order for a politician to make his way up the ranks, he usually needs to build a strong intra-ethnic coalition followed by inter-ethnic support. This can be a difficult task because the the politician has to please everyone, which makes him seem “bland” to his original supporters.
Summary – It is quite difficult to avoid any persuasive acts while resisting them at the same time. Being prepared with knowledge of how easy it is to be manipulated, controlled, seduced, etc. allows us to open up to the use of rhetoric.
Richard Gunderman asks the question, "Isn 't there something inherently wrong with lying, and “in his article” Is Lying Bad for Us?" Similarly, Stephanie Ericsson states, "Sure I lie, but it doesn 't hurt anything. Or does it?" in her essay, "The Ways We Lie.” Both Gunderman and Ericsson hold strong opinions in regards to lying and they appeal to their audience by incorporating personal experiences as well as references to answer the questions that so many long to confirm.
Many people will argue that honesty will make a person go far in life; however, people who practice artifice succeed substantially. Artifice is a clever or artful skill especially used to trick or deceive others. In the excerpt Empire of Illusion, Chris Hedges states that,” The most essential skill in political theater and a consumer culture is artifice.” I profoundly agree with Hedges’ position on artifice.
As John Ruskin once said, “The essence of lying is in deception, not in words.” This essence is debated in “The Ways We Lie”, written by Stephanie Ericsson, and “Doubts about Doublespeak”, written by William Lutz. In “The Ways We Lie”, Ericsson talks about the different ways people lie on a day to day basis. By comparison, in “Doubts about Doublespeak”, Lutz discusses the different forms of doublespeak that many individuals frequently use. Lutz considers doublespeak as a language that distorts the meaning of words in order to deceive another person, and only “pretends to communicate” (83). Although both authors agree that lying is about the use of deceptive language, Ericsson describes this use of language as occasionally being necessary,
The society that we live in today is built around lies. Banks lying to customers in order to feed the capitalist mindset, politicians lying to citizens in order to gain power, and charities taking donations with open arms however are stingy when giving back to the cause. The common reason why these organizations lie is to hide what they truly are. People also deceive others in order to hide who they truly are. From a young age, lying becomes engraved into one’s mind, we are taught to walk, talk, and lie.
The article “Rejecting All Lies: Immanuel Kant by Sissela Bok also presents the same argument. Sissela Bok presents the ideas and viewpoints of Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher. Kant believed that lying was bad and that “truthfulness is statements which cannot be avoided is the formal duty of an individual to everyone, however great may be the disadvantage.” He believed lying was always bad no matter the situation. Kant said that lying “vitiates the source of law,” or makes the source of law weaker. Our whole purpose of the government is to serve justice and if everyone is lying in court, it gets harder to serve justice. The purpose of the government would not be fulfilled if people lie. According to Kant, lying also “harms the liar himself, by destroying his human dignity and making him more worthless even than a small thing.” Kant says lying makes the liar lose his or her pride and honor. And I think it probably makes the liar feel bad and makes them feel guilty. In the article “Teens Do their Share of Lying” by Loretta Ragsdell, a quote from Sabrina, a college freshman, takes about how she lied...
To begin with, artifice can work so easily as long as the people can be manipulated. If they’re told what they want to hear, the population eventually fights for that person with all of their being. No one’s ever absolutely sure whether the politician’s words are truthful or not, but they take the chance anyway. At the beginning of Hedges’ excerpt, he explains that political leaders are some of the countless individuals who use
American writer and speaker, Dorothy Allison, once said “things come apart so easily when they have been held together by lies” (Allison). One of the first lessons that kids are taught is to be honest and always tell the truth. Being honest is not always easy, but the result of lying is much worse then telling the truth. In Animal Farm, George Orwell demonstrates how lies and deceit will ruin society if everyone always believes what the leader says, people lie to themself, and if laws are changed to benefit the group in power.
John Ruskin once said, “The essence of lying is in deception, not in words”. With regards to what Ruskin talks about, deception is an act that Americans have lovingly embraced. It has been so embraced that we don 't even know if we are deceiving or being deceived. Stephanie Ericsson’s essay, “The Ways We Lie”, claims that “our acceptance of lies becomes a cultural cancer that eventually shrouds and reorders reality until moral garbage becomes as invisible as water is to fish” (343). In a sense, the relation between Ruskin’s quote and Ericsson’s claim is they both describe the current state of the American culture. The modern American culture is full of deceit and lies whether it’s to protect someone or hide a secret. And yet, we still accept
Most of us use the art of persuasive thinking every day in one way or another. However, most of the time we do not even realizes that we are using persuasion to influence that person. Unless we use the power of persuasion intended for whatever purpose such as to sell something or influence your intended target of something. There are many ways to be persuasive, but first must understand a few things such as human nature, thinking carefully and learning to control our emotions. When we are trying to persuade someone to accept our message, we are using the art of persuasion. One way to persuade someone into your way of thinking is to appeal to his or her pride is a deceitful persuasion.
According to “Do Politicians Lie More Today”, the author, Maria Clemmitt, a veteran social-policy reporter, confirms that it is certain that politicians are capable of lying and blending in with the public and can still get away with it due to the First Amendment. Politics use lying as a strategy in order to obtain power. That is their goal and their purpose of combining camouflage and lying. It’s seen in the article with the examples provided by Maria Clemmitts that for years, politicians have been throwing false accusations towards other political members in order so that candidate can be looked as a better politician. This false information leads to mislead votes, and the result is the public being used for politicians benefit: money and power.
Deception is sometimes used by researchers when they conduct psychological experiments. Deception occurs when the participant is misled about the purpose, design, of the experiment, or when the researcher uses deliberate misleading to persuade the subject into believing a certain view (McLeod). Many people believe deception is ethically wrong, and psychologists should not use it to obtain important information. I believe psychologists should be able to use deception if the participant is not psychologically harmed. It is believed that deception is the only way we can obtain true information (Connolly). The knowledge we are able to obtain about psychological tendencies outweighs the temporary effects of deception.
We lie all the time, lying is not something new to our culture. We lie to our parents, we lie to our friends, we even lie to our significant other, but why do we do it? There is not one set reason on why we lie but they can vary from an insignificant reason to something more nefarious. A good operational definition of a lie is “A lie is a false statement to a person or group made by another person or group who knows it is not the whole truth, intentionally.” (Freitas-Magalhães) We have been raised to know that lying is usually a bad thing, and it’s better to tell the truth, not to mention the circumstances get exponentially worse if you are caught lying. No one wants to be labeled as a liar, or untrustworthy. This may sound unorthodox but I personally think lying is perfectly fine; depending on the situation. If you have a prima-facie duty to be dishonest it’s perfectly acceptable. Ross says a prima facie duty or obligation is an actual duty. “One’s actual duty is what one ought to do all things considered.” (Carson) I’m not the only one who finds this too be true. Ross would also agree with me, He says “Lying is permissible or obligatory when the duty not to lie conflicts with a more important or equal important prima facie duty.” (Carson) As I was doing research on this topic I did read one extremely compelling argument on why we ought not to lie. Aristotle basically said a person who makes a defense for lying could never be trusted. (King.)
This sort of lie is known as a white lie. White lies are accepted by the public since they are useful for everyone who needs to hear one. Little white lies are frequently overlooked. The general public tells such a significant number of white lies they scarcely perceive themselves as lying at all. For instance, white lies incorporate telling others they are fine (when they are not), they like somebody's hair (when they honestly do not), and so on. These lies build up, one on top of another, making a slippery slope. Once individuals disclose to themselves these lies are innocuous, telling larger lies becomes plainly