Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Controversies of the first amendment
Controversies of the first amendment
The first amendment essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Controversies of the first amendment
Chameleons : Do We Benefit From Them ? What happens when the First Amendment starts affecting the public in a negative way? For 226 years, the citizens of the United States have had the right to free speech and throughout these decades, the First Amendment has been an law that can be seen as a valued feature separates compared to other states. Freedom of Speech is a tool to benefit the people, a way so that the public could be heard. Yet, these past generations have abused the power of free speech. It’s an issue that has become harder to resolve since it interferes with Constitution. With the help of social media's, this arisen issue involves the public being manipulated by individuals protected by the First Amendments. People obscuring (bending …show more content…
According to “Do Politicians Lie More Today”, the author, Maria Clemmitt, a veteran social-policy reporter, confirms that it is certain that politicians are capable of lying and blending in with the public and can still get away with it due to the First Amendment. Politics use lying as a strategy in order to obtain power. That is their goal and their purpose of combining camouflage and lying. It’s seen in the article with the examples provided by Maria Clemmitts that for years, politicians have been throwing false accusations towards other political members in order so that candidate can be looked as a better politician. This false information leads to mislead votes, and the result is the public being used for politicians benefit: money and power. What is commonly seen with High School students is that they lean towards these lying politicians because of their money. These students believe that money is a way of fitting in and if their elected leaders have power then they can benefit from that. Take a look out Donald Trump for example. Throughout the 2017 presidential election, Trump had a whole lot to say about Hillary Clinton and the issues he believed was wrong with the government. For those he manipulated, he made them believe just because he had money that the rest of the United States would prosper from it. Take a look at today, what has he done to benefit the United States? All work done by him is to gain him and other fellow politicians money and power. As a recent graduate from High School, these accusations made come from experience seen from fellow classmates who voted Donald Trump as a “joke”. As funny as this joke is, now the United States has a President with one of the lowest presidential rating percentages, because the public fell for the manipulations of people obscuring their true identities and intentions. Taylor N. Carlson and Jaime E. Settle’s published their study in an
The first amendment is being abused by more people now than ever before. People like to shout, “First Amendment” when they find themselves in a controversial situation because of certain things they wrote or spoke about. People are being less responsible for their actions and are blaming the constitution for their slip-ups. In “Free-Speech Follies” by Stanley Fish, Fish addresses the First Amendment issue. Fish claims that people use the First Amendment to try to get themselves out of trouble or criticism and that they need to start being responsible for their actions and need to start having a sense of judgment.
Since its ratification in December of 1791, the Second Amendment has created a major controversy as Americans have been arguing over the meaning and interpretation of the amendment. Due to the controversy, “angry polarization and distortion, rather
This source supplies my paper with more evidence of how freedom of speech is in a dangerous place. American has always stood by freedom of speech, and to see how social media platforms try to manipulate and take off as the choose to increase slight bias is unpleasant. The article establishes a worry to the fellow readers that hold freedom of speech so high and that it is at risk. The article manages to explain why freedom of speech is in danger, and why there should be no limits to free speech.
Freedom of speech has been a controversial issue throughout the world. Our ability to say whatever we want is very important to us as individuals and communities. Although freedom of speech and expression may sometimes be offensive to other people, it is still everyone’s right to express his/her opinion under the American constitution which states that “congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or the press”. Although this amendment gave people the right express thier opinions, it still rests in one’s own hands as how far they will go to exercise that right of freedom of speech.
For more than 200 years, the First Amendment has been at the heart of United States’ history and most successful research in liberty. The history of America’s nation is the story of the constant struggle to extend the promise of freedom more fully and fairly to each and every citizen. By looking freedom of speech, democratic government is not that important to have it without these rights. People prefer democracy to avoid tyranny or suppression of others. The citizens of the United States need to protect these rights because they are fundamental to the human being to be free, have liberty. What Founding Fathers did is not enough, however, United States’ citizens has to work together for a better place, a better country, a better government.
Freedom of speech is the right of civilians to openly express their opinions without constant interference by the government. For the last few years, the limitations and regulations on freedom of speech have constantly increased. This right is limited by use of expression to provoke violence or illegal activities, libel and slander, obscene material, and proper setting. These limitations may appear to be justified, however who decides what is obscene and inappropriate or when it is the wrong time or place? To have so many limits and regulations on freedom of speech is somewhat unnecessary. It is understood that some things are not meant to be said in public due to terrorist attacks and other violent acts against our government, but everything should not be seen as a threat. Some people prefer to express themselves angrily or profanely, and as long as it causes no har...
According to “Freedom of Speech” by Gerald Leinwand, Abraham Lincoln once asked, “Must a government, of necessity, be too strong for the liberties of its people, or too weak to maintain its own existence (7)?” This question is particularly appropriate when considering what is perhaps the most sacred of all our Constitutionally guaranteed rights, freedom of expression. Lincoln knew well the potential dangers of expression, having steered the Union through the bitterly divisive Civil War, but he held the Constitution dear enough to protect its promises whenever possible (8).
...of nations, countries, cities, towns, and individuals can be severely harmed and damaged if there is no control on the information being disbursed through the vast communication devices available. While everyone cites the right to freedom of speech, it is sometimes forgotten about the part that states as long as it doesn’t harm another person is often overlooked.
Examining Trump’s rhetoric and past actions, it becomes clear that Trump’s ability to be the leader of America, especially in today’s already heated world climate, becomes questionable. When even the members of his own party refuse to endorse him and claim that he is not qualified to run a country, the general public needs to sit back and question his integrity. In Trump’s past, he has proven to be an insensitive, racist, greedy business man. Why would he prove to be any different once elected to office?
No other democratic society in the world permits personal freedoms to the degree of the United States of America. Within the last sixty years, American courts, especially the Supreme Court, have developed a set of legal doctrines that thoroughly protect all forms of the freedom of expression. When it comes to evaluating the degree to which we take advantage of the opportunity to express our opinions, some members of society may be guilty of violating the bounds of the First Amendment by publicly offending others through obscenity or racism. Americans have developed a distinct disposition toward the freedom of expression throughout history.
Chameleons are very special creatures. Chameleons use colorful ways to communicate and express their feelings. They use their special cells called iridophores to change their colors. Their iridophores allow them to change colors when they change emotions. When they get excited or angered their color changes to a very bright color. They are very unique and use a very atypical language to communicate to other chameleons.
Have you ever noticed how chameleons change color to blend in with their environment? Well this is true, chameleons change their color to camouflage themselves and to show their emotions. This unique reptile is often known for it’s ability to change on the spot. This concept of changing pigments is not fully understood by many people. Physics is used to describe these adjustments in hue.
The civil liberties that the American people have are inalienable rights. The most important of these is the freedom of speech. Yet freedom of speech is not entirely protected; using hurtful, false, or damaging speech is not allowed. But how can the American government control something as basic as speech? There are laws against libel and slander but how are they perpetrated? This essay will explain how the court cases and laws have evolved and been clarified throughout America’s history up to present day.
Freedom of speech cannot be considered an absolute freedom, and even society and the legal system recognize the boundaries or general situations where the speech should not be protected. Along with rights comes civil responsib...
Since the foundation of the United States after a harsh split from Britain, almost 200 years later, an issue that could claim the founding grounds for the country is now being challenged by educators, high-ranking officials, and other countries. Though it is being challenged, many libertarians, democrats, and free-speech thinkers hold the claim that censorship violates our so-called unalienable rights, as it has been proven throughout many court cases. Censorship in the United States is detrimental because it has drastically and negatively altered many significant events. Censorship allows governments more control of society than they already have, slowly progressing governments utilizing censorship to a dictatorship. Often times, this censorship can lead to immense rebellions.