Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ronald Reagan speech analysis
The challenger reagan speech analysis
Reagan's challenger speech analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
CAT 3 Speech Analysis Grade 10 English https://www.scribd.com/document/249423368/Speech-Analysis (check this for ideas)
https://prezi.com/kwgmijh9wtly/ronald-reagan-challenger-speech/ (check this for ideas)
https://shmoop.com/historical-texts/space-shuttle-challenger-disaster-address/structure.html (check this, it’s really good)
On the 28th of January 1986, it was supposed to be day of exploration and excitement but ended up being a day of sadness and tragedy. Ronald Wilson Reagan, the 40th president of the United States of America delivered a speech to the people of his nation to address them about an incident that occurred earlier that day. The space shuttle challenger exploded and broke apart, 73 seconds after its take-off sending the
…show more content…
crew members and its debris from the space shuttle back down to earth. The whole crew of the challenger seven died in the unfortunate event, which also included a lady name Sharon Christa McAuliffe who was a school teacher from New Hampshire. The words that Ronald Reagan used in his speech were very inspirational and mournful. This tragedy unfolded live on TV across the United States, shattering hearts of friends and families, schoolchildren and was felt deeply by people across the globe. The purpose for Reagans speech was to try and unite his people because it was a tough time for everyone.
It was a time of mourning over the loss of seven space pioneers, Ronald Reagan also addresses other key political messages, during the speech. Ronald Reagan wanted to show his empathy and support for the families that were related to the challenger crew, he mentions in the speech that him and his Nancy “Pained to the core by the tragedy of the shuttle challenger. We know we share this pain with all the people of our country. This is truly a national loss”. Reagan shows empathy towards the families throughout the speech by using emotional and empathetic language. He also shows support towards NASA, as a lot of the blame, because people were pointing fingers and blaming NASA for the accident and anger and emotion was also directed at NASA. Reagan diverts this blame and anger into empathy and support to his people. Reagan shows support for the future space programs and wanted NASA to further their progress and exploration in the space program. Before he speaks about NASA, he changes his tone and language to briefly talks to the children and he tries to comfort them by honouring the bravery of the challenger seven and calling them heroes. After, Reagan briefly mentions the USSR (the Russian space agency), when he says “we do not hide our space program. We don’t keep secrets and cover things up”. He never mentions the Russians, but it is really clear that he is talking about …show more content…
Russia. The people of America mourned for the loss of “our seven challenger heroes”, and he pays tribute for their “brave sacrifice” that they made in the speech. Reagan uses curt sentences (gets straight to the point), such as “We’ve never had a tragedy like this.”, “This is truly a national loss” and “they served all of us”. he also uses repetition in his speech to put his point and his purpose across to the nation. Reagan shows lots of emotions through his words and the emotions in the speech were heavy. https://www.nytimes.com/1986/02/01/us/reagan-pays-tribute-to-our-challenger-heroes.html Throughout the speech United States President uses an excellent deal of literature techniques, that helps him connect with the audience.
the facility of 3 is employed within the speech multiple times, that demands the audience’s attention and adds emphasises on key sentences. This repetition of 3 may be a common literature technique and utilized in different celebrated political speeches (e.g. Hitler’s speeches), as repetition extremely drives their purpose through. United States President additionally uses tiny and sharp sentences to grab the audience’s attention, these short sentences are terribly effective, a key example of 1 during this speech is “We mourn their loss as a nation together”. This sentence leaves a dramatic result on the audience. affective language is predominant throughout the whole thing of the speech. affective words and phrases are wanting to connect with the audience and to indicate support, samples of affective language within the speech are, mourn, our loss, and tragedy, of these words and phrases have a deep result on the audience. As key purpose of the speech is to unite the country and mourn the loss of seven space pioneers, inclusive words like, our, we and us, are wont to unite the state very tough time. (also change what’s written above make it sound better) Throughout Reagan’s speech he manages to connect with his audience through his personal emotive language, by using words such as I. Another example is when he say’s “Nancy and I are pained
to the core…”, this sentence allows him to connect with the audience on a personal and emotional level. Reagans tone and the way he speaks in his speech is very relevant to this speech and it also throughout his speech. Rhetorical Techniques and Devices Ronald Reagans words were very strong and powerful in that it was meant for everyone around the world. His response to the challenger disaster was heart-felt and very affective. In his speech he also used pathos (a quality that arouses emotions, mainly sorrow and pity) to show people that he was heartbroken by this unfortunate event and also ethos to appeal to authority (EXPERT, The Challenger, 31/05/2018). An example were his words are felt is when he says, “We mourn their loss as a nation together”, his tone is emotional, solemn and veneration. Another example is “it is hard to understand but sometimes painful things like this will happen”, and “your loved ones were daring and brave”, Reagan also mentions that “Were still pioneers. They […] were pioneers”. Reagan says how important the astronauts were and the comparison to pioneers, which is a deliberate comparison to them being heroes that were brave, daring and noble. This speech is a very good and it is very affective, it excites emotions and has meaning, and the speech is reached out and felt by everyone across the globe. Therefore, it makes the challenger speech, a great speech. Even though Reagan tries to ignore his responsibility of administrations in The Challenger disaster, instead, he goes to concentrate on reassuring the nation which makes this speech uplifting to the American people (Ronald Reagan Speech, 30/05/2018). The challenger speech was able to unify the nation over the grief of the Challenger seven, and it offered comfort to the nation and the families and friends of the challenge seven. The space shuttle challenger will be always remembered as a great speech Bibliography: https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Ronald-Reagan-Challenger-Speech-F3CCXX5YTC https://www.scribd.com/document/249423368/Speech-Analysis https://www.duarte.com/presentation-skills-resources/remembering-the-challenger-and-one-of-historys-greatest-speeches/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/01/28/how-ronald-reagan-explained-the-challenger-disaster-to-the-world-its-all-part-of-taking-a-chance/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.fd62fc6b7e3e https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Analysis-of-Ronald-Reagans-Sppech-The-Challenger-Disaster-P3JMRZS5HKU4Z https://www.shmoop.com/historical-texts/space-shuttle-challenger-disaster-address/structure.html https://www.shmoop.com/historical-texts/space-shuttle-challenger-disaster-address/analysis.html https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Analysis-of-Ronald-Reagans-Sppech-The-Challenger-Disaster-P3JMRZS5HKU4Z
Soon after launch on January 28th, 1986, the space shuttle Challenger broke apart and shattered the nation. The tragedy was on the hearts and minds of the nation and President Ronald Reagan. President Reagan addressed the county, commemorating the men and woman whose lives were lost and offering hope to Americans and future exploration. Reagan begins his speech by getting on the same level as the audience by showing empathy and attempting to remind us that this was the job of the crew. He proceeds with using his credibility to promise future space travel. Ultimately, his attempt to appeal to the audience’s emotions made his argument much stronger. Reagan effectively addresses the public about the tragedy while comforting, acknowledging, honoring and motivating his audience all in an effort to move the mood from grief to hope for future exploration.
In 102 Minutes, Chapter 7, authors Dwyer and Flynn use ethos, logos, and pathos to appeal to the readers’ consciences, minds and hearts regarding what happened to the people inside the Twin Towers on 9/11. Of particular interest are the following uses of the three appeals.
In the “George Bush’ Columbia” speech, George W. Bush used a variety of ways in order to make his mark and effectively assemble his dialog. One of the most prominent strategies Mr. Bush used was his sentence structure. He did a great job shaping his speech by initially addressing the problem at hand. He first stated what happened, who it happened to, and gave his condolences to the ones who didn’t make it, along with their families. Mr. Bush also seemed sincere throughout his speech as he made sure to mention each hero apart of the crew. Another technique George W. Bush displayed was the diction and tone he used while delivering the speech. From listening to the audio last week, I remember the passion behind Bush’s words and the sincerity
“Born in this century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our ancient heritage.” (Miss, Daly, Pg.). This show the U.S. people that he really loves this country and really cares about what’s going on and what happens to it in the future. Another way he brings pathos into his speech is by the language/words he uses in his speech. When he is talking he uses a lot of words like “we”, “us”. This makes the U.S. people feel very connected to him and makes the feel like they are a part of it to, it is like they made the decision to vote him president and now they get to help him make his decisions about the future of America. In his address he says “In your hands, my fellow citizens, more than mine, will rest the final success or failure of our course.” (Miss, Daly, Pg.). which again he connects to the people by making them feel involved and by basically saying the future of America is even more in our hands then in his and it really depends on us in how we want America to turn out, and again makes the U.S people feel very patriotic and proud of their country. Overall John F Kennedy was very successful in persuading the U.S. people about their choice by using pathos and by just talking to
On January 28, 1986, Ronald Reagan, the President who takes on the grievances of America and establishes hope, in his inspiring speech entitled the “Speech on the Challenger Disaster,” is able to guide the United States to prosperity. He guides the United States. by emphasizing the courage and bravery of the Challenger crew, then he drives the focus to the good that NASA allows us to accomplish, and finally tells the people that the crew dies doing what they loved. Through Reagan's use of Aristotle’s rhetorical appeals, tone, and rhetorical devices, he is able to inspire hope in the people instead of the failure of NASA.
In the book Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer wrote about Christopher McCandless, a nature lover in search for independence, in a mysterious and hopeful experience. Even though Krakauer tells us McCandless was going to die from the beginning, he still gave him a chance for survival. As a reader I wanted McCandless to survive. In Into the Wild, Krakauer gave McCandless a unique perspective. He was a smart and unique person that wanted to be completely free from society. Krakauer included comments from people that said McCandless was crazy, and his death was his own mistake. However, Krakauer is able to make him seem like a brave person. The connections between other hikers and himself helped in the explanation of McCandless’s rational actions. Krakauer is able to make McCandless look like a normal person, but unique from this generation. In order for Krakauer to make Christopher McCandless not look like a crazy person, but a special person, I will analyze the persuading style that Krakauer used in Into the Wild that made us believe McCandless was a regular young adult.
Her use of this rhetorical strategy elevates the level to which one can analyze her prose and the relation it has to her claim. The reader can identify Thatcher's use of sentence arrangement when she opens with a quote stating, “We have lost a great president, a great American, and a great man, and I have lost a dear friend” (Thatcher). Throughout this sentence are several perspectives and points of view from which Thatcher interprets Reagan. Thatcher uses a manipulated phrase order, beginning with a crucial and celebrated president and then diminishes the level of impact to then an American, a man, and a friend. By ending with “friend,” Thatcher can begin to draw the reader into her eulogy by creating a depiction to which one can relate on a personal level. While on a superficial level Thatcher depicts Reagan from several points of view, her purpose of this arrangement was to build upon her claim and the reader’s understanding. Furthermore, Thatcher uses sentence structure to affirm essential points with the reader to a place beyond where the surface prose suggests. To accomplish this goal, Thatcher uses a similar construct in sentence composition to exemplify Reagan’s achievements which one can identify in lines thirty
The Letter from Birmingham Jail was written by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in April of 1963. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was one of several civil rights activists who were arrested in Birmingham Alabama, after protesting against racial injustices in Alabama. Dr. King wrote this letter in response to a statement titled A Call for Unity, which was published on Good Friday by eight of his fellow clergymen from Alabama. Dr. King uses his letter to eloquently refute the article. In the letter dr. king uses many vivid logos, ethos, and pathos to get his point across. Dr. King writes things in his letter that if any other person even dared to write the people would consider them crazy.
In his speech in the aftermath of the Challenger explosion, Pres. Reagan used alliteration to convey his feelings of sadness to the families of the seven astronauts lost. He repeats the words special, spirit, and says to show as to what high regards he held the astronauts. Pres. Reagan said that the astronauts “had [a] special grace, that special spirit that says, “Give me a challenge and I’ll meet it with joy” (Reagan 1). The repetition of the words special, spirit, and says means that Reagan believed that the astronauts had something no one else had that differentiated them from the rest of society. Additionally, Ronald Reagan
In a person’s lifetime, many things can happen including death. In 1986 seven individuals, Michael Smith, Dick Scobee, Judith Resnic, Ronald McNair, Ellison Onizuka, Gregory Jarvis, and Christa McAuliffe, lost their lives doing what they loved most. The tragedy of the shuttle challenger brought much pain to the nation that day. Along with the pain comes grieving. The nation grieved the loss of these seven wonderful individuals and hoped to find peace and comfort for the days to come. As Ronald Reagan prepared to give the state of the union address, things changed for worse, he unexpectedly had to give a speech on a horrific event. Reagan was devastated at the loss of the seven men and women that were on that space shuttle challenger.
Since the presidency of George Washington, the people of The United States have turned to the commander in chief in times of distress to receive assurance and hope. Kurt Ritter comments on President Reagan’s address to the nation given on January 28, 1986 saying, “Perhaps no president could have fulfilled the country’s need to mourn and, then, to begin to heal as skillfully as Ronald Reagan (Ritter, 3).” On that morning the space shuttle “Challenger” violently exploded while the nation watched live televised coverage of the shuttle’s launch. President Reagan was scheduled to give his State of the Union Address on that date, but instead he reached out the country in this time of mourning. He spoke from his oval office to heartbroken teachers, children, NASA Space Engineers, and the entire country. President Reagan’s reaction to the tragedy of the challenger guided the United States out of despair and into a new light of hope behind seven fallen heroes. In this essay I will show that Reagan gave our country a new light of hope through his emphasis on Pathos but also incorporating Ethos and Logos in this memorable presentation.
Pollan’s article provides a solid base to the conversation, defining what to do in order to eat healthy. Holding this concept of eating healthy, Joe Pinsker in “Why So Many Rich Kids Come to Enjoy the Taste of Healthier Foods” enters into the conversation and questions the connection of difference in families’ income and how healthy children eat (129-132). He argues that how much families earn largely affect how healthy children eat — income is one of the most important factors preventing people from eating healthy (129-132). In his article, Pinsker utilizes a study done by Caitlin Daniel to illustrate that level of income does affect children’s diet (130). In Daniel’s research, among 75 Boston-area parents, those rich families value children’s healthy diet more than food wasted when children refused to accept those healthier but
The movie trailer “Rio 2”, shows a great deal of pathos, ethos, and logos. These rhetorical appeals are hidden throughout the movie trailer; however, they can be recognized if paying attention to the details and montage of the video. I am attracted to this type of movies due to the positive life messages and the innocent, but funny personifications from the characters; therefore, the following rhetorical analysis will give a brief explanation of the scenes, point out the characteristics of persuasive appeals and how people can be easily persuaded by using this technique, and my own interpretation of the message presented in the trailer.
Reagan’s ethos was created throughout his two terms but solidified in his second and final one. Reagan presents his ethos throughout his rhetoric by stating facts with authority and also in a way that made him credible to the audience. One of the parts in his speech is headlined with a cold and awakening fact directed at the Soviet Union. In a 1956 speech given by Soviet Union leader Nikita Khrushchev, the statement “We will bury you,” was aimed at Western ambassadors who stood for freedom. In Reagan’s speech at the Brandenburg Gate, he specifically calls out the previously stated notion that the Soviets would essentially, “bury the free world.” Reagan profoundly proclaims this: “In the 1950s, Khrushchev predicted: "We will bury you." But in the West today, we see a free world that has achieved a level of prosperity and well-being unprecedented in all human history. In the Communist world, we see failure, technological backwardness, declining standards of health, even want of the most basic kind--too little food. Even today, the Soviet Union still cannot feed itself. After these four decades, then, there stands before the entire world one great and inescapable conclusion: Freedom leads to prosperity. Freedom replaces the ancient hatreds among the nations with comity and peace. Freedom is the victor.” The great appeal this presented to the
Jonathan Kozol revealed the early period’s situation of education in American schools in his article Savage Inequalities. It seems like during that period, the inequality existed everywhere and no one had the ability to change it; however, Kozol tried his best to turn around this situation and keep track of all he saw. In the article, he used rhetorical strategies effectively to describe what he saw in that situation, such as pathos, logos and ethos.