Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of a speech
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In 1987, the President of the United States at the time was Ronald Reagan. Everyone has their differing opinions when it comes to judging the quality of the job a President has done. There are many factors that cause biased opinions. Some of these include your political party affiliation, your viewpoint on the social matters that were going on at the time, and your economic standing. Despite all these varying viewpoints, people can agree upon one thing when it comes to Ronald Reagan. That one thing is that in 1987, when turmoil due to post-war political issues split Germany into two sides, Reagan made a speech that is known as “The Speech at Brandenburg Gate” that altered the course of history. His exalted rhetoric was highly touted at the …show more content…
Reagan’s ethos was created throughout his two terms but solidified in his second and final one. Reagan presents his ethos throughout his rhetoric by stating facts with authority and also in a way that made him credible to the audience. One of the parts in his speech is headlined with a cold and awakening fact directed at the Soviet Union. In a 1956 speech given by Soviet Union leader Nikita Khrushchev, the statement “We will bury you,” was aimed at Western ambassadors who stood for freedom. In Reagan’s speech at the Brandenburg Gate, he specifically calls out the previously stated notion that the Soviets would essentially, “bury the free world.” Reagan profoundly proclaims this: “In the 1950s, Khrushchev predicted: "We will bury you." But in the West today, we see a free world that has achieved a level of prosperity and well-being unprecedented in all human history. In the Communist world, we see failure, technological backwardness, declining standards of health, even want of the most basic kind--too little food. Even today, the Soviet Union still cannot feed itself. After these four decades, then, there stands before the entire world one great and inescapable conclusion: Freedom leads to prosperity. Freedom replaces the ancient hatreds among the nations with comity and peace. Freedom is the victor.” The great appeal this presented to the …show more content…
The audience he was trying to directly get to was the people he understood were listening to it in the East. He also states, “I address my remarks to you just as surely as to those standing here before me.” To follow up with his statement of intended audience, Reagan says a powerful statement. A statement that is intended to the entirety of the audience. “For I join you, as I join your fellow countrymen in the West, in this firm, this unalterable belief: Es gibt nur ein Berlin.” The final sentence meaning “There is only one Berlin.” This is yet another instance in this rhetorical masterpiece that Reagan clearly states his objective of the speech, to unify
As we move into the reelection year, the authors accuse Nancy of ensuring that Reagan hasn’t campaigned for eight months, following a “Rose Garden strategy.” But Reagan has no credible opponent for the 1984 nomination, and Walter Mondale, who will be his Democratic opponent in the general election, has not yet been nominated. So there is no need for a strategy, Rose Garden or otherwise. Of course we get the full chapter and verse on Reagan’s poor performance in his first debate with Mondale; at least we also get the report on the second debate. From there the narrative jumps to the Iran-Contra affair. A few high points — like the Berlin Wall speech in 1987 — are indeed included, but without any perspective on Reagan’s strategy, perseverance with the Soviets on arms control, or success in revitalizing the U.S. economy. Nothing is said about Reagan’s four second-term summits with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev. Except for a few comments that Reagan deplored Communism, this is a policy-free book, and a book
Ronald Reagan adeptly utilizes Ethos Pathos and Logos in his Brandenburg Gate address, he attempts to sway the audience of the importance of success of the marshal plan and western values as a whole, and convince the leader of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev, to open up the barrier which had divided West and East Berlin since 1961. Reagan begins his speech by addressing the people present and recognizing the “freedom” and “feeling of history” of the city of Berlin has. He makes his first reference to previous speakers by saying, “Twenty four years ago, President John F. Kennedy visited Berlin, and speaking to the people of this city and the world at the city hall. Well since then two other presidents have come, each in his turn to Berlin. And today, I, myself, make my second visit to your city,”( Reagan 361) His first usage of pathos is when he addresses the east berliners who were separated from the westerners by the Berlin wall and tells them, “I join your fellow countrymen in the West, in this
Above all else, Reagan uses the speech to inspire
...speech to the world where he was quoted as saying, “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!” The speech was given at the Brandenburg Gate in West Berlin (“Mr. Gorbachev, Tear Down This Wall: President Ronald Reagan”). This speech signified the beginning of the end of the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union. President Reagan’s foreign policy tactics are another reason why he was a great president.
The day of the challenger explosion Reagan had originally planned on speaking to the nation to report on the state of the union, but this unfortunate event caused him to have a sudden shift in plans. He had to quickly put together a speech appropriate for the occasion and construct an argument to defend the NASA program. The shuttle challenger explosion caused many Americans heartache as well as great uncertainty about what would become of NASA. In the speech, Reagan spoke to the nation as a whole and tried to console everyone as best he could. He honored the men whom risked and ultimately lost their lives in this horrible accident. He also addressed the families of the seven brave men directly in his speech.
There is no doubt that the when the President of the United States speaks everyone listens to what he has to say. This credibility makes the Ethos of Reagan’s Speech almost unsurpassable. As mentioned Reagan was scheduled to give a State of the Union Address to our country on the evening of January 28, 1986. Instead, he postponed it, because “the story of the day was tragedy. Here he wanted to give an upbeat speech about America moving ahead. It just didn’t fit. It seemed in congruous (Weinraub).” He showed the country that his priority is the emotions of his people by, for the first time in history, postponing on the State of the Union speech in order to discuss the current event. This strengthened the creditability of his argument immensely. He likened the astronauts to pioneers and stated in his speech that “They had a special grace, that special spirit that says, ‘Give me a challenge and I’ll meet it with joy.” With this he appeals to the spiritual side of his audience using the word grace to describe the fallen. Again, “The president concluded by attaching the nation’s sorrow to God’s grace (Ritter, 4).” He said “As they prepared for there journey and waved ...
Although Reagan lacked a historical knowledge, he was a very intelligent president. A prime example of his intellect came in 1973, while serving as governor of California, he had suggested to Kissinger in the National Security briefing sessions that the United States should give Israeli troops the number of planes the Arabs said they shot down. This tactic would both fulfill a promise made by the United States and exact punishment on the Arabs using their own propaganda ...
A couple of the heroic values that Reagan possessed were strength and courage. Most people would agree that it took an agglomeration of strength and courage during the cold war era to make his ever famous, “Tear Down This Wall Speech” in Berlin. Ramesh Jaura explains how many people believe this speech made a positive effect toward ending the cold war:
1981-89. http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/speeches/publicpapers.html. Schultz, George P. Turmoil and Triumph. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1993. Skinner, Kiron, Annelise Anderson, and Martin Anderson, eds. Reagan:
During Roosevelt’s “Four Freedoms” speech a war was occuring over in europe. World War 2 to be exact. Beginning at 1939 to 1945 war was about, with Adolf
In later years, Afghani forces turned on heir former patrons, targeting United States interest around the world. Scholars have questioned the distinctiveness of the Reagan Doctrine. The United States was challenging communist and leftist movement far from the Soviet periphery. Others have continued to criticize the administration for applying the Reagan Doctrine selectively. Recipients of America aid were often lacking in liberal virtues. For instance, hardly any support on democratic grounds was stated. This also led critics to charge Reagan with pandering public opinion, since administration references seemed more reflective of the president’s domestic political needs than of the makeup of those forces receiving American assistance. Indeed, it is far from clear whether the allegedly greatest achievement of the Reagan Doctrine, the fall of communism itself, is attributable to Reagan at all. Historians have argued repeatedly that a host of troubles internal to the Soviet Union from a stagnant economy to a crisis of political legitimacy to the intractable nationalities question were far more consequential to the undoing of the Soviet system than any challenge mounted by Reagan. Nevertheless, other scholars point out that Reagan gave
Though times were tough for many years for some Germans, things are improving slowly. While the wall was erect, many Germans had high hopes of change and continue to strive towards equality nationwide. In June of 1963 when John F. Kennedy visited Berlin, he gave a very impacting speech to the people of Berlin, "There are some who say that Communism is the wave of the future. Let them come to Berlin" (Sidey). Although the wall no longer physically stands, it still today divides Germany and Berlin into two separate states today.
During Reagan’s tenure, it is evident that the Soviet Union and the communist and socialist ideology was the focus of his foreign policy, and although Reagan was viewed as aggressive and fearless towards to Soviets, he did have a softer side, and maintained bilateral relations and communications between the two nations. Reagan often did not have a stable relationship with the Soviet Union, there were times when the United States and the Soviet Union were close to war and there were times when both nations were able to reach agreements. Reagan was a critic of the Soviet Union, especially during his first term from 1981-1984. It was during his second term that he was able to relax the tensions and create a friendlier environment in negotiating
1. This was a time when the Soviet Union believed communism was the way to achieve a better life. Although it only did the opposite, and America knew that freedom was the answer. In Reagan’s speech we can see that Americas technology is growing faster than anywhere else in the world. Americans have freedom to create, which helps our country discover new useful tools. While communist countries have no freedom, which means no creating – which means no improving. He says at the end “Come to Berlin…tear down this wall.” Meaning that it is doing no good but stopping
The speech was delivered at the most heated part of the Cold War. During the 40's the Soviet Union was making an "iron curtain" on the eastern side of Europe. An iron curtain is a metaphorical wall of communism. As an example of communism: a person has three cows; the government takes all three cows and gives everyone milk. All the services and goods are given from a classless society instead of a business man or woman making a profit.