Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Uses of rhetoric
Examples of rhetorical analysis in everyday
Everyday life examples of rhetoric
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In his “Challenger Explosion” speech, Pres. Ronald Reagan comforts the nation in the aftermath of NASA’s Challenger Space Shuttle exploded shortly after takeoff killing all seven astronauts. In this speech, he used rhetorical devices, such as alliteration, allusion, anaphora, and euphemism to relay his feelings of sadness and grief. In his speech in the aftermath of the Challenger explosion, Pres. Reagan used alliteration to convey his feelings of sadness to the families of the seven astronauts lost. He repeats the words special, spirit, and says to show as to what high regards he held the astronauts. Pres. Reagan said that the astronauts “had [a] special grace, that special spirit that says, “Give me a challenge and I’ll meet it with joy” (Reagan 1). The repetition of the words special, spirit, and says means that Reagan believed that the astronauts had something no one else had that differentiated them from the rest of society. Additionally, Ronald Reagan …show more content…
alliterated a second time, this time, showing the courage of the Challenger crew. Reagan believed that “the future doesn’t belong to the fainthearted; it belongs to the brave. The Challenger crew [pulled] us into the future, and we’ll continue to follow them” (Reagan 1).The repetition of the letter “F” shows that Reagan wants the astronauts to lead the nation in their field, even from the grave. In addition to alliteration, Pres. Reagan also used allusion in his speech to the families of the seven astronauts killed when the Space Shuttle Challenger exploded shortly after takeoff. Addressing the nation after the explosion of the Challenger space shuttle, former U.S.
president Ronald Reagan used allusion in his speech to the families of the victims. Pres. Reagan used allusion when he alluded to a quote by an early historian about the death of Sir Francis Drake. Reagan alluded to the death of Drake who had “lived by the sea, died on it, and was buried in it” (Reagan 1). Reagan alludes to this quote because he believes that in the same way Drake was connected to the ocean in life and death, so were the astronauts of the NASA space shuttle. In addition to an early historian, Pres. Reagan also alludes to the poetry of British-American poet, John Gillespie Magee Jr. To Reagan, the astronauts “slipped the surly bonds of Earth to touch the face of God” (Reagan 1). This is an allusion because Reagan references the deaths of the astronauts to the poem, High Flight by John G. Magee Jr. He believes that the astronauts have left the natural world and have connected with God in the
supernatural. Anaphora is a rhetorical device used by Pres. Ronald Reagan in his speech the afternoon of the Challenger explosion. Reagan used anaphora when he said that we, as a nation, have grown numb to the idea of innovation. Reagan believes that “we’ve grown used to wonder in this century... [and] we’ve grown used to the idea of space, and perhaps we forget that we’ve only just begun. We’re still pioneers” (Reagan 1). The word “we’ve” is repeated to create an emotional appeal with the families of the victims. Reagan also uses anaphora when he states that the explosion will not have an affect on the NASA space program. Reagan says that there will be “more shuttle flights, and more shuttle crews, and, yes, more volunteers, more civilians, [and] more teachers in space” (Reagan 1). The word “more” is repeated as to not let the explosion hamper the good of the space program. No matter what circumstances arise, the space program will continue to thrive on. In addition to anaphora, Pres. Reagan used euphemism when he tried to console the nation following the grappling events of January 28, 1986 when the Space Shuttle Challenger exploded shortly after takeoff. When the Space Shuttle Challenger exploded shortly after takeoff from John F. Kennedy Space Center in Florida, then president, Ronald Reagan gave a speech to the families of the seven victims and the nation in which euphemism was one of the rhetorical devices used. At a time when the families were full of emotions, Pres. Reagan tried to not use words that would stir up their emotions even more. Although they “were aware of the dangers,” Reagan believed the astronauts showed great courage when they still managed to do “their jobs brilliantly” (Reagan 1). Reagan hints at the fact that the astronauts showed immense courage until the very end of their lives without referring to any terms related to death. Furthermore, Reagan tries to reiterate the notion that pain is a part of life. He mentions that “painful things happen” even though “hard to understand” (Reagan 1). Reagan refers to the death of the astronauts without telling the way in which they died. In final analysis, Pres. Ronald Reagan used alliteration, allusion, anaphora, and euphemism in his speech to a grieving nation following the explosion of NASA’s Space Shuttle Challenger on January 28, 1986. These rhetorical devices were used, not to sadden the moment, but to remember the seven astronauts and the lives they lived.
On a cold winter’s morning on the 28th day of January in the year 1986, America was profoundly shaken and sent to its knees as the space shuttle Challenger gruesomely exploded just seconds after launching. The seven members of its crew, including one civilian teacher, were all lost. This was a game changer, we had never lost a single astronaut in flight. The United States by this time had unfortunately grown accustomed to successful space missions, and this reality check was all too sudden, too brutal for a complacent and oblivious nation (“Space”). The outbreak of sympathy that poured from its citizens had not been seen since President John F. Kennedy’s assassination. The disturbing scenes were shown repeatedly on news networks which undeniably made it troublesome to keep it from haunting the nation’s cognizance (“Space”). The current president had more than situation to address, he had the problematic undertaking of gracefully picking America back up by its boot straps.
Ronald Reagan was one of the most liked Presidents. When being elected for his second term, he won by a landslide—winning all the states minus Minnesota and Washington D.C. Reagan addresses the people of the United States of America. He wants the American people to reflect on his presidency, and as all presidents do in their farewell addresses, he wants to say goodbye to the nation that he's led for the past eight years. Ronald Reagan uses repetition, parallel structure, and allusion to reflect on his presidency and to say farewell to the American people.
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt delivered a powerful speech before Congress on December 8th 1941, the day after Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. His purpose in addressing the country in this way is his attempt to calm the American People and avoid chaos across the country. Roosevelt is aware of the impact that the event has had on the Citizens. As their leader, he forcefully reassures the population that they will be safe. The President emphasizes that the United States would not allow the attacks to affect the country though his use of rhetorical devices, including pathos.
Bush opens his speech by acknowledging the events of September 11, and those that lost the lives of loved ones and to those that gave their life trying to save others in the buildings. He appeals to those that remain strong by saying that, “These acts of mass murder were intended to frighten our nation into chaos and retreat. But they have failed. Our country is strong.” His use of pathos helps Bush to calm and control the public in order to keep the country together. This
Throughout the speech, the Former President George W Bush strives to empower Americans by instructing them to remain resolute, but to “go back to [their] lives and routines”. He uses the personal pronoun we and the common pronoun us repeatedly to indicate that the people of the United States, who either saw the event on television or experienced this event firsthand, were and still are involved in this national tragedy. He implements this emotional appeal into his speech to involve all Americans--people living in the United States of America, regardless of their ethnicity, race, or culture, and to acknowledge that the American people have endured this together, and that they will continue to advance after this event with stronger resolve, stronger than ever. In addition, he implements personification to motivate and empower the American people. “Our nation, this generation, will lift a dark threat of violence from our people and our future” (Bush, 2001). “This generation”, again a synonym for the American people, with its unwavering resolve, will fight for its freedom persistently. He intimates that the future of America and of democratic freedom is in the hands of the American people: that the American people have the power to control their fate. The next sentence leads into America’s “philanthropically” democratic nature: “We will rally the world to this cause, by our efforts and by our courage” (Bush, 2001). This statement has been followed up by action only a few years later, when the United States intervened in the Iraqi War, Libyan Revolution, and even more civil wars to ensure the freedom of citizens from dictatorships, which in Islāmic nations, were militant groups, like the Hamas and Taliban. Lastly, the president utilized anaphora, specifically a tripartite structure, by affirming that the American people “will not tire”, “will not falter”, and “will not fail”. He implies that the American people will relentlessly fight for the worldwide establishment of peace and democratic institutions, a promise which America has kept even in the face of its own national crisis.
The world would have been very different if we had not landed on the moon and made it back safely those couple days in July of 1969. Many people were nervous and skeptical that the mission of Apollo 11 wouldn’t work, some even coming to the worst case scenario. As a president, President Nixon had to be prepared for any outcome of this great event in history. Regardless of the mission’s success, a speech was prepared for the outcome of Apollo 11 failing. The speech, In Event of Moon Disaster, written for President Nixon, effectively uses pathos and logos to appeal to a distraught nation in fragile time and uses descriptive language to regain the embodiment of hope again in the country. Because it was written before the event took place, however,
The day of the challenger explosion Reagan had originally planned on speaking to the nation to report on the state of the union, but this unfortunate event caused him to have a sudden shift in plans. He had to quickly put together a speech appropriate for the occasion and construct an argument to defend the NASA program. The shuttle challenger explosion caused many Americans heartache as well as great uncertainty about what would become of NASA. In the speech, Reagan spoke to the nation as a whole and tried to console everyone as best he could. He honored the men whom risked and ultimately lost their lives in this horrible accident. He also addressed the families of the seven brave men directly in his speech.
There is no doubt that the when the President of the United States speaks everyone listens to what he has to say. This credibility makes the Ethos of Reagan’s Speech almost unsurpassable. As mentioned Reagan was scheduled to give a State of the Union Address to our country on the evening of January 28, 1986. Instead, he postponed it, because “the story of the day was tragedy. Here he wanted to give an upbeat speech about America moving ahead. It just didn’t fit. It seemed in congruous (Weinraub).” He showed the country that his priority is the emotions of his people by, for the first time in history, postponing on the State of the Union speech in order to discuss the current event. This strengthened the creditability of his argument immensely. He likened the astronauts to pioneers and stated in his speech that “They had a special grace, that special spirit that says, ‘Give me a challenge and I’ll meet it with joy.” With this he appeals to the spiritual side of his audience using the word grace to describe the fallen. Again, “The president concluded by attaching the nation’s sorrow to God’s grace (Ritter, 4).” He said “As they prepared for there journey and waved ...
Bush demonstrates that with the use of metaphors, personification, and also repetition. Using metaphor, he compares America to steel, saying that America is like steel, but not pliable. Portraying that whatever dangerous act comes to America, America will stay strong and not move. Personification is to explain the reasoning behind the terrorists’ operations and the motives behind this move. Bush gives feeling and visualization traits to the nation, consequently putting it in the nation’s point of view, highlighting what the nation felt and saw. Repetition is to bring America together and strengthen everyone. It is to show that this heartbreaking event did not just affect the victims, but it affects the entire country. The way Bush uses repetition to get the people of America together makes America stronger because the more a country is together, the more power and strength it will possess. As a final point, President Bush’s usage of these three rhetorical devices grabs the attention of the people and helps Bush express the type of tone he wants to get
Millions of viewers tuned into the National Broadcasting Company television network for a special broadcast on the 27th of October. Viewers were anticipating Ronald Reagan’s “A Time for Choosing” speech. Reagan was acknowledged for his acting in motion pictures and television episodes since 1937, and was now being seen in an unfamiliar role. Reagan emerged in support of the Republican nominee Barry Goldwater. Barry Morris Goldwater was a businessman and five-term United States Senator from Arizona and the Republican Party's nominee for president in the 1964 election. “A Time for Choosing” was effective, because he gave personal examples to capture the audiences’ attention, and gave humor to a tough subject.
The audience he was trying to directly get to was the people he understood were listening to it in the East. He also states, “I address my remarks to you just as surely as to those standing here before me.” To follow up with his statement of intended audience, Reagan says a powerful statement. A statement that is intended to the entirety of the audience. “For I join you, as I join your fellow countrymen in the West, in this firm, this unalterable belief: Es gibt nur ein Berlin.” The final sentence meaning “There is only one Berlin.” This is yet another instance in this rhetorical masterpiece that Reagan clearly states his objective of the speech, to unify
“General Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, if you seek liberalization: Come here to this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall! (History Place)” On June 12, 1987, US President Ronald Reagan shocked the world with his speech at the Brandenburg Gate in East Berlin. In his speech, Reagan called for the removal of the Berlin Wall, which served as a constant reminder of the oppression of Communism in Germany. However, Reagan’s speech at the Brandenburg Gate was not his first open stand against the oppression of Communism. One of the highlights of Reagan’s presidency was his approach to Communism:
Dallek, Robert. Ronald Reagan : The Politics of Symbolism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999.
...his words. “We will never forget them, nor the last time we saw them, this morning, as they prepared for the journey”, peaceful imagery and a remembrance of their souls are spoken once more and in conclusion Reagan states “and “slipped the surly bonds of earth” to “touch the face of God” (Reagan). He ends with words taken from a poem by John Gillespie Magee Jr. and poetic touch of emotion that continues to resonate today. His faith shines through and reaches the nation’s heart. Bush uses the wrong diction and his poor choice of faith-filled words will create a forgotten speech. Instead of using general faith filled words or sayings, Bush reverts to a bible verse which is not received as well as Reagan’s words because the bible is too specific and could infringe upon someone else’s beliefs. A more general medium, like Reagan presented would have been received better.
When lives are involved they are given the undesirable task of speaking to a frightened and unstable nation. The goal of the speech is to grieve with the nation, as well as lift the nation up so that the citizens do not dwell on the tragedy, but to rise from the tragedy. While mourning they need to remember to stay strong and to come together as there are strength in numbers. Each president does this through a eulogy that displays ethos and pathos through tone, quotations, repetition and a “unique blend of eulogistic content and elements” (Campbell and Jamieson, 2008, p. 75). In times of tragedy it is the president’s job to offer solace and calm through a responsive speech. Their primary goals of this speech or eulogy is to help the nation come to terms with the death of a loved one, with the president helping the nation to make sense of the tragedy, “transform symbols of destruction to symbols of renewal” and finally to explain how he ensures it will not happen again (Campbell and Jamieson, 2008, p.