Rhetorical Analysis Of John M. Barry's The Great Influenza

869 Words2 Pages

At the beginning of the 1918 flu epidemic, many people were uncertain about the causes, effects, and circumstances that influenza revolved around. People were scared, and research on the sickness was nearly impossible due to the fear of the unknown. When people saw the frightening numbers of deaths, which finalized at around 21 million in four months, which took place around the entire world, no one would want to face the deadly virus themselves. John M. Berry, an author and historian, published the book The Great Influenza in 2004 to highlight the scientists of this time and the research they withheld. Barry uses rhetorical devices, including anaphora, allusion, and analogy in his book to emphasize the greatness behind scientists and their …show more content…

Like the people who were quarantined in fear due to the fear of the effects of influenza, scientists were also faced with the fear head-first, with no knowledge of the subject. Barry exclaims that having uncertainty will not achieve any of their goals, and to be seen as something greater than just a scientist. They had to be certain about their work. His word choice in this paragraph holds power, meaning, and assertiveness that teaches the reader about what many of the scientists who studied influenza in this period faced. The uncertainty of the virus was the main restraint for scientists, and for one to take the chance is what sets them apart from the ordinary. Likewise, Barry alludes to the findings of Albert Einstein, one of the most well-known physicists in world history in the late 1800s. While he may have been best recognized for his theories behind energy and mass, Barry studies that "Einstein refused to accept his theory until his predictions were tested, one must seek out such findings" which set him apart from others, allowing him not to doubt himself when things go …show more content…

In this situation, alluding to Einstein and his greatest studies allows for clarity, and honesty in the test of his ideas. Without the evidence that even the most well-known scientists may have struggled with, there is no evidence to back up the reasoning behind his claim. While many scientists may be searching to become famous, to become a well-known historian like Einstein, Barry knows they have to be honest with themselves and their work first before reaching the next step in their journey. In comparison to his earlier ideas, Barry recognizes the difficulty of continuing one's journey with uncertainty by using an analogy to recognize the greatness behind a single mistake in a scientist's work. All scientists "probe in a disciplined way." A single step can take them through the looking glass into a world that seems entirely different, and if they are at least partly correct their probing acts like a crystal to precipitate an order out of chaos, to create form, structure, and direction. A single step can also take one off a

Open Document