Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Intro to public speaking quizlet
Intro to public speaking quizlet
Public speaking final exam study guide
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In her aspiring speech, “A Whisper of AIDS”, AIDS activist Mary Fisher examines her proposal for how awareness is the key. Fisher’s purpose is to convey the idea that AIDS shouldn’t be treated like any normal disease, and to take in account how destructive AIDS can be. She adopts the use of rhetorical appeal, figurative language, and anaphora in order to appeal to her Republican leaders. Mary Fisher speech was a call to seek awareness, to urge the Republicans to no longer hold a stigma on the view of AIDS and to address the problem other than turning a blind eye to it.
The main point of this speech, was Mary Fisher’s demand for an end to the silence and prejudice surrounding HIV/AIDS and to inform about the spread of infection. She begins the speech with strong influential words of willingness to inform her listeners. This bears the message of how important and personal the
…show more content…
topic is for her. Throughout, she states that she herself has AIDS, and examples of the pain and trials she has been through in her personal life. Fisher represents the HIV/AIDS community with pride and indemnity as she calls upon the Republican party to not only see the suffering symptoms of AIDS, but to open up to the infected with a sense of affection and compassion. She concludes with the message of hardship and outlines her message by saying "I ask you to recognize that the AIDS virus is not a political creature” (Fisher). She is just simply asking for recognition of the virus and its affects, not for political gain or a need for compassion. Mary Fisher, AIDS Activist, spoke at the 1992 Republican National Convention.
Her purpose was to inform the ones whom were prejudice and hold a sense of ignorance about the disease and represent the AIDS community. During this time in 1992, HIV and AIDS were killing people around the world and people with AIDS were being solely rejected by society. This epidemic was spreading fast, and were commonly either the lower class people cause of drugs or the gay/bisexual community. She calls for the Republicans to listen by stating, “It does not care whether you are Democrat or Republican. It does not ask whether you are black or white, male or female, gay or straight, young or old” (Fisher). She shows the desire of presenting her point that AIDS doesn’t care what type of person you are; it can effect anybody. By her choice of words, she sets an alarm of guilt and sets the serious tone that is played throughout the rest of her speech. Some people believe that certain situations cannot happen to them, but just like Mary Fisher and her unlawful husband, proves that you cannot choose your own
battles. She starts to appeal to her audience with pathos and the heart-bearing story of her personal life and how she contracted the disease from her dishonest husband. Fisher gains sympathy from the audience by apealing to her children; Zachary and Max, which whom does not have AIDS, to not forget their ailing mother and to not suffer and fear the unsafe world. She proclaims the support she has from her dear family to fight and speak out for awareness for her current fight. She also goes into detail when she quotes the words of Pastor Nemoellor, a man who came out of the Nazi death camps to her personal gain to aid her purpose. “They came after the Jews, and I was not a Jew, so, I did not protest. They came after the trade unionists, and I was not a trade unionist, so, I did not protest. Then they came after the Roman Catholics, and I was not a Roman Catholic, so, I did not protest. Then they came after me, and there was no one left to protest” (qtd. In Fisher). She shows the reality through this quote by presenting the fear of AIDs and that any human is at risk for infection. Mary Fishers logic for this speech was clear to see- without awareness and understanding the illness, American’s cannot move onto fighting the battle against AIDS. She uses logos appeal through the use of statistics on AIDS saying, “Two hundred thousand Americans are dead or dying; a million more are infected. Worldwide forty million or sixty million or a hundred million infections will be counted in the coming few years” (Fisher). By her stating these random statistics is a use of fallacies. I believe by her using the word “or”, makes her unsure of her numbers and does not back up her evidence of the immense number infected. Her call to action is unclear because throughout her speech, she makes no point of research or ways for prevention. Understanding AIDS/HIV is a serious topic for her, moving forward to help the infected needed to be her call to action instead of informing. Thru her speech, Fisher brought up the ethics part of her situation. She showed the demand of what is happening in the real world, whether the audience would like to believe it or not. Her approach was heard as she gained support and made people aware of HIV from a real-person point of view. Her main point of ethos was equality. Through speaking of her personal story to the reference of scenario’s stating, “I am one with a black infant struggling with tubes in a Philadelphia hospital. Though I am female and contracted this disease in marriage and enjoy the warm support of my family, I am one with the lonely gay man sheltering a flickering candle from the cold wind of his family’s rejection” (Fisher.) Here she confronts stereotypes head on that only the homosexual category has or can contract the disease. She displays how she is equal with these normal stereotyped stories and how to relate. Her other rhetorical appeals were through figurative language. She began the speech with a simple use of a metaphor the “Shroud of Silence” pertaining to the need to concern the American people with the topic of AIDS. Continuing on, she uses repetition of the words “I was not at risk” to gain the idea that stereotyping is incorrect and shows the sense of security people should have. By using anaphora and repeating the same phrase at the beginning of each of her lines caught the audience’s attention because of the repetition that quickly engages hearing and makes points stick. By giving the sense of security emphasizes that everyone is at risk. Fisher catches eyes by giving a new face in representation for the disease. In summary, Fisher chose her words to encourage listeners to come forth and speak about HIV/AIDS and not feel fear or rejection. Mary Fisher speech was a call to seek awareness and convey the idea that AIDS shouldn’t be treated like any normal disease talked about in a sex education class. The speech was very powerful and touches people in a personal way through an understanding real-life experience.
Mary Fisher's speech on HIV and Aids was executed extremely well in almost every way possible. Out of all the aspects of Mary's speech, I felt her establishment of common ground is what made her speech so great. Pearson, Nelson, Titsworth, and Hosek (2016) says “common ground occurs when you and your audience share an understanding of the world”(p.246). Mary did a great job of sharing her understanding and views of HIV and Aids, which is helping to establish common ground with the audience. Also, Mary disclosed things about her personal life that made her establishment of common ground even greater with the audience. All in all, Mary’s use of common ground did great things for her during this speech about HIV
In 102 Minutes, Chapter 7, authors Dwyer and Flynn use ethos, logos, and pathos to appeal to the readers’ consciences, minds and hearts regarding what happened to the people inside the Twin Towers on 9/11. Of particular interest are the following uses of the three appeals.
She confirms her authority on the topic by revealing, very early on, that she has contracted the disease herself. She states, “Though I am female and contracted this disease in marriage, and enjoy the warm support of my family, I am one with the lonely gay man sheltering a flickering candle from the cold wind of his family's rejection.” She purposefully conveys to her conservative audience that she is not gay, is married, a mother and contracted her disease in marriage, not with a random partner. Here she is playing up her personal experience to support her argument. Fisher’s inclusions of these social facts are added to acquire the sympathy of her traditional audience. Likening herself to the hypothetical “lonely gay man” draws sympathy from the assembly for a hypothetical character in her rhetoric. These inclusions of speculative illusions strengthen the rhetorical appeal of her argument. Fisher specifically includes certain information to develop an understanding from a conservative audience that may need
Albert Einstein declared, “The most important thing is to never stop questioning.” Questions help extend our knowledge by opening our minds to change and new possibilities. The excerpt talks about the mindset that scientists need to become successful and the process they go through to make new discoveries. In The Great Influenza, John M. Barry educates citizens of the everyday challenges that scientists face through utilizing rhetorical questions, cause and effect, and contrast.
I chose this word because the tone of the first chapter seems rather dark. We hear stories of the hopes with which the Puritans arrived in the new world; however, these hopes quickly turned dark because the Purtains found that the first buildings they needed to create were a prison, which alludes to the sins they committed; and a cemetery, which contradicts the new life they hoped to create for themselves.
...n our country. She’s saying that the advancement of women is getting stuck between a rock and a hard place. This was such a strong point in her speech because it shed light into the logical thinking, and made a historical connection to slavery. By making this connection, she was able to help many see that women were convicted slaves to the current state of the union.
Anticipation is prevalent throughout The Road, which is set by the narrative pace, creating a tense and suspenseful feeling and tone.
That is the question of the century, and it frequently asked, especially by women in a relationship. Communication is key, but it is often a problem between couples. Men and women communicate in different ways, and there is constant misunderstanding during these variations of communication. Deborah Tannen really aids her audience in understanding these types of communication in her article, “Sex, Lies, and Conversation.” She has a PhD in linguistics, and is a professor of linguistics as well. She provides very useful information and even gives situations to relate to.
Science is a study that can be viewed and interpreted in various ways. Some believe science to be based on facts and specific results, while others believe it to be based on creativity and spontaneity. In his account of the 1918 flu epidemic, The Great Influenza, John M. Barry characterizes scientific research as work that requires creativity, spontaneity, and intelligence through his use of rhetorical devices such as allusions, metaphors, and rhetorical questions.
The subject of death is one that many have trouble talking about, but Virginia Woolf provides her ideas in her narration The Death of the Moth. The moth is used as a metaphor to depict the constant battle between life and death, as well as Woolf’s struggle with chronic depression. Her use of pathos and personification of the moth helps readers develop an emotional connection and twists them to feel a certain way. Her intentional use of often awkward punctuation forces readers to take a step back and think about what they just read. Overall, Woolf uses these techniques to give her opinion on existence in general, and reminds readers that death is a part of life.
…“With liberty and justice to all”, though this was not the case when the AIDS epidemic first jumped off. I believe that the only reason justice, mercy, and veracity were not served in the beginning of this battle is simply because of majority and minority. AIDS, at first, was only found to be attacking the gay population (minority), but the people that could do something about it, or controlled the money that could help with the situation were not being affected, and didn’t feel threatened by it (majority).
"Demanding that life near AIDS is an inextricably other reality denies our ability to recreate a sustaining culture and social structures, even as we are daily required to devote such time to the details of the AIDS crisis." -Cindy Patton
Fisher and Glaser both open their speeches by addressing the obvious: they don’t fit in with the stereotypical AIDS victim. Fisher destroys all stereotypes by saying AIDS “does not ask”, and “does not care.” While doing this, she is emphasizing that anyone is at risk, regardless of who you are. Fisher also proves that because she has contracted this virus, she is “one with” all AIDS survivors, struggling for help and being ignored. Similarly, Glaser touches on this topic by ironically identifying as a “strange spokesperson for such a group”, and even bluntly calls herself a “well-to-do white woman.” By doing this, she is showing the nation she has
During the time when the general public believes the only way to contract HIV/AIDS is to be homosexual, an addict, or prostitute, Fisher being a white, heterosexual, married mother of two from an upper-class family who contracted the virus from her husband is herself the certifying ethos of this speech (1). She tactfully uses her own circumstances and diagnosis to embody the plight of all in the AIDS community and shows that no one is exempt from this deadly disease. She emphatically states that HIV does not care about race, age, gender, sexual orientation, or political affiliation; all that it asks is “Are you human?” (2). She ceases to be the exception and gains the attention and respect of the American people when she aligns herself with others with HIV/AIDS with her statement:
From the moment scientists identified HIV and AIDS, social responses of fear, denial, stigma and discrimination have accompanied the epidemic. Discrimination has spread rapidly, fuelling anxiety and prejudice against the groups most affected, as well as those living with HIV or AIDS. It goes without saying that HIV and AIDS are as much about social phenomena as they are about biological and medical concerns. Across the world the global epidemic of HIV/AIDS has shown itself capable of triggering responses of compassion, solidarity and support, bringing out the best in people, their families and communities. But the disease is also associated with stigma, repression and discrimination, as individuals affected (or believed to be affected) by HIV have been rejected by their families, their loved ones and their communities. This rejection holds as true in the rich countries of the north as it does in the poorer countries of the south.