Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast leadership theories
Compare and contrast leadership theories
The theory and practice of change management
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare and contrast leadership theories
Groups and organizations are embedded into everyday life. We are either a part of one or a witness the one. Chapter twelve of Exploring Leadership by Komives discusses the organization system of an organization. This chapter explores how the five aspects of the Relational Leadership Model is apparent in organizations. Some of the main takeaways were the organization systems, leadership in organizations and organizational culture. Organizations are a large collection of groups which work together to serve a common purpose. According to the definition of a system, “defined as an environment in which each interaction between members produces outcomes that affect each individual and subsequent interactions and outcomes” (Komives 259), organizations can be considered a system. As systems grow, interactions between members develop, which means the organization becomes more complex. Kevin Kelly’s “The Nine Laws of God” suggest organizing principles in diverse organizations. I can see how these nine laws would benefit a large group. They include empowerment and inclusivism which corresponds to the Relational Leadership Model. These complex models offer new potentials. However, leading within …show more content…
They also create the structure. One of the structures I liked was the reversed triangle. In this structure, the leader should work for the group and provide them with the tools they need to be successful. However, different companies may require different structures. The web is a nice alternative. The power is distributed and is very adaptable. This structure is good for a company with a lot of change. It is important to realize, the structure does not make the organization, the members do. Making changes to the structures may make issues easier to deal with. However, it does not change the people. The leader must try to make connections and balance the people in order for an organization to work
The servant leadership model is about serving the people and the organization first, rather than yourself. This leadership method allows people in the organization to come together as a group and work to make a difference together. The relational leadership model is “attempting to accomplish change or make a difference to benefit the common good” (Daft). This leadership style is group oriented and allows people in the group to be individuals and for the leader to understand those individual traits, but then to use them to develop one cohesive group that is able to accomplish many goals. These two theories put together helped form my own personal leadership style and has allowed me to expand on my own definition of
Leadership has been defined in different ways, a definitaion of leadership that would be most commonly accepted would be “the ability of an individual to influence, motivate, and enable others to contribute toward the effectiveness and success of the organization…”(House et al., 1999, p. 184 as cited in Yukl, 2013, p. 19). After a comprehensive review of different leadership literature, Stogdill (1974, p. 259, as cited in Yukl, 2013, p. 18) concluded that “There are almost as many definitions of leadership as there are persons who have attempted to define the concept." Leadership can be viewed from two different angles one is shared influence process and other as a specialized role. Researcher who view leadership as a specialized role consider attributes as a factor in selecting a designated leader. On the contrast, theorist who emphasises on influence process considers “Leadership” as a social process or a pattern of relationship.
Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. p. 1-19. Retrieved from http://www.blackdiamond.dk/HDO/Organisation_Gary_Yukl_Leadership_in_Organizations.pdf
Vecchio, R. (Ed.). (2007). Leadership: Understanding the dynamics of power and influence in organizations (2nd ed.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Organizational structure is a necessity in any organization. It’s the foundation that defines how certain activities are directed towards an ultimate goal; such as supervising and coordination, along with allocating specific tasks to certain individuals, departments, or groups. Organizational structure reflects how individuals perceive their organization and the environment in which they reside within the institution. An institution can be structured in various ways, depending on its target goal. The structure of an organization will determine the modes in which it will operate and perform. Organizational structure provides a firm foundation in which standard operating procedures can rely on. This means, group members within the organization
The Foodcorp is a big organization of more than twenty thousand employees. The structure should help the organization achieved established goals and objectives. Therefore, the appropriate structural design is very crucial. The performance and the efficiency of the organization can be enhanced through specialization and appropriate division of labor. Foodcorp used a matrix structure but the management style of Foodcorp seemed to be a one boss arrangement. Information and decisions directly comes from the top. As we can see from the chart, group members report and communicate primarily with president. In my opinion, this style will work best in a simple organization, but not for a big organization like Foodcorp. If it relies too much on the president, the employees might face with many problems such as delays and bad decisions. Finally, Foodcorp may suffer from its structure. In my ...
In organizations aspiring for growth and continual improvement, relationships are more intricate and alternatives more numerous than the either/or imposition implied by the notion of leaders and followers. Practically no one leads all of the time. Leaders also work as followers; all in all, “everyone uses a portion of their day following and another portion leading” (Galie and Bopst, 2006, p. 11).
“Structures incorporate a network of roles and relationships and are there to help in the process of ensuring that collective efforts is explicitly organized to achieve to achieve specific ends." Child (1977)
This is to allow managers to make decisions about how to group employees together to meet their objectives. There six most common structures in Mintzberg’s Organization Design include; simple, functional, divisional, matrix, teams and network and an organisation will select a structure based on the originations needs. Simple structure is a basic organisational design structure with low departmentalisation, little work specialisation, a wide span of control, centralised authority and little formalisation or rules. This would normally define a small company with a simplified organisational structures with very few employees who would be responsible for numerous tasks within the organisation. The next structure is the functional structure, this structure focuses on practical specialisation where similar or related occupational specialise are grouped together. Functional teams/areas are a group of employee with similar skills and knowledge. Common functional areas/teams include departments such as Finance, Sales HR and IT. There are a number of reason why companies are organised in functional teams and one of the many reasons is because it is more efficient to have employees with similar skills group together where it is easy for them to team up for project. The second reason is that working in functional teams makes training and knowledge sharing easier, since employees working in similar functional teams work together making it very easy to share their knowledge with others. The third structure is a matrix structure, this is company structure in which the reporting relationships are set up as grid, or matrix, rather than in the traditional hierarchy meaning that employees have dual working relationships. The next structure is called a divisional structure also known as a multidivisional structure. This the manner of designing an organisation
Organizational structure is defined as ‘the organization’s formal framework by which job tasks are divided, grouped and coordinated’ (Robbins et al., 2000: 351). Generally an organizations’ structure is considered to be the managerial framework that directs the non-managerial employees. Traditionally western organizational structure can be argued to have developed from the feudal system of government where a strict pyramidal power and class structure existed.
How does the individual who is serving as a leader go about seeing that the needs of the organization are met?
This paper will identify different leadership theories that have I have felt have been most helpful as well as least helpful in relating to leadership insights. There is a wide variety of theories to explain the concepts and practice of leadership. I will provide an overview of the more dominant or better known theories. Leadership is a process that involves influence with a group of people toward the realization of goals as well as a dynamic and complex process. A lot of what is written today tends to over-simplify the process. My explanation here is to provide an overview that keeps things simple through my analysis of comparing and contrasting
Leaders who can inspire and The. Leadership and Diversity 3 Collaboration – Working together among employees and groups within the company is the key. When leaders demonstrate that they can achieve objectives that require a high level of intergroup cooperation, synergy is created and employees enjoy the work experience (Folkman). Walk the talk – Leaders need to be role models and set a good example for their employees (e.g. the Folkman). Trust – People trust leaders with deep expertise and knowledge because they project confidence in their ability to make informed decisions (Folkman). Develop and support others – Leaders work side by side with their employees and push them to develop new skills and abilities.
There are two kinds of structures that organisations operate with today. The first being the organic structure while the other being the mechanistic structure.
Anderson, Heather J., et al. “What Works for You May Not Work for (Gen)Me: Limitations of Present Leadership Theories for the New Generation.” The Leadership Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 1, Feb. 2017, pp. 245–260., doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.08.001.