Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Organization analysis
Organization analysis
Different types of organizational structures
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Organization analysis
An organisation can be structured in many ways which depends on an organization’s strategy and objectives. Therefore the organizational structure defines how tasks are controlled within a business. This is to allow correct allocation of tasks to different functional teams. These teams are developed and allocated specifically on the performed tasks in order to meet the organization’s objectives and required goals. Delic, A., Alibegovic, S. D. and Mesanovi, M. (2016) found that a narrower Organisational structure with very fewer hierarchical levels is appropriate for the development of intrapreneurship within an organisation. (Damanpour, 1991; Fadeyi et al., 2015) added that an organisational structure includes the nature of formalization, the …show more content…
This is to allow managers to make decisions about how to group employees together to meet their objectives. There six most common structures in Mintzberg’s Organization Design include; simple, functional, divisional, matrix, teams and network and an organisation will select a structure based on the originations needs. Simple structure is a basic organisational design structure with low departmentalisation, little work specialisation, a wide span of control, centralised authority and little formalisation or rules. This would normally define a small company with a simplified organisational structures with very few employees who would be responsible for numerous tasks within the organisation. The next structure is the functional structure, this structure focuses on practical specialisation where similar or related occupational specialise are grouped together. Functional teams/areas are a group of employee with similar skills and knowledge. Common functional areas/teams include departments such as Finance, Sales HR and IT. There are a number of reason why companies are organised in functional teams and one of the many reasons is because it is more efficient to have employees with similar skills group together where it is easy for them to team up for project. The second reason is that working in functional teams makes training and knowledge sharing easier, since employees working in similar functional teams work together making it very easy to share their knowledge with others. The third structure is a matrix structure, this is company structure in which the reporting relationships are set up as grid, or matrix, rather than in the traditional hierarchy meaning that employees have dual working relationships. The next structure is called a divisional structure also known as a multidivisional structure. This the manner of designing an organisation
The Organisation structure of a company addresses the fact that every organisation has specific units that are responsible for different roles and actions in the organisation and that no department within the organisation stands alone, they are intertwined. The organisational chart or structure should be designed to divide up the work load, responsibilities and roles to be done
There will be a cluster of different skills working together. This also saves time in inter-departmental communication. A matrix also lets people lower down the organisational chart use their skills. Weaknesses of a Matrix structure It can be expensive if extra help is needed. Staff may be divided in loyalties because they wouldn’t which job is most important.
In reference to the theoretical model that was created by Hasenfeld containing two axes, task-oriented/people-oriented and internal/external, is used to determine the type of leadership skills an organization may have. However, although task-oriented interna...
Sarin, S. & O’Connor, G. (2009). First Among Equals: The Effect of Team Leaders Characteristics on the Internal Dynamics of Cross-Functional Product Development Teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(2), 188-205. Doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00345.x
Gibson, J.L., Ivancevich, J.M., Donnelly, J.H., & Konopaske, R. (2009). Organizations: Behaviors, structure, processes (13th ed.) New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
In modern days, organizational architecture plays a key role in order to allow companies to get success in the market. Organizational architecture, also known as organizational structure, defines as a structure that where the specific company whether works roles, decision making or responsibility are centralized, delegated or coordinated. The organizational structure also identify how the information from level to level within the company. IKEA is one of the international famous firms that designs and produces home furniture such as bed frames and desks. The company also is the leader in retailing furniture and has become the largest furniture retailer over the globe. Therefore the structure of a company is an important factor to achieve a rapidly growth. This paper aimed to describe the IKEA’s organizational architecture and provide analysis that whether any recommendations or changes have to make based on current information.
Functional 2. Divisional 3. Hybrid 4. Matrix 1. Functional Structure involves the departmentalization in which positions are grouped according to there main functional- specialized area.
Business structure is a critical factor to determine a company 's success or failure. Generally, larger organization has a more complex organizational structure. In the case of H&M, they had adopted matrix structure, one of the traditional organizational structure, into their business. As shown in figure 1, range of functional groups is listed horizontally across the table and on the other is product/task with a manager taking control of each. The functional structure is divided
In addition to urgency, Gustavsson could not create a powerful guiding coalition. He established a cross-functional team to develop a new moisture-resistant product. But the team did not include a sales manager who knows customers' needs and eventually sells the product. Although the team developed a commercially-viable product, their efforts, at least in the short term, were unsatisfactory, because with sales people's own doubts about the new product, they were afraid of jeopardizing the reputation of current product. Moreover, these cross functional teams operated within the established organization maintained the company's dominate culture and past norms. We know that structurally independent teams that are tightly integrated into the existing hierarchy with different cultures and processes are often more successful.
Organizations must operate within structures that allow them to perform at their best within their given environments. According to theorists T. Burns and G.M Stalker (1961), organizations require structures that will allow them to adapt and react to changes in the environment (Mechanistic vs Organic Structures, 2009). Toyota Company’s corporate structure is spelt out as one where the management team and employees conduct operations and make decisions through a system of checks and balances.
As the theme of my essay I have chosen to find out what our contemporary society must not forget in order to be able to make organizational theory evolve well into the 21st century. For this task I have decided to take a look back to Aldous Huxley’s modern dystopia “Brave new world”, that warned against totalitarian regimes that intended to suppress individuality in order to advance the interest of the state in its time. Even as those regimes might not be a direct threat nowadays we can eerily conclude that some aspects of it are quite accurate for the times we live in. According to Phillip Yancey who suggested that “there is a much more subtle enemy inchoate within each of us - a natural tendency for people to trade autonomy for comfort, safety and amusement.” This for the most people does not set off alarms but I will argue that it is the most basic requirement that has to be met in our day and age in order to tackle the wide range of issues that we face at the crossroads leading to the future, whether we talk about humanity or organizational theory itself. I think the novel gives us the perfect opportunity to draw parallels with our contemporary society, and see what must be corrected within post modernity based on how things evolved over the course of history and from prophetical books like Huxley’s even as at his time it was only intended to be satire. In the World State people are controlled by technologies like genetic engineering, sleep-learning and drugs like soma to satisfy needs and gently induce masses to enjoy their servitude. If one were to describe postmodernism in just a word or two, "skepticism" and "relativism" would probably best capture the overall ethos of its adherents. Deep skepticism about...
The market-oriented structure groups workers according to the market they serve, such as product, project, client, or geographical area. Large companies that implement a market-oriented structure may have market-based divisions or create a conglomerate of separate subsidiaries (Judith R. Gordon, 2002). I believe that this structure is more adoptable by those multinational corporations which have to respond to diverse cultures and meet the unique needs of various countries. The teams have the same goal meeting the market demands.
Many large organizations are realizing that they need to be more innovative and flexible. Intrapreneurship has become more important nowadays for organizations. Intrapreneurship helps organizations to a transformation of dreams into reality. This essay will describe the intrapreneurship and compare the differences between Intrapreneurship and Entrepreneurship and show some examples from the business world. It will further explain why larger organizations are pursuing an agenda of intrapreneurship. In addition, it will look at the difficulties of developing of an intrapreneurial culture. Finally, it will suggest strategies which could be adopted in pursuit of an intrapreneurship culture.
Organizational structure indicates to how the work of employees and teams within an organization is coordinated. In order to obtain organizational goals, individual work needs to be coordinated and managed. Structure is an important instrument in obtaining coordination, as it appoints reporting relations (who reports to whom), designs formal communication channels, and portray how different actions of individuals are linked together.
Organizational structure within an organization is a critical component of the day to day operations of a business. An organization benefits from organizational structure as a result of all it encompasses. It is used to define how tasks are divided, grouped and coordinated. Six elements should be addressed during the design of the organization’s structure: work specialization, departmentalization, chain of command, spans of control, centralization and decentralization. These components are a direct reflection of the organization’s culture, power and politics.