Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Promoting effective communication
Effective communication
Promoting effective communication
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Wilhoit (2009) explains building an argument is a complex task that does not require adhering to a specific rules and methods prescribed to you throughout your high school career. Although they certainly have a place in arguments in that they provide the infrastructure, the key premised to building an academic argument is understanding and establishing the rhetorical situation. It will give you an understanding of who the writer and the audience is, what is the subject or topic, the reason or occasion and finally the purpose of why the argument it being written (p.1-4). In this essay we will take a step by step look at how to construct a reflective argument in response to Michael Hardt’s “Are we capable of Democracy” argument in Examined Life. …show more content…
As well as how and when did I learn this? How trustworthy or authoritative are my source of information’s? How might my feeling or belief be misguided (Wilhoit, 2009, pp. 130-131)? I have spent my life in the American school system and through that education I have gained access to both creditable and authoritative information as well as some information that it’s less than trustworthy. I have also visited many countries outside the United States so I feel that I have a general idea of what others think about democracy and human nature. Within U.S democracy is an entitlement of being a citizen. A majority of neighboring nations consider the U.S. as the land of opportunity; a true democratic nation. The reality is that the U.S is likely the closest reflection of democracy but it is nowhere near the true definition. My thoughts on democracy are completely subjective and based more on citizenship experience that actually knowledge. The same goes for my experience with human nature, there is a school of thought that states that a person’s nature is not changeable. However, if that were true, I would not be in a classroom striving to obtain my bachelor’s degree at the age of 43, I would be a homeless, hopeless drug addict begging on a street corner for a dollar in downtown Portland without hope or aspiration. My feeling and belief around democracy and human nature are just that my feeling …show more content…
For the purpose of developing this response argument I would elect to do more research. The rationale is that my knowledge is based on experience and emotion and not grounded in facts and in writing and effective, persuasive and convincing arguments you need to support your assertions and while I have large amounts of passion for my opinion they are just that opinions that are not fact based but rather emotion based and while that emotion will enable me to produce an persuasive argument once the research is complete it is not enough to manufacture an academic
Ramage, John D., John C. Bean, and June Johnson. Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings. 9th ed. Boston: Pearson Education, 2012. Print.
An explanation is a set of statements constructed to describe a set of facts which clarifies the causes, contexts, and consequences of those facts. This description may establish rules or laws, and may clarify the existing ones in relation to any objects, or phenomena examined. The first piece Bush Remarks Roil Debate over Teaching of Evolution written by Elizabeth Bumiller, is an explanation. Bumiller addresses her points using facts rather than opinions, she also says, “Recalling his days as Texas governor, Mr. Bush said in the interview, according to a transcript, “I felt like both sides ought to be properly taught.”(2), this signifies that this is an explanation and not an argument since he sees both sides instead of choosing one. For
Democracy is rule by the people; the people elect governing officials based off of their personal values and beliefs. Different political parties rule the political scene and are serving to represent the people’s opinions in the best ways possible. Previously, I had a belief that my political view was essentially the only one possible and therefore it was the best. These views changed quickly once I learned the different political parties, their views, how they represent the people’s views, and how public opinion shapes politics. The government is formed around differentiating opinions on which policies should be in place and which social aspects need to be considered first. Not only is the government guided by opinion, but the people’s lives are guided by opinion as well. Each individual holds a different view, and each view can have an influence on society. Fortunately, after roughly eight weeks of studying American Government, I now have a better sense of complexity and the value of
The United States is run by a democracy. There are many pieces to democracy that must be in good health in order for democracy to be effective and work. In this essay I will critique some of the most important parts of democracy in America and go deeper. I will first focus on the strengths of United States democracy and then I will dive into categories of democracy that I believe to not be thriving. I believe that the current conditions of United States democracy are becoming a hindrance to this nation, because the opinions and freedoms the public possess are being stripped away through poor media, education, and economy.
The complexity of the universe and life can be explained if we believe that God exists.
Our understanding of democracy is not only dependent on the education we receive on such government, but where we are born. In addition, not all countries have a democracy government system. Currently, there are countries that are of communist and monarchy government types in the world such as China and Vatican City. People being born in countries without a democracy will have less experience of it and therefore have a different opinion about democracy then those that are born in one. Furthermore, everyone’s beliefs are different depending on if your family is religious or not. I also believe that everyone’s attitude and beliefs are developed through life experiences such as how your family has raised you and the traditions of the country of your birth. In my case, I am born in the multicultural country Canada. I am raised in a non-religious, well off family, where most of my daily life necessities are fulfilled. In addition, the education system here in Canada has taught me to treat everyone equally. Moreover, our education system taught us that a democratic government is a much more beneficial system than others such as communism. Through my education, how I am raised and the influences of my country, I believe that a democracy government that promotes equity with diversity of different races is a very wonderful
The old Native American proverb that states, “We do not inherit the land from our ancestors; we borrow it from our children” really makes me think about my lifestyle and how it is benefiting the Earth. Being sustainable not only means to take care of the planet for my generation but also for future generations. It is my job to care for the planet as best as I can and to help pass on these good habits to my children. The best ways that I can help my environment are composting uneaten food and old vegetables, donating or reusing old clothes, and recycling plastic and paper products.
Upon writing this essay it solidified the thought within me that I have achieved a solid understanding of the argumentative writing process at a college level and can successfully move forward on this strengthened knowledge. I believe I presented an educated, engaging argument that the audience will have a hard time arguing for anything other than implementation of my proposed solution.
Overall, the best way to write an effective argument is to use the strategies that both Kelso and Saunders used. One used some better than the other, but neither failed to present their argument. Kelso’s credibility and use of facts overpowered Saunders, whereas Saunders use of opposing viewpoints and ongoing clear stance managed to surpass most of Kelso’s methods. In the end they were both engaging articles, who have points worth reading.
Democracy in the American culture is defined as “a system of government in which power is vested in people, either directly or through freely elected representatives.” Which is stated in Webster dictionary. Many Americans to me do not advantage democracy we live in. I feel as though too many people in authority have a substantial amount of power, and end up making the wrong decision. Which is not of the best interest for the people. The Government has devised a way for the rich to get richer and the poor to get poorer. There is no median in between the high levels of society and the lower-class. Our middle class is vanishing, and it mainly because of how our democracy is setup. Our government is corrupt as a whole, which includes our democracy. Too many people in our democracy have the overall power and decision making ability to enforce, what they feel should be enforced in law. One example of this is the ongoing pain of taxes. Democracy is all about equality, but we totally lack it when paying our taxes. The small one percent of high class Americans are getting richer while
One of the most famous arguments for the existence of God is the Ontological Argument, which was introduced by Saint Anselm. In accordance to Anselm, faith is believing without reason, and he supports his faith with reasons. Anselm defines God as “that which nothing greater can be conceived.” Which in result he is not stating a clear definition of god, he is implying that we may never conceive god. Anselm cited “the fool” from Psalm 14, who says in his heart there is no God. The fool then states that “God exists only in the understanding.” It is important to note that questioning things does not make you a fool, for everyone at one point questions another God. Anselm illustrates that the fool understands his understandings, although he does
Rhetoric. “The art of speaking or writing effectively” (Merriam-Webster). When reading that definition, one would think the practice of rhetoric would be easy because it is the art or speaking and writing. The key word of that definition is effectively. Before taking this class, the real meaning of rhetoric was a foreign topic to me. Throughout this semester, I have broadened my knowledge on many different topics that involve effective rhetoric. At first when assigned to take this class, I wondered what it had to do with becoming a business major. After spending a few hours in class, I quickly realized that these skills would greatly help me in analyzing business proposals, having confrontations with others in the business world, and presenting
The purpose of this essay is to see if this following argument is cogent. By applying all three ARG conditions to it, I will be able to know if the argument is cogent. The definition of cogency is an argument that needs to have each premise acceptable, in conclusion, are relevant to the conclusion, and the premises in conclusion must provide adequate grounds for the conclusion.
There are three things that Aristotle said that those are basic skills in persuading people. Ethos,Pathos,Logos. He said when people decide to do something, they rationally make a judgment and there always has to be reason. Therefore, explaining with some examples or quoting an expert opinion would be very successful idea in those reasons. So now we can see that Deborah Tannen, the author of ‘The Argument Culture’, shows us the way of using Aristotle’s three skills: interesting to readers by using her career indirectly, compelling readers to follow her writing structure so that making the reader’s pathos her own. So through this rhetorical analysis, I will observe and analyze her writing structure, what is the point that she wants to tell readers and what is her main skills among three Aristotle’s persuasion skills.
Democracy is “...the word that resonates in people’s minds and springs from their lips as they struggle for freedom and a better way of life...” (Schmitter and Karl, 1991:75). However, the word democracy has many different means depending on the country and context it is used in. “Every country has is own culture and comes by its political system through its own history” (Greenberg, 2007:101, cited in Li, 2008:4). Li, (2008) states that because of China’s political structure the usual road to democracy may be difficult for it to achieve. The western idea ...