Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why grading system is important
Classrooms implications for moral development
Importance of moral values in education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why grading system is important
The purpose of this essay is to see if this following argument is cogent. By applying all three ARG conditions to it, I will be able to know if the argument is cogent. The definition of cogency is an argument that needs to have each premise acceptable, in conclusion, are relevant to the conclusion, and the premises in conclusion must provide adequate grounds for the conclusion. A premise is acceptable if the reviewer can give adequate reasons by making the premise believable. A grade is meant to reflect a teacher’s assessment of a student’s understanding of a subject or mastery of a set of skills, not an assessment of a student’s personal values. This first premise is acceptable because you will never be grade on what you believe in. A grade …show more content…
The second premise is acceptable because American students don’t have a commitment on what they believe. They could either be religious person or someone who simply have different opinion on a subject. I never heard of a law where you have to believe in what you were taught in school, so American students can still be good in school. Some American students understand the theory of evolution, but do not believe in it. The third premise is acceptable because some American students can have knowledge on a certain topic, and they can either believe in it or not. Understanding the theory of evolution does not assume students should believe in it. Having knowledge does not reflect your beliefs, which is why arguments exist. Relevance means all premises of an argument need to be true, and the premises provide reasons on making the conclusion true. This argument does provide reasons to believing the conclusion to be true. American students who understand the theory of evolution should not be given a lower grade for not believing in it. This is the conclusion for the argument that I am evaluating. The premises in combination are relevant to this conclusion because they give good reasons for students to not get lower grade for not believing in the theory of evolution. Most American students are only grade on their understanding of a subject or mastery of a set of skills. Therefore, I can assume the premises should be enough to make the conclusion be
An explanation is a set of statements constructed to describe a set of facts which clarifies the causes, contexts, and consequences of those facts. This description may establish rules or laws, and may clarify the existing ones in relation to any objects, or phenomena examined. The first piece Bush Remarks Roil Debate over Teaching of Evolution written by Elizabeth Bumiller, is an explanation. Bumiller addresses her points using facts rather than opinions, she also says, “Recalling his days as Texas governor, Mr. Bush said in the interview, according to a transcript, “I felt like both sides ought to be properly taught.”(2), this signifies that this is an explanation and not an argument since he sees both sides instead of choosing one. For
On December 2,2015 I went to to the Lynnhaven building to receive some feedback on my agreement paper for English 111. It was a very rainy day after running through the rain when I reached the writing center room. There was a yellow note saying that the writing center was in the student center until December 4,2015. After reading the note I ran back in the rain to my car.It was to cold to walk it was raining. As I approached the student center I was told by a security guard that the tutoring lab was located on the third floor. I had walked up three flights of stairs. When I had finally reached the third floor,I walk into the tutoring lab. There were about eight tables, but only four staff members and one student. Amen had approached me asking what did I need help with today. I replied saying that I would like some feedback on my paper for English. He then pointed to the writing table and said “she can assist you with your paper”.
Evolution and Creationism are both fact and theory but the question is which one should be taught in schools? Only a few school distracts have approved the teaching of evolution because it has more senitific evidence than creationism to prove that it is true. According to a new Gallup poll, just 39% of Americans believe in evolution. The Gallup polls also show that those Americans with higher education believe in the theory of evolution as opposed to those with only high school diplomas. The polls found that 74% Americans with post-graduate degrees believe in evolution theory compared to 21% of Americans with only high school diplomas. The Gallup polls suggest that the belief in the theory of evolution is associated with education. Evolution should be taught in schools because it has more scientific evidence to support it than creationism does. Also, public schools should not teach things that have to do with God, such as creationism, because the Constitution requires the separation of church and state. Finally, if we do not allow schools to teach evolution it would be a form censo...
As mentioned earlier relevance evidence refers to any material fact or evidence that make the existence of a issue more probable than it would without facts. When evidence has been offered and a determination has been made to include it due to passing constitutional test and did not violated collection procedures, the supporter of the evidence will have to demonstrate the materiality, competency, and relevancy of same(Britz, 2008, p.273). The relevancy of an item evaluates the materiality of the item and its probative value.
Evolution has been taught in all public schools for as long as many can recall. Though the process of evolution is not the only theory, schools have been teaching it as if it is the complete truth, ignoring other aspects and only focusing and targeting on Darwin's theory of Evolution. However, there are still many other ideas that the students should be informed of as well because all are theories, all are hypothetic. Teaching of the evolution theory have yet to be proven reliable and confirmed by all scientists, thus it should not be taught in schools and should be left for students to wonder and discover by themselves.
They all also attempt to discredit the opposing view ,whether it is through logic or simple dismissal. The last main trait I noticed was the tendency to make the title a question but not to answer it. This is most likely to draw people from both sides of the argument. Over all this genres attributes all are in place to reach more people and have them listen to their argument in an attempt to persuade them.
In an article by Gienapp (2015), he stated that as the U.S. was being created, the Framers explored various types of government. The first was the Article of the Confederation which had a lot of problems and weaknesses that needed to be fixed, it required a succession of long debates, and it caused a great deal of regional conflict. Because of this, in the hopes that it will solve most of the problems, the Framers in 1787 began drafting the Constitution as well as signed it which replaced the Article of the Confederation. There was a push for ratification of the Constitution by two parties, one supporting it while the other opposed it. What it boiled down to was there was a split by two groups, the Federalist and Anti-Federalist who verbally
The editorial I chose to analyze was “Should elderly drivers face different licensing rules” by Scott Martelle from the Los Angeles Times. The Toulmin Model of Argument is essential to writing a good argumentative editorial, paper, or article. I will be using the Toulmin Model formula and breaking it down into its six parts to analyze this editorial. The Toulmin model was created by Stephen Toulmin, a former British logician and now a college professor at the University of Southern California. Toulmin, himself found trouble applying basic logic to everyday arguments. Toulmin proceeded to create an improved model of practical reasoning and the understanding of arguments. The first stage of the Toulmin model consists of three parts: claim, data,
James Marshall, I appreciate your openness and the personal touch you gave to your post, mentioning your past as an atheist and some of your struggles. In regard to what you mentioned about education in general, I think you are right when you note some of the major changes and shifts in the American educational system. You mentioned the fact that early on Americans had a very high view of scripture and faith. It is clear, moreover, that each family was deeply involved with the education of their children and this education was primarily based upon the Bible. Anthony & Benson (2003) make the following statement:
An inference is a way to yield a conclusion from statements that are presumed to be true—called premises. The conclusion includes new knowledge that the premises did not make explicit. For example, we could have two statements which are presumed to be true. 1.) “Steve is in choir.” 2.) “Everyone in choir sings.” From these two statements, we can infer a conclusion of 3.) “Steve sings.” We were able to reasonably put forth a new piece of information from two previously established pieces of information.
Artificial intelligence, more commonly called AI, has become the new frontier of human advancement and has gradually been coming into the public eye. Much like eras such as the stone age and the iron age, it is now the age of intelligent technology. Unlike the technological advancements of the past, though, this time, some issues surround the field. While it has been used for good such as developing cures for diseases or making knowledge more available to the populace, with its capabilities it could possibly create some problems as well as good. The reason it is such a debatable topic is because whichever direction humankind goes about developing AI will determine the future of humanity in how everyday life and jobs would get done. Considering
...ol over what they believe but themselves, and that is based on their education, upbringing, and morals. Therefore, they have the ability to consider changing their minds or just the ability to remember what they were taught and use it to benefit their side of the argument. In conclusion, evolution should not be taken from our school systems. It is a very useful science and can help explain many previously unanswered questions that students, and adults alike, may have had. Evolution is also a very important branch of the biological sciences. Our modern school system is not as good as it should be, and refusing to educate children is all areas of instruction would result in an ever-present decline.
While students are attending public schools they should be aware of their religion options. The student should have the right to practice their religion as they please, just on the own time. Yes, religion plays a huge part in molding a person but, should be practiced when the time is available, not in a classroom setting. The government should have the ability to control the protection of the students that just want to learn. The capability to regulate the religious practices while attending public educational institutions should be left to the government. Faith, religion and belief, usually are three words that are used to describe one situation, although these words have three different meanings. To have faith in something or someone you must first believe in it and also accept it as well, but have a belief without evidence. Religion is a belief in a heavenly superhuman power or principle, such as the almighty or creator to all things. Everyone has faith and belief, but not all believers believe in the almighty. Allowing religion into public schools while everyone attending not having the same belief is unfair, unconstitutional and is complicated to teach to a verity of students.
Have you ever wanted to wonder how that health food was good for you and how it can benefit you health or life.In this argument ti is stating that people should label the things that they put on the object and the other object was stating that they should not label the things on the objects.The people are wanting you to take and eat health and see if it will help you in the future they are trying to take and make you more healthy or more in shape then what you really are so lets take a look and see if we can pick a side on this argument.
In 1998 a British gastroenterologist, Andrew Wakefield publishes a paper in The Lancet proposing that the MMR vaccine caused intestinal inflammation that led to movement of peptides, in the GI tract, to the blood stream and eventually the brain; where they affected development. (Gerber and Offit) He based this off of his observation of 8 children that displayed symptoms of Autism spectrum Disorder (ASD) along with gastrointestinal discomfort 1 month after getting the meales-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine. After a spike in ASD diagnoses this article gained traction with concerned parents looking for something to blame. As it turns out Wakefield’s proposal was wrong for a few reasons. First his research had no control subjects, GI symptoms have never been associated with MMR vaccines, and the traveling peptide has never been identified.