Understanding Relevance Legal Standard

919 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Importance of evidence in the criminal justice process

In the grand scheme of trial, evidence is needed to convince jurors to give a verdict of guilt or not guilt. Evidence can take several forms such as physical evidence, substantial evidence. Regardless of what type evidence is presented must be relevant to the case to be admissible. “Relevance refers to any material fact or evidence having a tendency to make the existence of a matter at issue more probable than it would be without said fact (probative value)”(Britz, 2008, p. 344).

In this paper, an examination of the legal standard of relevance evidence will be discussed. Furthermore, the rules of inclusion and exclusion of evidence based on the wording of the rules will be scrutinized. In the final section, examples of evidence will be presented that could be both relevant and irrelevant for certain crime.

As mentioned earlier relevance evidence refers to any material fact or evidence that make the existence of a issue more probable than it would without facts. When evidence has been offered and a determination has been made to include it due to passing constitutional test and did not violated collection procedures, the supporter of the evidence will have to demonstrate the materiality, competency, and relevancy of same(Britz, 2008, p.273). The relevancy of an item evaluates the materiality of the item and its probative value.

The judge will conduct an evaluation evidence competency however, the jury can decide doing deliberation that a specific item or witness lacks credibility, in so doing refusing to consider it. In order to have the full understanding of evidence one need to understand the definition of relevance according to Federal Rules of Evidence. There are several reason evidence may be found to be lega...

... middle of paper ...

...the assassin in the drug case. This would be considered irrelevance.

In conclusion, as shown throughout this paper, evidence is needed to convince jurors to give a verdict of guilt or not guilt. Evidence comes in several forms such as physical evidence, substantial evidence. When evidence is presented, it acceptance in trial depends on relevant to the case to be admissible. “Relevance refers to any material fact or evidence having a tendency to make the existence of a matter at issue more probable than it would be without said fact (probative value)”(Britz, 2008, p. 344).

Works Cited

Britz, M.T. (2008). Criminal Evidence. Boston. Pearson Allyn & Bacon.

Federal Rules of Evidence (2011) Retrieved December 18, 2011, from http://www.law.cornell.edu

Spencer v. Texas, 385 U. S. 554, 560 (1967)

Show More
Related

  • Forensic Evidence Admissibility For or Against in the Bloodsworth v. State Case

    1944 Words  | 4 Pages

    On Bloodsworth’s appeal he argued several points. First he argued that there was not sufficient evidence to tie Bloodsworth to the crime. The courts ruled that the ruling stand on the grounds that the witness evidence was enough for reasonable doubt that the c...

    Read More

  • The Casey Anthony Trial: The Trial Of O. J. Simpson

    1077 Words  | 3 Pages

    Reasonable doubt plays a significant role in this particular case, as it requires a standard of unsurpassable evidence in order to be able to convict the plaintiff in a criminal proceeding. This is required under the Due Process Section in the Fifth Amendment of the American Constitution, allowing a safeguard and circumvention

    Read More

  • Lizzie Borden Trial Essay

    993 Words  | 2 Pages

    Judges make rulings on what evidence may or may not be admitted over the course of a trial and technology impacts the way police collect and process evidence, this is true today as well as during the 1892 trial of Lizzie Borden. The rudimentary practice of evidence collection and processing by police was a critical factor in the acquittal of Lizzie Borden. Fingerprinting had not been introduced into the court system and the absence of an eyewitness left the prosecution with little to work with, this left the prosecution only circumstantial evidence but most if not all of it pointed at the defendant. The Borden home was absent of any signs of forced entry and the traditional signs of a struggle couldn’t be located during the police examination but several gruesome facts indicated Lizzie Borden may have been innocent. Medical evidence as to the method used in the killings pointed toward a “tall man” being the culprit, specifically the nineteen wounds inflicted on Abby Borden were said to have been from a dull edge of an axe.

    Read More

  • False Confessions and the Norfolk Four Case

    2738 Words  | 6 Pages

    Kassin, Saul, and Lawrence Wrightsman (Eds.). The Psychology of Evidence and Trial Procedure. Chapter 3. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1985. Print.

    Read More

  • Anatomy of a Murder: Four Expert Witnesses

    1469 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to the Federal Rule of Evidence 703, an expert may base an opinion on facts or data in the case that the expert has been made aware of or personally observed. If experts in the particular field would reasonably rely on those kinds of facts or data in forming an opini...

    Read More

  • Criminal Trial Process Essay

    1178 Words  | 3 Pages

    The use of evidence and witnesses is a mechanism in which the law attempts to balance the rights of victims and offenders in the criminal trial process. Evidence used in court are bound by the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) and

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Visual Evidence

    1059 Words  | 3 Pages

    The article, “Trial Lawyers Cater to Jurors’ Demands for Visual Evidence,” written by Sylvia Hsieh stresses the importance of visual evidence. Hsieh writes

    Read More

  • Comparison Of Adam Dalgliesh And Quentin Altman

    755 Words  | 2 Pages

    For instance, the evidence Dalgliesh collects is still useful to his investigation, even if he is not working for the Metropolitan Police while he solves the case. He speaks to expert “Aubrey Glatt . . . a wealthy amateur criminologist” and the witness “QUOTE MAURGAURITE GODDARD.”. Aubrey Glatt assists Dalgliesh with the particulars of the case ________________________. Marguerite Goddard is absolutely essential to solving the case because she knows exactly who committed the crime. Altman, however, has the opportunity to use evidence besides expert and witness testimony. “Copycat” is set more recently than “Aunt Allie’s Flypapers,” Altman has technology available to him Dalgliesh did not possess. For instance, Altman utilizes the Forensics Department to prove that the writing in the library book is the same hand as the suspicious fan letter sent to the author. Because of modern forensics and the fact that all of the evidence he collects will have to stand in a court of law, there is more emphasis on physical evidence and the integrity of the evidence. To ensure the integrity of the evidence: “[Altman] pulled on his own latex gloves and slipped the book into an evidence envelope” (Deaver. 360). But, evidence, even reliable evidence, does not ensure

    Read More

  • Criminal Evidence

    1252 Words  | 3 Pages

    Evidence is the key element in determining the guilt or innocence of those accused of crimes against society in a criminal court of law. Evidence can come in the form of weapons, documents, pictures, tape recordings and DNA. According to the American Heritage College dictionary, evidence is the documentary or oral statements and the material objects admissible as testimony in a court of law (476). It is shown in court as an item of proof, to impeach or rehabilitate a witness, and to determine a sentence. This paper will examine two murder cases, O.J. Simpson and Daniel Taylor.

    Read More

  • Forensic Evidence Essay

    1204 Words  | 3 Pages

    Evidence collection is a crucial part of forensics. Its reliability can be compromised by input bias from law

    Read More

  • Incredible Evidence

    901 Words  | 2 Pages

    Known standards must be recognized and followed so that possession is obtained legally, evidence is marked appropriately samples are properly preserved, and the acquisition process is reported accurately. A complete chain of custody must be documented. Missing evidence or gaps in the chain of custody can produce doubt regarding the validity of the evidence. Doubt can lead to a ruling that evidence not be considered in a court of law because it lacks value in the prosecution. A ruling of not guilty, a mistrial or a complete dismissal of the case could ensue based on whether or not key evidence was dismissed from consideration, or how physical evidence is handled. In the case “Incredible Evidence” illustrated in our textbook on pages 68 and 69, a jury issued a verdict of not guilty in the high profile case involving O.J. Simpson, based on how the evidence was handled during the

    Read More

  • Importance Of Preponderance Of The Evidence

    861 Words  | 2 Pages

    In civil court, “preponderance of the evidence” and “clear and convincing evidence” are required standards of proof. “Preponderance of the evidence” is established when the evidence has shown that guilt has been more than 50% proven (Hails, 2014, p. 574). “Clear and convincing” standard requires proof greater than the “preponderance of the evidence” but not as great as “beyond a reasonable doubt”. Reasonable doubt is establish through evidence that disqualifies every reasonable opposing argument, thus establishing guilt. In criminal cases, guilt must be established “beyond a reasonable doubt” (Hails, 2014, p. 546). While the first two standards of proof are more commonly associated with civil trials, they are also read requirements in criminal courts during evidentiary rulings.

    Read More

  • Electronic Evidence

    1231 Words  | 3 Pages

    ISCUSSION PAPER ON THE REVIEW OF THE LAW OF EVIDENCE, DEALING WITH HEARSAY, RELEVANCY AND ADMISSIBILTY OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

    Read More

  • Why Evidence Is Important

    238 Words  | 1 Pages

    Evidence is the use of information to decide whether the accused did or did not in fact commit the crime. It can be from a weapon to even and DNA found once investigation starts. Even though evidence can be viewed to be a major factor in a case, there are rules behind what type of evidence and what can and cannot be admissible to court. As informed by Criminal Evidence, “evidence is any information about the facts of the case, including tangible items, testimony, documents…which, when presented to the jury at trial, tends to prove or disprove these facts.

    Read More

  • What Is The Importance Of Eyewitness Testimony

    1764 Words  | 4 Pages

    Eyewitness testimony plays a very large role in the American court system. It has been proven that a courts decision regarding the guilt of an accused person often depends on an eyewitness’ testimony and identification (Aronson, Wilson & Akert, 2010). To a jury eyewitness testimony is one of the most convincing forms of evidence is (Goldstein, 2008). When an eyewitness testifies and identifies a person as the criminal, his testification is given a lot of weight, and it is likely that the person identified will be convicted. This is true even when there is other evidence indicating that the accused is not guilty (Aronson et al, 2010). Furthermore, the more confident an eyewitness appears when testifying and identifying a criminal, the greater the likelihood of the jurors believing him (Aronson et al, 2010; Goldstein, 2008).

    Read More

More about Understanding Relevance Legal Standard

Open Document