When John J. Gabarro and John P. Kotter use the phrase ‘managing your boss’, they are not referring to sucking up to a boss, making political maneuvers, or controlling an ill tempered dictator. They are referring to understanding the way a boss best functions, and working in a way that will be compatible with their style. This involves fostering a relationship with one’s boss to better understand their strengths, weaknesses, and needs. It also involves realizing that an effective relationship with one’s boss will enable organizational goals to be met much more effectively. Some bosses are wired to prefer written reports, while some work better with oral reports. Many bosses like to have their hands on every part of operations, while others are hands-off and prefer to let their employees take charge of tasks. An employee that successfully manages a boss will take proactive action to meet their boss’s needs. For example, if a boss prefers written reports, it would be wise for an employee to provide them with strong written reports before they even asks for them. If a boss likes to be involved in every aspect of an employee’s project, then it would be wise to ask for …show more content…
I realize when I am able to swallow my pride and look beyond people’s action, I am much more likely to be successful in the business place. The article contained a story about a high-quality marketing manager who was hired by a cooperation facing financial pressure. The manager developed a plan to increase the company’s market share. The president however, was not looking for higher market share, but quick profits. Because of the marketing manager did not understand the president’s motivations, the company fired him. I need to make sure that I am constantly seeking to understand what my boss and my company really wants, because then I will be able to jump on their team instead of accidentally fighting against
Management is the ability to get a job done using appropriate processes, models and systems to achieve an objective. Managers think radically, abide by principles, rules and use experience in their respective fields to make things work. A good manager goes about the ordinary activities such a staffing, organizing, planning (Robert, 2007). The very ability of his/her colleague to discover the uniqueness in each of the subordinates, capitalize on it, harnessing the best out of them to accomplish goals clearly distinguishes such a person as great when compared to others. Great managers develop people and enthusiastically transfer acquired skills to others, work progress is constant and usually by leaps and bounds. In addition, a great manager outlines and strategizes his/her team for project plans such that there is a “buy in” on delivered commitments. In contrast, the former just transfers the required skills to subordinates; work progress is notable, vice versa of the latter. Rupert Murdoch of the News Corporation is ...
Not all managers are leaders. There are managers that are not effective leaders, just as there are leaders that do not have a clue how to manage. Typically, a manager denotes a position whereas a leader can be someone who simply influences regardless of title or position. Warren Bennis, a pioneer in leadership studies explains that managers “do things right” and leaders “do the right thing” (Bennis, 1982). Managers have a fiduciary relationship normally requiring them to ensure the process or routine is maintained. Where managers produce
Dr. Sutton highlights what it takes to be a good boss. People that work for a good boss are 20 percent less likely to have a heart attack (Sutton, 2010). Dr. Sutton wrote that teams with stronger leaders cost the company less money and achieved their work better (Sutton, 2010). Engagement and performance of employees were based upon their direct boss and not if the company was good or bad (Sutton, 2010). Most bad bosses have employees who have check-out: actively disengaged, and undermine their co-workers accomplishments. Managers have to find the balance between performance and humanity to be successful. Performance is about doing everything possible to help followers do great work; while humanity is about employees experiencing dignity and pride. Treating managerial work as an endurance race instead of a sprint race with small wins will lead one to becoming a good boss called grit by Sutton. Sutton believes that good bosses walk a constructive line between being assertive and not assertive enough with guidance, wisdom, and feedback that he called Lasorda’s law (Sutton, 2010).
In a firm, management and leadership are important and needed. Leadership and management are similar. Actually, leadership and management are totally different. The leadership would influence the firm. The leader would have difference leadership styles to lead the subordinate.
The manager in question is known for getting things done, which is desirable in a leader; however, the author has wi...
Managers are not only interested in status quo, but also production, expansion and growth. Management was a system to control machines. Leadership can never be controlled. Where one sits in life determines what you see. To be a good manager one must look at views from different perspectives. As situations change, leadership relations change. Leadership cannot be transactional. It can only work if both parties keep their agreements. A class survey was held to compare leaders to managers. The overall opinion was that they are similar in many ways. A leader and a manager can be one in the same. The difference be...
...itz, 2003). So, my research will firstly focus on what a manager can do on a day to day basis to develop their talent and that of their employees. First, I believe a leader needs to feed his/her people and let them grow. The leader must have an interest in what happens in the lives of people and have genuine interest in the individual employees: who they are and what they want. Ethics should be the bed from which you operate, first you have to give respect , in order to get it. High-quality management of people leads to longer employment , which leads to confidence , which leads to more work. A leader should thus provide a pleasant and friendly environment. I believe that the more fun you can make it for your employees to work, the more profit you will make. The real challenge is the willingness to bet on the long run and not get carried away by short-term pressure.
Ngirwa, C. C., Euwema, M., Babyegeya, E., & Stouten, J. (2013). Leaders styles of managing
Leadership is trait that is extremely important in any society. Leadership is known as the way people attempting to make a difference in a situation. However, I believe that it is better said to be a way of influencing others actions. Leadership is usually connected to a great leader that affected his or her followers in a dynamic way. Throughout the semester for my leadership class, I have expanded the knowledge in numerous ways. I now have fully understanding of the purpose and process of leadership to a society. Being a leader one must maintain an image of being the role model. I believe that this is leader should be who is someone who has the ability to influence, encourage, listen, and nurture. They are able to inspire, stimulate, persuade, shape, and have an effect on others.
John Dalberg-Acton once said that, “absolute power corrupts absolutely”, however what is often the case is that just a little bit of power can corrupt in a economy that has high unemployment rates, and low job security. In mid to lower level management there are individuals who use their position to dictate what employees do while on the job. According to Kellerman (2004), management has a lot to gain from dictating rather than cooperative work. Benefits of a boorish manager are primarily financial, although the benefits of bad management are usually short lived and result in high turnover. additionally, roughly 75% of employees report that their boss is the direct cause of their stress as reported by Robert Hogan an expert on personality assessment
In this essay we will be introduced to a leader who holds a high place of authority in the military and gain some personal insight on leadership and management. Then will look at this writer’s own personality traits and what leadership model the personality traits best match. Then look at the tenets of motivation and how this writer’s personality suites these tenets. Also look at the relationship between effective communication and motivation. Then finally we will look at some thoughts of what it takes to be an effective employee, successful manager, and an exemplary citizen.
Leadership is found not just at work but all around us. In any situation, leaders take a step forward and take charge of the situation. It can be at home, at work or at any other place. Leaders are never born, they become leaders because they have the credibility and people would love to follow them.
Leadership is not a position or a title it is action and example. In this Reflection, I will write about course topic, Leadership examples and me as a leadership. In course topic, I turn to what was the most interesting topic to me, which topic I find it difficult and which topic I find it useful for the future. In the Leadership examples, I turn to the most interesting thing I learned about a famous leader. The most important thing that great leaders all have in common, and I describe one famous leader’s approach to leading. In me as a leadership, I turn to what did I learn about being a leader from doing the classroom activities. What I will do is I was given a job as an office manager after graduating and if I would like
temper their need for public acclaim and financial reward with strong intrinsic motivations” (George, Sims, McLean, & Mayer, 2007).
More often organizations are getting into bigger risks in the market with their leaders in nowadays economy. The resistance to change is a reason why organizations trying harder to keep earlier recognized reputation within clients and community. The theme of leadership is relevant for each person as it occurs almost to everyone during the lifetime or to those who at least were a part of a team.