More handpicked essays just for you.
Briefly explain all managerial roles
Discuss three attributes each of leadership and followership
Briefly explain all managerial roles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
There are those that suggest leaders are born, while others contend that leadership itself is a learned art. When researching or simply asking several leaders or followers to define leadership, although some responses may be similar it is highly unlikely that that they will be the same. There are a countless definitions used when attempting to delineate what leadership is. A universal definition of the word does not exist, as the concept of leadership can be very elusive and complex. However, for the purpose of this research effort leadership is defined as “the influencing process between leaders and followers to achieve organizational objectives through change” (Lussier & Achua, 2015, p.5). It is important to note that the leader-follower relationship is a reciprocal process as followers also influence leaders. This is not to be confused with managing, as there is a clear distinction between the two. …show more content…
Leadership vs.
Management Not all managers are leaders. There are managers that are not effective leaders, just as there are leaders that do not have a clue how to manage. Typically, a manager denotes a position whereas a leader can be someone who simply influences regardless of title or position. Warren Bennis, a pioneer in leadership studies explains that managers “do things right” and leaders “do the right thing” (Bennis, 1982). Managers have a fiduciary relationship normally requiring them to ensure the process or routine is maintained. Where managers produce
order
Leadership has been defined in different ways, a definitaion of leadership that would be most commonly accepted would be “the ability of an individual to influence, motivate, and enable others to contribute toward the effectiveness and success of the organization…”(House et al., 1999, p. 184 as cited in Yukl, 2013, p. 19). After a comprehensive review of different leadership literature, Stogdill (1974, p. 259, as cited in Yukl, 2013, p. 18) concluded that “There are almost as many definitions of leadership as there are persons who have attempted to define the concept." Leadership can be viewed from two different angles one is shared influence process and other as a specialized role. Researcher who view leadership as a specialized role consider attributes as a factor in selecting a designated leader. On the contrast, theorist who emphasises on influence process considers “Leadership” as a social process or a pattern of relationship.
There are almost as many definitions of leadership as there are persons who have attempted to define leadership (Stogdill, 1974). Therefore, it is very difficult to understand what leadership actually is. According to John Sculley leadership revolves around vision and ideas and has to do more with inspiring people towards direction and goal. A leader is a person capable of inspiring other people to do things without sitting on top of them with a checklist. Precisely, leadership is a process whereby an individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a desired goal (Northouse, 2012). Distinguishing between leaders and non-leaders is hard as there exists no clear understanding of what differentiates leaders from non-leaders. Leadership and authority are constructed socially by superiors and subordinates, followers and peers.
The phrase “leader” versus “manager.” is used to show and compere how Leading is related to managing, Bennis and Nanus (1985:21) help us understand the broader role of supervision in their discussion of management and leadership: “To be a manager is to bring about, to accomplish, to have charge of, responsibility for, to conduct. Leading, on the other hand, is influencing, guiding in direction, course, action, opinion.” They go on to say that managers are people who “do things right,” and leaders are people who “do the right things.” Managers are more efficiency driven and focus on mastering routine activities, while leaders are driven by vision and judgment. Managers tend to be bean counters, while leaders focus on achieving desired results.
Leadership is a process by which a person influences others to accomplish an objective and directs the organization in a way that makes it more cohesive and coherent. Another popular definition of Leadership is — a process whereby an individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal. The word “leadership” has been used in at least three different ways. Occasionally it refers to a position within an organization,
Leadership is defined as a socially constructed process and which also affect organizational future outcomes. Leader is someone at high position who have overall duty for an organization, she or he decide what to do and the way how to achieve it. (Carter and Greer, 2013)The role of leader is extremely important for an organization, leader use their own power to influence the followers though many different ways such as motivation in order to realize the organization object. (Waal and Sivro, 2012)
Leadership is the ability of an individual to influence, motivate and inspire others (Gill, 2006). It is therefore defined as a process whereby a leader influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal (Northouse, 2013). A leader has to make a decision for something to happen and provide his followers with clear direction (Rost et al, 1991). It will evoke feelings of challenge, excitement and involvement for the followers to proceed with the task (Gill, 2006).
What is leadership? Researchers cannot seem to agree on any one answer. Defining the indescribable is a task that no one definition has seemed to prove victorious. Each definition has its own bias or implications that does not capture the full concept of what leadership truly is. Rost, an academic in the study of leadership, reviewed 221 different definitions to make the point that there is no common definition, and would reach the conclusion that “Neither scholars nor the practitioners have been able to define leadership with precision, accuracy, and conciseness so that people are able to label it correctly when they see it happening or when they engage it.” Understanding that there is no perfect way of defining or pin pointing leadership
I agree with the notion that there are many managers than leaders. For instance, in an organization, there exist many lines of managers who supervise, control and initiate work than is within the set rules and Principles. Leaders are very few in an organization setup who can influence, inspire and challenge people to be creative and
Leadership is studied and analysed so that the effective practices can be taught and applied in today’s organizations. The concept of leadership has been expanded to discuss the follower’s role in the leader-follower relationship. While leading is often considered an active role, following can have a negative connotation, especially when seen as a passive, subordinate position. However, following can be a choice, and the difference between the leader and follower is the activities, rather than abilities (Wren, p.201). An organization possesses effective followers is just as important for success as having effective leaders. Hersey and Blanchard describe this relationship as dynamic and use Situational Leadership (R) as a model for the leader’s to improve the performance of their followers. Manz and Sims describe a historical view of leader types which has evolved to view the superleader as the most effective type for our current culture. The role of the superleader is to empower followers to become self-leaders themselves. The Situational Leadership model may contain the word “Leadership”, but it is mostly about effective management practices and does not address developing the role of the follower.
There are lots of definitions and interpretations for the term LEADERSHIP. One is “A relationship through which one person influences the behaviour or actions of other people” (Mullins, L.J. 2002, Management and Organisational Behaviour, 6th Edition, FT Publishing, p904). Another popular definition would be, “the process of influencing an organization or groups within an organization in its efforts towards achieving a goal” (Johnson, Scholes & Whittington, 2005, Exploring Corporate Strategy, 7th Edition, FT Prentice Hall, p.519)
One of the most important components of leadership is the leader. A leader is responsible for his or her followers and the overall goal of the group or organization. Leaders are the people held accountable or everything that happens, good or bad. On the other hand, the second major component of leadership is the followers. Without followers, a leader would be worthless. Followers make up the backbone of a leader because they are the masses that get goals accomplished. A leader is just one person, but the number of followers is countless. In order to be an effective follower, there are a countless number of characteristics that allow a follower to be the best they can be. Five of these characteristics include a positive attitude, communication skills, being part of the process, being open to new ideas, and patience.
I learned from this program, the difference between a leader and a manager, leadership and management, as well as the characteristic of leadership. In the course, I understood that A leader then, is a person who leads by directing, commanding or guiding, inspiring and empowering people in order to achieve a certain goals. Manager, on the other hand, is a person responsible for controlling or administering an organization or a group of staff. They are the one who coordinates and overseas the work of other people so that organizational goals can be achieved. In short, leaders have
“Leadership is the process of influencing people by providing purpose, direction, and motivation to accomplish the mission and improve the organization” (Army). Leadership is defined in many different ways, however, there are certain characteristics that remain the same. The point that is irrefutable is that leadership is a process. It does not matter if someone is born with the ability to lead or if they learn how to lead; leadership is still a process. While most leadership styles can be broken down into two general categories there are some styles that may mix methods; those few variances will not be discussed. Additionally, leadership involves at least two groups of people, those that lead and those that follow. The approaches or styles
After decades of dissonance, leadership scholars agree on one thing: they can't come up with a common definition for leadership. Debate continues as to whether leadership and management are separate processes, while others emphasize the trait, skill, or relational aspects of leadership. Because of such factors as growing global influences and generational differences, leadership will continue to have different meanings for different people. The bottom line is that leadership is a complex concept for which a determined definition may long be in
Leadership can be defined in so many different ways and all of them could be correct as it relates to the context that they are used in. Many managers of organizations are viewed as leaders because of their title, community leaders are viewed as leaders because of their contribution to the communities in which they live, motivational leaders are viewed as leaders because of their eloquent speaking abilities, and teachers are viewed as leaders because of the level of impression that they have on young minds. Leadership’s true definition is so robust that someone could disagree with my above statement because of the titles that I mentioned don’t fall within their believed definition of leadership. One thing that can be believed is that leadership is a collective set of skills and a continual practice.