Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Workplace drug testing and privacy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The ethics of drug testing has become an increased concern for many companies in the recent years. More companies are beginning to use it and more people are starting more to have problems with it. The tests are now more than ever seen as a way to stop the problems of drug abuse in the workplace. This brings up a very large question. Is drug testing an ethical way to decide employee drug use? It is also very hard to decide if the test is an invasion of employee privacy. “The ethical status of workplace drug testing can be expressed as a question of competing interests, between the employer’s right to use testing to reduce drug related harms and maximize profits, over against the employee’s right to privacy, particularly with regard to drug use which occurs outside the workplace.” (Cranford 2) The rights of the employee have to be considered. The Supreme Court case, Griswold vs. Connecticut outlines the idea that every person is entitled to a privacy zone. However this definition covers privacy and protection from government. To work productively especially when the work may be physical it is nearly impossible to keep one’s privacy. The relationship between employer and employee is based on a contract. The employee provides work for the employer and in return he is paid. If the employee cannot provide services because of problems such as drug abuse, then he is violating the contract. Employers have the right to know many things about their employees. Job skills and training can even be investigated by the employer. The employee is to perform services and these services must be done in a certain manner. Someone who is incoherent because of drug abuse cannot be a pilot for example. This is why employers can test to see if characteristics or tendencies would affect performance. An employee may not want to give a urine or blood sample. The employee may not want to include all of their references but this is besides the fact that an employer is entitled to them. More and more employers are starting to feel this way. "A 1996 survey by the American Management Association found 81 percent of major U.S. companies had drug-testing programs at that time compared with 78 percent in 1995 and just 22 percent in 1987." (May 2) The employer has a right to only certain information and the line must also be drawn in the procedure to obtain the information.
As much as 95% of employers favor urine testing as a method for drug testing, and this one piece of statistic may have positively affected the trend and demand for synthetic urine over the years.
A study was taken at the University of Michigan, and of all their 12th graders, 12% tried narcotics and 1% tried heroin. This data represents a need for random drug testing in schools. It can identify students that need help and keep others from falling into bad crowds. To keep our students and schools safe ,and effectively cut down on teen drug use, random drug testing should be allowed in schools.
Recently, in our school, students have had to undergo random drug testing if they are in extracurricular activities or if they drive to school. This topic is important to me because it is something that is going on in our school. It is also something that will eventually happen to me. Some pros to drug testing students is that it may get students away from drugs and that it may help someone see the consequences of doing drugs. Some cons to this testing is that it is very expensive and that the results may come back as a false positive or a false negative. A comment is that all school faculty should be drug tested. There are many good and bad sides. I will show you some of both. In this essay, the topic that will be discussed is that students shouldn’t be drug tested.
Attempts to monitor employees have always existed in one form or another, from mechanical keystroke counters in the early part of the century, to the latest innovations in electronic monitoring. As technology advances, so do the monitoring possibilities in the workplace. As result of the endless possibilities in surveillance, anxiety in employee’s increase, which in most cases leads to illnesses. Studies have shown that individuals who are constantly being monitored at work suffer from inevitable effects, the majority being illnesses such as physical, emotional, and mental disorders. Employers feel they have the right to monitor their employees, however when extensive monitoring effects a employees health, then the employers has gone to far. Advance technology has lead to monitoring devices such as via computers, video surveillance, and active badges in the last decade, but as the intensity of the surveillance increases so do the negative effects on the employees.
Psychometric tests are designed to measure the behaviour and capabilities of possible employees. (Johnstone, 1999). Employers use these tests to measure two categories of qualities – abilities and preferences (Mills et al., 2011). This provides an effective and efficient way to find the best person for the job as the tests give a true reflection of how an employee can accomplish assigned tasks which is completed online as part of the application process. Candidates are chosen for the next stage of the process through the comparison of test scores, resulting in grouping candidates into high and low percentile scoring categories. The higher scoring applicants are put through to the next stage of the process. This would normally be the interviewing stage. The lower scoring applicants would be declined. This is a form of filtering down the number of applicants, although the interviewing stage provides the means of selection, despite its subjectivity the tests provide a uniform set of standards to measure one candidate objectivity against another (Johnstone,1999). Psychometric
During drug testing, school officials stand outside of the bathroom door listening to students urinate making sure there is no tampering with the specimens. In a situation like that anyone can become uncomfortable. Students should trust their school officials and go to them with their problems, even if it is drug related. Officials standing guard while they use the restroom, discourages them to seek help from the officials. Also, if the test showed positive results, questioning students about prescription medications they use, follow the positive result. This means that students have to disclose their private information (taking antidepressants or birth control) to schools. The legal status of the policy is questionable due to invading privacy. Many parents have filed lawsuits against school districts over their student drug testing policies. This means that, “schools electing to drug test their students are subject to tremendous legal liability” (“Preface to ’Should”). Laws vary in almost all the states. In some states judges of their Supreme Court have banned it. With the questionable legal status and invading the privacy of students, it is not ok for schools to have these types of
As we agreed upon maintaining confidentiality of employee’s medical test information, many of our employees have concerns in terms of disclosing their health problems and physical condition with the organization.
I consider that students should be drug tested so students can conserve their health & healthy lifestyle & behavior. Many students at school do drugs due to trying to act cool against other people in school. The generalization why people & kids smoke is considering they want to look cooler than other people and kids like I had mentioned before in this paragraph. I don't think it would be a great idea to do drugs just to get into the cool group in school.
the employees vulnerable in their work environment and serves more as a deterrent and a
"Electronic monitoring has deep ethical implications with respect to workplace outcomes such as employee perceptions of privacy rights, fairness judgments, quality of work-life, and stress-related illness." (Alder, Schminke, Noel, Kuenzi, 2008, p. 481). Most of the ethical implications of employee monitoring fall under an employee's idea of morality. An employee may feel that it is unethical to invade their privacy, even though that employee is using company property. "A common reaction to the suggestion that employers may monitor such internal (to the firm) communications is that this is an abridgement of the constitutional right to free speech guaranteed by the first amendment." (Hodson, Englander, & Englander, 1999, para
Many people are opposed to random drug tests in schools for an array of reasons. In a nutshell, it is mostly because they believe the drug tests are an infringement on the students’ constitutional rights. They claim that the drug tests won’t result in a decrease in drug use. Students will simply begin using different, less-detectable drugs. For instance, marijuana, the most commonly used illicit drug, is amongst the least harmful illegal drugs. Marijuana is also the most easily detected drug and most common drug tested for. Studies have shown that students who previously used marijuana resulted to drugs they think the tests will
Drugs are being use all over the world from young teens to the elderly with no way of preventing them from harming others and even themselves. How do these people get jobs with these drug addictions or massive consumption of drugs? That’s where drug testing comes into play. Drug testing is a test given to people for many reasons such as for jobs, abuse of substances,and even just a parent suspecting their teeager is using it. But with these test there are many positive but also negative effects that come from drug testing.
In Australia, the testing of employees on a mandatory basis for alcohol and illicit drugs in the workplace is becoming more acceptable. However, in those industries where it does occur; such as correctional services, mining and transportation, there are corresponding obligations relating to the employees privacy and safety. It is now commonplace for companies to obtain a drug and alcohol policy; and like any company policy, the Drug and Alcohol Policy should be reviewed as new cases are brought before the Employment Courts, bringing them with new decisions and requirements relating to drug and alcohol testing in the workplace.
Numerous individuals think that being drug tested in a workplace is a violation of their rights. In order to work, drug test should be a requisite because the United States has a substantial amount of people who are involved with drugs. If they have committed a felony because of having any kind of substance, they should be test more than once. In 2007, the National Survey on Drug Use and Health reported that 8.4% (10.2 million) employees, at the age of 18 or older, have been using drugs. When drugs are found in one’s system, they should be immediately reported to the police and help prevent someone from working under the influence. If someone goes to work or is at work not sober, they are more likely to cause an accident. They could harm themselves
Ethics can be defined as the rules of conduct recognized in respect to a particular class of human actions or a particular group, culture, etc. Ethical codes are adopted by organizations to assist members in understanding the difference between 'right' and 'wrong' and in applying that understanding to their decisions. An ethical code generally implies documents at three levels: codes of business ethics, codes of conduct for employees, and codes of professional practice. Code ethics in education “states the obligations to test takers of professionals who develop or use educational tests” (Joint Committee on Testing Practices). It also addresses the roles of test developers and test. The purpose of this