Students Shouldn't be Drug Tested

867 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Negative impacts of drug testing at schools

Recently, in our school, students have had to undergo random drug testing if they are in extracurricular activities or if they drive to school. This topic is important to me because it is something that is going on in our school. It is also something that will eventually happen to me. Some pros to drug testing students is that it may get students away from drugs and that it may help someone see the consequences of doing drugs. Some cons to this testing is that it is very expensive and that the results may come back as a false positive or a false negative. A comment is that all school faculty should be drug tested. There are many good and bad sides. I will show you some of both. In this essay, the topic that will be discussed is that students shouldn’t be drug tested.

A “pro” to students being drug tested is that it might help students get away from drugs. “The benefits to drug testing are obvious. It may make a big dent in the drug usage in public schools.” (Albow) Doctors and parents would be alerted about the kids using drugs. Then, they would work on getting clean. It also makes a statement about being a team player, to respect your body, and know what it means to really show up and compete. Another reason is that students are hooked on really harmful and terrible drugs, such as heroin and Adderall, a medication. These drugs could ruin someone’s life, and it needs to be stopped. There are many reasons for drug use in teens. One reason is to escape from reality. However, I’m not saying that this is a good thing to do. Also, teens on drugs that are playing sports are more likely to get hurt. (Albow, 1-8) It could cause them to get concussions or other injuries.

A “con” to drug testing students is the cost. These tests cost ...

... middle of paper ...

...nything at all. If this were to happen, then there would be no point in the faculty that is under the influence being be paid when they’re being a bad influence on kids. Many other jobs drug test their employees. It should be like any other job.

In this essay, what was discussed was why students shouldn’t be drug tested. There are many good and bad sides to drug testing students. The pros are that it might help students get away from drugs, and it may help someone see the consequences to drugs. The cons are that the tests are expensive, and these tests may come back as a false positive. A comment is that all school faculty should be drug tested. As you can see, there are many good and bad sides to drug testing students. Writing this paper has made me see some of the good sides of drug testing students, however I still think that students shouldn’t be drug tested.

Show More
Related

  • There's No Justice In The War On Drugs By Milton Friedman

    960 Words  | 2 Pages

    In order to achieve a good essay, one must defend his argument and use data and research to back their argument. In “There’s No Justice in the War on Drugs”, Milton Friedman talks about the injustice of drugs and the harsh reality of being addicted to drugs, and the causes or side effects that come along with them. The author clearly argues about the “war on drugs” and uses analysis and facts to prove his argument. The author agrees that the use of government to keep kids away from drugs should be enforced, but the use of government to keep adults away from drugs, should not be enforced. The author has a clear side of his argument and the audience can clearly see that. He argues against the “war on drugs” claim that President Richard

    Read More

  • Summary Of Darla Tappins Random Drug Testing Of Athletes

    929 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the article, “Random Drug Testing of Athletes”, the author, Darla Tappins, argues that student athletes should not be required to participate in random drug tests. She provides six main reasons in effort to support her claim. These include the unfair stereotyping towards athletes who are no more likely to be involved in drug use than nonathletes, the unreliability and inaccuracy of the drug tests, the high costs of performing such tests, the unnecessary time consumption they require, the uncomfortability of those required to partake in them, as well as the inability of tests to detect steroid use, which is the most common drug exploited by athletes. Overall, the author does an ineffective job of proving her claim and evaluating

    Read More

  • Date Rape Drugs

    621 Words  | 2 Pages

    The drug is a big problem at many colleges today, and is getting worse by time. There are more and more drugs circling in college atmospheres, where many students aren’t aware. If people learn what is happening around them, and watch out for each other, the problem should be able to be contained.

    Read More

  • No Drug Testing in the Workplace

    954 Words  | 2 Pages

    Drug testing is designed to detect and punish conduct that is usually engaged on-duty and off the employer's premises - that is, in private. Employers who conduct random drug tests on workers who are not suspected of using drugs are policing private behavior that has no impact on job performance. Someone may test positive after taking a drug days, weeks or months before. People are not generally required to organize their lives to maximize their productivity at work, and employers do not have a direct law enforcement function.... ...

    Read More

  • Mandatory Drug Testing for Student Athletes

    958 Words  | 2 Pages

    In many high schools around the country, student athletes are using drugs. “The percent of students that have drunk alcohol is 72.5% while the number of students who have used marijuana is 36.8%” (Report: Nearly Half of High School Students Using Drugs, Alcohol). The students believe that since they are athletes that they do not need to abide by the rules because they feel more superior and that the narcotic will not hurt or affect them. Implementing random drug tests for athletes will create a positive image and not hurt others or themselves. Schools need to have drug tests for student athletes because drugs effect relationships, using drugs have consequences, and lastly they have a major effect on the body.

    Read More

  • Drug Testing Student Athletes

    755 Words  | 2 Pages

    Some may say that drug testing students is unconstitutional because it is an “invasion of privacy”. This, however, is not true. . . “In 1995, the United States Supreme Court ruled that drug testing for high school athletes was constitutional, and some districts expanded their policies to include middle schools.” I believe allowing schools to drug test athletes was a very positive thing. For many reason, but mainly because athletes who are on drugs have a higher risk of being injured. For example a kid who is on drugs and plays a sporting event has a greater risk of their heart stopping on the field or court. “Drug tests analyze bodily samples such as urine, blood, or hair to detect the presence of legal and illegal drugs.” The most common one is urine testing. I believe urine testing is the best way for high school students, because it does not take as long as some other tests and it is not as costly as other tests. This is especially important because obviously a school does not want to spend money on anything they do not have to. Our school does randomly drug test students every once in a while but only a few of the athletes are chosen to take the test so that really is not helping ...

    Read More

  • Forced Drug Testing is a Violation our Rights

    408 Words  | 1 Pages

    In 1995, President Bill Clinton directed a universal pre-trail drug testing policy be implemental. Many feel this forced drug testing is an important addition to our criminal Justice System. On the other hand, there are those who feel that our privacy and confidentiality are being violated, that’s to include our Constitutional rights. Pretrial drug testing is based upon assumption, when we discuss assumptions, they can be defined better as well calculated guesses. The first viewpoint is the knowledge of the defendants drug use at the time of arrest. From this point, depending on the results of the drug test it may indicate possible misconduct at pretrial. The second aspect of the policy is that the monitoring which is used during the pretrial can be used with sanctions which will hopefully deter pretrial misconduct (Rhodes, 1996).

    Read More

  • Case Study: New Jersey V.

    1959 Words  | 4 Pages

    In 1985 a case the Supreme Court heard a case involving searches and seizure of student’s lockers and effects but the school need to show that “reasonable ground existed to believe that the search will uncover evidence of a violation of criminal law or regulation,” rather than the probable cause standard that applies in criminal proceedings. (Shmoop Editorial Team, 2008) Drug testing of students has since been upheld since the Supreme Court heard New Jersey v. T.L.O.

    Read More

  • Use of Drugs in School

    726 Words  | 2 Pages

    Kids of all ages are aware of and trying drugs. Most kids feel they have to join in to fit in, when a better solution would be to tell someone who can help. As children we are taught not to tell on one another or we are a tattletale or snitch. We need to stop the drug use before it stops our children. We need the kids to tell us where it is coming from and how we can help.

    Read More

  • Random Drug Testing is Ethical and Necessary

    1164 Words  | 3 Pages

    The ethics of drug testing has become an increased concern for many companies in the recent years. More companies are beginning to use it and more people are starting more to have problems with it. The tests are now more than ever seen as a way to stop the problems of drug abuse in the workplace. This brings up a very large question. Is drug testing an ethical way to decide employee drug use? It is also very hard to decide if the test is an invasion of employee privacy. “The ethical status of workplace drug testing can be expressed as a question of competing interests, between the employer’s right to use testing to reduce drug related harms and maximize profits, over against the employee’s right to privacy, particularly with regard to drug use which occurs outside the workplace.” (Cranford 2) The rights of the employee have to be considered. The Supreme Court case, Griswold vs. Connecticut outlines the idea that every person is entitled to a privacy zone. However this definition covers privacy and protection from government. To work productively especially when the work may be physical it is nearly impossible to keep one’s privacy. The relationship between employer and employee is based on a contract. The employee provides work for the employer and in return he is paid. If the employee cannot provide services because of problems such as drug abuse, then he is violating the contract. Employers have the right to know many things about their employees.

    Read More

  • Mandatory Drug Testing for High School Athletes

    1340 Words  | 3 Pages

    “A medical dictionary defines a drug as ‘any substance that when taken into the living organism may modify one or more of its functions’” (Newton 12). However, when speaking of drug testing for abuse a person is usually thinking about illegal drugs or drugs that can alter athletic performance in sporting events. Mandatory drug testing was not allowed in public schools until June 2002 when the Supreme Court allowed for public schools to do random drug testing (Carroll 23). This decision allowed for drug testing in all schools throughout the United States not just for athletes but also students who are in any activities within the school, for example clubs and competitive events (Carroll 23). Even though drug testing is now allowed by the Supreme Court many schools do not yet have mandatory drug test policies. Mandatory drug testing for high school athletes should be required because it decreases drug use in schools, is relatively inexpensive, and can prevent drug use and or abuse that can lead to a lifelong addiction.

    Read More

  • Welfare Arguments Against Drug Testing

    686 Words  | 2 Pages

    Drug use now in days has grown more over these past years, with the abuse of drugs many people still have the privilege to apply freely to the welfare programs such as WIC, Food Stamps, and TANF. My interest to this topic is why it would be unconstitutional to be able to do a drug testing on welfare applicants.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Speech: We All Should Support Mandatory Drug Testing in Schools

    819 Words  | 2 Pages

    Have you ever entered your school to see men in uniform processing drug tests to all students of your school, your friends, and even people you might know who do drugs? Have you ever thought about getting caught if you’ve had taken drugs or alcohol recently?

    Read More

  • High School Drug Testing

    783 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...ey to getting a good job, but high school students can’t get their education if they are caught up in doing drugs. Over thirty percent of dropouts in the United States are because of drugs. The thirty percent of drug addict dropouts may never find a job. Thats why it is important for high school drug testing to be enforced among all students. High school drug testing would allow early notice of drug use and allow the school to steer the student into the right path towards success. The drug tests will give students confidence and another reason to say “No” when being peer pressured into trying drugs. Many would argue that drug testings invade their privacy, but with drug usage being at an all time high who can we count on? High schools are made to prepare students for their future, and in order to make the students successful we must allow high school drug testings.

    Read More

  • Drug Education in Schools

    531 Words  | 2 Pages

    The first step when beginning to implement drug education in a classroom or school is for the individual that is considering the topic to deem why the implementation is important. There are three main reasons teachers have found the implementation to be important. The first reason is that students are more likely to come in contact with drugs by hearing about them, or using them. By having a program implemented into a classroom or school, it can assist individuals to gain knowledge about the topic. The purpose of this is to help individuals make healthy, responsible decisions about drugs now and in the future that will reflect the individual’s identity and morals. The second reason is to help promote a healthy lifestyle for students. Teachers believe that by engaging students in drug education programs, it can help to benefit well-being of the students so that healthy lifestyles are reached to the fullest potentials. Lastly, teachers have found it to be important because teachers can act as a partner with parents, guardians, and other members of the community, in order to ensure that students are being provided with accurate and developmentally appropriate drug education. The school can provide knowledge to students in an area that is sometimes difficult for parents, guardians, and the community to talk about.

    Read More

More about Students Shouldn't be Drug Tested

Open Document