Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of drug testing in the workplace
What are the possible consequences of drugs legalization
Impact of legalization of marijuana
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of drug testing in the workplace
In this essay contained is an investigation, discussed and, which is within scope of this essay, in the provision of answers to this question Do drugs tests violate employees’ right to privacy?’ The answers are given by the presentation and the analyzing different views evident in literature so as to build an argumentative case against or in support of, lastly drawing the conclusions set. This is made possible concentrating on a scope which considers the ethics existent in normative theories. It means that theories of a higher philosophical calling considering whether the employees violate the right of privacy of their employees by doing drug tests on them lie outside the scope of the essay. Lastly, the scope of this essay is to be determined by another aim: the provision of the responses given concerning the essay question asked. This may help in the provision of incentives needed for further work by other academics. This argument that employers have the right to violate the employees’ right to privacy by doing drug tests is collocate with its other counter-argument that is, employers do drug tests on their employees so as to be up-to-per on its productions to be against drugs employees use impairing an employees work performance. An estimate of 44% of young people accepted to have been using drugs in some of previous years. Now, these are the multitude of adults that are entering the workforce of the nation. With the high alarming high numbers of individuals using drugs, some of the employers had to come up with drug testing programs in their individual institutions so as to identify the current and the prospective employees and employers having drug habits. It is evident in the works of the formative author Moore (2011) who exp... ... middle of paper ... ... and Analysis, 2(8), 367-376. Ball, K., Daniel, E. M., & Stride, C. 2012. Dimensions of employee privacy: an empirical study. Information Technology and People, 25(4), 376-394. Faragher, J. 2013. Drug testing at work. Occupational Health, 65(7), 12-13. Fit2zpatrick, J. J., & Perine, J. L. 2008. State labor legislation enacted in 2007. Monthly Labor Review, 3-31. Lamberg, M. E., Kangasperko, R., & Partinen, R. et al. 2008. The Finnish legislation on workplace drug testing. Forensic Science International, 174, 95-98. Gilliom, J. (1996). Surveillance, privacy, and the law: Employee drug testing and the politics of social control. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Moore, A. D. (2011). Privacy rights: Moral and legal foundations. S.l.: Pennsylvania State Univ. Potter, B. A., & Orfali, S. (1998). Drug testing at work: A guide for employers. Berkeley, CA: Ronin Pub.
...lley, W. H., Jennings, K. M., Wolters, R. S., & Mathis, R. L. (2012). Employment & Labor Relations. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
Two sources that prove that drug testing in the U.S is unfair and unjust are Nickel and
"States Consider Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients." FoxNews.com - Breaking News | Latest News | Current News. 26 March 2009. Web. 31 January 2011
There is an ongoing debate over whether or not Welfare recipients should be drug tested to receive the benefits. The lines of reasoning from both sides of this argument have unambiguous points. Those who oppose the idea of drug testing say that it is unconstitutional, and violates the Fourth Amendment. Furthermore, they claim that this law stereotypes and discriminates against the poor
There has been many cases of fraud that people have lied about housing and unemployment. This leads to questionable debate whether recipients should be drug tested or not. In North Carolina a law has been passes for all of the recipients getting assistance must be drug tested. (Parker 1) “For example, according to The Associated Press, Utah saved $350,000 in its first year of drug-screening welfare applicants, though it found only about 12 people who tested positive” (Parker 1). Many states have questioned this new law to be passed or not because it may save the government money in the long run.
U.S. Department of Labor. U.S. Department of Labor, n.d. Web. The Web. The Web. 08 Feb. 2014.
In an age where instant access to information has influenced the privacy workplace model, which once prevails over what were inalienable assumptions of privacy is no longer a certainty in the workplace. Some companies require employees to sign confidentiality agreement to protect their patents, formulas, and processes. There are instances where companies dictate a “no compete” clause in their hiring practices, to prevent an employee from working for competitors for typically two years without legal implications. While these examples represent extents, employers go to protect their company’s privacy; companies do not go to that extent to protect the privacy of their employees.
"Summary." U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, n.d. Web. 20 May 2014.
(8) U.S. Dept. of Labor, Family and Medical Leave Act – Wage and Hour Division (WHD) (http://www.dol.gov/whd/fmla/), 2013, Website
The ethics of drug testing has become an increased concern for many companies in the recent years. More companies are beginning to use it, and more people are starting to have problems with it. The tests are now more than ever seen as a way to stop the problems of drug abuse in the workplace. This brings up a very big question. Is drug testing an ethical way to determine employee drug use?
25 Privacy Rights Clearinghouse (2002) Employee Monitoring: Is There Privacy in the Workplace? . (6/3/2004)
O'Reilly, John. An Employer's Guide to Surveillance, Searches & Medical Examination. Toronto: Thomson Canada Limited, 2003.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. (n.d.). U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved February 5, 2014, from http://www.dol.gov
In my opinion, a company has the right demand or ask new employees to do a drug test before they start working, so they can make sure that everyone is safe. Now the utilitarian opinion considers that drug testing breaks the privacy of a person, but since it helps the company, the employees, the employee him or herself, then it is logical to ask for this kind of examination. For example, if a truck driver is going to work for a trucking company where he has to drive, then, of course, he has to do the required tests to make sure that everyone is protected and no one is in danger when he drives. We know that it is a requirement for all drivers by the state law to do their drug test and to have the results sent to the company and the driver, but
“Summary” Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2012-13 Edition, Actuaries, 5 Apr. 2012. Web. 15 Nov. 2013.Handbook, 2012-13 Edition, Actuaries, 5 Apr. 2012. Web. 15 Nov. 2013.