Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Psychological approach to drug addiction
Psychological approach to drug addiction
Psychological approach to drug addiction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Psychological approach to drug addiction
Drug Testing in the Workplace
Drug abuse in the workplace is a very serious challenge faced by employers. The reason that drug abuse within the workplace is so serious is because it can negatively affect the company itself, the employee that is abusing the drugs, and fellow co-workers within that area. Even though we have not found the answer to completely eliminate drug abuse and bringing drugs into the workplace, drug testing is one of the most effective methods for employers to eliminate the potential harm that employees could bring into the workplace. Many variables are at risk when dealing with drug abuse in the workplace such as the quality and productivity of the goods and services offered by the company, the liability of the company
…show more content…
regarding the quality of the product, and the safety of the workers that are present in the workplace which are at risk of being effected by workers whom abuse drugs. Drug testing should be enforced in the workplace because without drug testing, it opens up an area for the company to be held liable for the actions of workers that are under the influence of drugs, and ultimately costing the company sufficient economic losses. There are many types of drug tests that are issued to employees such as urine tests, hair follicle tests, sweat tests, saliva tests, and even blood tests. These different tests are used for different applications, based upon what that specific employer wants to achieve in the tests. Different tests cost different amounts of money and also show different time frames of past drug use. A urine test is the most frequently because it is the easiest, quickest, and cheapest test to get immediate results. A urine test usually costs an average of $50-$80. According to the Micro Distributing Company, “The STAT Cup is FDA approved, eliminates urine exposure, requires no steps to activate, the results are shown in 1-2 minutes, and it tests up to 12 different drugs.” The hair test is the next most frequently used and also the most accurate. It is not necessarily the easiest and the cheapest drug test that employers can offer due to the price ranging from $100 all the way up to $650. Companies that have jobs which require a zero tolerance on any drugs, and have positions which have high safety clearances and high quality goods are more likely to pay the extra and provide a hair follicle test to the employees due to the fact that “hair tests are nearly impossible to cheat, users cannot “cleanup” quickly, users cannot use special shampoos to beat it, body hair can go back from 180-360 days, and hair tests can pick up multiple uses over time, unlike urine tests which only picks up a single use” (Rosenthal, 2015). Sweat tests are the next frequently used method of drug testing, but this method is mainly used in the criminal justice system to monitor individuals who are on probation. According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, Chemical analysis of human sweat may become an effective method of monitoring drug use over extended periods, according to NIDA researchers. Sweat, collected over several days or weeks in patches worn on the skin, is a sensitive indicator of heroin and cocaine use, according to Division of Intramural Research investigators at NIDA's Addiction Research Center in Baltimore (Swan). With the patch being present on the arm of the individual being tested, it will allow the constant monitoring of drug use, instead of taking a urine test 3-4 times within a week. This method of testing is a proven way to monitor drug use, but the results are usually shown after 7-10 days of wearing the patch. A sweat patch usually costs an average of $40 a patch and can detect up to 7 different types of drugs at once. As for the accuracy of the sweat patch, “The sweat can be collected only in limited quantities, there may not be sufficient specimen for repeat or confirmatory testing. Sweat is less susceptible to tampering or adulteration than is urine. The accuracy of sweat testing is not standardized. Its accuracy remains somewhat controversial” (Watson). Blood and saliva drug tests are the last two tests that employers use on employees.
Blood and saliva tests are usually presented at random, and the test is used to reveal workers that are currently under suspicion of being under the influence of drugs while present in the workplace. Tests like these are usually presented by the employees due to suspicion of being under the influence of drugs while being present in the workplace. As for the blood test, the examiner extracts a small amount of blood from the employee, the sample is inspected, and the results are then returned within 24 hours. Swabbing a sample of saliva from the mouth is the method in which the sample collector uses to perform a saliva test. The results from a saliva test can be retrieved instantly, with a waiting time of an average of 10 minutes. Blood and saliva tests are the most accurate out of all of the tests, but the reason they are not the most frequently used is because the tests only show accurate results of drug use between 6 and 22 hours. The cost to perform a blood test on an employee usually runs around $275 a test, and the saliva tests usually costing approximately $10 a test.
Liability is one of the main reasons behind drug testing employees. Statistics from recent studies on drug abuse by American workers, workplace drug and alcohol abuse may potentially cost U.S. businesses an estimated $100 billion each year and smaller businesses are more vulnerable to drug use in the workplace but drug tested
…show more content…
less than larger businesses” (Rosen). According to McLean Insurance Agency, Drug testing should be a critical part of every employers safety program. The good news is that with advances in testing technology – such as saliva testing – employers can implement a quality drug testing program very efficiently in terms of time and money. In the area of safety, the rewards are considerable: you can protect your company against an OSHA fine, and your employees know that their co-workers do not have a substance abuse problem that could put them, customers, or the quality of work at risk (Megill). Drug testing is an important act to take when having the position of an employer and being held responsible for the actions of the employees in the workplace. Even though a simple drug test may cost the company a few hundred dollars per test, the results will ultimately reduce the risk of casualties on the jobsite, and also lawsuits and job related problems regarding the product itself, or the interactions between employees. According to the national institute on Drug Abuse, data shows that substance abusers are almost four times more likely to be involved in workplace accidents (Megill). Studies have also shown that the general business liability insurance that most companies carry isn’t enough on its own to protect against the cost that could drain cash flow and bankrupt the business. (Megill). Drug testing is a proven method to reducing the risk of accidents happening on the jobsite and helps businesses in the long run by eliminating those possible hazards. “In addition, a survey by the National Cocaine Helpline revealed that 75% of addicts used drugs on the job and 64% admitted that drugs had adversely affected job performance. Even if your employees don’t fall into the 18-to-25-year-old age range, drug testing is essential” (Megill). Without the enforcement of drug testing, it exposes an opportunity for issues dealing with safety, liability on the company, and also economic costs that the company has to pay. Even though drug testing does not eliminate the use of drugs completely, it shows an example of the effort put forth in hopes of eliminating drug use in the presence of the workers. The quality of work has shown to decrease with the absence of drug testing in workplaces all over the nation.
Companies that do not require drug testing are more likely to have less productivity in their company due workplace accidents and fatalities. In National Drug-Free Workplace Alliance, it states that 33% less productivity will cost the average business $7,000 annually (NDWA). All the while, causing the quality of products to decrease and cost the company money from all the down side affects from the production loss. Some problems that employers and co-workers have to deal with by interacting with a worker that is under the influence would include carelessness, reduced productivity, decreased work quality, poor judgment, increased mistakes, and difficulty following instructions. These irresponsible actions impose the risk of possible fatalities or people in the workplace getting injured. With an individual that is under the influence of drugs, it is also common for those people to not even show up, take extended lunch breaks, and have no sense of dependability. A company should not have to face this problem by having irresponsible individuals interacting throughout the workplace, and these problems will be majorly reduced, if not, eliminated with the assistance of standardized drug
testing. In conclusion, the advantages of required drug testing pre-employment and random testing prior to employment improve productivity, attendance, maintains a safe workplace, while reducing workplace accidents and fatalities. The different tests are based upon the mandatory requirements that are presented by the employers towards the employees. These drug tests ensure safety to the consumers whom the company might be working with, while also making the consumers happy by providing a great product, environment, and workplace to employees.
Prescription and pharmaceutical drug abuse is beginning to expand as a social issue within the United States because of the variety of drugs, their growing availability, and the social acceptance and peer pressure to uses them. Many in the workforce are suffering and failing at getting better due to the desperation driving their addiction.
...ult, and some times it does not give a result at all. It is unfair because it only targets certain workers; mainly low wage employees. It is unjust because people are automatically accused of using drugs, and that is why the drug test is given. Drug testing should not be abolished, but it should be a more controlled issue since it is something everyone in the US must go through.
Have you ever questioned the tax taken out of your hard-earned money? Questions similar to that are where the money is going and if it is being used properly. In the U.S. news recently those questions have been on a great deal of State’s minds; reaching back to 2003, this issue has been brought up time and time again. The main topic of tax money is the use of assistance money and are the recipients really using the money for the right reasons. There are many problems with the assistance program but the one that comes to mind the most is that many people abuse the money given to buy the essentials and provide, for their family for illegal drugs. The solution that many state representatives have come up with is drug testing as a requirement for assistance. This will eliminate the abuse of the assistance program; also it will cut down the cost of assistance which is very expensive as a whole.
There has been an ongoing controversy as to whether welfare recipients should have to have drug testing done. Drug testing will ensure that recipients will not abuse the money they’re given by the government. Having people on welfare take drug test is advantageous because it could save the system money, it would help social workers identify children who are around drug abuse, and it would deter people from purchasing and using illegal drugs; however, it does have a downside such as people who are on prescription medication will show false positives, it can be an invasion of privacy and drug testing can take hundreds and even thousands of dollars to administer.
Implications of implementing this approach may be “to reduce the dangers of drug use for the community and the individual, and to shift the focus of illegal drugs as primarily a criminal justice of medical issue to a social and/or public health iss...
Substance abuse in the field of nursing has become a serious problem. Every day exposure to drugs in addition to other factors have contributed to the issue of substance abuse among nurses and the impact on patient care. Some may still be unaware of the substance abuse problem nurses struggle with, and they don't realize until they see the consequences on overall patient outcomes and work productivity. Learning to recognize the chemically impaired nurse has allowed the health care field to expand its awareness and begin to take action on this issue. “To ensure productivity, safety, and quality of care, most hospitals have instituted drug-free workplace programs...that identify prohibited behaviors and the consequences of violating the policy” (Epstein et al., 2010, p. 515). In hope of change to this issue, further action continues to be a work in progress.
The consequences that follow the use of any drug are unfavorable. Although many individuals may see drug addiction as a mere lifestyle choice, it is a problem that many individuals suffer from and inevitably a growing issue that leaves major social and economic impacts.
The ethics of drug testing has become an increased concern for many companies in the recent years. More companies are beginning to use it and more people are starting more to have problems with it. The tests are now more than ever seen as a way to stop the problems of drug abuse in the workplace. This brings up a very large question. Is drug testing an ethical way to decide employee drug use? It is also very hard to decide if the test is an invasion of employee privacy. “The ethical status of workplace drug testing can be expressed as a question of competing interests, between the employer’s right to use testing to reduce drug related harms and maximize profits, over against the employee’s right to privacy, particularly with regard to drug use which occurs outside the workplace.” (Cranford 2) The rights of the employee have to be considered. The Supreme Court case, Griswold vs. Connecticut outlines the idea that every person is entitled to a privacy zone. However this definition covers privacy and protection from government. To work productively especially when the work may be physical it is nearly impossible to keep one’s privacy. The relationship between employer and employee is based on a contract. The employee provides work for the employer and in return he is paid. If the employee cannot provide services because of problems such as drug abuse, then he is violating the contract. Employers have the right to know many things about their employees.
Blood stains are one type of evidence that can be found at a crime scene. Blood that is still in the liquid form should be picked up on a gauze pad. Once the blood is dried thoroughly it should be refrigerated and sent to the Laboratory (Andrus et al., n.d., para. 1). If the blood stain is found dried on clothing, the officer should wrap the piece of clothing in clean paper and place it in a sealed and labeled container. An object with dried blood stains needs to be sent to the Laboratory if it is small enough. If the object is too large to send, then using a clean knife the stain needs to be scraped onto a clean piece of paper, which then can be folded and placed in an envelope (Andrus et al., n.d., para. 2). When collecting autopsy blood samples, the officer should request that the pathologist obtain the sample directly from the heart and place it in a yellow or purple stoppered vacutainer. If the victim is still alive but in serious need of a blood transfusion, then the pre-transfusion blood sample needs to be obtained promptly before the hospital discards it (Andrus et al., n.d., para. 4). It is important for the Laboratory to receive all blood samples within 48 ho...
Drug testing can be a scary process, although it can be a very easy test for those people who don’t take drugs and don’t throw fits about it
High school students are leaders to younger kids and many others in their community. As a leader these student must show others what good character is like, but instead they are destroying their lives by doing drugs. In the past decade the drug use among high school students is on the rise once again. With the internet, their exposure to drugs is much greater. High school students are convinced that they are able to get away with using drugs. These drug addicts soon influence other students into doing the drugs because there isn’t a rule preventing drug use. In order to protect these student’s future, drug tests must be enforced among all students ensuring a safe environment for students to learn successfully. Allowing random drug testing in high schools will shy away students from trying these harmful drugs. The stop of drug use among high school students is crucial because drugs prevents student from learning leading them to dropping out of high school. Students that become overwhelmed by these harmful drugs will ruin their lives forever, but if steered in the right direction they can be saved.
Perhaps most substance abuse starts in the teen years when young people are susceptible to pressure from their peers. One of the main concerns when dealing with substance abuse is the long term problems with substance such as addiction, dependency and tolerance. The physical state of an individual, who is addicted to a substance, will deteriorate over a long period of time. This is due to the chemicals that are being put into an individual body. One of the most important aspects of the effect of substance abuse on society includes ill health, disease, sickness, and in many cases death. The impact of substance abuse not only affects individuals who abuse substances but it affects our economy. Our government resources are negatively impacted by individual who abuse substances. According to (Lagliaro 2004) the implication of drug users extend far beyond the user, often damaging their relationships with their family, community, and health workers, volunteer and wider
Drug abuse has been a hot topic for our society due to how stimulants interfere with health, prosperity, and the lives of others in all nations. All drugs have the potential to be misapplied, whether obtained by prescription, over the counter, or illegally. Drug abuse is a despicable disease that affects many helpless people. Majority of those who are beset with this disease go untreated due to health insurance companies who neglect and discriminate this issue. As an outcome of missed opportunities of treatments, abusers become homeless, very ill, or even worst, death.
Long working hours are associated with increased use of illegal drugs. Many people who own their businesses have been said to work for long hours in order to get higher returns. In order to achieve this success, they have turned to hard drugs such as cocaine, heroin and even marijuana. They are also using drugs to reduce fatigue and make them to remain alert for long hours. This is having an adverse effect on their bodies especially their vital organs such as heart, liver and kidney. Majority of them end up suffering from chronic diseases (Sutherland, Cooper & Palgrave Connect, 2000: 83). Once they are addicted, they are unable to control their feelings. In extreme cases, they get fired from their places of work or their ventures collapse due to poor management. As a result, they end up becoming depressed and some even commit suicide.
One major misconception of drug abuse is that drug abuse counts for taking hard drugs. In actual sense, drug abuse is a situation whereby one takes unprescribed drugs due to depression, illness or fear of the unknown, which could lead to one being stigmatized, ashamed or isolated. People take drugs out of curiosity; peer pressure, stress or depression and constant intake of these drugs is what brings about drug addiction. Consequently, illegal drug use is detrimental to the company and could lead to violence, depression and could lead to death.