Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical decision making and moral judgments
The influence of ethics on decision-making
Ethical decision making and moral judgments
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical decision making and moral judgments
Many businesses, employers, and employees are often faced with tough decision within the workplace that could forced them to make decision based on legal decision, moral decisions, and ethical decision. After reading the case study regarding compensation/discrimination at R&S Electronic Service Company, I have determined that all parties within this case scenario of stakeholders. Stakeholders are defined as any person with an interest or concern of a business. As we begin to identify the key stakeholders and their specific interest in the Family Business we must break down each individual and the role they play in the business. As mentioned, Jane just recently hired onto R&S electronics Services as the head of the Payroll Department. Under …show more content…
According to U.S Labor laws, it is possible that R&S Electronics Services has a written contract to it’s employees stating that they have the ability to fire any employee “for a good reason, bad reason, or no reason at all”. Therefore, if Jane decides to voice her concerns to Brad, it is highly possible that those concerns will be brought to the attention of Eddie and Greg, which will lead to senseless retaliation by Eddie to have Jane fired for discussing employee salaries and pay scales. Based on my readings of the text, there are no direct laws that could protect Jane from “Whistleblowing”, unless she was a member of a unionize work force, which the U.S. Supreme Court announced that “an employer could not use employment-at-will as a means of “intimidating or coercing its employees with respect to their self organization” (Halbert & Ingulli, 2012). Jane, however, could attempt to file a lawsuit against her company if faced with retaliation, and this lawsuit could affect the …show more content…
According to Britannica (2014) Eighteenth-century German philosopher, Immanuel Kant, stated, “Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become universal law”. Halbert & Ingulli (2012) states: “deontological ethics is marked by steadfastness to universal principles – for example, respect for life, fairness, telling the truth, keeping promises – no matter what the consequences.” Under this approach, Jane should have no fear to voice her concerns regardless of the outcome considering retaliation. On the other hand this approaches outlines the ability for one to keep promises. Based on the case study, it was clear that Eddie specifically informed Jane of the need for maintaining strict confidentiality regarding employee salaries and pay scale, therefore, Jane accepting the position would have the obligation to keep that promise to Eddie, and if not face consequences. However, this approach speaks more volumes to absolute fairness, and telling the truth, therefore, I would recommend Jane taking this approach over the Utilitarianism
The ethical code of an organization illustrates the importance of being honest, acting with integrity, and showing fairness in decision making (Bethel, 2015). Ultimately, “laws regulating business conduct are passed because some stakeholders believe they cannot be trusted to do what is right” (Ferrell, Fraedrich, & Ferrell, 2015, p. 95). In the last couple of years, culture has become the initiator for compliance, which means from the top down there has to be a commitment to act in a way that represents the company’s core values (Verschoor, 2015).
The stakeholder in an ethical dilemma is anybody that is affected by the outcome of the decision. In this scenario, Mark Solomon and Garza Lupe will be both subjected by the end result of the decision. The conflict is ...
The act of whistle-blowing is an ethical issue that all employees have the right to. Whether they decide to make the corrupt information known publicly or anonymously, the information they provide can protect everyone involved. The ethical and moral sides of whistle-blowing can go both ways. In order to protect the customers, patients, or consumers of the harmful products the companies are offering, employees that have morals and feel the need to make the truth be known have an ethical responsibility to do so. Issues of being a whistle-blower are more controversial than the responsibilities of the employees doing so. When a whistle-blower takes action, they expose information from their company that it not meant to be public. They basically turn their backs away from their company and colleagues by revealing the truth. When surveying these issues, an employee who is torn by exposing information or keeping silent must decide whether it is more ethical to stay loyal to their organization or to the organization's
The purpose of this paper will be to identify and describe ethical tactics used in the Jeanne Lewis case. The writer will also discuss Jeanne Lewis's ethical behavior in light of her decision to work with her employees until she was confident in the strength of her team.
With all discrimination aside, what’s important is to show some honest respect, ethics, value, and loyalty to every employee.
Workplace ethics engages in judgements and collective agreements regarding a suitable guide of behaviour. The ethical decision making framework (EDM) presents, business decision is ethical or unethical.EDM provides an indication of traditional decision making process and issues that manipulate ethical decisions. Employees tend to fraud because they can experience the unfair treatments or situation that they face. Manages may ask employee to work long hours, and then they can take additional time off. Good performance leads to remunerations and appreciation managers than workers.
Team A conducted research on FastServe Inc. regarding legal issues in reduction of the company's workforce. This paper will address the important issues in understanding and avoiding the risks of discrimination claims against the FastServe Corporation by: 1) discussing what role length of service plays in making decisions for a reduction- in force, 2) reviewing the extent to which management should consider gender, race, age and other protected class designations when making reduction- in force decisions, 3) explaining the role ethics play in decision making and 4) recommending employment policies for FastServe Inc. Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 employment practices must comply with federal and state anti-discrimination legislation (Harshman & Rudin, 2000).
Organizational Ethics Issue Resolution Paper Introduction For this paper, Washington Mutual has been selected to show how the ethical decision making process can be achieved. When it comes to business ethics in the workplace, Washington Mutual has designed what can be considered a well balanced workplace with behaviors that are aligned with their moral values and business ethics. Business ethics are sometimes depicted as resolving conflicts where one option appears to be the correct choice. There are many different ethical dilemmas that are faced by managers and leaders everyday that are highly complex and have no clear choice or guidelines to assist in making the choices for resolution. There are times when an employee has to decide whether or not to cheat, lie, steal, or break their contract.
Stakeholders-investors, customers, interest groups, employees, the legal system, and the community often determine whether a specific behavior is right or wrong, ethical or unethical. Judgments of these groups influence society’s acceptance or rejection of a business and it’s activities.
In applying the ethical decision-making model, the ethical theory of deontology provided the best solution for the case study resolution. Deontology 's universal principles allow an individual create a maximum or imperative that encompass not only the initial ethical dilemma, but also multicultural issues that may arise during the ethical reasoning process, such as gender, status, and social identity. Part two of the case scenario added new ethical issues for consideration. Jenny and Rhonda discuss an education culture that preferences gender in organizational practices, such as "old boys club", discriminates based on status "full professors over associates", power imbalances, which disallows pay equity, and uses in-group/out-group discrimination to threaten Jenny 's social identity. While ethical reasoning process involved in theories such as virtue ethics, communitarianism, feminism, and utilitarianism can hinder effective ethical decision-making by allowing situational, multicultural, or contextual factors like gender, pay equity, status, and social identity to create a cognitive processing overload that renders the individual incapable of objectively
Speaking about the business model of Dell, it has ability to remain on the higher end of the scale for a particular time period. Dell has business model, which primarily focuses on direct selling line of attack. It in a straight line supplies the PCs to the regulars. It does not believe in intermediary, retailers for the business practices. Undeniably, this gives them an edge to serve customer well. Nevertheless, it understood the importance of retailers and start offering products on the premises of retailers, such as Wal-Mart, Sam’s Club and so on. Next, Dell administration is certain of the exclusive business of PCs. As time goes on, however, observing the
With Jacob’s financial pressure, his integrity is shaken because he wants to use the money to pay off the bills and Jacob did not mention it to Krystal. Jacob needs to put his personal matter aside and communicate his medical situation and the bonus money to Krystal. By doing so, Jacob will maintain his honesty and not let his personal interest be in the way resulting trust within the workplace will be maintained. Additionally, the bonus money can be fairly divided between the two. Employees have the responsibility to follow and maintain business ethics and the code of ethics in the workplace. Employees have to be honest, communicate at all levels of the organization, deal issues at the lowest possible level, and avoid conflict of interest that would lead to unethical decisions. Also, employees should be educated with the policy and regulations set by the company in order to maintain ethical practices in the workplace. Jacob and employees in general are bombarded by ethical issues and by abiding by their roles and responsibilities will guide them in making an ethical decision. The following five-step model can help employees make appropriate decisions when faced with an ethical dilemma. First step is to recognize the issue. Knowing what is the root cause and the main
Harassment and discrimination can affect a business in many ways. Having a history of harassment and discrimination claims can damage a business’ reputation and affect its bottom line. It can cost the business current and future clients as well as investors and employees. Depending on the gravity of the claim(s), the process of settling the claim(s) can take anywhere from months to years. Meanwhile, the cost of the settlement and other fees continue to add up. A business might have to compensate the affected parties besides paying court fees and lawyers. The EEOC has seen a rise in monetary rewards from 7.5 million to 24.3 million (Glazer, 1996) However, all of these can be avoided by properly educating employers and employees about their rights and what harassment and discrimination entails.
Companies always know there is a possibility that the whistle will be blown, in this case the obstacle is created by knowledge that their employees stand to gain an advantage from uncovering corporate misbehaviour and thus they may be proactively looking for other people outside the organization to inform the
Work plays an important role in our daily life, it is considered much more huge part of our personal life. During our daily work we make many relationships throughout our career history. Sometimes these relationships become lasting, and sometimes employment discrimination might happen. This relationships that we thought it last could be cut off by the devastation of claims of discriminatory treatment. Discrimination in the workforce has been an issue since the first people of workers in United States in the present day and as well in the past. Some employees were subjected to a harsh working conditions, verbal abuse, denial of advancement,, and many other injustices. There was also the fact that certain employees were being treated differently than other employees.