Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of world war 2
The effect of World War 2 on people
Effects of world war 2
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of world war 2
The fact that “Purple Hibiscus” is a coming of age novel, the narrator Kambili finds herself having to mature and grow faster then she imagined. The Tyrannical and abusive lifestyle that her father inflicts upon her and the rest of her family, leaves Kambili with lasting effects from the violence. This idea is the same in “The Perils of Indifference” speech where it’s easy to see that there are profound lasting effects from World War 2 on those who survived, due to the horrific violence that Hitler inflicted.
These two texts are connected through the idea of the profound effects of violence and abuse and. In “Purple Hibiscus” Adichie creates Kambili as a young passive girl, who constantly strives to please her father in order to save herself from punishment if she makes a mistake. However, as the novel progresses and she starts to question her father’s tyrannical ways, she is inflicted with more and more abuse. Not only does the idea apply to the narrator Kambili, but also to her mother who
…show more content…
is affected severely by the lifetime of abuse from the father. Kambili’s mother has multiple miscarriages after she is beaten by her husband, witnesses her children being severely beaten all until one day she decides to take a stand and slowly begins to poison her husband until he dies, at the end of the novel. After this, she falls into a state of disillusion and disconnects herself from the world and everyone around her, completely shutting down. The violence, caused her to make a decision she never imagined herself making, and she is left with long lasting effects afterwards. Kambili, is the same as she is left with violent memories that she wishes she could forget, creating long lasting effects on her also. Wiesel's speech also holds the same idea behind it, as the effects of World War 2 have left such vivid memories on him, due to the horrific violence and the vast amounts of death that came with it. He begins his speech with the day he was liberated by American soldiers in which he states “..a young jewish boy from a small town in the Carpathian Mountains woke up, not far from Goethe’s beloved Weimar, in a place of eternal infamy called Buchenwald. He was finally free, but there was no joy in his heart. He thought there never would be again.” The vast amounts of violence that he saw during this time, is enough to last anybody a lifetime, and at the time it was enough to make Wiesel feel that he would never feel happiness again. Just like Kambili and her Mother, Wiesel has been left with long lasting effects from the violence that they have all lived through. Wiesel has such vivid memories and is still able to tell his story 50-60 years on. After reading all four of these texts, it becomes evident that all of them are connected through a bigger theme of Political Oppression.
Each Author has used their text to portray the violence and struggles that come with being Politically Oppressed, and how easy indifference and violence can follow on from it. After reading all four of the texts, the reader is left with a lasting impression, as the attitudes taken by the authors is that of great passion and strife. Each author has lived through a lifetime of indifference and violence, (in a country where extreme politics and or Dictatorship raged) and therefore has a purpose of showing the reader an insight into what they have had to live through. When we read these texts, we are left questioning ourselves and what we would do if we were ever put in a situation like what these four authors have had to live through, and also how so many people could just turn a blind eye to the indifference that clearly happens in this
world. In” Purple Hibiscus” Kambili was just a young impressionable child when the violence and abuse started , probably leaving her with some serious psychological issues as she got older, leaving the reader to question whether her father was punishing her for her “sins” or because he has was taking after the political violence and Gen. Sanni Abacha’s dictatorship. The authors have used their texts to not get sympathy from the reader (although the reader does come away feeling this) but to show the world what it really was like, and give a first hand account, whether it’s through novels with substituted names or speeches of survivors, they all allow an insight and the truth to these horrific and violent political times. The use of imagery in all four of these texts, also adds to the lasting impression as all of the authors tell their recollections in such a vivid manner, that it allows the reader to clearly picture what it would have been like.
War always seems to have no end. A war between countries can cross the world, whether it is considered a world war or not. No one can be saved from the reaches of a violent war, not even those locked in a safe haven. War looms over all who recognize it. For some, knowing the war will be their future provides a reason for living, but for others the war represents the snatching of their lives without their consent. Every reaction to war in A Separate Peace is different, as in life. In the novel, about boys coming of age during World War II, John Knowles uses character development, negative diction, and setting to argue that war forever changes the way we see the world and forces us to mature rapidly.
...ther they express the realistic conflict there is between the two. Outwardly, the characters conform, but, inwardly, they long to be free. In real life, most people do not sway to a definite side or another on the issue of conformity and rebellion, but rather, as these characters do, experience a complex inward struggle and conflict with the ideas.
As the boys witness death and mutilation all around them, any preconceived notion about the indoctrination, "the enemy" and the "rights and wrongs" of the conflict disappear, leaving them angry and perplexed. The story is not about heroism but about toil and futility and the divide between the idea of war and the real life and its values. The selected passages are full of violence and death and loss and a kind of perpetual suffering and terror that most of us have never and hopefully will never experience. Both authors ability to place the reader right there on the front line with the main character so vividly, not just in terms of what he physically experienced and witnessed All the complicated, intense and often completely numbed emotions that came along...
Why did so many people, young, old, sick, wealthy and even convicted felonies had to experience firsthand of the worst evil man could ever pursue to one another. What was the point? Surely there have been many explanations, but those did not answer mine. I understood why the prisoners questioned their faith in God, I probably would have to. On the contrary, not even prayers to God could stop such evil. It criticizes the acceptance of human rights. This story puts a strain on trusting others. The individuals in this novel had a redundant encounter. It maddens me to the core. The hardships of what they had to go through, just for survival gives me grief. The story overall makes me feel distressed from every angle of the
Through their use of allusion, symbolism and representation they portray many of societies flaws and imperfections. Such an imperfection includes the illustration of how totalitarian governments abuse the power they have acquired for their own gain, harming the people they are sworn to serve and protect. Through this abusive self-gaining government, we all are liable to become victims of consumer culture caused by the blind obedience to advertising and propaganda, being unable to form or voice an opinion of our own. But this lack of opinion can be at fault because of our own apathy, the ignorance and slothfulness that is contributed to the role we play in our society and the importance of that roles ability to motivate and inspire change. Whether you’ve read or viewed the novels or feature films I’ve discussed I have no hesitation in saying any text or film you have seen has been used in some way, shape or form to convey the criticisms of our ‘perfect’
...ainting symbolize the need for patriotism and unity in a country during war on and off the battlefront. These two prominent texts support each other’s points of fighting for human’s unalienable rights and liberties through writing and visualization. The connection between the to conclude that war may not be just but it is the act of physical force or even any action that can bring together a country and achieve the liberties they deserve. This is a message that can apply to any human today, when someone infringes on another’s liberties then they need to stand up and fight back in order to stop the other from doing it again.
The African Americans fought hard to make themselves equal to the whites, some of the leaders for this were Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X who spoke on behave of their people to try and fight through racism so that it can end. Unlike the African Americans, the Jewish people listened to the Germans, they followed all of their rules to stay alive because they were in a more life threatening situation; neither races deserved the treatment that they received. The racial differences, mistreatment of humans, and injustices between these two stories are similar but different, both authors tried their best to explain as much as they could on what they were personally experiencing or even telling a story on someone else’s experience, but no matter what in the end we are all equal
More importantly, in This Boy’s Life Wolff breaks down this myth-making function through his depictions of the damaged men who more than a decade later still felt the emotional ripples from WWII. This is a story that is different from the surface narrative of nostalgia, one with more shades of sorrow and anger mixed with youthful idolatry. The WWII generation is sometimes referred ...
In Marjane Satrapi’s Persepolis and in Ishmael Beah’s A Long Way Gone, both authors commentate on the romanticism of violence that is often associated with war. Because of this, the authors are able to dispel misconceptions surrounding war. Furthermore, the memoirs allow the authors reflect upon their own experiences of war during their childhoods, as well as examine how cultural shifts perpetuated by both war and the increased influence of western culture that took place within their cultures shaped who they became. Through their memoirs, the authors portray the reality of war and violence through cultural experiences.
Other characters and details throughout the story help make the idea of equality and culture come alive. The importance of this message reoccurs for the duration of the story as Rushdie visits this point again and again. This story of equality, criticism, war and corruption of power expresses topics authors rarely touch upon. Character’s actions, dialogue and relationships creates an impact on the reader. Thus changing the mindset of the importance of equality, and the fact that is the structure of culture and non-violence.
...is story, Hemingway brings the readers back the war and see what it caused to human as well as shows that how the war can change a man's life forever. We think that just people who have been exposed to the war can deeply understand the unfortunates, tolls, and devastates of the war. He also shared and deeply sympathized sorrows of who took part in the war; the soldiers because they were not only put aside the combat, the war also keeps them away from community; people hated them as known they are officers and often shouted " down with officers" as they passing. We have found any blue and mournful tone in this story but we feel something bitter, a bitter sarcasm. As the war passing, the soldiers would not themselves any more, they became another ones; hunting hawks, emotionless. They lost everything that a normal man can have in the life. the war rob all they have.
...uses the reader to be more invested in the story and therefore truly strive to understand the world portrayed instead of just shallowly absorbing the setting. This is a strength because it gave the reader unique outlook on the Asian cultures because the audience feels personally involved in these situations. There are a few weaknesses in the book. I think perhaps, by putting the audience in these men’s shoes you cause them develop a bias. The reader will possibly have and emotional tie to the characters and because of this not see straight facts of history. The book is highly recommended to readers interested in pre-modern history, the book is a good look into the eastern world especially if one lacks research experience with that part of the world and its history.
This type of writing interests me because it was used as a tool to open people’s eyes to the brutality of war. In a way it protested and spoke up against this injustice and most importantly gave a voice to the people who became the biggest victims of war – the soldiers themselves.
Women have battled for centuries to be equivalent to men. In “The Color Purple," Alice Walker illustrates the theme of women’s heartache, racist acts, and complications of a day to day woman. The Color Purple took place during a demeaning era to not only African American women but African Americans in general were treated inhumane. African American women submitted themselves to controlling men due to the belief of that’s how it should be. During this time, women were used for manual and sexual labor. They were referred as one’s property, hardly spoken of or treated like human-beings. Women faced lack of self-love and identity therefore the definition of love was clouded.
The three men in this novel represent the people who abandoned their homeland in search for a better life. This is what happens to people who abandon their homeland, their death is a shameful and undignified death not like the people who die defending their country where they are honored and looked up to. Abul Khaizuran represents the leader who betrays his people by promising them to fulfill their dreams but instead he led them to their death and he only cared to fulfill his personal needs. The road represents the struggle of life the characters go through to reach their dreams and the desert represents the obstacles that keep them for achieving the dreams. The three men had to knock to be saved but the never knocked, the Palestinians need to raise their voice in order to be heard just like knocking on the tank.