Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reflection paper on public art
Art essay on public art
Summary of public art
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reflection paper on public art
Though art is something everyone should be able to enjoy but more often than not there is not enough money to support the arts and artist across the country. So who is there to help with these problems, groups like the NEA, the National Endowment for the Arts. This independent government agency that offers support and funding for projects that exhibit artistic excellence. The NEA has been helping the art community by giving money to some of the newer as well as the artist that have been around for a while, art educators and more. The group has done many wonderful things by funding alone and have help out numerous artist. But the funding they have provided has come with controversy. Which brings us to the question the public funding a good thing or not?
There are people who argue that there is no reason for art to have public funding. They have many reasons like there are many “more” important things the government should be concerning themselves with. Issues like unemployment or the amounts of people need government assistance and things of that nature. The there is the issue of who the grants the give the National Endowment for the Arts are going to and what the messages their pieces are conveying. Artist like the four performance artist John Fleck, Tim Miller, Karen Finley, and Holly Hughes, often referred to as the NEA Four. These artist had works that were deemed quite controversial and the many conservative parties that said this argued that they did need the money they received to do their pieces. There will always be people saying that the government should not fund the art and the reason on why public funding should not be given for art are endless. Yet I believe that it is very much a great thing to have.
The Nationa...
... middle of paper ...
...me artist to take this to the extreme and tend to over do it especially when their pieces are being shown in public spaces. Though most artist hate to censor their work as they should. They should not create a piece no matter how wonderful not appropriate for children in a place where there are constantly children. But the public should not loose their marbles every time they don't like something an artist has created simply because a few conservative people feel an aspect of the piece is unacceptable. I think it is the responsibility of the artist to communicate with the community or look around to at least get a feel of the area before they create something for the public. Whether the artist chooses to be subtle or outrageous is totally up to them, but that is also what could set a countries art apart for all the other art from the various places around the world.
Rathnasambhava, the Transcendent Buddha of the South and Madonna Enthroned are very similar images that were produced by very different cultures. Both images were produced during the 13th Century. The image of Rathnasambhava, the Transcendent Buddha of the South was produced in Tibet during an interesting period of the country’s religious history. The branch of Tibetan Buddhism is led by a religious and sometimes political leader called the Dalai Lama. It was during the 13th Century during the reign of Kublai Khan, around the time of the production of this painting, that Tibet experienced the first incarnation of the Dalai Lama. One has to wonder if this painting is somehow related to that occurrence. According to one source, the reincarnation system for the Living Buddhas is the main point distinguishing Tibetan Buddhism from other forms of Buddhism.
Unbeknownst to many students in my generation, mounting hostility towards public arts funding also marked the cultural and political climate of the late 1980s and early 1990s. Debates had escalated over a number of National Endowment for the Arts grants, targeted at artists who violated sexual and cultural norms in their art, whether it was in painting, oral performance, writing, or photography. Most famous of these NEA outlaws was gay photographer Robert Mapplethorpe, whose photographs became the center of a national debate over the function of art, who should fund it, what is considered obscene and, as Laurie Anderson states, “the issue of control…and who controls what.
The fine arts were once highly revered by the community and were a part of everyday life, yet today the fine arts must face their biggest competitor, that being sports. Sports have become a big business and many schools find it easier and better to cut arts programs due to low funding rather than athletic programs. Even though fine arts programs are not as profitable as athletic programs, they should be funded equally to athletic programs because they help student achievement, help students improve their cognitive skills, and encourage creativity.
Fine arts gives students a chance to pour their hearts into something beautiful; a chance to be a part of something that is bigger than just themselves. Some schools are facing financial troubles with the current economy, and one of the first programs they consider cutting is fine arts. The removal of fine arts programs would be absolutely devastating to countless members of the community. Many students would lose their favorite class, in some cases the one class that helps them get through the day, and many teachers that truly care fir the students would lose their dream jobs. Fine arts should not be cut from schools; they build confidence, help with the application of other academic concepts, and even help to prepare students for their future work in the business world.
They did not spend this money on new school facilities, or fixing apartment buildings, or building safe areas for children, but rather they spend it to “paint the back and sides of the buildings so that people driving to the suburbs will have something nice to look at” (Kozol page 31). This is yet another way the city tried to cover up the people in the Bronx, while at the same time not doing anything to help them. The people there are still starving, or doing drugs, but heaven forbid a tourist get offended by the blatant disregard of the city’s most disenfranchised people. The money spent on that mural could have gone into actually aiding the community, perhaps through bettering the hospitals or repairing housing units that had elevators and electrical systems that killed people. The city was more focused on making people believe that places like the Bronx were not as bad as they actually were than they were with actually fixing the problems.
...ased revenues to the country from these artistic fields. A lot of Canadian-made content was cancelled on the air. Art, being a strong tool in creating and maintaining Canadian values, traditions and history is undervalued by the government, despite the socio-economic benefits. The funding cuts could potentially slowly eliminate cultural diversity in Canada, leaving place for American content and essentially a way of life. Is that what the conservatives want? Of course not every artist in Canada is an engine of progress. Many artistic trends will not contribute to the development of Canada. However isolating the funding to such important sectors as the arts and culture will deprive the entire cultural machine of progressing. It is clearly time to reassess what we value as Canadians, what we invest in, what books we read, what films we watch and what art we welcome.
Rhys Southan’s essay “Is Art a Waste of Time?” is about art and if it can really help people who are suffering or is it just better to hand over your money. In Yo-Yo Ma’s essay “necessary Edges: Arts, Empathy, and Education” he focuses more on art being used as educational purposes to essentially create more innovative/empathetic people. Instead of focusing so much on STEM, the author states that we should incorporate art too. Although some people might say art does not play a role in making the world a better place. I believe it can by bringing awareness to different social issues. Also, if we incorporate art at a young age it can teach kids to be open minded and happier people.
A fine arts education including music, drawing, painting, and photography has been a part of a well rounded curriculum for decades, but soon that may be changing. The fine arts department in the public education system has constantly been barraged with budget cuts. On several occasions, The Texas Education Agency has repeatedly refused to provide sufficient financial aid to back up important funds that are set up to benefit our youths. These funds are are now coming from parents in a desperate attempt to keep several deemed “unnecessary” programs from shutting down. Not only does the art and music education is essential to the children's learning process, it also grants them the proficiency to mature and become versatile citizens, and why together as a state, we needed to campaign together to save these programs.
National Assembly of State Arts Agencies. (2014) State Policy Briefs. “Why Should Government Support the Arts” Retrieved April 18, 2014, from http://www.nasaa-arts.org/Advocacy/Advocacy-Tools/Why-Government-Support/WhyGovSupport.pdf
Jane Alexander, Chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), once said, “Many children are missing out on something which gives their education context, gives their lives depth and meaning, and prepares them to be the future workforce.” This “something” that she spoke of is music and art education. Unfortunately, she is entirely correct. We are currently seeing in our country a dramatic cut in arts education curriculum in our public schools due to the limited amount of both time and funding. In many cases budget cutbacks mean arts education cutbacks. This limited amount of resources often forces administrators to place a value on the various subject areas. There is always a demand for greater concentration upon the traditional basics: English, math, science, and history. There is also a new focus on computer competency and a renewed focus on the need for foreign language education. Add to this health education, family life education, industrial arts education, AIDS education, home economics, physical education, and business education and one begins to wonder where arts education fits in.
Kieran, M. (2008, January 28). Art, censorship and morality. Open Learn, the Open University. Retrieved January 5, 2014 from http://www.open.edu/openlearn/history-the-arts/culture/philosophy/art-censorship-and-morality
Schools that are in low income areas tend to have a higher dropout rate and lower grades. When the art budgets are cut the only classes that may be keeping some of the kids engaged in school may also be cut. Although it takes the budget away from the core subject supporting the arts in a high risk school will eventually help the school in the long run and help the students there learn the life skills that are needed to get through school and succeed in life. Art is a great way to get and keep the attention of students who are not interested in
When I was in high school, I was very involved in the arts. I took a band, choir and two years of visual art. During the years of high school, I knew that the fees for the art courses cost much more than other electives at my school. I also observed that the school focused more on their athletic and academics programs, than on their art programs. We had many fundraisers to raise more money for the art programs even after paying an already expensive fee to takes these electives. Schools are neglecting the visual arts programs and placing all of their money and focus on academics and athletics programs. I propose a balance between the arts, academics, and the athletics.
Relationship Between Art And Society: Mimesis. The relationship between art and society: Mimesis as discussed in the works of Aristotle, Plato, Horace and Longinus. The relationship between art and society in the works of Plato is based upon his idea of the world of eternal Forms. He believed that there is a world of eternal, absolute and immutable Forms (the world of the Ideal) and thought that this is proven by when man is faced with the appearance of anything in the material world, his mind is moved to a remembrance of the Idea or an absolute and immutable version of the thing he sees.
To be fair, Oklahoma, specifically Norman, is actually going through an artistic and cultural awakening, and it isn’t the absolute worst place for the arts. However, the support for the arts just simply is not up to par. One of the problems I’m going to explore is the fact Norman is considered a college town. When someone thinks of Norman, they think of OU, and when they think of OU, most of the time they think football. That’s understandable and to be expected, since we are a part of the Big 12 and had such a successful season. With that being said, it is clear that football has an economical impact in Oklahoma. According to the NCAA, OU football brings in about $129,226,692 annually. Comparatively, the arts and cultural organizations impact the economy, as well, bringing in about $314,776,098 in local economic activity annually (The Economic Impact of Nonprofit Arts & Culture Organizations in Oklahoma). So, that begs the question: if the arts are impacting the economy nearly three times as much as football, why are the arts not as big of a deal or as supported? This is where that generalization of the South not being very supportive of arts comes back into play. For example, when someone thinks of New York, most of the time they are going to think Broadway or art galleries. Same thing with Chicago and even L.A, to an extent. Although