Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rise of pop art
Andy Warhol and the sixties popart movement
Andy Warhol's influence on pop art movement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Rise of pop art
This paper deals, in broadest terms, with the questions of how artwork is connected to the changes and dynamics that prevail in a society. To describe these changes, I will investigate how a specific type of art reflects its social content in contemporary societies. My analysis is carried out by closely looking at the Pop Art movement, especially with Andy Warhol, who has come to be known as one of the greatest artists of the 20th century. It will be argued that Pop Art managed to successfully articulate its time, and in so doing, it became a widely influential art movement whose effect is still very much existent in today’s world of art. In order to prove its claim, this paper relies on the theory of “the field of cultural production” by Pierre …show more content…
In his text, Bourdieu writes about his concept of the “habitus,” or the physical embodiment of cultural capital to the deeply ingrained habits, skills, and dispositions that we possess due to our life experiences (Bourdieu, 1996). Bourdieu extended this to the “taste” of cultural objects that people surround themselves with, as he explains that what one finds to be aesthetically pleasurable is stemmed from upbringing. His theory also creates distinctions among social classes and describes how some people are more comfortable when recognizing what art is. He says that “taste classifies, and it classifies the classifier,” creating a system of high, middle, and lower classes (Bourdieu, 1976). Bourdieu points out that people may be born to like certain things and dislike others, which is telling of their social standing. In the case of art, this classification of people can affect the judgement of quality and what is understood to be necessary to surround themselves with. Though people make conscious decisions about what is beautiful or not based on their aesthetic emotions, class fractions play a prominent role in shaping this distinction on a subconscious level. Bourdieu claims that these aesthetic preferences that are obtained at an early age are what drive them to their social classes. As a result, it is concluded that there is no such thing as pure aesthetic experience in the world of art; cultural lessons of class have a major influence on it. Bourdieu’s idea that the culture of social class holds a decisive factor in the types of art being created leads to the notion that almost anything in culture can be considered to be
Gallery 19 of the Museum of Modern Art features Pop Art trailblazers of the early 1960s, ranging from Roy Lichtenstein’s “Girl with Ball” to Andy Warhol’s “Gold Marilyn Monroe.” Alongside these emblematic works of art, there hangs a more simplistic piece: a six foot square canvas with three yellow letters, entitled “OOF.” The work of art, created by Ed Ruscha in 1962, is a painting that leaves little room for subjective interpretation as does the majority of his work. Ruscha represented the culture in the 1960s through his contributions to the transition from Abstract Expressionism to Pop Art, efforts to redefine what it meant for a painting to be fine art, and interpretation of the Space Race.
Pop Art was a Modern art movement that emerged durring the mid-twentieth century in both England and America. It first began to gain recognition in the early 1950’s, after about twenty years of Abstract, as artists altered their attention and looked to change. In the late 1950’s and early 1960’s, Pop Art became much more popular to the general public and successful for the movement’s artists due to the world growing tired of the repeditive forms of Abstract. Found in the Menil Collection, Seated Woman and Lavender Disaster are two examples of Pop Art. The comparison of these two pieces shows although they differ in medium and subject matter both Seated Woman and Lavender Disaster share common underlying themes possesed by all Pop Art.
In this paper I aim to analyze Becker's and Moretti's approaches when they make sociological studies of art. Their approaches have in fact opposite characteristics. Becker is more interested in the creation of the art works that are created in different art worlds. Becker's approach is related to the supply side of the art worlds. He analyzes the networks, ties and relationships that helps or directly contributes to the art works. However, Moretti's approach is quantitative and he analyzes how the consumers of the art works affect the created works. Those fluctuations of the demand affect the styles, genres and so on. He says that quantitative data helps us to analyze the forces that drives the art works to change. However, if I were to start
Though most works of art have some underlying, deeper meaning attached to them, our first impression of their significance comes through our initial visual interpretation. When we first view a painting or a statue or other piece of art, we notice first the visual details – its size, its medium, its color, and its condition, for example – before we begin to ponder its greater significance. Indeed, these visual clues are just as important as any other interpretation or meaning of a work, for they allow us to understand just what that deeper meaning is. The expression on a statue’s face tells us the emotion and message that the artist is trying to convey. Its color, too, can provide clues: darker or lighter colors can play a role in how we judge a piece of art. The type of lines used in a piece can send different messages. A sculpture, for example, may have been carved with hard, rough lines or it may have been carved with smoother, more flowing lines that portray a kind of gentleness.
Thus, our social existence is shaped by classificatory actions and desires managed by specific distinctions in our case social classes. These assumptions are central to Pierre Bourdieu’s social theory of practice. Bourdieu composed the term ‘habitus’ to encompass how the constitutions of principles subjectively shape dispositions, demeanors, perceptions, and evaluations. So the habitus is prejudiced to social practices and lifestyles.
The article Artists Mythologies and Media Genius, Madness and Art History (1980) by Griselda Pollock is a forty page essay where Pollock (1980), argues and explains her views on the crucial question, "how art history works" (Pollock, 1980, p.57). She emphasizes that there should be changes to the practice of art history and uses Van Gogh as a major example in her study. Her thesis is to prove that the meaning behind artworks should not be restricted only to the artist who creates it, but also to realize what kind of economical, financial, social situation the artist may have been in to influence the subject that is used. (Pollock, 1980, pg. 57) She explains her views through this thesis and further develops this idea by engaging in scholarly debates with art historians and researcher, and objecting to how they claim there is a general state of how art is read. She structures her paragraphs in ways that allows her to present different kinds of evidences from a variety sources while using a formal yet persuasive tone of voice to get her point across to the reader.
While Still life with Apples and a Pot of Primroses by Paul Cézanne and Still Life with a Skull and a Writing Quill by Pieter Claesz vary in time period, and therefore style and composition, the message they portray is similar. Cezanne and Claesz differ greatly in technique, more specifically in perspective, brush stroke, composition and realism. Their separation in time does account for the discrepancies in technique but surprisingly does not affect the subject and message.
Bourdieu’s theory of distinction, judgement, and taste are rooted in education and then secondly, familial economic class. Through exposure and experiences we develop culture capital, which is all about being in the know. The more exposure an individual has, the more they know about the world and therefore, the more culture capital they consume. As a result of having culture capital one has the ability to decipher different symbolic codes because they are aware of more context. A hipster has a very specific culture capital that diverges from the mainstream and is ever evolving because they constantly have to be in the know and consume the latest trends before it becomes popular. Then only people with certain cultural
Class fractions are determined by a combination of the varying degrees of social, economic, and cultural capital. Specifically, Bourdieu hypothesizes that these dispositions are internalized at an early age and guide the young towards their appropriate social positions, towards the behaviors that are suitable for them, and an aversion towards other behaviors. He emphasizes the dominance of cultural capital early on by stating that differences in cultural capital mark the differences between the classes. However he also states the importance of economic and social capital in the formation of cultural capital. E.g. learning to play piano requires economic capital. According to Bourdieu, tastes in food, culture and presentation are indicators of class because trends in their consumption seemingly correlate with an individual’s fit in society. Bourdieu himself believes class distinction and preferences are “most marked in the ordinary choices of everyday existence, such as furniture, clothing, or cooking, which are particularly revealing of deep-rooted and long-standing dispositions because, lying outside the scope of the educational system, they have to be confronted, as it were, by naked taste. Indeed Bordieu believes that the strongest and most indelible mark of infant learning” would probably be in the tastes of food. Consumption is determined by cultural and economic capital.
In Distinction, Bourdieu argues that one’s culture can affect what they are drawn to or from. He argues that one’s upbringing or education can alter how one sees the world around them, especially how he or she views art. Also, he feels that once a person is given this initial idea about aesthetics, they cannot be swayed in another direction. Bourdieu believes that taste is entirely based on your societal standing. To prove himself, he created surveys to find where a group of people’s taste lies depending on the circumstance of their birth. I disagree with what Bourdieu is saying, because I feel it is possible to find art in any form appealing, regardless of one’s culture or economic background. I feel Bourdieu overgeneralizes the idea by saying
Portraiture artwork includes painting, drawing, sculptures, medallions, and busts. Painting starts with painting the face, moves to the shoulders, then it includes hand gestures moving in different directions, the movement of eyes, communicating individual personalities and actions. The subject could wear clothes or not, be standing or sitting, and be individuals or a group, such as couple or a family. The painters can use oils, watercolor, pastel, or acrylic. Portraiture has different sizes; furthermore, creating a portrait normally spans about four sittings. However, according to (Simon, 1987, p. 129 & 131) some, such as Hans Holbein the Younger, one can make a drawing of the face, and then complete the rest of the painting without the sitter.
Bourdieu looks into art music and books and explores what social group regards artists as theirs; defining what certain classes believe belongs to them. Similarly to the works of Marx, he argues that Aestics within cultural capital and educational issues are seen as class markers. Using this as a way to define entitlement within a society; taste is the ability to know what is culturally defined as superior is often used as a means to exclude outsiders or those of lower social
When we analyze music, clothing styles and cultural behaviors over the last century we see trends that reappear in today’s society. Clothing styles of the 80’s made a comeback 20 years later among the teenage youth. Music styles of the 50’s are recreated adding new rhymes and rhythms to the iconic songs admired by generations before us. When we analyze art history we see similarities in the style, approach and their influences in the art world. We find that just like other trends art styles reappear in later art periods.
Creating art is an obscure thing to do because art is all around you. Everywhere you go, you see art. But when it comes to creating art, it gets a little complicated. You see art everywhere, but you don’t know how to create it, because you don’t know what makes something art. In my experience, art has many forms. It has different shapes and colors. For my painting class, I never knew what to paint. I can’t explain what art is, because art is such a big concept you can’t define. Many people see art differently. Something can be art to you, but to another, it’s just random lines, colors, and shapes everywhere on a canvas.
This piece of work from Bourdieu is based on recognition that “different types of lifestyle can gain legitimacy according to the way in which class struggle and competition develop” (Trigg, 2001, p. 110). The different types of capital and culture one has access to shape their lifestyle, and their position in the hierarchy of legitimacy. At the top of the hierarchy is the ‘sphere of legitimacy’, which is occupied by “music, painting…literature and the theatre”, wherein consumer’s judgements are denned by legitimate authorities, such as museums and universities (Jenkins, 1992, p. 84). In the middle is the “sphere of the legitimisable”, which is occupied by such interests as jazz, the cinema and photography (Jenkins, 1992, p.84). At the bottom is the “sphere of the arbitrary”, where individual taste is “the self-conscious arbiter of choice in fashion, food, furniture and so on (Jenkins, 1992, p. 84). Bourdieu went on to say that each of the spheres in this hierarchy were “internally hierarchized in terms of vulgarity or barbarism of taste” (Jenkins, 1992, p. 85). He concludes the concept of the hierarchy of legitimacy by stating that the further we move away from cultural legitimacy, towards arbitrariness of individual taste, the social competition over definitions of vulgarity and barbarism is likely to be sharper (Jenkins, 1992, p. 85). Gans also argued that there was a perceived hierarchy of ‘taste cultures’ which ran parallel to rankings of social status and prestige (Hanquin & Savage, 2015,