Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender identity is socially constructed
Gender identity and society
Gender identity and society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender identity is socially constructed
Identities exist in every social sphere of our society; they vary according to sex, race, nationality, race or ethnicity, and are formed through relations of individuals and groups in different places. However, there are tensions within these, thus reinforcing or challenging inequalities. They are also a subject of a changing social context, and their inclusiveness and exclusiveness contribute to a making of society. This essay will look at places where social interactions happen, and relate them to identities of people. It will examine how inclusion and exclusion work, and what role do identities have within social structures that connect or disconnect individuals. It will also be discussed that inclusion and exclusion in the city and the countryside are more than local, and can extend to other aspects of social life. Finally, the text will show that identities of a street and a neighbourhood must negotiate inclusion and exclusion within a neighbourhood identity. Hence, it will be concluded that connected lives are a subject of established identities and their meaning in places they exist. Exclusion and Inclusion Firstly, inclusion and exclusion of different communities happens in specific locations, where identities are viewed as either marked or unmarked. A marked identity signifies something unfamiliar, and thus abnormal, connected to a particular place and history. These identities can be determined by race, ethnicity, class, family, education, or an idea of 'us' and 'them'. Hence, typically, the Western identity is unmarked and normal, whereas other identities from other places are viewed as strangers with strange habits, conventions and social structures (Taylor, 2009). Moreover, everyday practices also propagate certai... ... middle of paper ... ...09). Introducing the Social Sciences. Making Social Lives. Milton Keynes: The Open University. Hinchliffe, S. (2009). Connecting People and Places. In: Taylor, S., Hinchliffe, S.,Clarke, J. and Bromley, S. (eds.) (2009). Introducing the Social Sciences. Making Social Lives. Milton Keynes: The Open University. Massey, D. (2005). For Space. London: Sage. Ridge, M. (2006). A Question of Ethnics. The Spectator , 21st January. Availble through: [Accessed 24th April 2014]. Taylor, S. (2009). Who Do We Think We Are? Identities in Everyday Life. In: Taylor, S., Hinchliffe, S.,Clarke, J. and Bromley, S. (eds.) (2009). Introducing the Social Sciences. Making Social Lives. Milton Keynes: The Open University. Willmott, P. (1986). Social Networks, Informal Care and Public Policy. London: Policy Studies Institute.
The Society for the Study of the Multi-Ethnics Literature of the United States. Spring 2000
Taylor, S. (2009) ‘Who We Think We Are? Identities in Everyday life’, in Taylor, S., Hinchliffe, S., Clarke, J. and Bromley, S. (eds), Making Social Lives, Milton Keynes, The Open University.
Ethnic Identity and Culture.’ New Tribalisms: The Resurgence of Race and Ethnicity. New York University Press. 1998
In conclusion, this essay has outlined an example range of ‘making and remaking’ on City Road in relation to ‘connections and disconnections’. It outlined how differences and inequalities are produced, how a person’s identity is attributed to them by other people and it is not always chosen and finally, the relationship between; society, making and remaking and connection and disconnection.
Blakely, G., Bromley, S., Clarke, J., Raghuram, P., Silva, E., and Taylor, S. (2012) DD131 Introducing the Social Sciences – Part 1, ‘ Learning Companion 1’, Milton Keynes, The Open University.
he argues in support of racial identity and flexibility complementing one another. This proves that the further society evolves, the closer mankind gets to eradicating the idea of a dominant race. However, there are occasions where labels could hinder a person’s opportunity. In fact, culture is the newest label that society takes into account the most, and to a minority, the main goal is to embed the roots of the old generation into the next generation.
276). Curtin’s Coculturation (2010) combats this hegemonic discourse by stating, “everyone is continually engaged in social and political processes of identification” (p. 283). Thus, one’s identity can consist of multiple cultures and they can in fact coincide. The idea that one group “belongs” in a particular imagined community is a myth, there is no single response or adaption. The theory of Coculturation ultimately accommodates to a more realistic approach to cultural adjustment where a newcomer can adopt some behavior of the host culture while still maintaining the conciliatory and subconscious aspects of their native
Kourvetaris, A. G. (2009). Perspectives on ethnicity, gender and race and their empirical referents: a four-sided paradigm and critical review. International Review Of Sociology, 19(1), 127-146. doi:10.1080/03906700802613988
Identity is one of the main questions throughout all of our readings, because it is hard for people to accept who they are in society. Accepting their identity as a minority with little if any freedoms sparks many of the social problems which I will show happening in all communities and cultures. The main issue we will discuss is how social environments effect the search for identity. The Mexicans in the U.S. module gives us examples how Mexicans try to keep their customs while living in a discriminated environment by the Whites. This module also gives us examples how people are searching for personal identity while struggling with cultural traditions. Finally, the African-American module gives us more examples to compare with the Mexicans in the U.S. module, because these readings deal with Blacks finding personal identity also through discrimination from the Whites. To properly understand the theme of identity, we must first look the factors influencing it.
Silva, E. B. (2009). Chapter 7. Making Social Order. In: Taylor, S., Hinchliffe, S.,Clarke, J. and Bromley, S. (eds.) (2009). Introducing the Social Sciences. Making Social Lives. Milton Keynes: The Open University.
Therefore it has become a source of division within the working class that only works in favor for the bourgeois and capitalist. On the there hand, Ethnicity has a wider concept than race but still can be useful and counterproductive. To begin, one obvious reason why ethnicity is useful because it allows for other cultures, customs to express themselves. Secondly, promotes multiculturalism and diversity. Be that as it may, it is counterproductive and overlapping because the systematic distinctions within ethnicity lead to equality and inequality in society Therefore resulting to racial supremacy and privilege. Given these points, in this paper, I will discuss in details the ways in which the concepts of race and ethnicity are useful and how they are counterproductive with regards to different authors; Peter Wade, Robert Milles, Etienne Balibar, David Nirebeng, Roman Grosfoguel and Joan
Identity. This simple world fulfills the answers to multitudes of questions: Who are you? Where do you come from? How do you appear? When were you born? Where will life take you? While some believe we answer these questions for ourselves, many scholars and experts in the field of media and cultural studies beg to differ. Conformity has become a social norm, and many people are no longer inclined to search for their own identity in the world. People allow the world and its inhabitants to identify them. Just as media and marketing have begun putting labels on everything people wear, digest, and observe, people too have become subject to labeling. These labels lead individuals to become ‘one dimensional’. In the words of Robinson (2010), this one dimensionality is due to the fact that the vast majority of human beings allow consumer culture and public opinion to dominate over their individuality. Evolving ideologies, alienating binary oppositions, and the question of identity are intertwined with media, culture and society in the lives of every being, be it implicitly or
Bhabha, Homi K. Interview by J. Rutherford. Identity, Community, Culture, Difference. 1990. J. Rutherford. London, Lawrence and Wishart: 207-221
The question ‘who am I?’ raises speculations about who we are as human beings and why we behave the way we do. This is of great interest to social psychologists. One particular theory about this social identity is that it is not fixed or innate but that it is something that changes over time and is constructed through our social interactions with other people. This essay will explicate the idea of socially constructed identities and consider the evidence for and against this view with examples of research studies from both social constructionism (Phoenix, 2007) and Social Identity Theory (SIT) (Turner and Brown, 1978).
In today's society, with the advent of modern digital communication and an increased focus upon global society and diversity, humans have a golden opportunity to evaluate themselves and how they identify both individually and in their broader culture. Although the question of “who am I” is perhaps one of the classical questions of the human cognizance of identity, our identity as both groups and individuals is directly related to the culture we are a part of, especially in regards to whether that culture is determined to be individualistic or collectivist. These differing mindsets have an inherent connection to the way that we view ourselves and the impact of interactions between different cultures.