Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How can culture impact identity
The role of culture in identity formation
Introduction to cultural identity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How can culture impact identity
In today's society, with the advent of modern digital communication and an increased focus upon global society and diversity, humans have a golden opportunity to evaluate themselves and how they identify both individually and in their broader culture. Although the question of “who am I” is perhaps one of the classical questions of the human cognizance of identity, our identity as both groups and individuals is directly related to the culture we are a part of, especially in regards to whether that culture is determined to be individualistic or collectivist. These differing mindsets have an inherent connection to the way that we view ourselves and the impact of interactions between different cultures.
To examine the impact of culture upon identity, we must first define what identity is. There is the age-old trend to view identity as the classical question of “who am I?”, when in reality, the common definition of identity is “...[the] individual's perception of self in relation to others” rather than the personality of the individual in question (Woodward). While personality is a way that we characterize ourselves by the traits that we posses, the identities that we claim are inherently a part of the groups that we assign ourselves. When I was young and in Sunday school, I was taught that the answer to the question of “who are you” is that I am a child of God, and I belong to the group of Christians. Now, some would reject that response almost immediately on the basis of that this answer does not define them, and in doing that, we have already segregated our identity based upon a group that we are a part of. Our identity is necessarily a product of our society and our relationships and the groups assignments that we give ourselves...
... middle of paper ...
...Do You See Yourself?" Psychology Today. Sussex Publishers, LLC, 01 May 2005. Web. 5 Jan. 2014.
Lam, Andrew. "Suicide Rates Rising Among Asian Americans." AsianWeek: The Voice of Asian Americans. AsianWeek, 14 Aug. 2009. Web. 05 Jan. 2014.
Leifer, Roman, and Julian Tam. "Human Rights: Collective Rights versus Individual Rights." ThinkQuest. Oracle Foundation, 2001. Web. 05 Jan. 2014.
McLeod, S. A. "Social Identity Theory." Simply Psychology. Saul McLeod, 2008. Web. 05 Jan. 2014.
McLeod, S. A. "Stereotypes." Simply Psychology. Saul McLeod, 2008. Web. 05 Jan. 2014.
NCSET. "Continuum of “Individualistic” and “Collectivistic” Values." Continuum of "Individualistic" and "Collectivistic" Values. National Center on Secondary Education and Transition, 2005. Web. 03 Jan. 2014.
Woodward, K. "Identity in Question." OpenLearn. The Open University, 19 Nov. 2010. Web. 5 Jan. 2014.
"Suicide in the U.S.: Statistics and Prevention." NIMH RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Mar. 2014.
Although the concept of identity is recurrent in our daily lives, it has interpreted in various ways.
We are not born knowing everything about ourselves; it is a daily learning process. Some live their lives vicariously through others, while some yearn to learn themselves. So, with all this being said, how do you see yourself?
The social identity theory is a person’s sense of who they are based on their social
Culture and identity are two very strange ideas. They are received at a very young age, yet they are very hard to give to someone else. They will affect you for the rest or your life, yet for the most part you are born into them. However, they soon become very important to us and we cannot, no matter what we do, live without them. They are a part of us, and a vital aspect of society. However, it took me a very long time to recognize that I had an identity and a little while after that before I knew what it was.
theory is: a person is has personal identity if and only if they have the same
Tajifel, H. a. (1986). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/258189
Some of the strengths of the social identity theory are that; throughout the years it has supported many empirical studies, it has also demonstrated the social categorization in intergroup behaviors, allowed us to differentiate between social and personal identities and has provide explanations for other areas of psychology (conformity). A weaknesses of the Social identity theory is that its application is restricted in the sense that it has very low ecological validity. Another weakness is that SIT favors situational factors rather than dispositional is not supported by evidence. The social Identity theory can be used to how to explain how we form our social and personal identities in the terms of in and out groups. SIT can also be used to explain why there is conflict between humans and different societies.
In the past, individual’s identities were often assigned to them by the hegemonic culture, largely based on their conceptualization of sameness. The hegemonic culture dominated identity discourse by drawing distinct boundaries between racial and cultural groups, separating and defining them. Modern discourse however, has seen individuals taking the power of assigning identity signifiers for themselves often in periods of great social change. While times of resistance are often the most easily recalled examples of this, subtle trends in society a tremendous impact, often without the conscience knowledge of the society. In the past two decades, Western Culture has been witness to a radical transformation in identification processes. Technology has become increasingly pivotal to popular culture, and as such, it has had a profound influence on the way we create and affirm our sense-of-self. Identification categories have become less rigid compared to thirty years ago, and people are on average more open to identifying across boundaries. The process of blurring identity lines between distinct groups has re-distributed the power of assigning signifiers from the hegemonic element of popular culture to the individual. Means of instant information distribution and exchange, discourse and academic retrieval, such as instant messengers, social networking sites, Wikipedia, et al are perhaps some of the most influential because of their instantaneousness. While the lines have become blurred on a social level, individual identities are often affirmed.
Experiencing a society of multi-cultures is beneficial through a variety of concepts to epitomize each individual identity. A person may vary in the degree to which he or she identifies with, morals, or...
Social identity theory can be applied to many different problems and real life situations. It demonstrates the role of categorization in behaviors, and explores how being part of a group affects social interaction in everyday life.
Another term that is commonly used in the Communication Studies is the “identity” which defines an individual. According to Simon (2004), identity is a position in a society. Persons can have several identities of belonging in larger groups (nationality, social class, profession, political beliefs, religion etc.) or in more exclusive groups (e.g. members in a club). In the social science (Ntampoudi, 2014), there are two different theories, the Social Identity Theory (SIT) and the Social Representations Theory (SRT). The first examines how the psychology affects the sense of having an identity, while the second theory focuses on the way that people imply this sense in a societal level.
The question ‘who am I?’ raises speculations about who we are as human beings and why we behave the way we do. This is of great interest to social psychologists. One particular theory about this social identity is that it is not fixed or innate but that it is something that changes over time and is constructed through our social interactions with other people. This essay will explicate the idea of socially constructed identities and consider the evidence for and against this view with examples of research studies from both social constructionism (Phoenix, 2007) and Social Identity Theory (SIT) (Turner and Brown, 1978).
For the purposes of this study I have defined cultural identity as the feeling of self-definition an individual has which is formed through a sense of belonging to a certain group. In this presentation I will be looking specifically at the effects of religion to this sense of cultural identity.
In the end, no matter what may be said about me, I know that I am some what of an abstract project. I continue to grow everyday and discover new factors that define me. I know what I stand for. I love myself, and the people around me. They don't create me, or make me who I am, but they do help be define myself