Persuasive Essay On Subway Vs Subway

1041 Words3 Pages

The scene opens with the Olympic gold medalist swimmer gliding across the pool. His head snuggly tucked into his body as his arms stretch towards the other end of the pool. His stroke pounds against the water, which ripples with his strength. His mom stands on the deck offering him his favorite sandwich and he gets out of the pool to receive the delicious energetic snack. The scene shows an advertisement for Subway sandwiches and how amazing athletes eat them. However, a swimmer who is training this hard for the Olympics has be to eating healthy food, not Subway sandwiches. That’s why Subway should not be suggesting that hard-working athletes like, Michael Phelps, are their customers. The chain food restaurant goes by the slogan “Eat Fresh.” …show more content…

When Anne Shooter from the Daily Mail did an article on Subway, she asked the server where the meat comes from. The passive response was, “it all comes from America.” This is incorrect. The company has admitted that the chicken and meat come from different countries like, Thailand, Uruguay, Germany, Denmark, and the UK. The meat takes month to reach countries like the US and UK, and is obviously not fresh. It is instead processed with chemicals and salts to keep it from going bad. . Studies on processed meats have shown that they cause obesity, cancer, and cardiovascular diseases. One supplier for Subway across the world, Dawn Farm Foods, was even worse. It not only provided stale meat; its meats caused an outbreak of salmonella, the horrible intestinal …show more content…

This is a lie. Michael Phelps burns about 9,375 calories a day from swimming. So maybe he can absorb the excess calories from one Subway sandwich every now and then. However, most people burn 600 calories a day on average. This means that a 955 sandwich cannot be healthy for us. We are just over eating with it, and becoming

Open Document