Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How social norms affect society
English essay on the importance of personal space
English essay on the importance of personal space
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How social norms affect society
Humans are surprisingly very territorial. Getting angry when their seat is “taken”, or when someone enters their room without knocking shows how much humans value personal space. For most people, the preferred bubble of space would be two feet or more, depending on if one is in public, or with a friend. It is considered a social norm to keep a distance away from strangers to avoid awkwardness and to avoid posing a threat. This idea is reflected all around the world: you see it on TV, and in the public. Society just tends not to notice its distinction because it is the “norm” to respect personal space. There are, however, a select few that are more social and are more intimate than normal who are willing to break the boundaries. As people encounter It has been defined that “...the invisible boundary that marks our absolute limit of personal space [is] between eight and 16 inches from our faces”(Gray). Because of this zone of space, a place like an overcrowded train could prove the fact that when this social norm is broken, people are more on edge. This happens in the classroom, and most frequently in transportation- like the subway or a bus. Most oftenly, people put bags or coats to occupy the space or seats next to them, giving others a sign that they don’t want people sitting next to them, and hence their range of personal space is widened. In an elevator, people tend to place themselves so that the distance between them and everyone else is maximized. It usually starts off filling in the corners, then in the middle in order to conform to respecting the privacy of others, but also for oneself. In most of these scenarios, close contact is unavoidable; people will do all they can to extend the radius of their bubble of The possessiveness, and value of your own territory. In research published in the journal Nature in 2009, Adolphs and his colleagues determined that “the bubbles are constructed and monitored by the amygdala, the brain region involved in fear” (Wolchover). The amygdala is a pair of almond-shaped brain regions that exist within each temporal lobe, controlling fear and the processing of emotion. Because the amygdala is what keeps you from getting too close to another person (who could possibly reach out and inflict injury) humans have established their own personal bubble of “protection”. The amount of distance from you and the next person measures what relationship they have with you- whether they are an acquaintance, a friend, or a stranger. The problem is “...some people always stand too close. Even on crowded public transport, there is inescapably close and threateningly close.” (Gray) This could explain why travel on the subway could give a traveller a stronger feeling of being in danger rather than riding in one’s own car. The invasion or limitation of personal space often increase one’s sense of danger because of how close everyone is. How people react or deal with these issues also vary depending on their geographic location, morality, culture and even
The Interaction Order of Public Bathrooms, written by Spencer E. Cahill, is an article that does a fairly well job at analyzing interpersonal relationships and individual practices in restrooms. Cahill used ideologies of Emile Durkheim, Erving Goffman, Margaret Atwood, Horace Miner, and Lyn Lofland to help construct his perspective on the individual’s expectations of bathroom etiquette through our experiences with others and how we internalize these behaviors.
Body contact and personal space in the United States. (n.d.). . In Wikipedia. Retrieved November 19, 2013, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_contact_and_personal_space_in_the_United_States
Social location plays a huge role in our day-to-day life. We 're classified by social class, education, gender, race, ethnicity, and the culture. Henslin (2015) notes, “One of the beautiful and fascination aspects of sociology is that it enables us to look at both parts of our current reality: being part of a global network and having unique experiences in our smaller corners of life” (p. 3). That statement is what draws me into sociology, we know that everyone 's treated different, and get more privileges than others based on social
The idea of Individualism can be traced all the way back to England before America’s existence. As we know, individualism has been interpreted in many forms throughout history. The 19th century is no different, taking hold of its own idea of individualism, called transcendentalism. Transcendentalism suggests freedom should not be confined to those focused on money and superficial gains. Instead, people should depend on no one but themselves. This movement focused on “greater individualism against conformity” (Corbett et al.). Heavily influenced by the Romantic period, transcendentalism adopted the belief that reason was more important than logic as Benjamin Franklin has believed. Reason must also include unique emotion and spirit (Corbett et
In the essay, The Baby Boom and the Age of the Subdivision, author Kenneth Jackson tells about the changes in the nation after World War II ended, and there was a spike in baby births. He talks about the creation of the Levittown suburbs to accommodate families in need of housing because of this. While the new rise of suburbs created a new kind of community and family, it also proved to have a changing effect on inner city areas and certain people.
An 11 years old kid lying on the ground in a dark room crying, shaking, and trembling with intense pain in both of his ears. The pain was similar to as if someone was hitting with some sharp object inside his ears and every time he would feel the shock of pain, he would pull both of his ears while enduring the pain. The pain would raise every couple of second and with each shock of pain, the kid would lose part of the hope that he had of surviving. He would experience so intense pain that he had never anticipated and all he could think of that “he is about to die.” This was the experience that I felt when I had a severe ear infection in both of my ears.
While I was breaking the rule of personal space, I felt somewhat uncomfortable myself. I did learn that this is a real rule in our society and that I am not alone in how I feel. In my home, the kitchen is my personal space and I don’t like to have anyone in there when I am cooking a meal. I also don’t like people to stand too close to me when I am talking with them. I will automatically move a few steps away if someone, other than my family, is too close to me when they are conversing with me. Thus, breaking this rule was a little difficult for me and extremely fascinating at the same
* The personal space may be very small for a man and a woman if they
I began to get fascinated by our capitalist world’s economy at a very early age of my life. Growing up, I was incredibly curious to unravel how systems function, and this curiosity developed into a burning desire to learn how processes and organizations operate and run our world. As I started my first job, I realized how much I needed to be better acquainted with the science of money making and the scientific approaches to money management. Later on in my life, being within a company system, I wanted to see the big picture by learning where such a company stands in the midst of all other business interactions locally and internationally. Being involved in the company’s practices I started analyzing the methods used by my managers, the causes and consequences of their managerial choices.
My interest in public interest law, nonprofit advocacy, and social justice began at a very young age. My passion was influenced by my upbringing, as well as my journey down a path different from what my family and culture envisioned. It is this same divergent path that has led me to me to pursue the legal profession today.
Who am I? Wrestling with identity— our history, our culture, our language— is central to being human, and there’s no better way to come to grips with questions of identity than through the crossing of borders. The transcendence of borders reveals the fluid nature of identity, it challenges absurd notions of rigid nationalities, and highlights our common humanity. It is no coincidence, then, that my experience as an immigrant has shaped my academic journey and pushed me to pursue graduate studies.
“Don’t talk to strangers,” my parents would tell me in unison. Ironically, as I would traverse familiar party-blocks, strangers would come up to me and ask for directions so I would do my best if I could to help. To this day, I’m not sure if there really is a “stranger danger” that is universal to all creeds, though I tend to think people on the same path ought to be respected to a certain extent.
Because all individuals possess different sets of experiences and perspectives, their individual realities, or their interactions with and responses to their surroundings, differ accordingly. While the outside reality that exists independently from human interaction remains consistently unaffected by individuals’ perceptions, one’s individual reality can change and shift as a result of changes in perception that can be triggered by events, relationships, and interactions with others. Leslie Bell’s “Hard to Get: Twenty-Something Women and the Paradox of Sexual Freedom,” Oliver Sacks’s “The Mind’s Eye,” and Martha Stout’s “When I Woke Up Tuesday Morning, It Was Friday” collectively address this idea that the realization of individual realities
The philosophical problem of personal identity pertains to questions that arise about ourselves by virtue of our being persons. There is no single question that will sum up the problem, but rather a multitude of questions that are loosely connected to each other. Within this essay, the four most prominent problems will be explained and addressed. One of the most familiar is the question of “Who am I?” This regards to what makes one a unique individual. Another familiar question is, “What is it to be a person?” This concerns the necessary criteria for something to count as a person as opposed to a non-person. There is also the problem of persistence, relating to personal identity over time. An example of this would be to glance upon an old photograph of a childhood class, point and say, “That's me.” The questions arises of, “What makes you that one instead of one of the others?” The last problem to be explained is the one of evidence. How do we find out who is who? There are two separate sources of evidence used often in philosophy: first-person memory, pertaining to one remembering an action or event and therefore being the person who did such, and physical continuity, where if the one who performed the action or witnessed the event looks like you, then it is you.
Social psychologists, such as Hazel, Kitayama, Triandis, and Brewer to name a few, have been working on the subject of culture and social self since the early ninety’s. Through individual studies, they have found relationships between the origin of ones’ culture and their sense of self. In order to analyze their work, some definitions will have to be discussed in order to make for a better understanding of the relationship between culture and the social self.