Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Locke's theory of personal identity
An essay on self identity
Problems with John Locke's idea of personal identity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Locke's theory of personal identity
The philosophical problem of personal identity pertains to questions that arise about ourselves by virtue of our being persons. There is no single question that will sum up the problem, but rather a multitude of questions that are loosely connected to each other. Within this essay, the four most prominent problems will be explained and addressed. One of the most familiar is the question of “Who am I?” This regards to what makes one a unique individual. Another familiar question is, “What is it to be a person?” This concerns the necessary criteria for something to count as a person as opposed to a non-person. There is also the problem of persistence, relating to personal identity over time. An example of this would be to glance upon an old photograph of a childhood class, point and say, “That's me.” The questions arises of, “What makes you that one instead of one of the others?” The last problem to be explained is the one of evidence. How do we find out who is who? There are two separate sources of evidence used often in philosophy: first-person memory, pertaining to one remembering an action or event and therefore being the person who did such, and physical continuity, where if the one who performed the action or witnessed the event looks like you, then it is you. John Locke believed that the mind was a blank slate, shaped by experience, and the two sources of all our ideas were sensations and reflections. Within his theory of identity, Locke separated the idea of a substance, an organism, and a person; each determined by different criteria. The identity of a substance consists in its matter. For example: a mass of atoms is the same throughout time so long as it retains the same atoms, regardless of arrangement. He does not tie t... ... middle of paper ... ...corporating fiction into the concept of who they are. To resolve the issue of false memories occurring, there must be an alternate verification used to determine the validity of the chain of memory. Due to the need for an alternate form of verification, it is apparent that memory alone is not sufficient enough to determine personal identity. An example of this is a person who was born in 1964 who claims to remember sitting in the car behind John F. Kennedy when he was assassinated. Considering the assassination occurred in 1963, the person is either lying or experiencing a false memory. While Locke's theory of personal identity fails in many ways, it is still significant in the fact that it was the first to separate the specific issue of personal identity from the larger topic of identity in general, as well as being the theory in which further theories built upon.
What the texts suggest about the relationship between how an individual sees themselves vs how the individual is seen by others, is through the concept of identity. An individual’s identity is shaped by many factors: life experiences, memories, personality, talents, relationships and many more.
Personal identity is a nonphysical structure and cannot be found within the soul or in the body. Due to the separation between consciousness and body, Locke proclaims that physical injuries do not influence who somebody is. Personal identity is limited to an individuals compacity to continue the sameness of consciousness. Locke states that “whatever past actions [a man] cannot reconcile or appropriate to that present self by consciousness, can be no more concerned in than if [it] had never been done”, (Locke 4). which proclaims that the forgotten experience was not part of them at all. According to Locke, who a person is, can be tracked by their memories of their life previously. Therefore, Locke’s views imply the body of Clive is constantly harboring new consciousness that comprises different personal identities. Since each “new” life of Clive every few seconds is oblivious to the lives before, the multiple personal identities must not be a part of his present state or
Hume, David. "Of Personal Identity." Twenty Questions: An Introduction to Philosophy. Ed. G. Lee Bowie, Meredith W. Michaels and Robert C. Solomon. 4th ed. Harcourt College Publishers, 2000. 348-352
The question of personal identity is very intuitive, yet very difficult to define. Essentially, what makes you, you? John Locke was one philosopher who attempted to answer this question. He proposed a psychological theory to define personal identity. His theory does have some merit, but it is not a correct definition of personal identity, since there are some counter-examples that cannot be accounted for. My argument will prove that Locke’s theory of personal identity is false.
In this essay I am going to be discussingthe question of the persistence ofpersonal identity. Particularly, defending the theory that I think is the best. Therearethreemajor competing theoriesthat are brought upwhen it comes to personal identity. They are the brute-physical, psychological-continuity, and the antichriterialist view. Here,I will be defending the psychological-continuity view because I think this theorybest explains what we call personhood; and I think it gives the most satisfactoryanswer to the question.The psychological continuity theory states that what makes a certain individual who they are is their psychological state (i.e. memories, mental functions); and these mental functions are a product of a functioning physical organ
In his 1971 paper “Personal Identity”, Derek Parfit posits that it is possible and indeed desirable to free important questions from presuppositions about personal identity without losing all that matter. In working out how to do so, Parfit comes to the conclusion that “the question of identity has no importance” (Parfit, 1971, p. 4.2:3). In this essay, I will attempt to show that Parfit’s thesis is a valid one, with positive implications for human behaviour. The first section of the essay will examine the thesis in further detail, and the second will assess how Parfit’s claims fare in the face of criticism. Problems of personal identity generally involve questions about what makes one the person one is and what it takes for the same person to exist at separate times (Olson, 2010).
Locke was an influential and intelligent thinker. Property and nature were highly recognized by Locke. That was more of his prized possession. He demonstrated the fight for rights and believed people were sovereign. Liberty rights, property rights and life rights. Locke believed that everyone should be treated equally. I a white person can do it, so can a black. If an African did it, so can an Asian. All rights were equal for everyone. Equality was a state of Locke’s that he tried to enlarge. No man was/is superior to another. He demonstrates freedom and individualism as well as regards to the bill of rights and
Locke was the first to define the self through a continuity of consciousness. He assumed that, at birth, the mind was a blank bluish gray or slate. Contrary to Cartesian philosophy based on pre-existing concepts, he maintained that we are born without
One major critic of Locke’s account is Antony Flew who offers two objections in his article “Locke and the Problem of Personal Identity”. The first objection, which he attributes to Bishop Butler, suggests that by defining personal identity in terms of consciousness Locke has in effect created a circular argument. The second objection concludes that “Locke’s criterion is at the same time both too strict in blackballing and too lenient in admitting candidates.” Although I contend that both objections are flawed, the scope of this paper shall only be to evaluate and respond to the first of these objections.
The development of individual identity has long been scrutinized by scientists of all disciplines to determine the biological and cultural aspects of life which influence the creation of identity. The structure and agency debate within the social sciences was born from opinions considering the postmodernist social changes throughout history; and aims to determine the influential significance held by the structural institutions within a culture, compared to that which is obtained from social interactions and personal agency. Social structures within society range from the larger global structures; to the macrostructures or institutional organisations that govern certain aspects of the way we live, such as political, economic, and education systems; to the smaller microstructures of face-to-face interactions and behavioural patterns accepted within a society, such as etiquette and social norms (Furze et al 2012, p.5,6). Human identities are undeniably shaped by the social structures that govern the culture from which they belong. This essay aims to discuss the influences of structure and agency respectively, as well as the altering frameworks predetermined by social scientists during different historical periods, in an effort to assess the levels of influence that social structures and social interaction possess over establishing an identity in a cultural world.
This hypothesis proposes that our identity is not a steady trademark. Furthermore, it can always show signs of change because of the general population we are around and associate with. Our identity likewise changes because of the progressions id social circumstances.
Throughout the years, the notion of personal identity has captured the attention of many philosophers. One such philosopher, John Locke, attempted to solve the problem in his book, Essays Concerning Human Understanding, in which he provides his definition of what personal identity should be considered as. This idea has not come without its fair share of criticism, however. Antony Flew, a contemporary English philosopher, attempted to show that Locke’s notion of personal identity was severely flawed. It is my intention to show that Locke was not incorrect in his ideas, but rather the apparent flaws in his work are merely due to his writings being misinterpreted by Flew.
Summary of John Locke’s view on personal identity The concept of personal identity is a central philosophical component to a debate to which many theorists have contributed their theories to. One of the most prominent theories on personal identities was by John Locke, one of the influential theorist in the 17th century. Locke first begins by making an important distinction between the nature of identity as being relative, rather than absolute.
Locke was the first one to separate out the specific issue of personal identity from the larger topic of identity in general. Locke's treatment of personal identity might seem counterintuitive to a lot of people, especially his claim that consciousness, and therefore personal identity, are independent of all substances. Notice, however, that the claim is not that consciousness can exist independent of a body or a mind, only that there is no reason to assume that consciousness is tied to any particular body or mind. Still, there is no reason to assume, on this view, that consciousness cannot be transferred from one body or mind
John Locke stated that the identity of persons was the identity of conscious. What Locke meant by this is even if our body changes our mind doesn’t such as our memory’s. So for example, many people have horror accidents where they lose their arms, fingers or even legs, but either way the memory stays the same therefore they are the same person. Locke focused a lot on memory, he thought that our memory’s made us who we are and if we were to switch brains with someone and our memory were now in their body of another person 's. That the person who held the memory is now the same person they were before they switched bodies. So for example, if I was to break my mother’s favorite vase, then decide I wanted to switch bodies with my brother, but I