Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of myers briggs personality test
Analysis of myers briggs personality test
Myers briggs personality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
How many of you argue or debate with a particular person? (pause) My top offender is my brother John. In an argument awhile ago, I was intrigued at our unique responses to an unexpected event. Our youngest sister Anna spilled paint in various places around our dining room and kitchen. We both agreed she needed to clean it up. John bluntly told Anna she shouldn’t have made the mess. I told Anna it was no big deal. Then we both gave her instructions on how to clean it up. After this episode, I wondered why John and I say basically the same thing so differently. I never understood why John and I say basically the same thing so differently (pause) until I took the Myers-Briggs personality assessment. According to the official Myers-Briggs website …show more content…
MBTIonline.com, published by CPPinc. 2016, Katherine Briggs, and Isabel Myers created the assessment, basing their research on the work of Swiss psychologist Carl Jung. This assessment asks a series of questions. Your answers result in 4 letters which explain parts of your personality. Today, will give you an overview of the Myers-Briggs types and two of the benefits of understanding your type. The first set of types is extroversion and introversion. For this set, the key word is energy. Extroverts recharge by being with people and introverts receive energy when they spend time alone. How do you recharge your phone? You plug it into an electrical outlet. We also have to recharge. How many of you feel refreshed after spending time alone? Me too! That means that the rest of you probably recharge by interacting with a group of people. Your type explains how you normally receive energy. The next set of types is sensing and intuition. This explains how you take in information. Let’s take a look at this desk. What do you think of when you see the desk? Do think of the color, length, or the type of material it is made out of, or do you compare it to your desk at home, think of a memories related to desks, or what type of person would like this desk? Sensors are prone to think in terms of facts-the height, color, and material, while intuitives make big picture connections, and think more about the meaning behind things. Thinking and feeling is next. This is how you make decisions. Think of a pair of green tinted sun glasses. When you wear them, everything you look at appears green. Thinkers make decisions through the lens of logic, weighing the facts with a methodical approach, while feelers tend to make decisions based on their values and how their decisions will impact others. Do you make decisions through logic or how they will impact others? And lastly judging and perceiving. This preference reflects how you approach the outside world. (pause) Let’s say all of us took the week off of school. (pause) Raise your hands if you would plan what you would do during the week? You all are most likely judgers. And how many of you would just go with the flow and see what fun things would come up? You are probably perceivers. I think of judging and perceiving as structured and organized vs spontaneous and flexible. Neither preference is better than the other. They are just two different ways to live. All of the combinations of these letters create 16 different types. Now that we have that review under our belt, we can move on to the exciting benefits of the Myers-Briggs assessment, how it can help you understand yourself and your relationships. Paul and Barbra Barron-Tieger, well-known and respected trainers of the Myers-Briggs assessment in their book, the Art of Speed Reading People 1998, state “[The Myers-Briggs assessment] helps us recognize, and very clearly identify, our natural strengths and potential weaknesses.
And by allowing us to understand the ways we are alike and different, it helps us to value our differences, but to celebrate them as well.” In other words, we can use the assessment to better understand ourselves and others. There are a few things about me that I thought were peculiar a few months ago…before I took my first assessment. A few things about me used to puzzle me. Sometimes I find it hard to brainstorm and come up with original ideas, especially for essays. Sarcastic jokes are never funny to me and I sometimes annoy my friends when I won’t relax until I have completed my assignments. Not until I took my first assessment did I realize why I am this …show more content…
way. I have taken the personality test five times and each time I’ve been an ISFJ an introverted, sensing, feeling, judger. Introverted-I need alone time to recharge. I usually do this by reading a book. My 7-year-old sister Anna is an extrovert and comes to my room to talk when she’s tired. Because I took the Myers-Briggs assessment I’ve become aware that I need to balance her recharge time and mine. Sensing-Sometimes it’s hard for me to brainstorm how to make things better. I am a part of a leadership group and at one of our chapter meetings we brainstormed on how to plan a better something. While others were spouting off ideas, I was still thinking about how we currently did things. Feeling-I have a problem with sarcastic jokes. (pause) They just aren’t funny to me. (pause) It’s hard for me to let things slide, especially when something can potentially hurt others. For others it’s not a big deal. This is because I have the feeling preference. I make decisions on how they can impact people and I don’t focus on logic. Judger-I am a serious person who likes to get things done and stay on track…sometimes this bugs my friends. I use to wonder why they were fine with playing a game while we had work to do. Now I understand that at least two of those friends have the perceiving preference, so they don’t feel the need to follow a strict plan like I do. The Myers-Briggs assessment can help you understand your relationships. Isabel Briggs Myers and her son Peter Myers, Isabel Myers helped create personality assessment and Peter carries on her work. Here is a quote from their book Gifts Differing 1995. “The merit of the theory presented here is that it enables us to expect specific personality differences in particular people and to cope with the people and the differences in a constructive way.” How many of you argue or debate with a particular person?
My top offender is probably my brother John. In an argument awhile ago, our youngest sister Anna spilled some milk after dinner. We both agreed she needed to clean it up. John bluntly told Anna she shouldn’t have made the mess and how to clean it up. I told Anna it was no big deal and that she needed to mop up the mess. Not until I took the Myers-Brigs personality assessment did I realize why John and I say basically the same thing so differently. Now, I’ve come to realize that John and I see the world of decisions differently. Logic and facts matter deeply to John, while I consider the impact decisions have on people. Both ways of thinking are important to
decisions. I participate and help run a local leadership club. I along with my friend Simeon serve as the team of chapter mentors. Simeon is and ENFP and (just in case you forgot) I am an ISFJ. So we have almost the exact opposite personalities (except for the feeling preference). You may think working on a team with a near opposite would be difficult, but in reality, it is very rewarding and can be quite comical at times. Simeon adds humor to lessons and announcement we create, while I help with details and structure. Both are crucial. We sometimes puzzle each other, but that only adds to the fun of working together. Knowing your type help you understand your relationships.
When I was little everyone told me I would make a great lawyer, they said I loved to argue. For a long time I believed them, I do love to argue. However, the older I got the more I realized that it wasn’t the arguing I loved, it was the dialog. How two people can have the exact same experience, but have two totally different views about that experience baffled me. When I was in high school I struggled with some things that I didn’t quite understand at the time. I didn’t understand why my teammates would listen to my male co-captain instead of me even when we said the exact same thing. I didn’t understand why my teammates would skip practice or do something that might get them kicked off of the team. We all loved water polo and had a great
Some assessments are norm- or criterion-referenced, so they are not too difficult to analyze; but some assessment results are ambiguous. It is up to educators to decide what the results mean and what to do with them. Using the data is a crucial part of this whole process. The data collected from these assessments should, “…guide instruction (i.e., determine which skills to teach, help refine and identify which practices are best to teach those skills)” (307). Using information collected from assessment regarding talents, interests, and career ambitions can help to motivate students in academics. Knowing what they’re interested in can help tailor lessons to capture their attention and make the learning more meaningful. I think individualization and making learning meaningful to each student is a very important part of education— something I will strive to do in my teaching
Such internal conflict is defined by Leon Festinger as cognitive dissonance: “a psychological state in which an individual’s cognitions—beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors—are at odds” (Bloom, Santos, & Egan, 2007, p. 978). Sendhil Mullainathan and Ebonya Washington (2009) describe cognitive dissonance as “the internal need for consistency” (p. 86). Mullainathan and Washington exemplify cognitive dissonance as occurring when “[an] individual…unconsciously [changes] his beliefs to alleviate the discomfort of having inconsistent attitudes and actions (p. 87).
In brief, I agree that we, as humans, tend to be set in our ways and many of our problems are related to miscommunication, along with the fact that our judgments are biased because of our experiences and education. Even though I believe that it is human nature to lean towards the more interesting argument, I do not agree that all humans follow the individual in command without questioning as well as disagreeing with their views on at least one subject.
One study finds that factors such as “birth order” and “birth intervals” have a hand in the way sibling relationships develop and thrive (Is Sibling Rivalry Fatal?). Another study found that “parental treatment, genetics, gender, life events, ethnic and generational patterns” as well as “people and experiences outside the family” can contribute to the dynamic of a sibling connection. Regardless of which factor is to blame, sibling rivalry can very quickly spiral out of control. A study done by Mike Brundrant came to the conclusion that “have found that sibling rivalry is often filled with psychological and physical aggression, which can traumatize children, leading to higher instances of depression, anxiety, and anger later in life” (Worse Than Bullying). In it’s most severe form, it can even lead to self-sabotage. These effects are never considered by today’s society when sibling arguments occur, and that is unfortunate because they are just as detrimental as any other emotional
Who I think I am? I’m not exactly sure who I think I am or how to describe who I think I am. I tend to act differently around certain people. Constantly changing to try to seek approval. Constantly in fear of accidentally doing something wrong; that I might say something wrong and all my friends will abandon me or leave me for someone better. I think this fear came from when my best friend was taken from me. I had known her since preschool, but she had met another girl and she stopped talking to me completely. I’m in constant fear that this will happen to me again, so I struggle to be accepted. I don’t want to be forgotten again.
I believe the conflicts made my relationships neither stronger nor weaker. The conflicts were civil conversations where no one had emotional ties and the problem is resolved. It is an expectation of everyone to act like rational adults and to get over things if there ever was any emotional response out of the conflicts. As mentioned, besides the resentment of being correct about the subject, I am apathetic.
I found the results of my self-assessments to be a very insightful and accurate description of myself. The results of the learning styles test and the Keirsey Temperament Sorter II are very valuable for examining my personality traits and learning style and making improvements as needed.
One thing I have learnt by having two siblings around is to both argue, and also being able to compensate. No one in my family has problems with saying what they think, and to argue for that. I think I have learnt a lot from that, and that you need to explain how you are feeling and what you are thinking if you want to change something. But, while I have had both my siblings around, I have not always been able to get it the way I want it, so I have learned to
Although we both share the same personality type, many of our personality strengths and limitations conflict with one another. Turner, for example, can sometimes come across as bossy and demanding. These traits conflict with my over sensitive and emotional traits. This conflict can potentially to explosive arguments between us when we have opposing views. Furthermore, I am extremely opinionated and I always feel like I am right. This characteristic of mine also does not mesh well with how bossy and demanding Turner can be. Nonetheless, arguments between us rarely last long as we both are respectful and considerate of each other’s perspectives. Although both our personalities are categorized as the same color, it does not necessary mean that we do not have
Each person has their own way of managing conflict, termed conflict styles. The styles of conflict are described by Hocker & Wilmont (2014) as being “patterned responses, or clusters of behavior, that people use in conflict” (p. 145). Personal history plays an important role in the development of individual conflict styles because, as Hocker & Wilmont (2014) explain, “your personal history, such as your family of origin and other influences, makes a difference in how you respond to conflict. Perceptions about conflict, whether it is an activity to be avoided or sought out and whether it is a negative or positive activity, develop over time” (p. 71). Depending on which perception the person develops, there are many different approaches to conflict resolution available. For instance, the five primary conflict styles include the accommodation style, the avoidance style,
Attention Getter: When you think of your sibling, you usually remember bratty, snarky remarks about each other or light pinching. For the most part though, even if you are reluctant to admit, your relationship with your sibling is pretty good. However, my relationship with my brother had a rocky beginning.
In my personal life I did encounter some conflicts with my family members and friends. As a young child I did not posses any skills to manage my conflict efficiently and responsibly. Over the years I have developed my conflict management skills by taking a meta-conflict perspective. By this I mean that I have developed my ability to analyze my strengths and weaknesses and improve on the mistakes I made during those conflicts. I applied this skill to most of my relations, may they be with family, friends or even at work. Another strength or positive attribute for me is my willingness
My target behavior was to increase my punctualness/timeliness to early morning activities such as work; class and other scheduled events by altering my sleeping and wake habits. I wanted to shorten the time it takes me to wake up and get ready for such activities. I realized that the action of me waking up in the mornings has several competing behaviors that restrict me from achieving my target behavior. I think that it is very important to be on time for one's morning activities, especially if one has an obligation, this is why I chose this to be my subject of study.
Jim Morrison once said, “The most important kind of freedom is to be what you really are. You trade in your sense for an act. You give up your ability to feel, and in exchange, put on a mask. There can’t be any large-scale revolution until there’s a personal revolution, on an individual level. It’s got to happen inside first.” A lot of people become absorbed with the fallacies created by society, and they pretend to be someone they aren’t. It isn’t until you step back and look at it that you realize who you really are. The Big 5 Personality test did a good job of externalizing this and bringing these traits to my attention. The results were much more accurate than not. It was spot on when it predicted that I was highly extroverted, but it predicted