Jim Morrison once said, “The most important kind of freedom is to be what you really are. You trade in your sense for an act. You give up your ability to feel, and in exchange, put on a mask. There can’t be any large-scale revolution until there’s a personal revolution, on an individual level. It’s got to happen inside first.” A lot of people become absorbed with the fallacies created by society, and they pretend to be someone they aren’t. It isn’t until you step back and look at it that you realize who you really are. The Big 5 Personality test did a good job of externalizing this and bringing these traits to my attention. The results were much more accurate than not. It was spot on when it predicted that I was highly extroverted, but it predicted …show more content…
that I wasn’t overly agreeable. I have to disagree with that statement. Extraversion, to most, is the way a person presents themselves in a social setting. There can be a plethora of attributes that go along with this though. Most extroverts are considered the life of the party. They are the person that everyone flocks to and most often is very likeable. They tend to talk rather loudly as well. I, for the most part, am the epitome of extraversion. I have to remind myself during conversations that I need to talk softly. In the classroom, I find that I usually have the loudest voice and speak the most often. I’m looked to in social settings to provide a comic relief. I’ve always used humor to break an awkward or uncomfortable situation, so people automatically expect me to be funny or quick witted. For example, I got chased by the police one night with a group of my friends. When the cops finally caught up to my Jeep, I had already pulled into my friend’s driveway. The police had followed from a distance and pulled onto our block with their lights off. I instinctively bailed out as the light bar came on. I laid on the ground out of sight, leaving my passengers helpless in the vehicle. They had been panicking the whole drive. I heard the familiar, but stern tone of one of my favorite cops. I immediately stood up. He asked what I had been doing on the ground, and I responded with, “I dropped my contact.” He laughed and told me that we needed to stay where we were, because the cops had been looking for us. When he left, we all laughed about the witty comment I had made. A couple of my friends made the comment that I probably should have gotten in trouble, but they thought my antics had lightened the mood. Another example would be the first time I went to a Lake Land party. I showed up with an older friend, but I had no idea who any of the party goers were. I started off following my friend so she could introduce me to new people. I met a couple of people and ditched her to go talk to random people. By the end of the night, I had a small crowd of people who were following me everywhere. I wasn’t much for partying because of the potential consequences, but I continued to get invites. I’d like to think all that ties back into my extraversion. I scored moderately high on the openness portion of the test, but it wasn’t as high as I would have expected.
I am always open for new adventures, and I’m always curious about new things. I am down for an adventure any time and any day. One time I decided to ride a bull as part of a dare. I hadn’t ridden one before, so I was accepting of the idea. I didn’t think much of it and chalked it up as a new adventure that would create a good story. We ended up driving all the way to St. Petersburg, because my friend knew a guy who had bulls that could be ridden. I ended up getting very bruised up, and we ended that excursion quickly. I went skydiving over the summer as well for a new adventure to add to my list. I am not a fan of heights and figured that was the best way to conquer my fear. They say curiosity kills the cat, but I’m still alive. I’ve done some unintelligent things due to my curious nature. I had a knack for taking things apart and putting them back together. For example, when I was in seventh grade I got an Xbox 360 for Christmas. I decided to take it apart to see what the inside looked like, and I wanted to know how it worked. I got it back together, but I got in trouble for it. Another time I took apart my dad’s old push mower apart. Unfortunately I couldn’t get it back together correctly. I quickly learned that my openness would get me in trouble if I wasn’t
careful. I disagree with the tests’ prediction that I was not very agreeable. Once you get to know me, I am an empathetic and sensitive person. If you ask anyone who has known me, sensitive would be one of last characteristics they’d include in my repertoire, but it’s hard to be outwardly sensitive in an insensitive world. Until recently, I was very unsympathetic, and rather harsh. I didn’t have much compassion for emotional people. If you were crying, I’d more than likely walk by without looking at you. I finally came to a realization that rudeness was nothing more than a weak person’s limitation of strength. I have been taking many steps to raise my vibrational frequency. Being sensitive, therefore, is simply a result of my endeavors. I am also very trustworthy as well. My friends know that if they tell me something in confidence, it doesn’t leave our conversation. I once had a friend who was going through a rough patch in his life, and I left my house in Shelbyville at two in the morning to go to Charleston to be there for him. He knew that I would be there, because I’m always there if someone needs me. The only part I found to be accurate was the lack of tolerance that my test revealed. I don’t do well with people who lack common sense, and I don’t deal well with negative people. I sat beside someone with a poor attitude on the first day of class and immediately changed seats the next class to remove myself from the situation. I didn’t want to say anything to avoid conflict, but I knew I didn’t have to put up with her attitude. Overall, the test was fairly accurate in describing my personality. It stated that I was a very extroverted person by nature, but I scored lower on the agreeableness portion of the test than I had expected. By taking the time to sit down and look over my results, it brought about a self-awareness that I hadn’t really thought about. I had to ask myself, “Why did I score so low on the agreeableness portion? And what can I do to change that?” I am always looking for ways to improve who I am as a person, so this test really had me thinking about what I could change in my life to better myself on an individual level.
Does personality determine behavior? Phelps (2015) dived into this discussion in his article by reviewing the perspectives of personality, how psychology relates to behavior and the idea of self, and further, how behaviorists define personality and all of its components. Phelps (2015) compares and contrasts the common beliefs of personality and the view of self as attributed to personality theorists with those characterized by behavioral theorists. A typical understanding of personality is one that defines it as an internal substance that drives behavior, and therefore, by seeking to understand a person's personality we can almost assume their actions (Phelps, 2015). Behavioral theorists, on the other hand, do not lean on vague internal conditions to explain behavior, but rather they evaluate a person's past and present settings to define behavior, according to Phelps (2015). The conclusion is that behaviorists' perspectives on these topics are far more parsimonious in nature and most popular views of personality speak to a more internal and far-reaching position rather than the behavior itself (Phelps, 2015). Likewise, Phelps (2015) addresses the issue of meeting specific criteria for discerning whether a theoretical viewpoint is valid in helping us understand people. He continued to remark that behaviorists' stances meet a large portion of the criteria as presented by Gordon Allport (Phelps, 2015). For example, they have less assumptions, they are consistent, and not to mention, they are testable and falsifiable, Phelps (2015) supports. In my opinion and critical review, this article is useful because it provides an unbiased assessment of a variety of personality theories and definitions of personality and the self. Likewise, it is simple and easy to understand, thus qualifying it as parsimonious. Overall, I think the article did its ultimate job of evaluating different perspectives and
I love riding four wheelers. I also love to adventure so I guess you could say my character trait is being adventurous. I’ve been riding my whole life, you think I’m kidding but my mom even rode four wheelers when she was pregnant with me so yeah. I got my very first four wheeler when I was three and I rode it till I was nine, but then I wanted to ride with the big boys or girls or whatever. When I was ten I got Yamaha blaster two hundred. It was my first manual transmission four wheeler. It was also a fixer upper, so I restored it to original condition and learned valuable knowledge along the way. So now I know a lot about four wheelers. When I got done fixing it it was a lot better than before. So I figured I was ready to learn how ride a
Human assets experts regularly utilize the Big Five identity measurements to help place workers. That is on account of these measurements are thought to be the hidden qualities that make up a singular 's general identity. The "enormous five" are general classes of identity characteristics. While there is a critical collection of writing supporting this five-component model of identity, specialists don 't generally concur on the accurate marks for each one measurement. The Big Five characteristics are Openness, Conscientiousness, Extroversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism:
Every person that has different characteristics that influence how they think, act, and build relationships. While some people are introverted, others are extroverted. Some people are strict and do not take risks, while others are carefree and free spirited. However, there are times where a person’s behavior becomes destructive, problematic, and maladaptive (Widger, 2003). The key to examining a person for a possible personality disorder is not if they have quirks, but if they display severe behavioral, emotional, and social issues. A diagnosis of having a personality disorders involves identifying if their extreme behaviors, emotions, and thoughts that are different than cultural expectations interfere with the ...
The Big Five Personality Test provided an interesting account of my personality. Although the majority of the results were accurate, I was surprised by two of the outcomes. According to this test, I am a closed-minded, unmethodical, social butterfly that is well-mannered towards others and composed under pressure (John, 2009). First, the results were completely accurate as I am extremely extroverted. I never meet a stranger, and I carry on conversations with anyone. From the custodian, to the cashier, to a random person on the street, it gives me a great sense of fulfillment to engage in dialogue with others from all walks of life. Second, I agree that I am polite and supportive, especially with family and friends. Overall, I try to always
Identity-“Ones personal qualities.”Identiy is something only he or she can fully define. My uncle says I am affectionate,cheerful, and calm. My grandmother sees me as slim, pretty and sweet. My dad described me as perky, cheerful and happy, my mom says beautiful, gentle, and self-conscious. These adjectives describe me accurately, yet they are only abstract versions of me. Adjectives cannot begin to describe me and I aknowlege these descriptions for what they are, a condensed translation from my outward self to the world. It is impossible for anyone to understand me completely because nobody has experienced the things I have. My mother has never cherished a raggedy doll named Katie and my father never spent hours upon hours making collages and scrap books for his future children. My uncle never hid in the back of a pick-up-truck and traveled four hours to New York and my grandmother has never walked hours in the rain looking for the Queen of England. My identity is something only I can define.
Personality Theories The Big Five Approach plays a major role in the process of understanding and analyzing a child’s outcome, as well as any adjustment issues that may occur during a child’s development. Along with these accomplishments, the Big Five approach has proven to be able to cover children, adolescents, and adults under one spectrum (Van den Akker et al., 2013). The article, “The development of personality extremity from childhood to adolescence: relations to internalizing and externalizing problems” provides an intense amount of information on personality theories and goes into depth about how personalities develop and how to distinguish between them as well. This study not only incorporated the study of personality extremity throughout childhood and adolescence, but the issues between personality extremities and personality adjustments as well (Van den Akker et al., 2013).
A person’s personality has been the subject of psychological scrutiny for many years. Psychologists have drawn up several theories in an attempt to accurately predict and determine one’s personality. Foremost amongst these, is the “Big Five Trait Theory” which stemmed from Raymond B. Cattell’s theory.
In today’s times psychologists often see a person’s personality as their own unique code or pattern that tends to define who they are in terms of emotions and behaviour and this is easier done with help and reference to what is commonly known as the Big Five Personality Traits Theory. In this essay the traits, personality and characteristics of Mr X will clearly be described followed by a brief description of the above mentioned theory. This essay will then finally explain the behaviour and personality of Mr X with regards to the Big Five Personality Traits Theory followed by a brief conclusion.
Personality is massive part of an individual’s identity. Our personalities dictate our patterns of thinking, feeling, and acting. An individual’s personality exposes them to predispositions and habits that influence their actions and lives. Early on, personality assessments consisted of physical features ranging from head shape and facial characteristics to body type. In today’s world, personality assessments are mainly based around traits. Traits are simply descriptions of one’s habitual patterns of behavior, thought and emotion. The most popular personality assessment is the Five-Factor Model, also known as The Big Five. This model allows us to describe people based on the five main traits/dimensions. These traits are extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience. Each of these five traits measures a different aspect of one’s personality. Extraversion is based on one’s level of engagement with the world,
Different people describe the word ‘personality’ differently. Martin et al. (2010,p.610) describes personality as a “particular pattern of behavior and thinking that prevails across time and situations, and differentiates one person from another”. According to Mullins and Christy (2013,p.136), they explain that Personality may be perceived as “consisting of stable characteristics that explains why an individual behaves a certain way. Independence, conscientiousness, agreeableness and self-control are all examples of personality characteristics”. Mullins and Christy (2013, p.136) further explain that we can only identify and understand a person’s personality from listening, watching and observing them. For instance, an independent person may show independence characteristic by demonstrating a strong sense of self-sufficiency. It would be expected that this individual would not be dependable on other people around him and if this is established, it can support the characteristic being a consistent part of the person’s behavior. Individuals are therefore generally consistent in the way they respond to situations. At...
Organisations have spent many resources in attempt to predict workplace deviance at the time of hire (Ones, 2002). According to Mount, Ilies, & Johnson (2006), deviant behaviours at work are likely to be subjected to individual’s personality traits rather by ability-related factors because individuals make conscious choices when they decided to or to not engage in deviant behaviours. In the area of research on personality, the Big Five Model (McCrae & Costa, 1987) was identified as the most widely used and empirical supported personality measure in industrial psychology (Salgado, 2002). There are five personality traits in the Big Five Model of Personality. First, the agreeableness personality dimension includes traits related to getting
With regards to this question, l will absolutely rate myself high on this Big Five personality dimensions/traits since l know that customers, colleagues and other employees knows me better than l can actually say more about myself. My capability encompassed the big five traits as one of my friends do regard me as very ‘compassionate’, what a good quality. Therefore; human being brings in their personalities, physical and mental abilities, and other stable traits to work (Talya B. & Berrin E)
After completing the assessment exercise I have been able to carefully my personality. The exercise consisted of an evaluation of four areas: Locus of Control, Personality Type, Stress Reactions, and Learning Styles.
Trait approach covers the big five personality traits: extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience. These five traits have been identified as the most identifiable personality traits, even across cultures and societies. According to McCrae, Costa, and Busch’s (1986) study on personality system comprehensiveness, the big five personality model included the five traits most identified with by individuals asked to describe themselves and others. I found this segment of the class especially intriguing as it helped me not only learn so much about myself, but also take a deeper look into the personality of my family, peers, and even strangers. I am also more conscious of how I self-monitor my personality traits. For example, I am very much so an introverted person but at times I try to be extroverted based off the environment. In highly social environments, I consciously smile and try to talk to people because I want to be perceived in a favorable light, not actually because I feel the need to be sociable. In other words, I don’t want to be perceived as odd. I believe I developed this form of self-monitoring because when I am introverted at social events people will constantly ask me if I’m ok since I’m quiet, which makes me uncomfortable as they make me the focus. Being the center of attention makes me anxious, and therefore to prevent that I have developed being a fake-extrovert to avoid it. This exemplified how I apply self-monitoring to my everyday life. Trait approach gave me insight into how to identify vastly accepted personality traits, as well as, how each of these traits can be influenced and