Pamela Meyer Arguments Against Lying

418 Words1 Page

Lying has a significant impact on one’s behavior, personality, and daily interactions throughout their personal and professional lives. In Pamela Meyer lecture “How to spot a liar” she identifies two truths regarding deception; lying is a cooperative act, and secondly we’re against lying, but we’re covertly for it in ways that our society has sanctioned for centuries and centuries and centuries.

Lying as a cooperative act appears to slightly more significant than one being against lying. I believe when it comes to effectively coupling deception and judgment to identify when someone is attempting to deceive you, one’s ability is often ineffective. Put simply by con man Henry Oberlander, “everyone is willing to give you something. They’re ready to give you something for whatever it is that you’re hungry for”. I believe Oberlander view is more effective based on societies eagerness to deceive as stated in the lecture, “On a given day, studies show that you may be lied to anywhere from 10 to 200 times. Now granted, many of those are white lies. But in another study, it showed that strangers lied three times within the first
10 minutes of meeting each other.

While I believe one’s lack of discernment allows deception to flourish, I believe the …show more content…

Often it appears that one’s education is deemed sufficient to supersede faith. While historically scholars from around globe have continually been unable to reproduce vital organs, create life, or guarantee one’s heath, the notion of faith and the existence of GOD often get dismissed or becomes secondary to one’s lack of wisdom, faith, due to relying on their own understanding. Society failure to diligently seek to understanding in things unseen. Because individuals are often unable to conceptualize things which they have never seen, allows the continuation of determining the existence of GOD to

Open Document