A quote by Hitler in Mein Kampf explains “if you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed”. I recently attended a lecture on fraud and forensic accounting, with a focus on lie detection techniques. The lecture was presented by Pamela Meyer, the author of Liespotting: Proven Techniques to Detect Deception. Meyers is a fraud examiner and the CEO of Calibrate, an institution that trains organizations in lie detection. Meyers presentation began by giving several truths about lying, such as: lying is an attempt to connect wishes and fantasies. She also gave facts about lying in the workplace, highlighting that there is an annual global fraud loss of $3.7 million. As the lecture continued, Meyers focused on two types of lying: verbal dodging and body language. Meyers presentation emphasized on the idea that adults lie constantly. After the presentation, I began questioning the prevalence of lying in society, and the relationship between …show more content…
group and societies as well as the damage of lying, leading me to question the relationship between lying and ethics. I was thinking about catastrophic events such as 911 or the Holocaust, and how causes and effects impact defining as well as upon everyday life. Is lying an inhibited characteristic into society that is an unintended catalyst for unethical actions preformed by people in everyday life? Is lying an inevitable action? What is the relationship between lying and ethics? Can catastrophic events be prevented or are they inevitable events caused by exogenous social, political and economic forces? Recent research conducted on the emergence of lying in young children found that children develop the ability to lie as young as 42 months old. As they become older, they begin telling more lies that become so complex, suggesting that lying is an inevitable skill (such as learning how to read or write). Lying affects any aspect of society, as even if people know they are being lied to, they chose not to confront it. It can be assumed that lying plays a major role in ethics, as people often lie to hide an unethical act committed. Children lie to conceal aggressions, while adolescents may lie to cover up dishonesty in the school environment, and adults conceal the truth in the workplace or through personal relationships. Similar research conducted by psychologists found a relationship between children’s cognitive skills and deception. In the Emergence of Lying in Very Young Children, researchers Kang and Lee studied sixty 2 and 3 year olds. The children were asked to not look at the toy when the experimenter wasn’t watching. The researchers found that 80% of children peeked at the toy. When the children were asked whether or not they had peeked at the toy, the researchers found that the younger children were, the more likely they were to be honest. However, as they got older, children were more likely to lie. These research studies show that lying begins at such an early age, it is a naturally acquired skill, and perhaps even inevitable that people will always lie. The recent studies on the emergence of lying in young children is extremely useful as it questions whether lying can be stopped, as people learn to lie at such an early age, lying is an acquired skill the same way reading or speaking is. Researchers Feldman, Tomasian and Coats studied “Nonverbal Deception Abilities and Adolescents’ Social Competence”.
The participants in the study were 11 to 16 year olds who were asked to pretend whether or not they liked a drink. The researchers found half the time, participants were being truthful, while in the other half, adolescents were deceptive, leading the psychologists to conclude that as children get older, they are more likely to lie, and adolescents lie through a series of blinking and shrugs. The results from research conducted in the studies show that children develop the ability to lie at such an early age, a fact that most people, especially parents are not aware of. When it comes to the topic of the emergence of lying in young children, most people would not think that children start lying as young as 2 years old. Since young children develop the ability to lie at such a young age, would a change in parenting techniques affect future actions that their children commit in later
years? Academic cheating has become a rising problem throughout primary and secondary education. Academic cheating is defined as “representing someone else’s work as your own… students who cheat often feel justified in what they are doing… cheating may begin in elementary school when children break or bend the rules to win competitive games against classmates” (Stanford University, Perspectives in Assistive Technology). The fact that student’s feel justified in cheating, is similar as to how people say lies because they feel that they are justified in doing that action, such as a child may feel justified to lie to their parent about eating a snack before a meal.
“A good liar uses the truth.” This is a technique used by notorious imposters Frederic Bourdin, and Frank Abagnale. Although Bourdin posed as a child for a second chance at adolescence, Abagnale posed as an adult to gain financial means and respect. Bourdin and Abagnale’s success in deception can be primarily attributed to their careful observation of their surroundings, as well as their ability to detect the emotions of those around them.
In The Ways We Lie, Stephanie Ericsson expresses the inevitability of lying and the way it is casually incorporated into our everyday lives. She personally brings light to all the forms of lying and some that are often not recognized as a lie. Ericsson questions the reasons and validity behind lies by highlighting the effects and consequences.
Richard Gunderman asks the question, "Isn 't there something inherently wrong with lying, and “in his article” Is Lying Bad for Us?" Similarly, Stephanie Ericsson states, "Sure I lie, but it doesn 't hurt anything. Or does it?" in her essay, "The Ways We Lie.” Both Gunderman and Ericsson hold strong opinions in regards to lying and they appeal to their audience by incorporating personal experiences as well as references to answer the questions that so many long to confirm.
Although it is considered wrong to tell lies, it seems that literature has offered us situations where telling lies isn’t necessarily bad. Of course, lying often has a tragic outcome, but not always for the person or people who told the lie or lies. Oftentimes, these unfortunate outcomes are directed at the person about whom the lie was told. Furthermore, these stories have explained that dishonesty can result in success for both the liar and the target. Maybe we have been teaching the wrong values to our children.
As John Ruskin once said, “The essence of lying is in deception, not in words.” This essence is debated in “The Ways We Lie”, written by Stephanie Ericsson, and “Doubts about Doublespeak”, written by William Lutz. In “The Ways We Lie”, Ericsson talks about the different ways people lie on a day to day basis. By comparison, in “Doubts about Doublespeak”, Lutz discusses the different forms of doublespeak that many individuals frequently use. Lutz considers doublespeak as a language that distorts the meaning of words in order to deceive another person, and only “pretends to communicate” (83). Although both authors agree that lying is about the use of deceptive language, Ericsson describes this use of language as occasionally being necessary,
The society that we live in today is built around lies. Banks lying to customers in order to feed the capitalist mindset, politicians lying to citizens in order to gain power, and charities taking donations with open arms however are stingy when giving back to the cause. The common reason why these organizations lie is to hide what they truly are. People also deceive others in order to hide who they truly are. From a young age, lying becomes engraved into one’s mind, we are taught to walk, talk, and lie.
In “The Ways We Lie”, Ericsson describes the different types of lies: white lie, facades, ignoring
Lying is an issue that has been debated on for a long time. Some people believe that lying is sometimes ok in certain circumstances. Some people believe lying is always acceptable. In contrast, some believe lying is always bad. Keeping all other’s opinions in mind, I believe that lying is a deficient way of solving problems and is a bad thing. I claim that only certain situations allow the usage of lies and that otherwise, lying is bad. Dishonesty is bad because it makes it harder to serve justice, harms the liar individually, and messes up records. Furthermore, it should only be said to protect someone from grave danger.
Stephanie Ericsson’s The Ways We Lie, analyzes and reflects on how lying has simply become the norm in our society. We all lie, there is not one person in the world that does not lie. Most people lie because they are afraid of telling the truth, however what they do not know is telling a lie can lead them in the wrong direction because many things can happen when lying to a person. The person can find out when everything unravels that person will not have trust in you and you would be known as a liar. To every action there is a consequence, so why not deal with just one consequence when telling the
The reliability of children’s eyewitness testimony is a controversial issue. Opinions range from proponents believing that children are virtuous in every detail to those who are more skeptical. In actuality, child testimony falls somewhere in between the two divergent views. Though children may not intend to intentionally distort the truth, they do seem to be very vulnerable to suggestibility. Therefore, certain comments and the form of questions can influence testimonials.
Lying is simply an act of not telling the truth, and this definition of lying will be used in future sections of this paper. There are three groups of lies t...
When initially asked about the morality of lying, it is easy for one to condemn it for being wrong or even corrupt. However, those asked are generally guilty of the crime on a daily basis. Lying is, unfortunately, a normal aspect of everyday life. In the essay “The Ways We Lie,” author Stephanie Ericsson makes note of the most common types of lies along with their consequences. By ordering the categories from least to most severe, she expresses the idea that lies enshroud our daily lives to the extent that we can no longer between fact and fiction. To fully bring this argument into perspective, Ericsson utilizes metaphor, rhetorical questions, and allusion.
Tell the truth, live the truth, do the truth, or there will be terrible consequences.
Deception exists in media, among prestigious universities, and perhaps most commonly in the workplace. According to Dunleavy (2010), reasons for deception in the workplace include: competitiveness, conflict, or a response to a supervisor or fellow employee (p. 241). Dunleavy develops hypotheses’, conducts experiments, and collects data to determine what is considered acceptable and unacceptable behavior as it applies to deception in the workplace. Ultimately, the reason for deceiving and the method in which one deceives, through either withholding (omission) or distortion (commission), directly effects the perception of coworkers’ credibility, power, and trustworthiness (Dunleavy, p.241).
People lie everyday to, in someway or another, keep themselves out of trouble. Many teenagers will lie to their parents about what they are doing for the evening, how much of their homework they have done, or how that glass vase got broken while they were out of town. We even lie to our significant others about who that other boy was that called the house or what exactly we did with our friends last night. All anyone is trying to accomplish by this is to stay out of trouble when we know we’ve done wrong. But we never think of the effects of lying. Although we think we’re being sly, parents are usually smarter than we give them credit for! And eventually our boyfriends and girlfriends will find out! Then the problem becomes the issue of trust. If you lie, there is no trust. That can be one of the serious consequences of lying.