Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The existences of god
The impact religion can have on the individual and society
Philosophy essay about god's existence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The existences of god
Questions of God’s existence has long been discussed and studied for many, many years. Theist and Atheist question the fundamental question of belief: how do we know that there is a God? As usual, the question of proof is always displayed? How can we or anyone prove that there is truly a God? Without taking a theological, or Biblical approach, can we philosophically argue that God is real? Furthermore, a heavily debate question of God’s existence is: If God is real, why is there so much evil in the world? That is a question that many theist do not even know the answer to and may never be fully discoverable. Researching and studying this questions is beneficial in knowing how to approach the question when asked. H.J. McCloskey, author of the article “On Being an Atheist”, took the atheistic approach to answering the theistic …show more content…
McCloskey argued that the “mere existence of the world constitutes no reason for believing in such a being”. Evans and Manis (2009) argues the existence of God due to the objects of the universe (p.69). It is expressed that there is no natural reason that objects exist. The ultimate argument is that “a necessary being is the only kind of being whose existence requires no further explanation of a contingent being” (Evan, 2009, p.69). All objects or things come from something, therefore, the cause of the universe is imperative to argue against McCloskey. McCloskey (1968) also claims that the cosmological argument “does not entitle us to postulate an all-powerful, all-perfect, uncaused cause”. Evans (2009, p.77) enlighten his standpoints of the cosmological arguments in response to McCloskey. We can argue that the cosmological argument does not include all important aspects; however it is relevant to the conclusion that there is a God. Furthermore, everything is caused by something which we cannot deny the theist belief that God is the creator of the universe and everything in
This essay features the discussion of the problem of evil in relation to the existence of god. Specifically outlining two sections where the problem of evil is discussed from atheist and theistic viewpoint.
The existence of God is quite controversial issue. God has different names in the world, and a lot of people, strongly believe in his existence. While, on the other hand, there are also people who don’t believe in his existence. In their discussion entitled “Does God Exist?” William Lane Craig, who is the supporter of the idea of existence of God, debates with Austin Dacey, who is an atheist, on the idea of existence of God. They provide the strong arguments and their debates are quite interesting, and innovative (not similar to those arguments, we usually read about in book). These are the fresh views on the question of existence and non-existence of God.
In this universe everything has a cause of its existence, so this universe might have a cause, but no is sure who created, so we as humans think that God created this universe, but unless if you’re an atheist who doesn’t believe in God. The reason time exist because of this universe, which mean that time has a cause and time didn’t exist before if the universe wasn’t existed. At the end of the day, as opposed to surmise that God exists, we may think there is only an interminable relapse of causes. Something has dependably existed. God's presence isn't coherently demonstrated, yet it is likely, given the premises. Considered without anyone else, the claim God exists is exceptionally implausible, says Swinburne. However, in light of the cosmological contention, it turns out to be more plausible, on the grounds that God's presence is the best clarification for why the universe exists. God is the real reason why orders and purpose of things that we find on this universe, according to design, viz. We can include the contention from religious experience and a contention from supernatural occurrences. Each work a similar way, “The presence of God is the best clarification for these wonders”. When we set up every one of these contentions together, he asserts, it turns out to be more likely that God exists than that God doesn't. the premises are conceivable, and the inductions are natural. So, in spite of the fact that it isn't an explanatory
According to agnostics, there is absolutely no proof of a God and thus, “God” could actually be an existence fabricated from myths. In addition, it is believed that the universe is both ethereal and uncaused by any higher power; it is simply “just there”. Take the Big Bang Theory for example, agnostics claim the universe essentially sprang into existence all on its own and life is merely a series of random processes. Likewise, one could easily ask the question, if God created the universe then who created God? However, some may argue that deism is the most accurate worldview since it is most rationally correct. Many scientists today are actually discovering reasons to believe a God does exist but does not intervene in our daily lives. Philosopher, Antony Flew, was known for being a famous atheist that later took on the deist approach because of how modern science is beginning to “prove” the existence of a creator. Both agnostics and deists agree that there are explanations for mundane happenings and mystical occurrences are merely coincidental. Similarly, if there is a supposedly good God, why is there so much evil and suffering in the world? Why does he not
Religion is the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods, a particular system of faith and worship or a pursuit or interest followed with great devotion (Oxford Dictionary, 2014). From religion, many new groups, communities and further derived religions have formed. Closely related to religion and with endless controversies surrounding it’s classification as a religion is the concept of Atheism- which is defined as the disbelief or rejection of a deity. Descending from this is a social and political movement in favour of secularism known as New Atheism. Understanding the historical content concerning the emergence of atheism, this essay will then address how various aspects within the field inclusive the goals, structures and approaches have emerged and developed over time in comparison to the original atheist ideals.
What makes a good person good? According to WikiHow, "We should learn to define our own morals ourselves. One of the simplest ways to do so is to love others, and treat them as you would like to be treated. Try to think of others before yourself. Even doing small things daily will greatly enrich and improve your life, and the lives of others around you." This quote shows us what we need to do in order to be what society thinks as, “good". In order to be a good person, you have to do good and moral things in your society consistently. However people might think that by doing one good thing once in a while will automatically make you a “good person”, but in reality it doesn’t.
These arguments, try to use the existence of God through the existence of the cosmos or universe. This is often mentioned to as the “first-cause argument” because theists believe that God is the first cause of the existence of the universe. McCloskey finds the cosmological argument implausible, he voices his opinion claiming that “the mere existence of the world constitutes no reason for believing in the existence of such a being . Everything in the universe exists because something caused it to exist. Evans and Manis address this by introducing the non-temporal form to this cosmological argument, this form features parts of the cosmological argument to form reasons for why the universe exists. He also claims that this argument “do not entitle us to postulate an all-powerful uncaused caused”, In my opinion McCloskey should consider the effects of the claim that no necessary being exists as an uncaused cause. Though the cosmological argument does not prove God’s existence it does verify to a necessary being as the only cause that eliminates the need for limitless revert
The most famous argument against God’s existence is the problem of evil. God and religion is often a hot topic in society and many people often steer clear of bringing up the topic unless they are sure they will not get into a heated discussion about it. Information is extremely limited when it comes to trying to figure out the problem of evil. That being said; the problem of evil is defined by trying to argue that “if god is all-powerful (omnipotent), all-knowing (omniscient), and just, then how is it possible that there is so much unearned suffering and unpunished wickedness in the world?” (Solomon, et al.75). Theodicy argues that god exists and that he also allows evil in this world. Additionally, an excellent question is brought up upon
Is God real is a question that has been asked for many years. This is controversial topic that is discussed daily. Whether you are religious or do not believe that there is a higher power at all is simply up to you. However, I do believe that God is real. Philosophers such as Paley, Hume, Hegel, and Kant have played the central role of development of philosophy of religion. Late medieval to early modern time philosophers had dabbled with the concept of God. A lot of these philosophers used human reason to figure out God. These philosophers all support the claim that God is in fact real for there own moral reasoning. Nonetheless, most of their reasonings are true as far as Earth’s creation. As a believer, our most basic religious belief is
God is the almighty, the creator of everything and without him there would be no world and no us. But many people seem to question if He really exist. In the world there are many streams of philosophy that have argued the existence of God, Platonism, naturalism, Aristotelianism, realism, empiricism, and rationalism they have even tried to convince nonbelievers about the defensibility and validity of God. But regardless of the findings it has always been an individual’s choice of what to believe and who to believe in.
If you look at any standard definition of atheism, as a movement or as a commonly-accepted worldview, it's usually something like 'the rejection of theological claims of the existence of a god or gods'. Atheism is probably the most unapologetically 'scientific' worldview, as it uses the scientific method as its starting point - that is, the burden of proof is upon those making the hypothesis (the positive claim about the nature of the universe), which in this case is the particulars of the existence of a god or gods. The atheist position is that no such definitive proof has ever been forthcoming, from any religion or holy book, components of which are often debunked by actual scientific and historical research (which in the sciences would
Religion can become a controversial topic in any conversation. The reason being is that any follower of a religion holds their beliefs as the most holy and real to them. More specifically religion is a system of beliefs and rules used to worship a god, many gods, or a form of higher power. Every intricate detail of a religion makes it unique and special; from prayer to worship and everything that follows. I feel that now I can hold an intellectual conversation without feeling ignorant. I also believe religion can be viewed from many perspectives; philosophical are theological just two examples. I say this because I got to see how religion tied in very well with an Ethics class I am taking in conjunction to this one. Although these philosophers did not get deep into religion I was able to make a connection from a different point of view. There are many topics that are parallel to religion, for example virtues
Humankind considers religious studies to be the most disputable field of science and / or view of life. Such approach based on division of people into those who perceive religious corns of world construction, and those who do not believe in God, known also as “atheists”. An issue under discussion is the problem of evil or so-called theodicy problem in the world. The main idea of above-mentioned problem is that if God is perfectly good and all-knowing Creator then why there are so many troubles all over the world. This is the way why existence of God called into question. In my opinion, there is no doubtless reply while approach on theodicy problem depends on external factors. For instance, when someone is delighted he does not accept existence
I believe that there are three distinctive sides to this topic of evolution in regards to science and religion. There are people who believe only in science with regards to evolution (Dawkins), some believe solely in God (many Christians), and some believe in a middle ground between the two (Gould). There is no way to prove evolution (since we have not seen it occur in the time of humans), just as there is no way to prove God exists. Therefore there is a flaw in both sides of this problem. The one issue individuals will find is that if someone is on one side of this debate they are not likely to change their mind about it.
For many Yeshiva University student's life in New York City will be their first time truly living on their own away from home with a real sense of freedom. As a result, many students will have their first interaction with the world exterior of the jewish bubble in which they were raised Along with new experience, many difficult to answer questions will arise due to the spread of atheism in our society. University student and alumni will be surely questioned on their beliefs and the source of their beliefs, and many current and former students of the University will find themselves inadequately prepared to deal with the modern day atheist. Furthermore, they will find that most of the reasons and arguments for believing in God will seemingly