Objective Truth Vs Subjective Truth

1383 Words3 Pages

If there are certain physical and immaterial things in the world, and human understanding is only capable of a finite amount of reasoning and knowledge, then anything real is a set of objective truths independent of our understanding. In the first half of this premise, it states that there are certain physical an immaterial things in this world; this encompasses objects such as grass and houses with affections for others among other unquantifiable things. The second premise makes a quantifiable statement that the human brain can only handle so much reason and knowledge, which is only reasonable. By stating that there and physical and immaterial things in this world and there is only a certain amount of things that humans are able to understand, …show more content…

The objective truth is a reality that cannot be argued independent of time, and the subjective truth is humanity 's understanding of reality dependent on time. In the first premise, it states that truth is what is real; this is a fact because anything that is real in life cannot be disputed therefore it is truth. Human understanding of truth on the other hand, changes over time. It is because of this that truth is two things, objective and subjective. Objective truth is something that cannot be disputed, it is a worldly truth that will never be argued because there is an absolute answer for it. Subjective truth is human’s understanding of a non-provable truth dependent on time. This reasoning is dependent on time due to technological and scientific advances that come with increasing years. For example, eight hundred years ago, it was a subjective truth that the world was flat, but as the years progressed, it was disproved through technology and science. It is due to objective truth being much less common, there are not many things that cannot be disputed in our real world, that subjective truth is the most widely spread thing in today’s world. This syllogism is cogent because it takes into account every perspective of what truth is, was, and will be in the future, maintaining all objective truths that are independent of time. This is in accordance with my …show more content…

In premise one, it states that humans are the only things that are able to do anything outside the necessary; this is an accurate statement in that we consciously have a choice and are able to weight outcomes based on those different choices. This is true in the fact that humans are able to decipher what will happen in optional scenarios, which enables humans to make the choice to act in a way that will potentially positively influence or effect reality. This argument is cogent because it takes into account all of the other options in any given scenario and does away with them. This argument is consistent with my own beliefs because I do truly believe that if you always put yourself in the most optimal position, it will be easy to make a choice that has the potential to positively affect the

Show More
Related

  • NASA Ethos Pathos Logos

    870 Words  | 2 Pages

    The first is argumentum ad populum fallacy. He paraphrases a Stephen Hawking quote that say he “had argued that we must colonise other planets to ensure mankind's long-term survival.” The author goes on to say that, “Much as I admire Hawking, that's nonsense. The Earth is indeed doomed, but where might refugees go? Mars makes Antarctica seem like paradise. As for distant galaxies, a spaceship capable of travelling at a million miles per hour (20 times faster than Apollo) would take 4,000 years to reach the nearest star system that might theoretically be hospitable.” The reason this is an ad populum fallacy is because he going after the current weaknesses of mankind and has decided to ignore two basic facts. The speed of which technology improves over time and the drive of humans to explore. Both as back by general knowledge of human

    Read More

  • The Things They Carried by Tim OBrien

    2258 Words  | 5 Pages

    Subjective truth, as I understand it, is truth. The only difference separating it from universal or general truth is “subjective.” Our understanding of truth can cause arguments when trying to distinguish what is universally true. My definition of subjective truth, not necessarily perceived as true to others, is that the truth of something that happened may not be what actually happened to you, but what you felt happened to you. Objective facts, however, are based on facts that cannot be denied.

    Read More

  • Peter Singer's Argument in Famine, Affluence and Morality

    1493 Words  | 3 Pages

    The first premise of his argument (P1) states Most people would agree with this premise, regardless of their specific reasoning. Connecting suffering and death to a lack of basic needs seems clear and its characterization as bad seems to be in alignment with our common sense. However, some might still object for reasons that would be challenging or impossible to refute. In spite of any such objections, the premise can be accepted and those who disagree should step away at this point.

    Read More

  • An Analysis Of George Berkeley And Descartes

    850 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to Descartes, “because our senses sometimes deceive us, I wanted to suppose that nothing was exactly as they led us to imagine (Descartes 18).” In order to extinguish his uncertainty and find incontrovertible truth, he chooses to “raze everything to the ground and begin again from the original foundations (Descartes 59).” This foundation, which Descartes is certain to be the absolute truth, is “I think, therefore I am (Descartes 18).” Descartes argues that truth and proof of reality lies in the human mind, rather than the senses. In other words, he claims that the existence of material objects are not based on the senses because of human imperfection. In fact, he argues that humans, similarly to Plato’s Allegory of the Cave, are incapable of sensing the true essence or existence of material objects. However, what makes an object real is human thought and the idea of that object, thus paving the way for Descartes’ proof of God’s existence. Because the senses are easily deceived and because Descartes understands that the senses can be deceived, Descartes is aware of his own imperfection. He

    Read More

  • The Roseto Mystery and Outliers

    448 Words  | 1 Pages

    Of course the logic in Chapter 2 is easy to agree with; I really agree with the ideas about opportunities the most. Chances at success are scarce. As the population grows chances become increasingly scarce.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Human Cloning

    1524 Words  | 4 Pages

    The P in the first premise stood for “a person is in a situation in which they want to avoid dealing with daily responsibilities” and the Q portion in the second premise stands for “it is morally wrong for that person to get someone else to handle those responsibilities”. P is the full second premise which states “In Most Human Cloning cases an experimenter is in a situation in which they can conduct a Human Cloning experiment that allows them to avoid dealing with daily responsibilities”. The Q part is “in most Human Cloning cases it is morally wrong for that person to get an experimenter to create a Human Clone on their behalf”. The arguments that I posed were great ones due to the fact that they strongly correlate the way in which a good argument should appear to resemble. The argument and example both matched to be specific or general in order to support

    Read More

  • Subjectivity Vs. Objectivity Morality

    1214 Words  | 3 Pages

    In our generation, there is so much ability and freedom to do what appeals to each person as an individual. With all this freedom, we often forget to stop before acting, and question if our choices are ethical. What exactly are ethics? Ethics are according to Oxford Dictionary "Moral principles that govern a person's behavior or the conducting of an activity." Taken down to its essence, to be an ethical person, one must have morals. What are morals? Again, pulling from Oxford Dictionary "Principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behavior." With these definitions given, morality becomes subjective. But really

    Read More

  • Freedom of Will: Is It a Deception or Not?

    823 Words  | 2 Pages

    The first premise of the argument states that if they perform an action of free will then they would be responsible of that action. This means that the action was performed because they chose to do it. This leads to the second premise which talks about actions that are effected by factor they cannot control themselves. An example of a factor would be the unpredictable weather. A person’s decision on what to wear is affected due to conditions outside. They cannot control what the weather would be like. Therefore, according to the premise, the action the person makes is due to the weather and they had no freedom to choo...

    Read More

  • Morality And Objective Morality

    1498 Words  | 3 Pages

    The position that I hold regarding the essay’s question is that I do not believe in an objective morality or in objective moral truths, I believe that all morality is entirely relative and subjective based on cultural norms because moral relativism is the philosophized meaning that right and wrong are not absolute values and that they are personalized based on the individual and the circumstances or cultural orientation. Morality applies within cultures but not across them. Ethical or cultural relativism and the various schools of pragmatism ignore the fact that certain ethical percepts probably grounded in human nature do appear to be universal and ancient, if not eternal. Ethical codes also vary in different societies, economies, and geographies

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Beliefs In Othello

    858 Words  | 2 Pages

    Beliefs unlike our knowledge of things have the quality of either being true or false. Like with all information of things, persons, places or objects we either know of their existence or we do not. There does not exist a state of mind where there exists truth or falsehood associated with something that is known by the existence of that thing. We could be wrong about the knowledge we have of things but that knowledge could not be deceptive in nature, you either know of the existence of a thing or you do not. This means that while belief can be true or false knowledge of things does not have this property. Conversely we know that beliefs can both be true or false as many people can have widely varying opinions on the same subject that contradict

    Read More

  • Russell's Theory of Descriptions in On Denoting

    4035 Words  | 9 Pages

    Therefore, with every proposition we could possibly apprehend (whether true or not) each of their constituents are real entities with which we do have immediate acquaintance, so long as we can apprehend them.

    Read More

  • The Library Of Babel By Jose Luis Borges

    769 Words  | 2 Pages

    Reality is something that we humans have a hard time comprehending. We don’t know the exact reason why we live and why we exist but we have many theories that could be the reason. For example, Christians believe that God made the world in six days and that we live as his creations, to worship and adore him. Jose Luis Borges likes to conduct thought experiments with his stories and one theme he uses quite often is the nature of reality. Borges created a perplexing universe in “The Library of Babel” that plays with the idea of never being able to grasp certain concepts because of the limit of what one can perceive.

    Read More

  • The Lacanian Psychoanalysis Of Desire In Narcissus And Goldmund

    1944 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...t” (310). The reasons you cannot exist with your ‘real’ I suggest is the idea that the real exists beyond so many things such as language and symbolism, which are arguably a majority of the world we inhabit.

    Read More

  • The Socratic Dialogue: The Phaedo Dialogue By Socrates

    1162 Words  | 3 Pages

    2)True knowledge only comes from the knowledge of the Forms that are perfect, eternal, unchangeable, and do not have physical existence in our sensible

    Read More

  • Reality Essay: Real, Reality, And Reality

    1023 Words  | 3 Pages

    Thus, in our search to understand that which is intangible, we come to realize that the definitions that we seek are further than meets the eye. For although many may say they understand what is and is not real, they often rely on a surface level of understanding. Yet when the curious seek out a deeper grasp of the words real, surreal, and reality, many would discover that they are, in fact, unsolvable. Thus we will never know the ultimate truth, we only can get closer and closer to

    Read More

More about Objective Truth Vs Subjective Truth

Open Document